3
   

Schwarzenegger Announces : Running for CA Gov.

 
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Oct, 2003 12:53 am
Because the fascist right wing will be in a little more control - this is the real meaning of "America" - I think not!!!!!!!
0 Replies
 
Italgato
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Oct, 2003 01:41 am
Bill W. I am very much afraid that you do not know the truth about Mussolini's fascism. Mussolini's facism sprang from SOCIALIST roots- Nothing right-wing about it.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Oct, 2003 02:39 pm
So Schwarzenegger's father was a socialist???
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Oct, 2003 03:21 pm
In Austria, yet?
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 08:46 am
Yes, and the Haymarket riots were leftist inspired (they were actually driven by the anarchists who did convince labor and a few socialists that the cause was in their best interest). A bomb was lodged into the line of Chicago policemen and it was never proven who did it. Marshall Fields saw to it that four of the anarchists were accused as the the culprits and saw to it that they were hung. They were later exonerated as having nothing to do with the bombing. I didn't know Marshall Fields had a bomb department in his store -- :wink: Laughing

Ahnold has been accused of fondling six women without their consent. Although the LA Times says it was an independent journalistic probe (sic), many of the voters will believe it was instigated by the Democrats. Nevertheless, my friends in the business have told me that Ahnold is a chauvenistic womanizer and Shriver has tolerated it over their marriage. Shriver's being offered some high TV journalistic posts including anchor woman which throws another element of Barnam and Bailey into the mix.
0 Replies
 
step314
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 02:02 pm
Schwarzenegger
People and Californians in particular ought to read the Schwarzenegger article in the L.A. Times, "Women Say Schwarzenegger Groped, Humiliated Them" (Tuesday, Oct. 2). I'd like to think if they did he would lose. One woman working on the Terminator 2 Crew claims Schwarzenegger reached out to her, pulled he onto his lap and whispered, "Have you ever had a man slide his tongue in your [anus]?" Schwarzenegger actually reminds me of his compatriot Mr. Hitler (yes, Hitler was from Austria, too). They both were too stupid to realize that the appeal of forcible sodomy is not its forcible quality or violence but the sodomy part of it. Schwarzenegger was too stupid to realize that forcible scary behavior doesn't appeal to women but rather that the sodomy itself is responsible for most of the (addictive, evil) appeal and terror. Similarly, Hitler was too stupid to realize that violence by itself wouldn't create the terror he hoped to create. This Schwarzenegger I suspect is one of the most evil people around. A natural tendency to treat females in a controlling, scary, selfish way mixed with arrant idiocy is a very dangerous combination for a person with power. His stupid view of females (as evinced by his behavior) is like that of Hitler in Mein Kampf:

"Like the woman, whose psychic state is determined less by grounds of abstract reason than by an indefinable emotional longing for a force which will complement her nature, and who, consequently, would rather bow to a strong man than dominate a weakling, likewise the masses love a commander more than a petitioner and feel inwardly more satisfied by a doctrine, tolerating no other beside itself, than by the granting of liberalistic freedom with which, as a rule, they can do little, and are prone to feel that they have been abandoned. They are equally unaware of their shameless spiritual terrorization and the hideous abuse of their human freedom, for they absolutely fail to suspect the inner insanity of the whole doctrine. All they see is the ruthless force and brutality of its calculated manifestations, to which they always submit in the end.

If Social Democracy is opposed by a doctrine of greater truth, but equal brutality of methods, the latter will conquer, though this may require the bitterest struggle." (Mein Kampf, Vol.I, Chapter 2, from www.hitler.org [now's my chance to see whether "Disable HTML in this post" really works])

It only remains to see to what extent his views concerning women will have a similar influence on his political tactics.


But perhaps the stories are not credible? Considering that the L.A. Times went looking for the victims (rather than vice versa), and considering that the anonymous stories were corroborated by friends, relatives, etc., as having been mentioned near the time at which they occurrred, the reasonable assumption is that they are very credible and only a small sample of his total tastelessness when it comes to women.

It says something about how screwed-up Hollywood is that someone like him could get somewhere there. I predict he will lose in California--I can't think Californians are sufficiently screwed-up or ignorant to vote this disgusting galoot into office. I certainly hope they aren't--anybody but him!
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 02:10 pm
I heard a tape of S fessing up after the LA Times article came out. Sounded like his crowd was cheering him as he sort of apologized. Something tells me none of this will matter much. Women already knew he's a jerk in that regard...
0 Replies
 
williamhenry3
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 05:20 pm
'Tis sad . . .

. . . while watching Candidate Schwarzenegger defend himself today against charges of cheap sexual behavior, I realized that this man -- as did Ronald Reagan -- had become a parody of himself.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 05:36 pm
Not my favorite person for sure, Ronny Baby as I know what he did as head of Screen Actors Guild but he was definitely smarter than Ahnold. Annold has managers running his businesses of the past although he alludes to signing paychecks (which he did at Planet Hollywood). He also signed the pink slips letting people go as Planet Hollywood began to fail. Wonder if he took turns doing that with Bruce and Sylvester?
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 05:40 pm
He also promoted the work as an investment of Hiro Yamagata, the artist who was churning out scenes of Paris with cartoonish characters cavoring around the streets. Yamagata wanted to get into the more serious arts and stopped distributing prints in the U.S. and only in Japan with Ahnold's advice. The prints are currently deflated to 25% of their original value.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 07:21 pm
I remember seeing those Yamagata cartoons, but that was years ago. Sort of similar to Thomas Kindaid. If the art is junk, people will eventually learn they bought junk.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 09:03 pm
Yamagata is at least a league ahead of Kinkaid but in that same commercial niche. His art was actually sold at market values two to ten times it's original cost. That just isn't happening with Kinkaid. Not that people didn't realize their investment would depreciate to the degree it did and Ahnold was right up there with the rest of the hucksters boasting the value of the work. Don't politicians basically have to be effective boasters?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 09:32 pm
boasters and boosters.....
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 10:16 pm
For the full article, read ABC News: Arnold Says Hitler Is His Hero
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 11:23 pm
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 11:30 pm
Remember when BBB posted this Aug. 29th?
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:51 pm
Post subject: Why BBB is pissed at Arnold Schwarzenegger

I don't care a fig about Arnold's sex life, then or now. What really pisses me off is that he knew this stuff would come out and he went ahead with his political plans without regard to the effect this info would have on his young children. And its not just the old stuff, the news about his womanizing since his marriage to Maria will also be comming out.

He is supposed to care so much about children, yet he seems blind to how his children are supposed to cope at school and other places when their father's raunchy behavior is exposed. And why didn't Maria make a stand to protect their children? I didn't think she was a wimp, but maybe so.

And Arnold's sex-object attitude towards women won't make his children or his wife feel any better.

If you love your children, you just don't indulge in your own self interest at their expense. Arnold is a world class egotistical asshole!

---BumbleBeeBoogie
0 Replies
 
Italgato
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 11:35 pm
The left wing's opinions on Schwartzenegger are ridiculous and hypocritical.

At least Schwartzenegger the "guts" to apologize to the women he accosted.

William Clinton was a coward compared to Arnold. Clinton never apologized to Willey. He never made any comment about his rape of Juanita Broadderick, he said he only had a one night stand with Gen Flowers when the fact was that they had been lovers for years. Clinton lied to the entire world on TV-"I did not have sexual relations with that woman- Ms. Lewsinksy.

Arnold will win. He will win because the voters will remember that the left wing said:

"They are persecuting Clinton about sex"
"It's only about sex"

Arnold will win because the public sees the desperation of the left wing who is trying to use a personal act to delegitimize a political player.

Too late. The Democrats have long ago made it clear.

We don't care about the sex, they said. All we care about is good political leadership.

Now, if California was loaded with Puritans, the smear of Arnold might work, but the left know that they have "modernized" the state so throughly that it won't dent Arnold's campaign one bit.
0 Replies
 
Italgato
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 11:39 pm
And Clinton lied to the world about Monica's blow jobs. I suppose it didn't have any effect on his daughter that he pleasured Monica with a cigar.

What hypocrites on the left. They defend the world's worst sexual harrasser- Bill Clinton who raped women and attack a man who, at most, laid hands on them.

What hypocrites!!!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 11:54 pm
It's not so much that Arnold apologized to the women, but the way he treated women in the past without considering their feelings. That, to me, says alot about his personality. I don't care how young he was. It's not right to treat women with that much disrespect - at anytime in one's life. I knew that as a teenager.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Oct, 2003 12:29 am
Italgato
Italgato, as usual, when the person you support is attacked, you attack someone else to divert attention from the issue at hand. That tactic demonstrates the profound weakness of your argument and support of Arnold.

Italgato wrote: "What hypocrites on the left. They defend the world's worst sexual harrasser- Bill Clinton who raped women and attack a man who, at most, laid hands on them."

With your love of demanding facts and citations of others, why don't you document your claim that "The Left" defended Bill Clinton's sexual behavior?

I don't know any Liberal who defended Clinton's behavior and lying, I certainly didn't.

When you cite "The Left", whom do you include in that label with regard to Bill Clinton? I don't consider Clinton to be a member of The Left as I understand it.

BumbleBeeBoogie
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 03/16/2025 at 05:22:26