High Seas wrote:OE - you truly are the most godawful bore! I need no assistance with finding my own posts, or counting from 0 to 100 - thank you for the kind offer all the same.
So if you are able to count from 0 to 100, maybe you're also able to understand - now that you've had the chance to go back and re-read - that ebrown was talking about matchups.... right?
Of course I
don't know if your comment on his post was the consequence of insufficient reading comprehension skills, or if you, as you so often like to do, simply didn't bother about the lack of logic or substance in your reply and lashed out at somebody, while mixing in some insults about the poster's background that had absolutely nothing to do with this thread or the topic at hand.
Whatever it was, congratulations. Good work.
High Seas wrote:Re-posting past entries from short threads is boorish behavior and a discourtesy to our host, who wishes to discuss Ron Paul.
You're certainly the right person to lecture others about boorish behaviour, High Seas. Or about what our host wishes to discuss.
You've jumped into this thread, lashing out at ebrown, and you probably thought you'd come across witty and intelligent by using funny words like "hispanically-challenged probability calculus".
And you know what? That's fine, too. It marvellous. You absolutely have the right to make a fool out of yourself. Or to ignore the topic of the thread in order to insult other posters. In fact, I encourage you to keep up the good work. Not that you need my endorsement, of course.
A scenario in which the "voter generated" millions of dollars continue to roll in and in the same manner that he has surprised many by drawing with Giuliani, he will tie with Romney and then Huckabee.
