RON PAUL........ FTW

Ron Pauls 10% is extraordinary given that he is being ignored or suppressed by the people that pick who will be taken serious.

This is what sets him above he is an individual and dares to be among the same spirit that made America.

Who dares?

0 Replies

ebrown_p wrote:

((You do understand WHY I want him to be the Republican nominee, right?))

enlighten me.
and also read what Amigo said ^^^.
A point I had forgotten.

0 Replies

If Ron Paul wins the Repubs don't have a chance in hell.

0 Replies

jasonrest wrote:

ebrown_p wrote:
((You do understand WHY I want him to be the Republican nominee, right?))

enlighten me.
and also read what Amigo said ^^^.
A point I had forgotten.

McCain has probably a 40% chance of beating Clinton (a bit less if Obama is the nominee). Giulliani probably has a 30% shot ... Romney about 25% and the other Huckster guy about 10%....

I assure you it is not the Democrats who are suppressing Ron Paul's candidacy... he is the best thing for the Democrats (until, of course some right wing nut fulfills the promise of a third party).

0 Replies

The status quo groupies like to dress up and play democracy.

The two party system is a necessary illusion.

For example:

The left wing party wants to repeal NAFTA.

The right wing party wants to send all the illegal immigrants (unrepresented labour) back to mexico.

Neither of these will happen because THE party keeps it the way they want it and there is no real vote.

But I could be wrong. It is just a theory.

0 Replies

Or it could just be that the American public tends to reject extremism.

0 Replies

ebrown_p wrote:

jasonrest wrote:
ebrown_p wrote:
((You do understand WHY I want him to be the Republican nominee, right?))

enlighten me.
and also read what Amigo said ^^^.
A point I had forgotten.

McCain has probably a 40% chance of beating Clinton (a bit less if Obama is the nominee). Giulliani probably has a 30% shot ... Romney about 25% and the other Huckster guy about 10%....

I assure you it is not the Democrats who are suppressing Ron Paul's candidacy... he is the best thing for the Democrats (until, of course some right wing nut fulfills the promise of a third party).

It is not the candidates that would see Ron Paul buried, its the media(wont say any names.....FOX.)

0 Replies

Romney and Huckabee would both like to see Ron Paul buried (I would add Hunter to the list if there was any point).

Giuliani and McCain both love Ron Paul since the 5% of Republican voters Ron Paul is attracting are sure not being stolen from either of them.

0 Replies

ebrown_p wrote:

Or it could just be that the American public tends to reject extremism.

On the surface.

0 Replies

ebrown_p wrote:

jasonrest wrote:
ebrown_p wrote:
((You do understand WHY I want him to be the Republican nominee, right?))

enlighten me.
and also read what Amigo said ^^^.
A point I had forgotten.

McCain has probably a 40% chance of beating Clinton (a bit less if Obama is the nominee). Giulliani probably has a 30% shot ... Romney about 25% and the other Huckster guy about 10%....

...............................

LOL - I so wish I could bet on the fantastic odds quoted by Mr Brown-Munoz!

Total as calculated in his post is 105%. Plus the maximum 10% generously awarded in a previous post to Ron Paul makes 115%. Adding a few points for minor candidates, fees and commissions, and we're safely over 120%.

Bilingual education in arithmetic is to blame?!

0 Replies

High Seas wrote:

Total as calculated in his post is 105%.

You're kidding, right? You were not thinking that ebrown was saying that those were the total percentages of people supporting the respective candidates...?

0 Replies

High Seas wrote:

ebrown_p wrote:
jasonrest wrote:
ebrown_p wrote:
((You do understand WHY I want him to be the Republican nominee, right?))

enlighten me.
and also read what Amigo said ^^^.
A point I had forgotten.

McCain has probably a 40% chance of beating Clinton (a bit less if Obama is the nominee). Giulliani probably has a 30% shot ... Romney about 25% and the other Huckster guy about 10%....

...............................

LOL - I so wish I could bet on the fantastic odds quoted by Mr Brown-Munoz!

Total as calculated in his post is 105%. Plus the maximum 10% generously awarded in a previous post to Ron Paul makes 115%. Adding a few points for minor candidates, fees and commissions, and we're safely over 120%.

Bilingual education in arithmetic is to blame?!

I guess bigotry and mathematics don't go too well together.

((Would you like me to explain why your post is stupid in English or in Spanish?))

0 Replies

Paul gained these left endorsements because he has taken a stand against the occupation of Iraq and the U.S. “war on terror” that few Democrats dare to.
He voted against last year's war funding bill, supports repeal of the USA PATRIOT Act and opposes an attack on Iran.

But that's not all Ron Paul stands for--far from it.

http://www.socialistworker.org/2008-1/657/657_07_RonPaul.shtml

0 Replies

ebrown_p wrote:

Romney and Huckabee would both like to see Ron Paul buried (I would add Hunter to the list if there was any point).

Giuliani and McCain both love Ron Paul since the 5% of Republican voters Ron Paul is attracting are sure not being stolen from either of them.

Naturally, two mindless drones such as Romney and Huckabee would love to see a logical politician such as Paul buried but are they actively pursuing this?
No, Fox is taking care of it.

Who's Hunter? Smile

0 Replies

Ramafuchs wrote:

Paul gained these left endorsements because he has taken a stand against the occupation of Iraq and the U.S. “war on terror” that few Democrats dare to.
He voted against last year's war funding bill, supports repeal of the USA PATRIOT Act and opposes an attack on Iran.

But that's not all Ron Paul stands for--far from it.

http://www.socialistworker.org/2008-1/657/657_07_RonPaul.shtml

This author is a hack.
He "personally" opposes abortion but has stated
he would not pursue the matter while in office.

I didn't read past that......didn't need to.

0 Replies

Jason - you wonder if any posters are hacks; just look at the hispanically-challenged probability calculus of Messrs Brown-Munoz and"Old Europe", or the naive Indian communism of Rama Fuchs, formerly assistant librarian at University of Cologne - until paramedics carted him off in restraints.

It was uncharitable of me to even read any of their posts - invariably they make me laugh, but then they get upset Smile

0 Replies

old europe wrote:

High Seas wrote:
Total as calculated in his post is 105%.

You're kidding, right? You were not thinking that ebrown was saying that those were the total percentages of people supporting the respective candidates...?

Stick to lex, legis, as I've told you before; math isn't your strong suit if you can't total percentages any better than Brown-Munoz - your distinction in aiding and abetting fugitive Latino law-breakers in the U.S. notwithstanding Smile

0 Replies

High Seas wrote:

old europe wrote:
High Seas wrote:
Total as calculated in his post is 105%.

You're kidding, right? You were not thinking that ebrown was saying that those were the total percentages of people supporting the respective candidates...?

Stick to lex, legis, as I've told you before; math isn't your strong suit if you can't total percentages any better than Brown-Munoz - your distinction in aiding and abetting fugitive Latino law-breakers in the U.S. notwithstanding

So weren't kidding. Just wanted to make sure.

Well then, High Seas. ebrown gave his estimates for the respective Republican candidates vs. the nominated Democratic candidate.

Let's say the Democratic candidate would be Hillary Clinton, like in this poll here (courtesy of Gallup):

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/PresTrialHeats112607Graph2.gif

Now, it seems as if the November numbers for Giuliani, McCain, Romney and Thompson add up to 166%.

Shouldn't it be, like, less than 100%?

What have Gallup and ebrown done wrong? Please explain....

0 Replies

Jason,

I am curious.

Do you agree with Hispanic math, or with bigot math?

((I just want to know if this is a Ron Paul supporter thing)).

0 Replies

ebrown_p wrote:

Jason,

I am curious.

Do you agree with Hispanic math, or with bigot math?

((I just want to know if this is a Ron Paul supporter thing)).

I'm not entirely sure
what you two are going
back and forth about
but.............................Ron Paul-FTW.

0 Replies

RON PAUL........ FTW

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know