0
   

The Police Murdered Him

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 08:06 am
They were tasered by CPD as well? Shocked
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 08:07 am
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. When in need, call the police and then accept the consequences of that call. Otherwise...don't call the cops...call "Dust-Busters". Cool
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 08:40 am
I'm sure charges will more than likely be filed against the officers who tasered Gefery, leading to his death. When the mother and sister say one thing and the cops say another...why should the family just let it drop? Because they made the call and some expect them to just live with the consequences? The police are calling them liars. Why should they just let that go?
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 08:42 am
Lawyers who defend cops in Court make the big bucks. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 11:35 am
I don't think they should let it go, but I'm not sure what charges would be filed. Maybe we're talking semantics here, but they will need to convince someone that the officers broke a law in order to have charges filed against them. They're certainly able to file a civil suit against the officers and perhaps the city, but what criminal charges do you see being filed? I'm not saying there weren't any laws broken by the cops, but I don't know what they would be.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 11:46 am
Okay. A civil suit against the officers involved and against the city. Sorry I'm not up on the terminology. That's what the Rev. Jesse is for. Smile
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 11:49 am
Agreed. I just wish he'd spend more time assisting and less time posing.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 11:49 am
JPB wrote:
Agreed. I just wish he'd spend more time assisting and less time posing.


Who says he doesn't?
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 11:53 am
Miller and cj..... you are being rude, here. This isn't just some bit of news. This is something personal for eoe.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 12:32 pm
Miller wrote:
Neither you, nor I know the mental or the physical capabilites of the man being arrested. Likewise neither your nor I know anything about this person's physical or mental health

You havent read any of eoe's posts then, I guess.

Eoe, what a horrible story, if not, unfortunately, a very surprising one. Feeling for everyone involved.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 01:24 pm
little k, don't fret. Every A2K character is in place and exactly where you would expect them to be. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 02:26 pm
Eoe--

You're a wise woman.
0 Replies
 
massmutual
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 02:59 pm
eoe wrote:
little k, don't fret. Every A2K character is in place and exactly where you would expect them to be. Rolling Eyes


long as it's only ONE of each character that's no prob but sometimes 'round here we gotta dial GHOSTBUSTERS, if you get my drift

sorry about your friends eoe
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 09:06 pm
Thanks massmutual. And welcome.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 09:29 pm
Miller wrote:
edgarblythe wrote:
There are some (some) cops who get off to tasering people. They always managed before the taser, why not now?


In criminal law, we always managed without DNA analysis, why NOW?


That's too stupid to reply to.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:17 am
edgarblythe wrote:
Miller wrote:
edgarblythe wrote:
There are some (some) cops who get off to tasering people. They always managed before the taser, why not now?


In criminal law, we always managed without DNA analysis, why NOW?


That's too stupid to reply to.


But you just did! Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:45 am
littlek wrote:
Miller and cj..... you are being rude, here. This isn't just some bit of news. This is something personal for eoe.


I'm more aware of that, than you could possibly be. Cool
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:47 am
Miller wrote:
littlek wrote:
Miller and cj..... you are being rude, here. This isn't just some bit of news. This is something personal for eoe.


I'm more aware of that, than you could possibly be. Cool


So act on your awareness, Kak.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:51 am
dlowan wrote:
Miller wrote:
littlek wrote:
Miller and cj..... you are being rude, here. This isn't just some bit of news. This is something personal for eoe.


I'm more aware of that, than you could possibly be. Cool


So act on your awareness, Kak.


I already have...
0 Replies
 
massmutual
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 10:22 am
dlowan wrote:
Miller wrote:
littlek wrote:
Miller and cj..... you are being rude, here. This isn't just some bit of news. This is something personal for eoe.


I'm more aware of that, than you could possibly be. Cool


So act on your awareness, Kak.


well countinh the fact she offered no part of her aleged "medical expertise" by way of "awareness" or maybe new laws on medical fraued, lol

Quote:
Nancy Achin Audesse, executive director of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine, said the case should be a wake-up call for medical regulators, noting that a failed background check today could do more than expose patients to an incompetent doctor.......
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 11/12/2024 at 06:30:56