3
   

Schwarzenegger Announces : Running for CA Gov.

 
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 03:14 pm
That's politics, Craven -- it's always going to be a tit-for-tat, don't dish it out if you can't take it line of reasoning. Unfortunate and it just ends up muddying the polticical waters even more than they are. As it is, a private citizen can't see what's going on until long after the problem occurs.

I'm still wondering what happened with Ahnold and the indians. His ads stated he "doesn't play that game," but anyone knows that even if they imagine someone new in politics won't get into the machinery and become just as sullied as the next surly politician, that's the rules of the game. They call it "compromise" when it is really is pandering (and that's if you know the meaning of the word "is.") A world of illadvised and consenting adults.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 03:18 pm
I know it's politics. I accept it as an inevitability but still maintain it's absurdity.

Ad hominems against politicians might be the rage but their validity is not changed much by this fact.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 03:22 pm
Politicians are always a fresh and easy target. Ahnold had to bear the slings-and-arrows of the movie critics, not look out!

Leno last night said the pundits were constantly saying "he's only an actor" to which Ahnold was estatic, "Gee, they finally recognize that I'm an actor!"
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 03:32 pm
There are many girls around who (privately) would give an arm and a leg to be groped by Arnold and probably Bill too, at the same time. So these reports may not be as damaging as suggested by the media. Embarrassed

A long time ago, there was an incredibly funny recording by Stan Freberg, made when Ronald Reagan was running to become Governor of California, one or two may remember it. It was called "The Flackman and Reagan". It angered the Reagan camp greatly and they tried to suppress it. In the end it didn't matter because he still won.

0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 03:36 pm
I remember when I was in college (in Upstate NY) how we laughed at the notion that the Californians were choosing Reagan as their governor. Well, of course, the laugh was eventually on us.

Somehow it's not as funny this time around...
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 03:37 pm
These "purist" women are beating a dead horse. They'd better find out what their daughters have been doing before they embarass themselves.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Oct, 2003 12:12 am
New York Times: Schwarzenegger Releases Data on Hitler CommentsMr. Butler also read other sentences of the transcript, spoken in Mr. Schwarzenegger's then-imperfect English, that related to the subject. "Yes, in Germany they used power and authority but it was used in the wrong way," Mr. Schwarzenegger said, according to Mr. Butler. "But it was misused on the power. First, it started having, I mean, getting Germany out of the great recession and having everybody jobs and so on and then it was just misused. And they said, let's take this country, and so on." Mr. Schwarzenegger concluded: "That's bad."

Mr. Butler's book proposal also described Mr. Schwarzenegger clicking his heels and pretending to be an SS officer or playing Nazi marching songs at home. In an interview, Mr. Butler attributed Mr. Schwarzenegger's antics to immaturity and the context of the outrageous bodybuilding culture.


Yesterday, Douglas Kent Hall, a writer and photographer who co-authored Mr. Schwarzenegger's autobiography, "Arnold: The Education of a Body Builder," said that on two occasions around 1980 he, too, had watched Mr. Schwarzenegger imitate Hitler gestures and appearance for laughs. Mr. Hall provided a photograph of Mr. Schwarzenegger clowning around in a barbershop, pulling his hair down over his forehead, employing the end of a comb as a short mustache, and raising his fist.

"To some people that is funny and to some people it is not funny," Mr. Hall said, adding that Mr. Schwarzenegger was entering his acting career at the time.

In 1991, Mr. Butler agreed to sell the rights to "Pumping Iron" and the unused footage to Mr. Schwarzenegger for $1.2 million. The purchase agreement was made public in court papers when partners of Mr. Butler filed suit against him and Mr. Schwarzenegger for agreeing to the sale of the film rights without their consent.

The agreement included a provision entitling Mr. Schwarzenegger to destroy all copies of the footage if he chose. It also entitled him to destroy still photographs belonging to Mr. Butler that Mr. Schwarzenegger deemed embarrassing.

In 1997, Mr. Butler first began circulating his proposal for unflattering book about Mr. Schwarzenegger, including references to his comments about and mimicry of Hitler. In March of that year, Mr. Schwarzenegger resolved the lawsuits against him and Mr. Butler by paying the other partners in "Pumping Iron" for their stake in the rights.

Mr. Butler sold the book proposal to St. Martin's Press for about $500,000 but never completed the book. He said this week that he decided against it on further reflection. But executives at St. Martin's said that in early 2001 he sought unsuccessfully to dissuade them from canceling the project and demanding return of the advance.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Oct, 2003 12:40 am
This is the kind of stuff I wish the media would obsess upon rather then how many silicon breasts Arnold tweaked. Can't say I'm in awe of the author's writing style and rhetoric, but would love to see mainstream media pick this up and put their money into investigating it to verify or dispute it.


by Greg Palast
Friday October 3, 2003

It's not what Arnold Schwarzenegger did to the girls a decade back that should raise an eyebrow. According to a series of memoranda our office obtained today, it's his dalliance with the boys in a hotel room just two years ago that's the real scandal.

The wannabe governor has yet to deny that on May 17, 2001, at the Peninsula Hotel in Los Angeles, he had consensual political intercourse with Enron chieftain Kenneth Lay. Also frolicking with Arnold and Ken was convicted stock swindler Mike Milken.

Now, thirty-four pages of internal Enron memoranda have just come through this reporter's fax machine tell all about the tryst between Maria's husband and the corporate con men. It turns out that Schwarzenegger knowingly joined the hush-hush encounter as part of a campaign to sabotage a Davis-Bustamante plan to make Enron and other power pirates then ravaging California pay back the $9 billion in illicit profits they carried off.

Here's the story Arnold doesn't want you to hear. The biggest single threat to Ken Lay and the electricity lords is a private lawsuit filed last year under California's unique Civil Code provision 17200, the "Unfair Business Practices Act." This litigation, heading to trial now in Los Angeles, would make the power companies return the $9 billion they filched from California electricity and gas customers.

It takes real cojones to bring such a suit. Who's the plaintiff taking on the bad guys? Cruz Bustamante, Lieutenant Governor and reluctant leading candidate against Schwarzenegger.

Now follow the action. One month after Cruz brings suit, Enron's Lay calls an emergency secret meeting in L.A. of his political buck-buddies, including Arnold. Their plan, to undercut Davis (according to Enron memos) and "solve" the energy crisis -- that is, make the Bustamante legal threat go away.

How can that be done? Follow the trail with me.

While Bustamante's kicking Enron butt in court, the Davis Administration is simultaneously demanding that George Bush's energy
regulators order the $9 billion refund. Don't hold your breath:
Bush's Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is headed by a guy proposed by ? Ken Lay.

But Bush's boys on the commission have a problem. The evidence against the electricity barons is rock solid: fraudulent reporting of sales transactions, megawatt "laundering," fake power delivery scheduling and straight out conspiracy (including meetings in hotel rooms).

So the Bush commissioners cook up a terrific scheme: charge the companies with conspiracy but offer them, behind closed doors, deals in which they have to pay only two cents on each dollar they filched.

Problem: the slap-on-the-wrist refunds won't sail if the Governor of California won't play along. Solution: Re-call the Governor.

New Problem: the guy most likely to replace Davis is not Mr. Musclehead, but Cruz Bustamante, even a bigger threat to the power companies than Davis. Solution: smear Cruz because -- heaven forbid! -- he took donations from Injuns (instead of Ken Lay).

The pay-off? Once Arnold is Governor, he blesses the sweetheart settlements with the power companies. When that happens, Bustamante's court cases are probably lost. There aren't many judges who will let a case go to trial to protect a state if that a governor has already allowed the matter to be "settled" by a regulatory agency.

So think about this. The state of California is in the hole by $8 billion for the coming year. That's chump change next to the $8 TRILLION in deficits and surplus losses planned and incurred by George Bush. Nevertheless, the $8 billion deficit is the hanging rope California's right wing is using to lynch Governor Davis.

Yet only Davis and Bustamante are taking direct against to get back the $9 billion that was vacuumed out of the state by Enron, Reliant, Dynegy, Williams Company and the other Texas bandits who squeezed the state by the bulbs.

But if Arnold is selected, it's 'hasta la vista' to the $9 billion. When the electricity emperors whistle, Arnold comes -- to the Peninsula Hotel or the Governor's mansion. The he-man turns pussycat and curls up in their lap.

I asked Mr. Muscle's PR people to comment on the new Enron memos -- and his strange silence on Bustamante's suit or Davis' petition. But Arnold was too busy shaving off his Hitlerian mustache to respond.


Greg Palast is author of the New York Times bestseller, "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy" as well as "Regulation and Democracy" (with Theo MacGregor and Jerrold Oppenheim), the United Nations guide to utility deregulation. Read Palast's commentaries at www.GregPalast.com. Reprints permitted. Contact: [email protected]. The Enron memos were discovered by the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, Los Angeles, www.ConsumerWatchdog.org
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Oct, 2003 01:58 am
Consumer Watch Dog

NEWS RELEASE
Oct 03, 2003

Schwarzenegger: Total Amnesia?

Enron E-Mails Show Arnold Met With Ken Lay During Energy Crisis
Santa Monica, CA --Internal Enron e-mails confirm that Arnold Schwarzenegger was among a small group of executives who met with Lay at the posh Peninsula Beverly Hills hotel in May of 2001, in the midst of California's energy crisis. View the e-mails. The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, which obtained the e-mails, is calling on Schwarzenegger to acknowledge the meetings and disclose the information that was presented and discussed. The meeting with Enron occurred ten days after rolling blackouts darkened California for two consecutive days; Schwarzenegger has previously said that he does not remember such a meeting.

"You don't meet with America's most well-known corporate crook in the middle of California's biggest financial disaster and not remember," said FTCR's senior consumer advocate Douglas Heller. "Mr. Schwarzenegger should come clean about what happened at that meeting and if he shares Ken Lay's views on energy regulation."

The documents provide a list of invitees to the hastily arranged meeting and a list of those who actually attended. Only eleven of the 45 invitees attended, including Schwarzenegger. The meeting was meant to be an opportunity to gain business community support for Enron's "comprehensive solution" to the energy crisis. In one e-mail, Enron's VP of Public Relations wrote: "We'd like to position this meeting as an insider's conversation of what's going on with the energy situation. This meeting should be for principals only." (emphasis in original)

FTCR contends that Enron policies were responsible for the severe energy crisis California faced in 2000 and 2001. The group noted that the crisis had dramatic implications on the state economy and state budget and will continue to impact consumers for years to come. FTCR has called for a repeal of the deregulation and supported SB 888 (Dunn) to re-regulate the state's electricity system. FTCR has been critical of Enron's involvement in the California energy crisis, in which the company developed schemes for manipulating the power market that forced massive price spikes in the state.

"Since it was apparently important enough for Schwarzenegger to attend despite the last minute notice, Schwarzenegger should now explain what happened at his meeting with Enron's Ken Lay and whether or not he supports electricity re-regulation," said Heller.


.

-30-

FTCR is a non-partisan, nonprofit organization. FTCR does not support or oppose candidates for office and takes no position on the California recall.
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Oct, 2003 02:31 am
Butterflynet, I must admit that until I read your posting, I thought the Schwarznegger candidacy a great piece of political farce, with little damage and even some benefit to California if he won.

Now it would appear that those backing him are one and the same as the very cunning group who organised the theft of the White House and all that followed.

If your tale is based upon reality, then Arnold is not exactly the good guy most of us would like to believe or may even be another front man like the President, with billions of dollars depending on the outcome of the election.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Oct, 2003 02:35 am
The emails are in PDF format and couldn't be copy and pasted from so I had to retype the following. I apologize in advance if there are any unintended errors or typos. BFN




Excerpt from the emails:

Los Angeles CEO Meeting
May 17, 2001

Attendees

Mayor Richard Riordan
Eric Moses - Assistant Deputy Mayor
Kevin Sharer - Chairman & CEO, Amgen Inc.
Sara Jensen - Vice President of Engineering and Operations, Amgen Inc.
Ray Irani - Chairman & CEO, Occidental Petroleum Corp.
Robert Day - Chairman, CEP & Managing Director, The TCW Group
Selim Zilkha - former CEO Zilkha Energy
Tom Patterson - Partner, Sidley & Austin
Robert Sinnott - Senior Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer, Kayne Anderson Investment Management, LLC
Arnold Schwarzenegger - President, Oak Productions
Bruce Karatz - Chairman, President & CEO Kaufman & Broad
Michael Milken - President, Foundation of the Milken Families
Ken Lombard - President, Magic Johnsom Theaters & Johnson Development

Invited

Gordon Binder - Chairman (ret), Amgen Inc.
Liam McGee - President, Bank of America California
Daniel Villanueva - Chairman, Bastion Capital
David Baltimore - President, California Institute of Technology
Nelson Rising - CEP, Catellus Development Corp.
Jeffery Katzenberg - Partner, Dream Works SKG
Henry Yuen - Chairman & CEO Gemstar - TV Guide Int'l Inc.
Gary Winnick - Foundar & Chairman, Global Crossing
Steven Sample - President, University of Southern California
Bary Munitz - President, J. Paul Getty Trust
Earvin Johnson - CEO, Magic Johnson Theaters & Johnson Development
Edward Roski - President, Majestic Realty
Michael T. Smith - Chairman & CEO, Hughes Electronics
Eli Broad - Chairman, President & CEO, Sun America
Michael Eisner - Chairman & CEO, The Walt Disney Company
Ronald Burkle - Managing Partner, The Yucaipa Companies
Jerry Perenchio - Chairman & CEO, Univision Communications Inc.
Charles Miller - President & CEO, Avery Dennison
Yoshimi Inaba - President & CEO, Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc.
Tom McKeman - President & CEO, Auto Club of Southern California
Peter Mullin - Chairman & CEO, Mullin Consulting Inc.
David Pyott - President & CEO, Allergan
Charles Schetter - Director, McKinsey & Company
Stephen Bollenbach - President & CEO, Hilton Hotels
Kent Kresa - Chairman, President & CEO, Northrop Grumann Corp
Philip Anschutz - CEO, The Anschutz Corp.
Donald Bren - Chairman, The Irvine Company
Dennis Tito - President, Wilshire Associates Inc
Terry Semel - Chairman & CEP, Yahoo! Inc.
Sherry Lansing - Chairman & CEO, Paramount Studios
Joan Payden - President & CEO, Payden & Rygel
Martin Feinstein - Chairman & CEO Farmers Group, Inc
Bill Simon - Founder, William E Simon & Sons
Richard Ferry - Chairman, Korn/Ferry International


Excerpts from email from Karen Denne to Ken Lay
05/11/2001

For the Los Angeles meeting, we'd like you to call Mayor Dick Riordan and ask for his help in pulling together a group of key, influential business leaders. As background, Riordan is a very wealthy Republican businessman who has been term-limited out ans has not yet made public his future political aspirations (a bid for governor has been mentioned by insiders). You might congratulate him on helping to settle the Writer's Guild strike and ask if he'd now like to resolve the energy crisis. You can say you've been told that he was one of the clearer heads during the deregulation process and were instrumental in keeping DWP out of the regulatory mess. This is an opportunity for Riordan to help broker a solution, and that's why you're calling him. Explain about our comprehensive solution - business support is critical to garner political support. Ask if he could invite and host a meeting of key business leaders and introduce you. I've attached a suggested list of prominent businessmen, close associates and personal friends of Riordan's. We'd like to position this meeting as an insider's conversation of what's going on with the energy situation. This meeting should be for principals only.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Oct, 2003 03:52 am
This is long, but please read. The dots will begin to be connected. BFN




Published on Sunday, August 17, 2003 by CommonDreams.org
Ahnuld, Ken Lay, George Bush, Dick Cheney and Gray Davis
by Jason Leopold

Arnold Schwarzenegger isn't talking. The Hollywood action film star and California's GOP gubernatorial candidate in the state's recall election has been unusually silent about his plans for running the Golden State. He hasn't yet offered up a solution for the state's $38 billion budget deficit, an issue that largely got more than one million people to sign a petition to recall Gov. Gray Davis.

More important, however, Schwarzenegger still won't respond to questions about why he was at the Peninsula Hotel in Beverly Hills two years ago where he, former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan and junk bond king Michael Milken, met secretly with former Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay who was touting a plan for solving the state's energy crisis. Other luminaries who were invited but didn't attend the May 24, 2001 meeting included former Los Angeles Laker Earvin "Magic" Johnson and supermarket magnate Ron Burkle.

While Schwarzenegger, Riordan and Milken listened to Lay's pitch, Gov. Davis pleaded with President George Bush to enact much needed price controls on electricity sold in the state, which skyrocketed to more than $200 per megawatt-hour. Davis said that Texas-based energy companies were manipulating California's power market, charging obscene prices for power and holding consumers hostage. Bush agreed to meet with Davis at the Century Plaza Hotel in West Los Angeles on May 29, 2001, five days after Lay met with Schwarzenegger, to discuss the California power crisis.

At the meeting, Davis asked Bush for federal assistance, such as imposing federally mandated price caps, to rein in soaring energy prices. But Bush refused saying California legislators designed an electricity market that left too many regulatory restrictions in place and that's what caused electricity prices in the state to skyrocket. It was up to the governor to fix the problem, Bush said. However, Bush's response appears to be part of a coordinated effort launched by Lay to have Davis shoulder the blame for the crisis. It worked. According to recent polls, a majority of voters grew increasingly frustrated with the way Davis handled the power crisis. Schwarzenegger has used the energy crisis and missteps by Davis to bolster his standing with potential voters. While Davis took a beating in the press (some energy companies ran attack ads against the governor), Lay used his political clout to gather support for deregulation.

A couple of weeks before Lay met with Schwarzenegger in May 2001, the PBS news program "Frontline" interviewed Vice President Dick Cheney, whom Lay met with privately a month earlier. Cheney was asked by a correspondent from Frontline whether energy companies were acting like a cartel and using manipulative tactics to cause electricity prices to spike in California.

"No," Cheney said during the Frontline interview. "The problem you had in California was caused by a combination of things--an unwise regulatory scheme, because they didn't really deregulate. Now they're trapped from unwise regulatory schemes, plus not having addressed the supply side of the issue. They've obviously created major problems for themselves and bankrupted PG&E in the process."

A month before the Frontline interview and Bush's meeting with Davis, Cheney, who chairs Bush's energy task force, met with Lay to discuss Bush's National Energy Policy. Lay, whose company was the largest contributor to Bush's presidential campaign, made some recommendations that would financially benefit his company. Lay gave Cheney a memo that included eight recommendations for the energy policy. Of the eight, seven were included in the final draft. The energy policy was released in late May 2001, after Schwarzenegger, Riordan and Milken met with Lay and after the meeting between Bush and Davis and Cheney's Frontline interview.

The policy made only scant references to California's energy crisis, which Enron was accused of igniting, and did not indicate what should be done to provide the state some relief. Cheney said the policy focused on long-term solutions to the country's energy needs, such as opening up drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and freeing up transmission lines. That's why California was ignored in the report, Cheney said.

What's unknown to many of the voters who will decide Davis's fate on Oct. 7, the day of the recall election, is that while Cheney dismissed Davis's accusations that power companies were withholding electricity supplies from the state, one company engaged in exactly the type of behavior that Davis described. But Davis would never be told about the manipulative tactics the energy company engaged.

In a confidential settlement with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, whose chairman was appointed by Bush a year earlier, Tulsa, Okla., based-Williams Companies agreed to refund California $8 million in profits it reaped by deliberately shutting down one of its power plants in the state in the spring of 2000 to drive up the wholesale price of electricity in California.

The evidence, a transcript of a tape-recorded telephone conversation between an employee at Williams and an employee at a Southern California power plant operated by Williams, shows how the two conspired to jack up power prices and create an artificial electricity shortage by keeping the power plant out of service for two weeks.

Details of the settlement had been under seal by FERC for more than a year and were released in November after the Wall Street Journal sued the commission to obtain the full copy of its report. Similarly, FERC also found that Reliant Energy engaged in identical behavior around the same time as Williams and in February the commission ordered Reliant to pay California a $13.8 million settlement.

Had the evidence been released in 2001 when Davis accused energy companies of fraud it would have helped California's case and voters may have viewed the governor more positively. But if FERC were to publicly release the details of the Williams settlement it wouldn't have jibed with Bush's energy policy, which was made public instead in May 2001. It's highly unlikely that Bush, Cheney and members of the energy task force were kept in the dark about the Williams scam, especially since the findings of the investigation by FERC took place around the same time the policy was being drafted.

But Davis was still causing problems for Lay. California's power woes had a ripple effect, forcing other states to cancel plans to open up their electricity markets to competition fearing deregulation would lead to widespread blackouts and price gouging. For Enron, a company that generated most of its revenue from buying and selling power and natural gas on the open market, such a move would paralyze the company.

Fearing that Davis would take steps to re-regulate California's power market that Lay spent years lobbying California lawmakers to open up to competition, Lay recruited Schwarzenegger, Riordan, Milken, and other powerful business leaders like Bruce Karatz, chief executive of home builder Kaufman & Broad; Ray Irani, chief executive of Occidental Petroleum; and Kevin Sharer, chief executive of biotech giant Amgen.

The 90-minute secret meeting Lay convened took place inside a conference room at the Peninsula Hotel. Lay, and other Enron representatives at the meeting, handed out a four-page document to Schwarzenegger, Riordan and Milken titled "Comprehensive Solution for California," which called for an end to federal and state investigations into Enron's role in the California energy crisis and said consumers should pay for the state's disastrous experiment with deregulation through multibillion rate increases. Another bullet point in the four-page document said "Get deregulation right this time -- California needs a real electricity market, not government takeovers."

The irony of that statement is that California's flawed power market design helped Enron earn more than $500 million in one year, a tenfold increase in profits from a previous year and it's coordinated effort in manipulating the price of electricity in California, which other power companies mimicked, cost the state close to $70 billion and led to the beginning of what is now the state's $38 billion budget deficit. The power crisis forced dozens of businesses to close down or move to other states, where cheaper electricity was in abundant supply, and greatly reduced the revenue California relied heavily upon.

Lay asked the participants to support his plan and lobby the state Legislature to make it a law. It's unclear whether Schwarzenegger held a stake in Enron at the time or if he followed through on Lay's request. His spokesman, Rob Stutzman, hasn't returned numerous calls for comment about the meeting. For Schwarzenegger and the others who attended the meeting, associating with Enron, particularly Ken Lay, the disgraced chairman of the high-flying energy company, during the peak of California's power crisis in May 2001 could be compared to meeting with Osama bin Laden after 9-11 to understand why terrorism isn't necessarily such a heinous act.

A person who attended the meeting at the Peninsula, which this reporter wrote about two years ago, said Lay invited Schwarzenegger and Riordan because the two were being courted in 2001 as GOP gubernatorial candidates. A week before the meeting, Davis signed legislation to create a state power authority that would buy, operate and build power plants in lieu of out-of-state energy companies, such as Enron, that the governor alleged was ripping off the state.

For Enron's Lay, the timing of the meeting was crucial. His company was just five months away from disintegrating and he was doing everything in his power to keep his company afloat and the profits rolling in.

It wasn't until Enron collapsed in October 2001 and evidence of the company's manipulative trading tactics emerged that FERC began to take a look at the company's role in California's electricity crisis. Since then, memos written by former Enron traders were uncovered, with colorful names like "Fat Boy" and "Death Star," that contained the blueprint for ripping off California.

Enron's top trader on the West Coast, Timothy Belden, the mastermind behind the scheme, pleaded guilty in December to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and has agreed to cooperate with federal investigators who are still trying to get to the bottom of the crisis.

California is still demanding that FERC order the energy companies to refund the state $8.9 billion for overcharging the state for electricity during its yearlong energy crisis. But FERC says California is due no more than $1.2 billion in refunds because the state still owes the energy companies $1.8 billion in unpaid power bills.

Davis, who refused to cave in to the demands of companies like Enron even while Democrats, Republicans and the public criticized him, was right all along. Maybe Californians ought to cut Davis some slack.

Jason Leopold ([email protected]) spent two years covering California's energy crisis as bureau chief of Dow Jones Newswires. He is currently working on a book about the crisis.

###
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Oct, 2003 04:20 am
An even longer article. I'll provide some excerpts. Entire article can be found here: http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081903G.shtml Looks like Arnold and Enron were made for each other.

Schwarzenegger's Next Goal on Dogged, Ambitious Path
By Bernard Weinraub And Charlie Leduff
The New York Times

Sunday 17 August 2003

LOS ANGELES - Thirty-five years ago, Arnold Schwarzenegger, an unknown Austrian bodybuilder who spoke only a few words of English, had little money and no acting experience, came to the United States and soon made a prediction: He would become a movie star, make millions of dollars, marry a glamorous wife and wield political power.

By all accounts, Mr. Schwarzenegger's drive to succeed was not merely an immigrant's classic up-by-the-bootstraps obsession. It was a calculated effort to turn himself into an invulnerable and powerful (physical and otherwise) figure. He was also a far cry from the skinny Austrian boy whose father, Gustav, a policeman and a one-time member of the Nazi Party, intimidated and sometimes beat him, favoring his other son, Menhard, according to published accounts of Mr. Schwarzenegger's life. (Mr. Schwarzenegger did not attend the funeral of his father in 1972, or that of his brother, who died in a car crash in 1971.)

"What fascinated Arnold was money and power, and what money and power bestow on an individual," said George Butler, producer and director of "Pumping Iron," the 1976 documentary that became Mr. Schwarzenegger's first successful film.

"The past meant nothing to Arnold because it was over," Mr. Butler said. "He never looked over his shoulder. This is a man of bottomless ambition. It's always been there. Nothing's happened in the last few days that hasn't happened before. He sees himself as almost mystically sent to America."

Mr. Butler, who still keeps in touch with Mr. Schwarzenegger, put it another way. "Arnold is one of the most political people I've ever met," Mr. Butler said. "Everything he does is political. He has an uncanny ability to go to a meeting, get into an elevator, sit down with people in a restaurant, and immediately assess their strengths and weakness. He manipulates."

In the early 1980's Mr. Columbu, now a chiropractor, invited one of his patients, Dana Rohrabacher, a speechwriter for Ronald Reagan, to have dinner with the action hero.

"When I first met him, he talked about how much he loved America, how much he admired Reagan," said Mr. Rohrabacher, now a congressman from Huntington Beach. "I remember him saying, `Dana, some day I'm going to be governor of California and I'm going to call you.' I knew he was a guy going places."

Mr. Schwarzenegger's film stardom led him to meet top Republicans like Mr. Reagan, Vice President George Bush and Pete Wilson, then a senator from California and eventually the governor. Although he keeps a bust of Mr. Reagan in his office, Mr. Schwarzenegger grew especially close to Mr. Bush, admiring his pragmatism and world view and regular style of speech.

Around 1990, at the time he was nominated by the first President Bush to lead the fitness council, and aware that he might seek a political future, Mr. Schwarzenegger went to the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles in an attempt to gauge the political consequences of his father's past. He asked officials at the center to investigate his father's ties to the Nazi Party, during World War II.

"He said that for years his father served in World War II, and he wanted to know exactly what he did," recalled Rabbi Marvin Hier, the founder and dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

Rabbi Hier said investigators found that Mr. Schwarzenegger's father had tried to join the Nazi Party in 1938, and was accepted for membership in 1941. He said that investigators found no evidence that the elder Mr. Schwarzenegger had committed war crimes.

"Arnold said, `What did it mean to be a member of the Nazi Party?' " Rabbi Hier recalled. "I explained, `Look, any son who finds that his father was a member of the Nazi Party is not something to be proud of.' "

Since then, Rabbi Hier said, Mr. Schwarzenegger and his wife have become very supportive of the Wiesenthal Center and its Museum of Tolerance. He said the couple had been the hosts of numerous fund-raising events at their home and had donated more than $1 million to the center.


Mr. Schwarzenegger, who lives with Ms. Shriver and their four children in an estate in the Brentwood area of Los Angeles, is plainly confident that he will triumph in politics. Just as he has triumphed in body building and the movies. As he said in "Pumping Iron": "I was always dreaming of very powerful people, dictators and things like that. I was just always impressed by people who could be remembered for hundreds of years."
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Oct, 2003 09:01 am
Here's more about Arnie and Ken Lay and the $9 billion Enron owes the State:

ARNOLD UNPLUGGED
> It's hasta la vista to $9 billion if the Governator is selected
>
> by Greg Palast
> Friday October 3, 2003
>
> It's not what Arnold Schwarzenegger did to the girls a decade back that
> should raise an eyebrow. According to a series of memoranda our office
> obtained today, it's his dalliance with the boys in a hotel room just
> two years ago that's the real scandal.
>
> The wannabe governor has yet to deny that on May 17, 2001, at the
> Peninsula Hotel in Los Angeles, he had consensual political intercourse
> with Enron chieftain Kenneth Lay. Also frolicking with Arnold and Ken
> was convicted stock swindler Mike Milken.
>
> Now, thirty-four pages of internal Enron memoranda have just come
> through this reporter's fax machine tell all about the tryst between
> Maria's husband and the corporate con men. It turns out that
> Schwarzenegger knowingly joined the hush-hush encounter as part of a
> campaign to sabotage a Davis-Bustamante plan to make Enron and other
> power pirates then ravaging California pay back the $9 billion in
> illicit profits they carried off.
>
> Here's the story Arnold doesn't want you to hear. The biggest single
> threat to Ken Lay and the electricity lords is a private lawsuit filed
> last year under California's unique Civil Code provision 17200, the
> "Unfair Business Practices Act." This litigation, heading to trial now
> in Los Angeles, would make the power companies return the $9 billion
> they filched from California electricity and gas customers.
>
> It takes real cojones to bring such a suit. Who's the plaintiff taking
> on the bad guys? Cruz Bustamante, Lieutenant Governor and reluctant
> leading candidate against Schwarzenegger.
>
> Now follow the action. One month after Cruz brings suit, Enron's Lay
> calls an emergency secret meeting in L.A. of his political
> buck-buddies, including Arnold. Their plan, to undercut Davis
> (according to Enron memos) and "solve" the energy crisis -- that is,
> make the Bustamante legal threat go away.
>
> How can that be done? Follow the trail with me.
>
> While Bustamante's kicking Enron butt in court, the Davis
> Administration is simultaneously demanding that George Bush's energy
> regulators order the $9 billion refund. Don't hold your breath:
> Bush's Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is headed by a guy proposed
> by … Ken Lay.
>
> But Bush's boys on the commission have a problem. The evidence against
> the electricity barons is rock solid: fraudulent reporting of sales
> transactions, megawatt "laundering," fake power delivery scheduling and
> straight out conspiracy (including meetings in hotel rooms).
>
> So the Bush commissioners cook up a terrific scheme: charge the
> companies with conspiracy but offer them, behind closed doors, deals in
> which they have to pay only two cents on each dollar they filched.
>
> Problem: the slap-on-the-wrist refunds won't sail if the Governor of
> California won't play along. Solution: Re-call the Governor.
>
> New Problem: the guy most likely to replace Davis is not Mr.
> Musclehead, but Cruz Bustamante, even a bigger threat to the power
> companies than Davis. Solution: smear Cruz because -- heaven forbid!
> he took donations from Injuns (instead of Ken Lay).
>
> The pay-off? Once Arnold is Governor, he blesses the sweetheart
> settlements with the power companies. When that happens, Bustamante's
> court cases are probably lost. There aren't many judges who will let a
> case go to trial to protect a state if that a governor has already
> allowed the matter to be "settled" by a regulatory agency.
>
> So think about this. The state of California is in the hole by $8
> billion for the coming year. That's chump change next to the $8
> TRILLION in deficits and surplus losses planned and incurred by George
> Bush. Nevertheless, the $8 billion deficit is the hanging rope
> California's right wing is using to lynch Governor Davis.
>
> Yet only Davis and Bustamante are taking direct against to get back the
> $9 billion that was vacuumed out of the state by Enron, Reliant,
> Dynegy, Williams Company and the other Texas bandits who squeezed the
> state by the bulbs.
>
> But if Arnold is selected, it's 'hasta la vista' to the $9 billion.
> When the electricity emperors whistle, Arnold comes -- to the Peninsula
> Hotel or the Governor's mansion. The he-man turns pussycat and curls
> up in their lap.
>
> I asked Mr. Muscle's PR people to comment on the new Enron memos -- and
> his strange silence on Bustamante's suit or Davis' petition. But
> Arnold was too busy shaving off his Hitlerian mustache to respond.
>
The Enron memos were discovered by the
> Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, Los Angeles,
> www.ConsumerWatchdog.org
> ============================================
0 Replies
 
williamhenry3
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Oct, 2003 12:01 pm
Lightwizard wrote:

I think Clinton's transgressions will be used by both sides until the horse dies -- which in politics can be several hundred years.


I usually agree with Lightwizard's posts, and the above is no exception.

Clinton's indiscretions are now in the history books for future generations to judge him.

Some people on the right seem to forget that Mr. Clinton is now a private citizen, and his sexual appetite has nothing to do with Mr. Schwarzenegger's. The latter is seeking the highest office of a large, influential state.

Mr. Clinton is no longer a public official. His wife is, however, and the far right-wing lunatics have a field day berating her. Sen. Clinton is much more respected as a senator than Mr. Schwarzenegger is as a gubernatorial candidate in California.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Oct, 2003 02:04 pm
Oakland Newspaper Withdraws Schwarzenegger Endorsement; Former Trainer Defends Him
By Jeremiah Marquez Associated Press Writer
Published: Oct 4, 2003


LOS ANGELES (AP) - Arnold Schwarzenegger sought to shake off allegations of sexual misbehavior that cost him at least one newspaper endorsement Saturday as he and the other gubernatorial candidates leaped into their final weekend of campaigning.

The Oakland Tribune withdrew its endorsement of Schwarzenegger on Saturday, saying the sexual harassment allegations indicate "a pattern of recurring abuse and boorish behavior that in different circumstances could have led to assault charges."

"By no stretch of the imagination can his groping and grabbing on 'rowdy movie sets' be dismissed as an isolated incident," the newspaper said.

http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGASAJM1ELD.html

for the rest of the article
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Oct, 2003 04:28 pm
The details escapes me, but I thought I read in the paper recently that a judge settled the energy penalties down to a few measely million dollars from the original billions. Maybe somebody can find that article.
0 Replies
 
step314
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Oct, 2003 04:53 pm
How left should attack Schwarzenegger.
Quote:
This is the kind of stuff I wish the media would obsess upon rather then how many silicon breasts Arnold tweaked. Can't say I'm in awe of the author's writing style and rhetoric, but would love to see mainstream media pick this up and put their money into investigating it to verify or dispute it.


How do you know the women he degraded had silicon breasts? Are you so liberal that you hold the importance of viewing depravity as innocuous so great that even when a great gift of a scandal drops down on a thoroughly wicked Republican you won't take advantage of it?

Personally, I am not at all hypocritical in despising Schwarzenegger. In my opinion, the Democrats tend to be more right on economic matters and the Republicans tend to be more right on sodomy matters. This Schwarzenegger is wrong about everything. He is not only pro big money like you might expect of a Republican, he is also (obviously) very pro-sodomy. He is despicable every way around. Because he is a Republican, people really won't be very surprised if his lust for money has compromised his integrity somewhat--that is not something easy to make political hay out of. But that he lusts for sordid behavior with females so much that he scares females in disgusting ways, that is not a trait that his merely being Republican would cause people to believe he possesses. The Democrats should stress his disgusting behavior. Those Republicans who are Republicans on account of their "family values" would not (I am inclined to think) vote for Schwarzenegger if the veil were more clearly lifted from his extremely disgusting pro-sodomy attitude.

It is profitable to consider most selfish people as divided into two camps. Those who claim to view unselfish female sexual behavior (like mating for love more than for money) as disgusting because it is the same as stupid disgusting behavior (who vote Republican), and those who claim to view female disgusting behavior as unselfish because it is the same as unselfish behavior (who vote Democratic). Bad people don't vote by considering the consequences of the candidate winning (What after all is the chance of their vote making a difference?), they vote by considering the consequences of their wanting to vote for a candidate on what others think of themselves. Your attitude toward sex in particular is something that can have consequences on what people think of you--bad people will care in the voting booths about what their view toward politicians' sexual behavior says about themselves to others more than they will care about (say) what their view toward budget deficits says to others. If you are a bad Republican, you wil be mercenary in your sexual behavior, but you will typically justify your mercenary behavior by saying that to not be mercenary is to have a disgusting lack of self-respect that basically amounts to letting others screw your hindquarters. You will not want to vote for someone who in fact is not at all careful about hiding his tendency to in fact enjoy screwing females in the ass. You might even hate him more than a Democrat with the same disgusting tendencies because, well, Why not prefer to support a candidate that at least has some good qualities? It will make you look better and is the patriotic thing to do (and so will make you look patriotic). I wouldn't be surprised if Bush and other leading Republicans don't declare support for Tom McClintock. It would make them really look like they put class above partisan considerations, and Who knows? If some prominenet Republicans did support McClintock, McClintock just might win (but I doubt it), especially since it would give voters a chance to make all the pollsters and pundits look ridiculous.

Political astuteness I suppose is not my greatest virtue (I've been in two juries and both times I talked myself into being the last person holding my view). Still, I don't think the Clinton situation really is entirely analogous to the Schwarzenegger one. Sexual depravity is I am inclined to think more of a political liability to a Republican than to a Democrat, at least if the Democrats are willing to take advantage of it. And while being half-bad (especially about sex) may be a political plus, giving you the support of half the bad voters, being fully bad as Schwarzenegger seems to be will of course make you more completely hated by the good voters while hurting you slightly among the bad voters (or at least not really helping you). Thus, I like to think I have reason to hope Schwarzenegger will lose.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Oct, 2003 05:20 pm
step, Here's another vagaries of this recall election. Over one million absentee ballots were cast before the news of Ahnold came out in the media, and they have no chance of changing their votes. That 1.2 million votes could make the difference between who wins and who loses. Another sticky wicket about this recall.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Oct, 2003 07:05 pm
I'm not so sure it is the Democrates who are responsible for this latest surge of dirt on Arnold. Most of this stuff has already been out in the press since 2001 when Arnold first verbalized his wishes to run for governor and was discouraged by the article in Premiere Magazine about his womanizing. None of this is 11th hour shock and awe bombing tactics. This all came out again within hours of Arnold's announcement on Jay Leno's show and was mostly ignored by the media.

What is 11th hour about it is that people are finally starting to take it seriously now that it looks like Arnold might actually win.

What I wonder is whether or not the 11th hour surge of dirt is coming from the conservative wing of the Right in an effort to dissuade people from voting for Arnold and switch to McClintock. I'll be looking for Arnold's last minute withdrawal from the race. He did his job, he got the folks to think Republican.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.69 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 07:32:09