0
   

SHOULD SEN. LARRY CRAIG RESIGN?

 
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 10:52 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
If leftist Representative Barney Frank (homosexual Democrat of Massachusetts)
is arrested, in exactly the same circumstances,
I expect that Advocate and other leftists on this forum
will come to his DEFENSE, because of Barney' s liberal hostility against personal freedom
in matters of economic or political significance.


David


Great thought process there, Om. Nothing like this could happen to Frank since he is out.

THAT controls his activities in public bathrooms ?

David


Hey genius, gay men who are OUT do not have sex in airport bathrooms, get it?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 01:16 am
Roxxxanne wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
If leftist Representative Barney Frank (homosexual Democrat of Massachusetts)
is arrested, in exactly the same circumstances,
I expect that Advocate and other leftists on this forum
will come to his DEFENSE, because of Barney' s liberal hostility against personal freedom
in matters of economic or political significance.


David


Great thought process there, Om. Nothing like this could happen to Frank since he is out.

THAT controls his activities in public bathrooms ?

David


Hey genius, gay men who are OUT do not have sex in airport bathrooms, get it?

I get that ( in all probability )
thay do what their lust impels them to do,
when & where it impels them to do it,
tho I will defer to your expertise to the contrary.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 07:30 am
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
If leftist Representative Barney Frank (homosexual Democrat of Massachusetts)
is arrested, in exactly the same circumstances,
I expect that Advocate and other leftists on this forum
will come to his DEFENSE, because of Barney' s liberal hostility against personal freedom
in matters of economic or political significance.


David


Great thought process there, Om. Nothing like this could happen to Frank since he is out.

THAT controls his activities in public bathrooms ?

David


Hey genius, gay men who are OUT do not have sex in airport bathrooms, get it?

I get that ( in all probability )
thay do what their lust impels them to do,
when & where it impels them to do it,
tho I will defer to your expertise to the contrary.[/quote

Well I certainly am an expert when it comes to men's lust, straight men, of course. They seem to be able to control themselves, at least to a degree, and follow social conventions. Most of my male friends are gay and none of them would ever think about cruising in an airport bathroom. There is no reason to. This is the type of behavior that REPRESSED homosexuals engage in and YOU should be an expert on that.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 02:26 pm
Straight men do not lust after shmans.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 06:22 pm
What are shmans?

And why are YOU trying to speak for straight men??? Let them speak for themselves.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 06:54 pm
It's a tough question. An heroic flag-loving commie-fighter who digs anal with strange guys in public restrooms and lies about it and who everyone knows now is a hypocrite. What are the options? Resignation, carry on and embarrass the hell out of his party, or director of the FBI seem about it.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 07:39 pm
Anal? I always assumed that it was oral that guys engaged in although not having access to mens rooms I wouldn't know. Maybe we need an expert opinion.

Shiksa?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 07:44 pm
blatham wrote:
It's a tough question. An heroic flag-loving commie-fighter who digs anal with strange guys in public restrooms and lies about it and who everyone knows now is a hypocrite. What are the options? Resignation, carry on and embarrass the hell out of his party,
or director of the FBI seem about it.

U r very good at defaming the dead; u shud be proud of it.

Does the color of your coat indicate the color of your ideology ?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 09:31 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
blatham wrote:
It's a tough question. An heroic flag-loving commie-fighter who digs anal with strange guys in public restrooms and lies about it and who everyone knows now is a hypocrite. What are the options? Resignation, carry on and embarrass the hell out of his party,
or director of the FBI seem about it.

U r very good at defaming the dead; u shud be proud of it.

Does the color of your coat indicate the color of your ideology ?


That the fellow is dead somehow matters? And if it does, it would follow then that we shan't hear any criticism from you as regards the deceased Mssrs. Hitler, Stalin, Sadaam and Nero. Have I got you right here?

Hoover may have worn dresses and he may have worshipped Satan. He may have been secretly working for Moscow. None of those things would have made him a more ugly human or a more ugly american than what he did get up to. You really ought to reformulate your criteria for hero-worship.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 09:49 pm
blatham wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
blatham wrote:
It's a tough question. An heroic flag-loving commie-fighter who digs anal with strange guys in public restrooms and lies about it and who everyone knows now is a hypocrite. What are the options? Resignation, carry on and embarrass the hell out of his party,
or director of the FBI seem about it.

U r very good at defaming the dead; u shud be proud of it.

Does the color of your coat indicate the color of your ideology ?


Quote:
That the fellow is dead somehow matters?

The point is that u r kicking a corpse that can 't fight back;
requires exceptional courage.



Quote:
And if it does, it would follow then that we shan't hear any criticism from you
as regards the deceased Mssrs. Hitler, Stalin, Sadaam and Nero.
Have I got you right here?

That 's a good point; I like that, and I accept your argument.
I don 't believe that 's happened b4.





Quote:
Hoover may have worn dresses and he may have worshipped Satan.

That is slander on the basis of 3rd hand hearsay;
from the widow of someone who claimed to have heard that
from someone else before the alleged witness died.
U only accept it 's alleged truth because of who the target was.





Quote:
He may have been secretly working for Moscow.
None of those things would have made him a more ugly human
or a more ugly american than what he did get up to.

I 'm an uglier human than he ever thought of being.
The fact of your enmity is an excellent recommendation in his favor.


Quote:
You really ought to reformulate your criteria for hero-worship.

More GRATITUDE and admiration for his accomplishments
against the national socialists and the international socialists.
No worship, but now that u mention it:
yeah, he was a good hero.
David
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 11:20 pm
If you feel you ought not to speak negatively about the deceased, by all means proceed through your life in that manner. I think the notion rather idiotic (you know, as all history books or any discussion of historical figures would have the depth and value of a Hallmark card) so I won't proceed in that manner.

As to whether it is courageous or not, I'm quite as happy saying very bad things about your president who, as you probably know, is yet alive. Stupid, criminal, incompetent, but alive.

Lovely chatting with you, omsig.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Dec, 2007 01:33 am
blatham wrote:


Quote:
If you feel you ought not to speak negatively about the deceased,
by all means proceed through your life in that manner.
I think the notion rather idiotic (you know, as all history books
or any discussion of historical figures would have the depth
and value of a Hallmark card) so I won't proceed in that manner.

R u stupid or blind ?
I conceded that point to u already.



Quote:

As to whether it is courageous or not, I'm quite as happy saying very bad things
about your president who, as you probably know, is yet alive.

As if I CARE.



Quote:
Stupid, criminal, incompetent, but alive.

What criminal statute did he violate ??

I will also concede the point of his stupidity and incompetence.
I voted for him 2ice, and strongly supported going to war
to finish the job his dad shud have completed in the last century.
Inasmuch as that job was successfully accomplished when we captured Saddam,
I have withdrawn my support of this gigantic foreign aid project
of W 's in Iraq.
Foreign aid is unconstitutional.



Quote:

Lovely chatting with you, omsig.

Yeah; I am wonderful; ugly, but wonderful.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Dec, 2007 07:18 am
Glad to hear you have withdrawn your support for the war america launched against Iraq though you are four or five years behind those of us who don't eat Frosted Flags for breakfast.

And to help along your quest to become sane, launching a war that kills and maims hundred of thousands of men, women and children and which destroys the civil and physical infrastructure of that country and which was launched to ensure the attacker's access to resources in that attacked country and which enriches america's military/industrial complex would be an example of "foreign aid" only in the mind of someone who is in some serious need of help in any quest for sanity.

But out of sensitivity, I will not bring up the matter of Davy Crockett's preference for sex with young boys.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Dec, 2007 09:54 am
Blatham had sex with Davy Crockett?
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Dec, 2007 05:56 pm
Quote:
which was launched to ensure the attacker's access to resources in that attacked country


Then why havent we gotten of those resources?
Why arent we getting the oil?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Dec, 2007 06:09 pm
blatham wrote:
Glad to hear you have withdrawn your support for the war america launched against Iraq though you are four or five years behind those of us who don't eat Frosted Flags for breakfast.

And to help along your quest to become sane, launching a war that kills and maims hundred of thousands of men, women and children and which destroys the civil and physical infrastructure of that country and which was launched to ensure the attacker's access to resources in that attacked country and which enriches america's military/industrial complex would be an example of "foreign aid" only in the mind of someone who is in some serious need of help in any quest for sanity.

But out of sensitivity, I will not bring up the matter of Davy Crockett's preference for sex with young boys.

Just to be clear,
I strongly supported and I approve of taking out Saddam,
but NOTHING BEYOND THAT.
We shud have simply left Iraq in shambles and come home.

W is wasting our soldiers' lives and our treasure
in trying to make Iraq a nice, sweet place,
for W 's place in the history books.
That is UNCONSTITUTIONAL foreign aid.
When we got Saddam we shuda left,
like his dad left when we got Manuel Noriega in Panama.
W shuda followed his example.

David
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Dec, 2007 06:44 pm
Most Americans want our troops home, but Bush is determined to keep them there no matter what Amerians want. Bush thinks he's a king, and not the president of a democracy.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Dec, 2007 09:24 pm
W is not the President of a democracy.

America has never been a democracy.

However, W 's idiotic policy of KEEPING troops there
after we already took out Saddam,
which is the reason we went there,
threatens to throw the next election to the Democrats
and subvert American freedom into socialist authoritarianism.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Dec, 2007 09:34 pm
mysteryman wrote:
Quote:
which was launched to ensure the attacker's access to resources in that attacked country


Then why havent we gotten of those resources?
Why arent we getting the oil?


"CLIENT STATE UPDATE....Iraq czar Douglas Lute says the United States has begun talking to Iraq about "a set of principles from which to begin formal negotiations" about our long-term presence in Iraq:

    Two senior Iraqi officials said Iraqi authorities had discussed the broad outlines of the proposal with U.S. military and diplomatic representatives. The Americans appeared generally favorable subject to negotiations on the details, which include preferential treatment for American investments, according to the Iraqi officials involved in the discussions. ....Preferential treatment for U.S. investors could provide a huge windfall if Iraq can achieve enough stability to exploit its vast oil resources. Such a deal would also enable the United States to maintain leverage against Iranian expansion at a time of growing fears about Tehran's nuclear aspirations. ....The Iraqi officials said that under the proposed formula, Iraq would get full responsibility for internal security and U.S. troops would relocate to bases outside the cities. Iraqi officials foresee a long-term presence of about 50,000 U.S. troops, down from the current figure of more than 160,000.
We appeared to be "generally favorable" to these terms, eh? Knock me over with a bowling ball."

--> Source
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Dec, 2007 09:43 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
W is not the President of a democracy.

America has never been a democracy.

However, W 's idiotic policy of KEEPING troops there
after we already took out Saddam,
which is the reason we went there,
threatens to throw the next election to the Democrats
and subvert American freedom into socialist authoritarianism.


I guess Israel is and the US isn't.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 11/05/2024 at 09:40:06