0
   

Bush Supporters' Aftermath Thread V

 
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 11:27 am
okie wrote:
Implied as such, by Kerry, Murtha, and Durbin, to name some.


So they didn't actually say it?
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 11:30 am
okie wrote:
Implied as such, by Kerry, Murtha, and Durbin, to name some.


So they didn't actually say it?
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 11:32 am
okie wrote:
Implied as such, by Kerry, Murtha, and Durbin, to name some.


You mean they didn't actually say it?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 11:35 am
The criminals are those who would send them to an illegal war, cut their veteran's benefits and services, and have the gall to tell us we must support our troops.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 11:35 am
Ha.

I think I made my point.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 11:43 am
old europe wrote:
Ha.

I think I made my point.
One gets no points by challenging okie; it can easily be done just by breathing.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 11:47 am
dyslexia wrote:
old europe wrote:
Ha.

I think I made my point.
One gets no points by challenging okie; it can easily be done just by breathing.



ROFL
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 11:48 am
Somebody's having way too much fun here...
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 11:55 am
I'm not.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 12:01 pm
old europe wrote:
okie wrote:
Implied as such, by Kerry, Murtha, and Durbin, to name some.


So they didn't actually say it?


Actually, John Murtha did.
After the incident in Haditha, Murtha DID call the marines "war criminals".
After many of them were cleared, he refused to retract his statemen or apologize for it.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 12:13 pm
mysteryman wrote:
old europe wrote:
okie wrote:
Implied as such, by Kerry, Murtha, and Durbin, to name some.


So they didn't actually say it?


Actually, John Murtha did.
After the incident in Haditha, Murtha DID call the marines "war criminals".
After many of them were cleared, he refused to retract his statemen or apologize for it.



I think he said that the troops involved in the Haditha massacre "killed innocent civilians in cold blood."


Then again, okie said that "Democrats [are] calling [all soldiers] war criminals".

That's about as valid as saying that all airport toilets are full of Republicans trying to have gay sex.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 12:19 pm
Lots on haditha at wikipedia and elsewhere.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 12:32 pm
When you don't live in the 'reality-based community' the number of things you can say expand by leaps and bounds...
Quote:
In public, President Bush has been careful to reassure Israel and other allies that he still sees Iran as a threat, while not disavowing his administration's recent National Intelligence Estimate. That NIE, made public Dec. 3, embarrassed the administration by concluding that Tehran had halted its weapons program in 2003, which seemed to undermine years of bellicose rhetoric from Bush and other senior officials about Iran's nuclear ambitions. But in private conversations with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert last week, the president all but disowned the document, said a senior administration official who accompanied Bush on his six-nation trip to the Mideast. "He told the Israelis that he can't control what the intelligence community says, but that [the NIE's] conclusions don't reflect his own views" about Iran's nuclear-weapons program, said the official, who would discuss intelligence matters only on the condition of anonymity.
from Newsweek, noted here http://talkingpointsmemo.com/
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 12:46 pm
George W Bush's "intelligence" is implied.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 01:01 pm
old europe wrote:
That's about as valid as saying that all airport toilets are full of Republicans trying to have gay sex.


Or saying all Democrats are spineless, terrorist appeasers.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 01:09 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
old europe wrote:
That's about as valid as saying that all airport toilets are full of Republicans trying to have gay sex.


Or saying all Democrats are spineless, terrorist appeasers.



That caught your attention, didn't it?
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 01:11 pm
mysteryman wrote:
old europe wrote:
okie wrote:
Implied as such, by Kerry, Murtha, and Durbin, to name some.


So they didn't actually say it?


Actually, John Murtha did.
After the incident in Haditha, Murtha DID call the marines "war criminals".


mmm, nope
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 01:31 pm
ehBeth wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
old europe wrote:
okie wrote:
Implied as such, by Kerry, Murtha, and Durbin, to name some.


So they didn't actually say it?


Actually, John Murtha did.
After the incident in Haditha, Murtha DID call the marines "war criminals".


mmm, nope
This is where we get into the "wilful stupidity" element so common with both MM and Okie.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 01:33 pm
I don't usually 'read' MM that way.

<shrug>
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Jan, 2008 01:43 pm
ehBeth wrote:
I don't usually 'read' MM that way.

<shrug>
I almost always do, so it goes.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 09:43:49