RON PAUL........ FTW

I don't think I blame him for his remark. While I don't think the number is as high as 95%, a lot of residential black people are involved in crime in ratio to whites. I'm not a white supremicist (I have my bouts with every color of skin) but I don't honestly care about that aspect of Ron Paul. Racism isn't a major concern of mine. It exists everywhere, even against white people. People in America hate my Russian heritage even though the cold war is over; my boyfriend is constantly remarked at for being Polish (and therefore likely Jewish blooded). It's just inevitable; humans have always held grudges and prejudices against other races. What matters is that their rights aren't taken, which he doesn't seem intent on doing in the slightest. I'm more interested in his plans for the economy and particularly the IRS.

kickycan wrote:

From wikipedia's Ron Paul page.

~~~~~

"In 2001, Paul took "moral responsibility" for the comments printed in his newsletter under his name, telling Texas Monthly magazine that the comments were written by an unnamed ghostwriter and did not represent his views. ..."

I think you can judge a politician by those who support him:

Neo-Nazi Leader Supports Ron Paul

I don't think it is fair to judge someone by who supports them. Especially if the support is minimal, as in a $500 contribution, when millions are involved.

Ron Paul is also all over the prison planet website.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

White supremest support Ron Paul because of his firm stance on immigration which is

No amnesty, no welfare and Physically securing the boarder. No other candidate takes that stance (or any other stance).

TTH wrote:

I don't think it is fair to judge someone by who supports them. Especially if the support is minimal, as in a $500 contribution, when millions are involved.

What a concept!!!

jasonrest wrote:

TTH wrote:

I don't think it is fair to judge someone by who supports them. Especially if the support is minimal, as in a $500 contribution, when millions are involved.

What a concept!!!

What is your point?
Edit: Forget I asked. I am sure it is something negative anyway.

The way you wrote it, I thought it was the equivalent of no sh*t sherlock. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

But hey, that Thompson has a nice voice and a trophy wife.

New Hamphire Republican Primary Results:

McCain: 37%
Romney: 32%
Huckabee: 11%
Giuliani: 9%
Ron Paul: 8%
Thompson: 1%

wandeljw wrote:

New Hamphire Republican Primary Results:

McCain: 37%
Romney: 32%
Huckabee: 11%
Giuliani: 9%
Ron Paul: 8%
Thompson: 1%

Yes, now tied with Giuliani when a couple of months ago he was a joke.
Far from possible but I am still very excited about Ron.
When he talks, it just makes sense.(besides the earlier matter that has been resolved).

jasonrest wrote:

wandeljw wrote:

New Hamphire Republican Primary Results:

McCain: 37%
Romney: 32%
Huckabee: 11%
Giuliani: 9%
Ron Paul: 8%
Thompson: 1%

Yes, now tied with Giuliani when a couple of months ago he was a joke.
Far from possible but I am still very excited about Ron.
When he talks, it just makes sense.(besides the earlier matter that has been resolved).

You are trying to be funny right?

The fact that Ron Paul got 8% means he is still a joke. The fact that he is tied with Giuliani might mean that Giuliani is a joke (we will see in Florida) but it doesn't help Paul any.

I bet he doesn't do better than 10% in any state. Polls have him pegged at 5% in South Carolina.

'Tis a pity since I would love to see him win the Republican primary.