1
   

Democrat / Clinton fundraising scandals continue

 
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 09:16 pm
parados wrote:
okie wrote:
The FBI files do explain alot of things.

Is that your reason for the lies?



What ****ing lies?? When a politician is widely known to be a psychopathic serial rapist, a traitor, and a lunatic ready at the drop of the hat to start illegal military conflicts for the express purpose of taking bad news about himself off of American newspapers, why would anybody expend the energy to LIE about him??

What kinds of lies would top that sort of reality?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 09:19 pm
There are lots of Koolaid drinkers, gunga. And Parados is chug-a-lugging it.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 09:40 pm
okie wrote:
There are lots of Koolaid drinkers, gunga. And Parados is chug-a-lugging it.


Of course okie. That's why I can post links to official documents from Congress and the courts and you can only post your lies without any support other than RW sites. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 12:47 am
Official documents and the court say O.J. is innocent too. Are you going to run him for president next? Maybe you are the first one in line to buy his book?

Notice to voters out there, according to Parados, you cannot suspect anyone of any wrongdoing and vote against them unless they are convicted in a court of law, and further, you are automatically labeled a liar by Parados. Keep chug-a-lugging, Parados, theres more Koolaid to drink, as your beloved heros, Hillary and Bill, are mixing huge batches for you.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 01:43 am
Maybe somebody needs to lay the thing out for the benefit of those like Parados who have simply somnambulatd their way through the last 14 years. SlicKKK KKKlintler is a psyshopath and a serial rapist and Hillary KKKlintler is a psychopath and serial rapist enabler. The evidence indicates that Hillary understood very early on that in SlicKKK she had a guy who was massively photogenic, a brilliant speaker with a photographic memory, and clearly presidential material IF she could keep some sort of a lid down on the problems and, thus, there have been lid committies in place from day one, mostly Terry Lensner and several other California PI groups, and the only person who's been there long enough to be the main lid-committee boss, has been Hill.

Hillary KKKlintler represents the gangster wing of the dem party and, as of right now, that wing is running the show.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 04:30 am
Why is it all these crimes that the Clintons are suspected of committing haven't been prosecuted in the past eight years? Is the Bush Justice Department complicit in these matters? Does Janet Reno, now being considered for jury duty in Florida, still hold sway over the FBI?

Wowser. For fourteen years, according to gunga, somehow no one has been able to break through the "lid committees". They have better secrecy than the mafia and apparently no one is feeding any information to anyone at Fox News either. Golly Ned.

Luckily for us, it's only a gangster wing of the Party. Surely someone from the non-gangster wing will press for the facts.

Oh wait. That's right. We don't want facts. We want to spread rumors and lies.

Note to Okie: No one has said you can't suspect someone of some wrongdoing and vote against them because of that suspicion. It's a stupid reason for voting, but hey, whatever works for you. What Parados was asking you for was a reality check. "Where's the beef?" If you can't come up with some reasonable, verifiable facts about a suspicion you hold, sooner or late, people will begin to believe that it is you who a problem grasping reality. Or worse, they will think you know what you are saying is bunk and you are saying it anyway. That would be lying.

Joe(Get a grip)Nation
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 08:05 am
okie wrote:
Official documents and the court say O.J. is innocent too. Are you going to run him for president next? Maybe you are the first one in line to buy his book?

Notice to voters out there, according to Parados, you cannot suspect anyone of any wrongdoing and vote against them unless they are convicted in a court of law, and further, you are automatically labeled a liar by Parados. Keep chug-a-lugging, Parados, theres more Koolaid to drink, as your beloved heros, Hillary and Bill, are mixing huge batches for you.

LOL.. I see you are resorting to logical fallacies since you can't provide any evidence to support your allegations about the CLintons.

Kool-aid drinkers are ones that believe in things without facts. So.. where are your facts about about the CLinton's crimes? Let's stick to just the facts here okie and see who is the one that is delusional. I haven't seen anything from you other than WorldNetDaily. I disputed that with the Cox report and congressional investigation.

So, do you have something of substance or just little packets you are trying to sell hoping people will provide their own sugar and water.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 02:20 pm
Discussion of the KKKlintler body count:

http://chat.anncoulter.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=49589


'He was five and she was six, they rode on horses made of sticks,
she wore black and he wore white and
she would allways win the fight


bang bang, she shot him down
bang bang, he hit the ground
bang bang, that awful sound,
bang bang, Vince Foster hit the ground....
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 02:31 pm
were you folks aware that okie and gungasnake are lovers who felch each other regularly and also prey on young boys sexually?

What's that? I'm a slanderer and a liar? Prove it isn't true.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 08:27 pm
Running totals on Hsu and friends contributions: Quite an active guy!

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pI5QkfhRBwUgAiaAQVTXffw

Now, Mr. Hsu is in the hospital for something, in Colorado? On Amtrak? Where was he going? Have they found any polonium yet?

Another question, why would they be having a bail reduction hearing for a guy that has been on the lam for 15 years? Could the judge have been a Democrat?

Interesting comment by Ed Rendell:
"Though Norman is my friend, and remains so, his failure to appear casts a new light on his assertions regarding the original case," Rendell said in a statement. It seems stormin Norman was perhaps a well known figure among some Democrats? How friendly was Hillary? I noticed she was wishing him well. Hmmmm, what does that mean? Norman I would watch your step.

What we don't know yet, is what was old Norman getting or going to get out of all this money he was throwing around?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Sep, 2007 08:24 pm
This reads better than most novels:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/09/us/politics/09hsu.html?pagewanted=2&n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/People/H/Hsu,%20Norman&_r=1

"Since Mr. Hsu's fall from grace, efforts to learn more about the nature of his business and the source of his wealth have led mostly to dead ends.

On campaign finance disclosure forms, he listed his employer as one of a half-dozen companies, some of them with names that seemed to change with each retelling. On some forms, the company was Components Limited or Next Components or Next Consultants. Other times it was Next Limited or Consultants Limited. And his title was different from one form to the next, sometimes appearing as president or managing director, other times as consultant, supplier or partner.

The Manhattan office addresses he listed appeared to be little more than mail drops, and his neighbors in the buildings said he rarely showed up and seemed to conduct no business there."
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Sep, 2007 01:27 am
Here's something for all of our in-denial demokkkrat friends to think about when they consider the wisdom of having a shithead likc SlicKKK KKKlintler in a position to be selling H-bomb secrets to the chicoms for DNC cash...

Assuming some sort of an H-bomb war were to actually get started, what would be the most likely cause of it? The answer is computer malfunction. It almost happened two or three times during the cold war. Cases included building the DEW line during the months when the moon is not seen over Canada, and a contractor handing NORAD a warfighting system set in game mode.

Bad enough that the US and Russia have these kinds of weapons, at least we have the fifty year history of using computers to go with it. China was just starting to use computers at all when chinagate was going on. Moreover, China's entire culture is based on picture writing, making EVERYTHING they ever do with computers several times more difficult.

For every possibility of a computer snafu starting a world war with the US or Russia, there has to be some multiple of that number for Russia.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Sep, 2007 07:42 am
gungasnake wrote:
Here's something for all of our in-denial demokkkrat friends to think about when they consider the wisdom of having a shithead likc SlicKKK KKKlintler in a position to be selling H-bomb secrets to the chicoms for DNC cash...
Clinton never sold any parts or technology for H-bombs to China. You can provide no evidence to support this ridiculous claim.
Quote:

Assuming some sort of an H-bomb war were to actually get started, what would be the most likely cause of it? The answer is computer malfunction. It almost happened two or three times during the cold war. Cases included building the DEW line during the months when the moon is not seen over Canada, and a contractor handing NORAD a warfighting system set in game mode.
That would seem to be in support of what Clinton DID sell to China. Clinton sold computers to China that were better than what was allowed at the time by giving a presidential waiver. The RW concern was that the Chinese might actually use those computers in their nuclear program. Now it seems you are afraid they didn't use them.

By the way, since Clinton sold those computers I have one on my desk that is more powerful than what he sold them.
Clinton signed a waiver for a 31,000 mtops (million theoretical operations) computer. Today a 2.66mhz 2 processor duo core mac pro goes for about $2000 and does about 82,000 mtops. Apple sells a 2 processor quad core at 3.00mhz that does close to 200,000 mtops.
Quote:

Bad enough that the US and Russia have these kinds of weapons, at least we have the fifty year history of using computers to go with it. China was just starting to use computers at all when chinagate was going on. Moreover, China's entire culture is based on picture writing, making EVERYTHING they ever do with computers several times more difficult.
Ignorance at its finest there Gunga.
Quote:

For every possibility of a computer snafu starting a world war with the US or Russia, there has to be some multiple of that number for Russia.
Hmm.... That makes as much sense as the rest of your blubbering.

They whine about Clinton but ignore things like this..

Quote:
From the January 03, 2002 issue of CRN
President Bush on Wednesday said the federal government would allow U.S. technology firms to sell high-speed computers to Russia, China, India and countries in the Middle East, easing a Cold War-era ban designed to halt the spread of nuclear arms.
...


The Bush Administration more than doubled the processor speed limit, from 85,000 Millions of Theoretical Operations Per Second, or MTOPS, to 195,000 MTOPS.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Sep, 2007 06:53 pm
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,296361,00.html

A cool 850 grand, and Hillary didn't have a clue who this guy was? Hahahaha. She does "wish him well," however.

And this time it isn't going to charity I guess. It goes back to the donors. Maybe she knows they need hush money and a way to pay their attorneys?
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Sep, 2007 07:17 pm
parados wrote:
gungasnake wrote:
Here's something for all of our in-denial demokkkrat friends to think about when they consider the wisdom of having a shithead likc SlicKKK KKKlintler in a position to be selling H-bomb secrets to the chicoms for DNC cash...
Clinton never sold any parts or technology for H-bombs to China. You can provide no evidence to support this ridiculous claim.


http://s168232716.onlinehome.us/inprogress/images/stories/press_downloads/kool_aid_man_waving.jpg


Aside from kool aid, that big old river in Egypt is still there as well:

http://www.uwrf.edu/ugandatour/pictures/nile_river.jpg

De-Nile....

http://www.alamo-girl.com/0022.htm

Quote:

Drudge Report 12/11/99 Matt Drudge "…. A day after indicting Los Alamos scientist Weh Ho Lee, senior government officials tell the NEW YORK TIMES on Sunday that Lee "jeopardized virtually every nuclear warhead in the American arsenal through unauthorized computer transfers of many of the country's most sensitive nuclear secrets." TIMES hotshot James Risen reports that much of the data is still missing -- vital information that Lee put on 10 portable computer disks from 1993 to 1997. Only 3 of these disks have so far been recovered! …..On the disks, Risen writes, "were thousands of pages of nuclear-related documents." In 1997 Lee placed on one disk the "'complete source code for the current version' of the government's most advanced primary weapon design, which is an atomic bomb that acts as the trigger to explode a hydrogen bomb." ….."



I mean, I hadn't looked at this one for a while; most of what I see now indicates that demoKKKrats aren't even trying to deny this stuff any more, rather they're trying to shove it back in time into the Reagan/Bush years, i.e. into a time frame during which libs controlled 100% of the media in the US and the chances of a pubby admin getting away with such a thing would have been zero.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Sep, 2007 09:08 pm
I always wonder what rock you live under Gunga

It is sometimes helpful to know when stories have been retracted as being wrong.

You might want to google "Wen Ho Lee" and "exonerated".
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 08:44 am
Very few things worse than living under rocks, kool-aid overconsumption is one of them.

Like I say, even the real lefties are not denying the sale of H-bomb technology to the chicoms but are rather trying to move it far enough back in time to get Ollie north and George HW Bush involved.

The deals with Loral and China acquiring the ability to target American cities with missiles is pure KKKlintonism and the whole world knows it.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 08:48 am
gunga when Hillary is elected president...... PLEASE let me be there when you kill yourself. These days I take my pleasures where I can :wink:
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 08:34 pm
Americans Coming Together makes Tom DeLay look like a walk in the park. But of course how much do we hear about this scam? Not much from the mainstream media.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MmI4OWY1YjZmNzg1Y2ZiZGMxNjk5MGUxMWE2ODI1MTc=

What good are campaign laws if they aren't enforced during the elections? Do Democrats care about this corruption? Obviously not. Does the press care about it much? No. Evidently this scam was running full tilt during the Kerry campaign.

And what about Abdul Jinnah, another fugitive fundraiser that fled the country?

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/a-paki-hillary-fundraiser-disappeared-last-march
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 09:17 pm
Here are the largest fines by the FEC. Both sides are guilty
http://www.fec.gov/press/bkgnd/history.shtml

Swift boat vets for truth have one of the top 15 largest fines.

Number 1 Freddie Mac (The FEC conciliation agreements for the case place the number of Freddie Mac fundraisers for Republican candidates at 70 or more, and the number of fundraisers for Democratic candidates at no more than 15.)
Number 2 largest fine for Audiovox (gave to Ted Stevens, Jerry Nadler, and Olympia Snowe amongst others)
Number 3 is Americans Coming Together - Liberal 527 - fined $775,000


Number 4 and right behind is Progress for America which heavily funded George W Bush. - fined $750,000
The scam was running during George Bush's 2000 campaign and you just don't care do you okie?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 06:15:20