5
   

Why Every Woman Should Carry a Gun

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 11:49 am
edgarblythe wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
Define "reasonable gun ownership".

I bet it involves restricting the types of guns owned by law abiding citizens, based on what you think is "reasonable". Laughing


I bet it involves being a civilized member of the human race.

I think that Edgar is a big supporter of DISCRIMINATION
and he is hiding that behind the concept of being " civilized ".


David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 12:03 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
edgarblythe wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
Edgar, they must not let you out in public in Texas. Laughing!!!


There are more Texans who think as I do than most non Texans would imagine. We are far from a majority, but don't misunderestimate our presence.


I don't underestimate your presence or your lack of firepower! Laughing


You appear to assume I have never owned or felt compelled to use a gun.
There is a difference between reasonable gun ownership and
the idiocy I see in this thread.

It looks like Edgar advocates that EVERYONE shud support DISCRIMINATION,
like he does, and that anyone who does not is an IDIOT.

Right, Ed ?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 12:21 pm
Public safety from crime
is best served by REMOVING the person with a history of criminal violence
from contact with polite society
( by confinement in a secure prison, or by BANISHMENT, the way Botany Bay was used ).

Simply declaring their tools to be illegal
will have no effect upon those criminals who are unwilling to obey the law.



If criminals are willing to ignore the laws against ROBBERY;
if criminals are willing to disregard the laws against MURDER,

HOW likely is it that thay will OBEY "gun control" laws ?

Such laws only make it worse for the victims.





It is like saying that if the wolves are devouring the sheep,
then the farmers shud pull the teeth out of the mouths of the SHEEP.

David
0 Replies
 
vikorr
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 04:05 pm
Quote:
We have it in MI. Only retarded states and countries disarm their law abiding citizens.


Leave countries out of this. Your States are a somewhat different matter.

Quote:
Public safety from crime
is best served by REMOVING the person with a history of criminal violence
from contact with polite society
( by confinement in a secure prison, or by BANISHMENT, the way Botany Bay was used ).

David, I'm impressed that you even know the name Botany Bay, but perhaps you weren't aware that many people shipped to Australia were shipped for stealing bread / food.

http://www.cultureandrecreation.gov.au/articles/convicts/

Quote:
Most of the convicts were thieves who had been convicted in the great cities of England. Only those sentenced in Ireland were likely to have been convicted of rural crimes. Transportation was an integral part of the English and Irish systems of punishment. It was a way to deal with increased poverty and the severity of the sentences for larceny. Simple larceny, or robbery, could mean transportation for seven years. Compound larceny - stealing goods worth more than a shilling (about $50 in today's money) - meant death by hanging.


Closest thing I could quickly find Smile
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 04:21 pm
I only DISCRIMINATE against willful idiots. You decide for urself what that denotes.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 04:44 pm
vikorr wrote:

Quote:
Public safety from crime
is best served by REMOVING the person with a history of criminal violence
from contact with polite society
( by confinement in a secure prison, or by BANISHMENT, the way Botany Bay was used ).

Quote:
David, I'm impressed that you even know the name Botany Bay,

U take me for a historical ignoramus ?



Quote:
but perhaps you weren't aware that many people shipped to Australia were shipped for stealing bread / food.

He who steals brings the consequences thereof upon himself.


http://www.cultureandrecreation.gov.au/articles/convicts/

Quote:
Most of the convicts were thieves who had been convicted in the great cities of England. Only those sentenced in Ireland were likely to have been convicted of rural crimes. Transportation was an integral part of the English and Irish systems of punishment. It was a way to deal with increased poverty and the severity of the sentences for larceny. Simple larceny, or robbery, could mean transportation for seven years. Compound larceny - stealing goods worth more than a shilling
(about $50 in today's money) - meant death by hanging
.


Quote:
Closest thing I could quickly find Smile

The French had Devil 's Island.


After a physician filters a man 's blood with dialysis,
and removes the dirt,
he does NOT then put the dirt back into his blood again.

It is CONSUMMATE STUPIDITY ( or malice against innocent citizens )
to repeatedly release recidivistic violent criminals back into polite society,
being satisfied to criminalize possession of weapons,
trusting that the said criminals will obey the anti-weapons laws,
and will not continue their careers of predatory crime.
0 Replies
 
vikorr
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 07:27 pm
vikorr wrote:

but perhaps you weren't aware that many people shipped to Australia were shipped for stealing bread / food.

OmSigDAVID wrote:
He who steals brings the consequences thereof upon himself

True enough. The question is, should stealing food to feed your family be punishable by separating you from your family? Personally, the main contributing factor to a person stealing food would be the failure of the Govt of the time, food being a necessity of life - it hardly seems something punishable by deportation and hard labor.

OmSigDAVID wrote:
U take me for a historical ignoramus ?

People in the US, generally speaking, appear rather ignorant of the rest of the world. I would not have thought that the name Botany Bay would have even registered as worthy of mention in US schools.

Aside from that, no insult is meant. Everyone, including you and I, are ignorant of many things.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 07:41 pm
Don't you wish you could throw some people into the dungeon
and throw the key away?

(some people = any gun fanatic)
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 08:08 pm
No one even noticed that I carry a gum! In fact, I carry a gum everywhere I go! Doesn't anyone worry about this?

I'm feeling very left out!
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 09:25 pm
Montana wrote:
No one even noticed that I carry a gum!
In fact, I carry a gum everywhere I go!
Doesn't anyone worry about this?

I'm feeling very left out!

Is it REGISTERED ?
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 09:29 pm
Dave.....One is not required to register gum, even in Canada

Is all irony lost on you....
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 09:45 pm
Yes David, it's registered ;-)

I would never carry a gum that wasn't registered Cool
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 09:45 pm
Dentine? Or, Juicy Fruit? Laughing
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 09:53 pm
Chiclets-Assorted Fruit-Sugar Free.

I saw them ring it up at the register, so it's registered all right! I even have the recipt to prove it.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 10:26 pm
Rockhead wrote:
Dave.....One is not required to register gum, even in Canada


I doubt that.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 10:27 pm
Montana wrote:
Yes David, it's registered ;-)

I would never carry a gum that wasn't registered Cool

Did the Mounties give u a LICENSE for it ?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 10:29 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Rockhead wrote:
Dave.....One is not required to register gum, even in Canada


I doubt that.


I can guarantee that there is not one Canadian province or territory that requires gum users to be registered. You can have all the gum you want.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 10:30 pm
Don't think they were mounties David. Why? Does it have to be registered by mounties?
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 10:33 pm
I even use to walk around with a loaded gum. That was back when I was packin Squirt ;-)
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 10:37 pm
Did you have a shoulder holster?

That would make a sexy gum commercial....
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Drumsticks - Discussion by H2O MAN
nobody respects an oath breaker - Discussion by gungasnake
Marksmanship - Discussion by H2O MAN
Kids and Guns by the Numbers - Discussion by jcboy
Personal Defense Weapons (PDW) - Discussion by H2O MAN
Self defense with a gun - Discussion by H2O MAN
It's a sellers market - Discussion by H2O MAN
Harrisburg Pa. Outdoor Show "Postponed" - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 08:40:17