osso - the dead don't bleed, but there can be blood transference. Hey, I watch CSI :wink: there's all kinds of blood evidence.
I will say this. I thought, at the initial press conference, that the father's behaviour was odd. Yes, he was under stress in a desperate situation, but something about his behaviour did not ring true to me.
But, I can't make a criminal case out of that. Maybe the truth will out.
McTag wrote:I will say this. I thought, at the initial press conference, that the father's behaviour was odd. Yes, he was under stress in a desperate situation, but something about his behaviour did not ring true to me.
But, I can't make a criminal case out of that. Maybe the truth will out.
Maybe by this latest action, the police are trying to turn the parents against each other, to get more information.
Chai wrote:Why exactly are they suspects?
What evidence to they have?
I've heard before they were suspects, but I've never heard it explained why.
Anyone?
Forensic evidence found in their hotel room and blood found in a cab, they used 25 days after the disappearce of the child.
How did they know it was the child's blood?
Yea, but CSI is wrong in a lot of ways, according to chief LA pathologist in some big article in the LA Times a bit ago. Not that I've ever watched it, I can't stand the dialog/tone. Cheese city.
happycat wrote:osso - If they found her DNA in a car the parents rented 20some days after they reported her missing, it means she (or her body) was still around.
The list of screw-ups by the Portugese police is astounding. So many things they didn't do right in order to preserve evidence, plus they didn't even take her disappeared seriously for 15 hours!
The substance was identified as blood. No mention was made of a DNA analysis, as far as I know.
ossobuco wrote:What I read was they found blood. (Who knows the legitimacy of what I read.). You don't bleed while dead.
Clearly I don't know anything. I'm interested as if it was a book, but it's not a book.
I'll belatedly post that I agree with your early post of not-surprise, Happycat - along the lines of the near glamorous search, and those who cry loudest, I'm not completely surprised. But I don't know they did it, either.
On the other hand, complications may vary.
You can bleed while dying...
Natch, I had those same questions, Miller.
Well, we'll see.
(Er, blood transference after weeks?)
Really, I don't want to follow this, no matter how enthusiasatically I post while tired. I'd like the result mailed to me.
happycat wrote:ossobuco wrote:Yea, but CSI is wrong in a lot of ways, according to chief LA pathologist in some big article in the LA Times a bit ago. Not that I've ever watched it, I can't stand the dialog/tone. Cheese city.
Only CSI-Miami is cheese city. :wink:
Miller - they could easily get Madeline's DNA from hair samples or a toothbrush. Or I suppose get a DNA match from parents and siblings.
I'm not talking about a SOURCE of her DNA, I'm talking about analysis of her DNA in the blood spots found, and conformation, at the analytical level that the DNA did not come from her father, mother or siblings.
Does Portugal have the technology to do this type of analysis?
Checkout the abnormality observed in the iris of the child's eye:
http://www.findmadeleine.com/
Obviously they could get her blood while dying, but, then she died twenty five days later?
Not arguing that that could not have happened, indeed, that is where I'm sort of off to, some kind of abduction, oh, by weird neighbor, and then killing, weeks later, but
hey, where is Joe Nation when we need him? He could work out the script..
though this isn't his usual material.
Nothing makes sense at this time.
Following along with Miller, nodding, except I don't want to look at some eye iris. I'm late to beddy bye. Night, all.
Well, I've been reading local papers online and it seems that there's more than what said in here.
Madeleine's mother "would" have given her a sedative before leaving to the restaurant and that the dose "could" have been too strong..
Along with many other contradictions in Kate McCann explanations, this makes the police suspect her for "negligent homicide" and "hiding the body"...
This "move" by the Portuguese police is much more likely to be a backlash to them being a focus for media criticism than anything else. IMO its simplistic aim is to try to get the circus "out of their hair" by trying to get the parents to "clear off".
fresco wrote:This "move" by the Portuguese police is much more likely to be a backlash to them being a focus for media criticism than anything else. IMO its simplistic aim is to try to get the circus "out of their hair" by trying to get the parents to "clear off".
You obviously read different papers to those Francis quoted from.
Nevertheles, the parents plan to retun to Britain as soon as possible, on Monday, relatives say. And they hope, it doesn't look as if they are running away, because that were nonsense.
What are you thinking this so called abnormality means, Miller?
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Nevertheles, the parents plan to retun to Britain as soon as possible, on Monday, relatives say. And they hope, it doesn't look as if they are running away, because that were nonsense.
On the other hand, a friend told BB$ radio today, they had siad to him this morning that wanted o course to stay in Portugal ...
ARGUIDO/ARGUIDA STATUS
Officially a suspect
Bestowed by police or requested by individual
Right to remain silent
Right to a lawyer
Must report to police every five days
(art.º 57º, art.º 58.º, art.º 243.º Código de Processo Penal)
