More likely it's a cjhsa insult implying Intrepid's a sissy.
0 Replies
Intrepid
1
Reply
Wed 19 Dec, 2007 03:02 pm
Mame wrote:
More likely it's a cjhsa insult implying Intrepid's a sissy.
Am not. I would only be a sissy if I had to carry a .22, .38, 45, 357 or 9mm. Don't need no stinkin gun to be a man. :wink:
0 Replies
cjhsa
1
Reply
Wed 19 Dec, 2007 03:32 pm
No, you would require a dick and balls.
0 Replies
Intrepid
1
Reply
Wed 19 Dec, 2007 03:34 pm
0 Replies
OmSigDAVID
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 12:48 am
Intrepid wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
Only if you give guns to idiots who are afraid to use them. Intrepid, please go cower in the corner and hope the bad guy doesn't shoot you before the police get here, who don't really have an obligation to protect you.
No need to cower. I am not a coward. Guns to idiots? Um, err...nevermind. How the hell many people with guns trying to kill people do you think there are? Must be a U.S. thing.
I thought you lived in the land of the brave and the free? You seem to be very afraid.
Being brave does not equate
to being helpless.
A wise man needs no emotions
to prepare himself for possible misfortune.
David
0 Replies
OmSigDAVID
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 11:44 am
Intrepid wrote:
Mame wrote:
More likely it's a cjhsa insult implying Intrepid's a sissy.
Am not. I would only be a sissy if I had to carry a .22, .38, 45, 357 or 9mm.
Don't need no stinkin gun to be a man. :wink:
Guns don 't stink.
0 Replies
Intrepid
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 11:48 am
I love the smell of gunpowder in the morning.
0 Replies
cjhsa
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 11:53 am
Me too.
0 Replies
OmSigDAVID
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 11:57 am
Intrepid wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Gun control laws = unnecessary death.
David
Nuts with guns = unnessary death
Hopefully the deaths of predatory violent criminals,
like the Manson gang.
I guess the Intrepid one believes that Ms. Tate 's party
was better off being UNARMED on the occasion in question.
Quote:
I believe that everyone carrying guns is a much more dangerous
situation than the random violence that sometimes occurs.
U reveal your mindlessness.
Before around 1920, the English had no gun control laws.
Was there a " much more dangerous situation " ?
Were bullets flying as numerous as mosquitos in a swamp ?
IS THAT KNOWN HISTORY ?
( It probably was not much different in Canadia, then either.
Admittedly, I don 't know much about Canadian history. )
In Vermont, thay have NEVER Had any anti-gun laws,
and it has always been among the very safest, lowest crime states.
In Alaska, thay repealed all of their anti-gun laws a few years ago,
and there has been no news of " a much more dangerous situation ".
This DISPROVES your " belief "
which is only mindless fear.
David
Quote:
What you advocate is dangerous and yes, foolish.
I only advocate returning to how it was in the earlier 1900s, around the 1930s.
That was not dangerous.
0 Replies
OmSigDAVID
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 11:58 am
Intrepid wrote:
I love the smell of gunpowder in the morning.
I enjoy it anytime.
0 Replies
Intrepid
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 12:01 pm
You are living in the past OmSigDavid. The mindless fear is yours.... certainly not mine as you so imply.
0 Replies
OmSigDAVID
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 07:44 pm
Intrepid wrote:
You are living in the past OmSigDavid.
The mindless fear is yours.... certainly not mine as you so imply.
I 'm not afraid of anything.
I used to fear the commies,
but not since Christmas Day of 1991.
David
0 Replies
OmSigDAVID
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 07:48 pm
Intrepid wrote:
You are living in the past OmSigDavid.
The mindless fear is yours.... certainly not mine as you so imply.
The freedom of Vermont and of Alaska is in the PRESENT,
( as u so intrepidly avoided noting ).
0 Replies
edgarblythe
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 08:08 pm
In the local news this past month:
Man taking gun out of his car accidentally shoots himself. Dies
Police officer cleaning his weapon accidentally shoots himself. Dies.
Shooting instructor at range accidentally shot. Dies.
0 Replies
Mame
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 08:30 pm
Interesting that a police officer would have been cleaning a loaded gun... hmmm... Darwin Awards, anyone?
How do you shoot yourself removing a gun from a car?
Was the shooting instructor shot by someone else?
0 Replies
OmSigDAVID
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 09:59 pm
Mame wrote:
Interesting that a police officer would have been cleaning a loaded gun... hmmm... Darwin Awards, anyone?
How do you shoot yourself removing a gun from a car?
Was the shooting instructor shot by someone else?
Most likely an automatic.
I 've always preferred revolvers.
Thay r what nature intended.
David
0 Replies
Sglass
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 10:17 pm
I have always had this fantasy about wiring a house up with mucho loud speakers and mucho flood lights and if an entruder endtruded the air would be filled with the sounds of John Phillip Souza's Washington Post March, the flood lights would put the night aglow. And a water sprnkler stytem would fill the room with icy cold water.
0 Replies
OmSigDAVID
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 10:18 pm
Who among us can cease to ponder & to wonder
whether Man 's most primordial and fundamentally metaphysical raison d'etre,
and the innermost essence of his being,
was to invent the REVOLVER and the hollowpointed slug ?
David
0 Replies
OmSigDAVID
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 10:24 pm
Sglass wrote:
I have always had this fantasy about wiring a house up with mucho loud speakers
and mucho flood lights and if an entruder endtruded
the air would be filled with the sounds of John Phillip Souza's Washington Post March,
the flood lights would put the night aglow.
And a water sprnkler stytem would fill the room with icy cold water.
How wud the Manson Gang have taken that,
if Sharon Tate had employed such a defense ?
( I guess it cudn 't have been worse than it actually was. )
0 Replies
Sglass
1
Reply
Thu 20 Dec, 2007 10:28 pm
He probably would have thought that he was on the ulitimate acid trip.