Schwarzenegger Announces : Running for CA Gov.

He also told her she had a loophole in her tax plan big enough to drive his Hummer through! She hates SUV's!

As well she should. They represent American consumerism at its worst: wasteful, polluting and totally unnecessary.

And now, for something completely different...

I switched back and forth last night between the Cali debate and another show.

I can't give a factually informed critique, but I hid behind my hands during a couple of Arnold moments. He seemed very simplistic to me.

McClintock...(OK, blanking on his name) would have earned my vote...

If anyone without a pro- or anti-Arnold bias could fill me in-- Did I just catch him at bad moment "Taxes go up, up, up..." or did he do pretty dismally?

He actually got a little more articulate than tax, tax, tax, and seemed fairly informed on the questions asked. Probably looked better given expectations of him were low.

And today, are even lower!!!!!!

Arnold
Arnold continued to mouth platitudes and cliches that have been his mainstay in his campaign speeches. Nothing new; nothing better.

BumbleBeeBoogie

Those who favor expanding the Constitution like to pretend ascertaining original intent is an arcane, black art. It is not. As I have stated ad nauseum in these discussions, the authors of the Constitution wrote in detail to tell us what they intended. Anyone who pretends they meant something different is either ignorant or willfully perverting the Constitution for their own purposes.

Indeed you have, Scrat. Yet we still get it wrong. How upsetting this must be for you...

So I am to assume one can believe that the Supreme Court wasn't the ideal of the founding fathers to ultimately interpret the words of the Constitution? There are, after all, no absolutes in semantics -- one can explain and explain what they believe the forefathers meant and still come out either right or wrong in someone's eyes. Then it becomes only opinion. That's what judges write -- opinion. If it sticks, the forefathers can roll over and over in their graves, groaning that their words have been distorted. I rather think from reading the Federalist Papers that they meant to Constitution to be a flexible document and their meaning would be fine tuned to keep up with the times.

I just found it in the Constitution the other night where it specifically says that the Supreme Court is too step into any close election and decide the Presidency in favor of the Federalist Party member. Yeah baby!!!

So by that logic then:

"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

might become:

"...the right of the people to bare arms, shall not be infringed. So long as you wear sunscreen."

Here's the latest from California. The polls now show that over 60 percent wants to recall Davis. Another change is that Ahnold is now ahead of Bustamante in the polls. Nine more days till election day.

If I were a Dixie Chick, I'd be in Canada right now announcing to an audience that I am embarrassed to be from the same state as Arnold.

Only in California would you find people thinking that the best way to solve the worst fiscal crisis in state history is to elect the Terminator.

Butryflynet:


I am very much afraid that we are going to have to go along with the will of the people.

If, as the most recent polls show, the people of California reject Davis and elect Schwarzenegger, it will show that the "elite" pundits--the "wine and cheese" crowd who are oh so finely tuned and superby educated will just have to go along with the will of the "masses"

How Revolting!!!!
.

This is the land of opportunity and opportunists. I think if Ahnold wins he has the right to prove he can do to California what he did to Planet Hollywood.

oh, oh.......

Arnold's Bad Business; campaign the new Planet Hollywood?
Arnold's Bad Business
Is his campaign the new Planet Hollywood?
By Daniel Gross
Posted Monday, August 11, 2003, at 3:26 PM PT

Care for some fries with that candidacy?

The most celebrated business venture of Arnold Schwarzenegger's career was his involvement in Planet Hollywood. Planet Hollywood, you may have forgotten, was the gaudiest avatar of the '90s idiotic theme-restaurant trend, which also spawned the Rainforest Café, the Official All-Star Café, and, most absurdly, the Fashion Café. ("What's on the menu," David Letterman asked. "A stick of gum?") Founded in 1991 by producer Keith Barish (The Fugitive, Sophie's Choice, The Running Man) and restaurant impresario Robert Earl (Hard Rock Café), the profitable Planet Hollywood chain had 34 units when it went splashily public in 1996.

It turns out there's a lot of similarity between the business plan of Planet Hollywood and the business plan of Arnold's gubernatorial campaign.

1. Allow celebrities to cash in on the sweat and equity of unglamorous moneymen. Planet Hollywood's capital was provided by Barish and Earl, and by the not-so-fabulous Singapore billionaire Ong Beng Seng. Schwarzenegger and fellow A-listers like Sylvester Stallone were regarded as "founding celebrities," but the only equity they provided was their Actors' Equity card. They made noisy public appearances on Planet Hollywood's behalf. In exchange, options representing 20 percent of the company's stock were set aside for "celebrity investors."

A similar dynamic has defined the recall campaign. Republican car-alarm magnate Rep. Darrell Issa, a backbencher from an unglamorous patch of Southern California, took on virtually all the risk. Issa put up the venture capital money to bankroll the recall and endured immense flak during the pre-campaign road show. Arnold did nothing to put the recall on the ballot. But once the election was set, Arnold hurled his helmet into the ring, Issa disappeared into a supporting role, and Arnold hogged all the glory.

2. Rely on cheap celebrity-fueled free media instead of expensive advertising. Name recognition is the great desideratum of a nascent restaurant chain (or political candidate). After all, you're entering a field in which fierce incumbents have already invested hundreds of millions of dollars to entrench market position and build brands. But Planet Hollywood didn't have to embark upon an expensive TV advertising campaign to do battle with Chili's and T.G.I. Fridays. As the prospectus noted, Planet Hollywood could rely upon "the active involvement of some of the world's most famous movie stars, including Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis, Demi Moore and Whoopi Goldberg, all of whom are stockholders." (Schwarzenegger was always first among equals on Planet Hollywood's A-list.) By attending openings and other events, these celebrities would generate "significant media attention and publicity for the Planet Hollywood brand." In 1995 the company spent less than 5 percent of revenues on advertising and marketing?-a low sum for an expanding startup.

Just so, Schwarzenegger's candidacy so far has been an orgy of free media. Unlike recall rival Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante, Schwarzenegger won't have to spend heavily on 30-second spots. Campaign Arnold has been the subject of coverage in outlets ranging from the Wall Street Journal to Access Hollywood, which lavished the same attention on his gubernatorial announcement as it did on T3's launch.

3. Create synergies by cross-promoting the venture with Arnold's latest big-budget movie. In its prospectus, Planet Hollywood proudly noted that because of its celebrity alliances, "the motion picture community frequently uses the units as sites for well-publicized movie promotions and other celebrity-sponsored events." This helped bring even more attention to the restaurants. Schwarzenegger's campaign is coinciding with the wide release of T3. He seamlessly rode the promotional wave: One day he was chatting up co-star Kristanna Loken's assets, the next he was discussing California's deficit. Schwarzenegger even managed to plug the film in his announcement speech.

4. Attract customers with a broad menu of blandly appealing fare. Planet Hollywood, in the great American tradition, offered food that appealed a little to every taste and offended no one: burgers and fries, salads, fajitas, and pizza?-all mediocre. Schwarzenegger's political platform, which is long on platitudes but short on specifics, tries to do the same. It's got items for the left (he's pro-gay rights), for moms (he successfully lobbied for expanded after-school programs), for populists (he rails against "special interests"), and for small-government types (he won't raise taxes).

Republicans must hope Schwarzenegger's campaign is more durable than Planet Hollywood. The company raised $196 million in its IPO and plowed the proceeds into expansion. But its celebrity cachet dissipated once outlets opened in London's Gatwick Airport and Edmonton, Alberta. In October 1999 the chain, which peaked at 95 restaurants, filed for Chapter 11. Schwarzenegger severed his ties with the company in 2000. Planet Hollywood exited bankruptcy in 2000 but then earned membership in the Chapter 22 club by going bust again.

So far, the recall campaign has been very much like a meal at Planet Hollywood. There's plenty of ruckus and shouting and fake smiles. A lot of celebrities are hanging around?-for no apparent reason. The fare is insipid. And when the experience is over and the bill comes, nausea may follow.

The food wasn't just mediocre at Planet Hollywood, it was grossly overpriced and the service was terrible.

The rise of a new idiom: "We've been Schwarzeneggered" No wonder I feel so bad, thought it was a Mac truck.

When Schwartzenegger wins the governorship in California and the Texa Legislature completes its re-districting, then the posters like Professor Hobitbob and Blatham will realize that all of the puffery and rhetoric in the world will do nothing to stop the destruction of the Anti-American left wing.