0
   

Bush Supporters' Aftermath Thread V

 
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 03:37 pm
McTag wrote:
Not only is Grenada your ally, it's also part of the British Commonwealth.

But that fact didn't bother Mr Reagan's planners much.....


At the time we invaded,there were Cuban troops on the island.
THere were American students at risk.

There is no way you can deny either of those facts,so dont even try.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 03:44 pm
Americans go to Grenada to study?

With Cubans there though, they would have no problem seeing a good doctor.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 04:02 pm
I know that you Conservatives don't want to listen to me, so - listen to Podhoretz, writing at The Corner:

Quote:
The Bad-Daddy Party [John Podhoretz]

Kurt Andersen is onto something very interesting in New York magazine this week, if you overlook the standard-issue right-wing bashing and anti-Bush throat-clearing:

Quote:


He's absolutely right, except - the problem isn't with people's perceptions, or branding, but the fact that this is what the republican party is about - posturing, talking big and tough, blundering around like fools and not taking care of responsibilities.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 04:14 pm
McTag wrote:
Americans go to Grenada to study?

With Cubans there though, they would have no problem seeing a good doctor.


There were no Cuban doctors on the island at the time,they were mostly combat engineers.

St Georges Medical School is on Grenada.
There were about 200 US students there at the time of the invasion.
But you already knew that,didnt you.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 04:52 pm
not that facts are important here but, there were somewhat near 600 US students and there were not combat engineers but rather military engineers and the thatcher gov't strongly supported the building of the aeroport and Margaret Thatcher strongly condemned Reagan for the invasion
Quote:
This action will be seen as intervention by a Western country in the internal affairs of a small independent nation, however unattractive its regime. I ask you to consider this in the context of our wider East-West relations and of the fact that we will be having in the next few days to present to our Parliament and people the siting of Cruise missiles in this country...I cannot conceal that I am deeply disturbed by your latest communication.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 05:23 pm
dyslexia wrote:
not that facts are important here but, there were somewhat near 600 US students and there were not combat engineers but rather military engineers and the thatcher gov't strongly supported the building of the aeroport and Margaret Thatcher strongly condemned Reagan for the invasion
Quote:
This action will be seen as intervention by a Western country in the internal affairs of a small independent nation, however unattractive its regime. I ask you to consider this in the context of our wider East-West relations and of the fact that we will be having in the next few days to present to our Parliament and people the siting of Cruise missiles in this country...I cannot conceal that I am deeply disturbed by your latest communication.


Considering the 8th grade education you are so proud of, I'd say your facts are in doubt.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 05:25 pm
"facts in doubt" doesn't mean a hill of beans unless you can provide evidence to the contrary.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 05:27 pm
Quote:
This action will be seen as intervention by a Western country in the internal affairs of a small independent nation, however unattractive its regime. I ask you to consider this in the context of our wider East-West relations and of the fact that we will be having in the next few days to present to our Parliament and people the siting of Cruise missiles in this country...I cannot conceal that I am deeply disturbed by your latest communication.


Thatcher, Margaret (1993) The Downing Street Years page 331.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 05:27 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
"facts in doubt" doesn't mean a hill of beans unless you can provide evidence to the contrary.


That's not how it works here C.I. Someone post something as factual, they then backup their facts with some sort of link or evidence. Your side is very big on this idea.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 05:35 pm
McG, How do you like your egg on your face? LOL
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 05:43 pm
Though I don't agree with his position, McG is correct - when an affirmative argument is placed (X is true or X is false) then the person who is advancing that argument should be willing to supply evidence in order to support it.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 05:45 pm
oe did just that. Isn't a little late good enough?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 05:51 pm
If you look at the timestamp, they posted simultaneously. I doubt McG actually saw OE's post before requesting more information...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 08:47 pm
Cyclo, All McG needed to do was cut and paste the quote into a search engine to get the answer. If that's asking too much before one is attacked, I guess I'm still on dys' side - with his 8th grade education..
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 11:39 pm
The Cubans of course are the Devil incarnate and any place where they happen to be, even by invitation of a peaceful ally, should be invaded.

Makes as much sense as recent events anyhoo.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 01:14 am
Are there any Bush supporters left in the USA now?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 09:58 am
Yes, 35 percent and climbing as he prepares his war with Iran.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 10:12 am
George Bush the Texan is 'scared of horses'
By Alex Spillius in Washington
link

President Bush may like to be seen as a swaggering tough guy with a penchant for manly outdoor pursuits, but in a new book one of his closest allies has said he is afraid of horses.


George W Bush saddles up,
but where is the horse?


Vicente Fox, the former president of Mexico, derided his political friend as a "windshield cowboy" - a cowboy who prefers to drive - and "the cockiest guy I have ever met in my life".

He recalled a meeting in Mexico shortly after both men had been elected when Mr Fox offered Mr Bush a ride on a "big palomino" horse.

Mr Fox, who left office in December, recalled Mr Bush "backing away" from the animal.

''A horse lover can always tell when others don't share our passion," he said, according to the Washington Post.

Mr Bush has spoken of his fondness for shooting doves and cutting brush on his Crawford ranch in Texas, which he bought in 1999.

The property reportedly has no horses and only five cattle.

advertisement

Mr Fox is the latest old friend to turn on Mr Bush as the US president faces a lonely final 18 months in office, derided for failures in Iraq and at home.

Donald Rumsfeld, his defence secretary until last November, asked recently if he missed the president, said flatly: "No."

Alan Greenspan, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve, has attacked the Bush administration's economic policy at length in a new autobiography, accusing the Republican president of poor fiscal discipline and betraying the party's basic principles of low spending.

Asked for his reaction to criticism from former aides, the president replied: "My feelings are not hurt."
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 11:30 am
Actually, Bush is all hat and no cattle. Five is hardly anything to brag about. The poorest in Africa may have five.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Sep, 2007 01:43 pm
Look! Bush approves a tax increase.


Administration urges Social Security fix

By MARTIN CRUTSINGER, AP Economics Writer 2 hours, 36 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration said Monday the only way to permanently fix Social Security is through some combination of benefit cuts and tax increases.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/10/2025 at 03:00:14