Bush Supporters' Aftermath Thread V

Less of the "straw man" jibes, Tico, the logic is fairly straightforward even for a corkscrew like you.
Rather than address the issues straightforwardly, you would prefer to throw "limp-wristed weenies" epithets about.
Am I surprised?

Ticomaya wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

What does 'limp-wristed' mean, specifically?

I've seen you use the term before, and I'd like clarification.

Cycloptichorn

Are you serious?

Yes, I'm serious. Please give a detailed explanation.

Cycloptichorn

Since you use this term so often, Tico, what is an "ultra-liberal view of the world" in this context?

A viiw, the European liberals have? (Which would be a bit confusing, since they have both extreme right and left wing world views.)

A social-democratic view? (Like in what country would be the question.) [Though I could imagine that of the Labour's Fabian Society would be called 'liberal' in the USA.]

A socialistic like by Labour in England? (Which is very close to the US view.)

Or ...?

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Ticomaya wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

What does 'limp-wristed' mean, specifically?

I've seen you use the term before, and I'd like clarification.

Cycloptichorn

Are you serious?

Yes, I'm serious. Please give a detailed explanation.

Cycloptichorn

In this context is means virtually the same thing as "Euroweenie" -- so I apologize for the redundancy. Look it up on urbandictionary.com, if you're still confused.

Although living in San Fran, I would have thought you very familiar with some of this terminology.

limp wrist:

(1)a male with femine qualites and a sexual desire to be with other men; gay; homosexual; fag; fruit cake; fudgepacker
(2)refers to when a gay male's wrist falls limp and forms a 90 degree angle with a verticle forearm, often times an involuntary movement occuring while in conversation.

Well, why don't you just write 'faggot,' if that's what you mean?

You think that people who disagree with you online are some derogatory version of gays? That being anti-war makes you gay? Is that what you're saying? I just want you to be clear here - have the courage of your convictions to say what you really mean.

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Well, why don't you just write 'faggot,' if that's what you mean?

Well for one thing, that's not a term I use.

Cyclops wrote:

You think that people who disagree with you online are some derogatory version of gays? That being anti-war makes you gay? Is that what you're saying? I just want you to be clear here - have the courage of your convictions to say what you really mean.

Cycloptichorn

I didn't call anybody anything, but you seem a little hyper-sensitive about something.

Why exactly did you move to San Francisco, Cyclops?

----

No, I have used that term very little on A2K, and I'm relatively sure every time has been in the context of discussing the war on terror, and the lack of spine shown by most leftists on the issue. I wanted you to look up the term "Euroweenie" on urbandictionary.com. So, no, I didn't mean homosexual, I mean lack of backbone ... spineless ... wussies. Here's the urbandictionary.com definition of "Euroweenie," the one Walter was referring to:

[color=blue][b][i]euroweenie[/i] [/b] A European, or American who wishes he/she were European, with an ultra-liberal view of the world, who believes that the United States should roll over like a bunch of pussies and become testicle-less Socialist wimps like they are. [i]John Kerry is a Euroweenie.[/i][/color]

Thanks for asking.

In this context is means virtually the same thing as "Euroweenie"

Why exactly did you move to San Francisco, Cyclops?

Ticomaya wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Well, why don't you just write 'faggot,' if that's what you mean?

Well for one thing, that's not a term I use.

Cyclops wrote:

You think that people who disagree with you online are some derogatory version of gays? That being anti-war makes you gay? Is that what you're saying? I just want you to be clear here - have the courage of your convictions to say what you really mean.

Cycloptichorn

I didn't call anybody anything, but you seem a little hyper-sensitive about something.

Why exactly did you move to San Francisco, Cyclops?

----

No, I have used that term very little on A2K, and I'm relatively sure every time has been in the context of discussing the war on terror, and the lack of spine shown by most leftists on the issue. I wanted you to look up the term "Euroweenie" on urbandictionary.com. So, no, I didn't mean homosexual, I mean lack of backbone ... spineless ... wussies. Here's the urbandictionary.com definition of "Euroweenie," the one Walter was referring to:

[color=blue][b][i]euroweenie[/i] [/b] A European, or American who wishes he/she were European, with an ultra-liberal view of the world, who believes that the United States should roll over like a bunch of pussies and become testicle-less Socialist wimps like they are. [i]John Kerry is a Euroweenie.[/i][/color]

Thanks for asking.

Well, according to you,

Quote:

In this context is means virtually the same thing as "Euroweenie"

You're a f*cking bigot, Tico. Kind of misogynist as well. And you know you are, so why deny it?

You equate 'not being militaristic' with being a faggot or a 'pussy.' That's your worldview; that one is either willing to use force against people who they don't like, or they are a faggot.

Amazing to me how empty your rhetoric turns out to be under examination. Just another right-wing blowhard bigot. I'm quite sure in real life, if you tried to say the sorts of things you are comfortable saying when hidden behind a keyboard, you'd be looking for your f*cking teeth on the ground. If you could look for anything. That's why the internet is the perfect vehicle for a$$holes such as yourself; it allows for consequence-free insulting of those who, deep down, are better and stronger then you are.

You ask,

Quote:

Why exactly did you move to San Francisco, Cyclops?

B/c my girlfriend was accepted to graduate school here. Why does that matter to our current conversation, at all, bigot?

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Ticomaya wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Well, why don't you just write 'faggot,' if that's what you mean?

Well for one thing, that's not a term I use.

Cyclops wrote:

You think that people who disagree with you online are some derogatory version of gays? That being anti-war makes you gay? Is that what you're saying? I just want you to be clear here - have the courage of your convictions to say what you really mean.

Cycloptichorn

I didn't call anybody anything, but you seem a little hyper-sensitive about something.

Why exactly did you move to San Francisco, Cyclops?

----

No, I have used that term very little on A2K, and I'm relatively sure every time has been in the context of discussing the war on terror, and the lack of spine shown by most leftists on the issue. I wanted you to look up the term "Euroweenie" on urbandictionary.com. So, no, I didn't mean homosexual, I mean lack of backbone ... spineless ... wussies. Here's the urbandictionary.com definition of "Euroweenie," the one Walter was referring to:

[color=blue][b][i]euroweenie[/i] [/b] A European, or American who wishes he/she were European, with an ultra-liberal view of the world, who believes that the United States should roll over like a bunch of pussies and become testicle-less Socialist wimps like they are. [i]John Kerry is a Euroweenie.[/i][/color]

Thanks for asking.

Well, according to you,

Quote:

In this context is means virtually the same thing as "Euroweenie"

You're a f*cking bigot, Tico. Kind of misogynist as well. And you know you are, so why deny it?

You equate 'not being militaristic' with being a faggot or a 'pussy.' That's your worldview; that one is either willing to use force against people who they don't like, or they are a faggot.

Amazing to me how empty your rhetoric turns out to be under examination. Just another right-wing blowhard bigot. I'm quite sure in real life, if you tried to say the sorts of things you are comfortable saying when hidden behind a keyboard, you'd be looking for your f*cking teeth on the ground. If you could look for anything. That's why the internet is the perfect vehicle for a$$holes such as yourself; it allows for consequence-free insulting of those who, deep down, are better and stronger then you are.

You ask,

Quote:

Why exactly did you move to San Francisco, Cyclops?

B/c my girlfriend was accepted to graduate school here. Why does that matter to our current conversation, at all, bigot?

Cycloptichorn

Well, seeing as you neither know me nor anything about me, I'll just have to chalk this up as a case of flyover-state jerkiness. Yeah. That would be my guess.

Trust me, Cyclops, if I said what I want to say to you, in real life, and you tried to take any kind of physical action against me, it would be your teeth splattered all over the ground.

Do the two of you realize how silly you both sound?

You sound like a couple of 4 year olds.

I suppose what really gets me is that, like most right-wing males, your concept of Strength and your concept of Sexuality are entwined. You believe that insulting someone's sexuality is the equivalent of insulting their strength. But, the concept itself ridiculous to anyone who has an emotional progression which has gone beyond high school.

Your definition of 'euroweenie' involves the word/s 'testicle-less.' Do you think women are wimps and weaklings? They don't have testicles. Why would you include that phrase, unless that's what you happened to think?

Do you think that eunnuchs are wimps and wussies? People who have had testicular cancer - are they wimps? Or, is this another way to use the word 'fag' without writing something that will get you booted from A2K?

Your conflation of the two concepts is hardly original - many of your ideological brethren engage in this same revealing behavior. I've seen it from you before, 'specially in regards to Roxxane - I understand that there are valid reasons why you don't get along with her, but that has nothing to do with why you harass her; the reason you harass her is because she doesn't match up with your definition of acceptable sexuality and you enjoy gay-bashing. You enjoy it. You ought to just admit it.

Cycloptichorn

You know, I don't really give a crap about what "gets you." Yes, I think you, and all the other wimpy leftists who are weak on terrorism are lacking testicles. Now, when I say that, I'm not insulting your sexuality, I'm insulting your strength. You have it reversed. I don't think you are actually and physically without balls --- DO YOU GET THAT?

Nah, I don't trust you on this one. In fact, I'm pretty sure that you couldn't do sh*t even if you wanted to. You'd be weak and ineffective. Dare I say, you'd be shown to be a pussy. Right-wing bigots like you always are in the end.

I know enough about you through your rhetoric. I really could care less about the size of your muscles - you are weak inside your head. And you can tell, b/c of what you write.

You didn't answer: why does it matter that I moved to San Fran?

Cycloptichorn

Quote:

You know, I don't really give a crap about what "gets you." Yes, I think you, and all the other wimpy leftists who are weak on terrorism are lacking testicles. Now, when I say that, I'm not insulting your sexuality, I'm insulting your strength. You have it reversed. I don't think you are actually and physically without balls --- DO YOU GET THAT?

Of course I get that - if you can't rise above the level of idiocy, why even type, Tico?

Why would you think that 'not having any balls' is an indicator of 'not having strength?' That those who don't have them, = weakness? What makes that equivalence in your mind, that testicles = strength? It's quite obvious that you believe this, or else the insult is meaningless and you wouldn't use it. I'd like you to explain that, but you won't, b/c we both know just how badly it would sound when you tried, bigot.

I find it hilarious, that you on one hand like to make insults which revolve around misogyny and homophobia, but when people call you on your behavior, you get all huffy and offended. Calling attention to your dissonance really puts you off of your game, bigot.

Every now and then you write something interesting, but why do you have to go and f*ck it up by letting your actual personality show through?

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Nah, I don't trust you on this one. In fact, I'm pretty sure that you couldn't do sh*t even if you wanted to. You'd be weak and ineffective. Dare I say, you'd be shown to be a pussy. Right-wing bigots like you always are in the end.

I know enough about you through your rhetoric. I really could care less about the size of your muscles - you are weak inside your head. And you can tell, b/c of what you write.

You didn't answer: why does it matter that I moved to San Fran?

Cycloptichorn

You know, you've demonstrated this talking tough over the keyboard plenty of times to me. You've said many a time now how you think I'm a pussy, and I wouldn't do **** if I was to meet you face to face. And what have I said in response? Very little. That's the interesting thing about this. IRL, I could toss you around and pound you into the ground, but I don't know if I've ever once bragged about that. You are the one who continually says crap about how you think I'd be "week" or a "pussy" if we were to meet ... or that you think I'm a short, little fat man. You've said this crap several times now, and I've smiled, because I know what I know.

And I'll tell you this much ... I would love for us to meet face to face so we could find out.

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Quote:

You know, I don't really give a crap about what "gets you." Yes, I think you, and all the other wimpy leftists who are weak on terrorism are lacking testicles. Now, when I say that, I'm not insulting your sexuality, I'm insulting your strength. You have it reversed. I don't think you are actually and physically without balls --- DO YOU GET THAT?

Of course I get that - if you can't rise above the level of idiocy, why even type, Tico?

Why would you think that 'not having any balls' is an indicator of 'not having strength?' That those who don't have them, = weakness? What makes that equivalence in your mind, that testicles = strength? It's quite obvious that you believe this, or else the insult is meaningless and you wouldn't use it. I'd like you to explain that, but you won't, b/c we both know just how badly it would sound when you tried, bigot.

I find it hilarious, that you on one hand like to make insults which revolve around misogyny and homophobia, but when people call you on your behavior, you get all huffy and offended. Calling attention to your dissonance really puts you off of your game, bigot.

Every now and then you write something interesting, but why do you have to go and f*ck it up by letting your actual personality show through?

Cycloptichorn

Only a fool like you would try and claim I'm trying to insult the eunuchs of the world. How many times are you going to try and claim I'm "insinuating an insult"? In addition to growing a set, you need to grow some skin.

I'm willing to bet you were picked on as a child, right? You were bullied on the school playground. It's plain to see you had a sheltered life. Maybe you can ask someone else to explain about testosterone to you, and maybe you then would understand what I'm getting at.

Ticomaya wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Nah, I don't trust you on this one. In fact, I'm pretty sure that you couldn't do sh*t even if you wanted to. You'd be weak and ineffective. Dare I say, you'd be shown to be a pussy. Right-wing bigots like you always are in the end.

I know enough about you through your rhetoric. I really could care less about the size of your muscles - you are weak inside your head. And you can tell, b/c of what you write.

You didn't answer: why does it matter that I moved to San Fran?

Cycloptichorn

You know, you've demonstrated this talking tough over the keyboard plenty of times to me. You've said many a time now how you think I'm a pussy, and I wouldn't do **** if I was to meet you face to face. And what have I said in response? Very little. That's the interesting thing about this. IRL, I could toss you around and pound you into the ground, but I don't know if I've ever once bragged about that. You are the one who continually says crap about how you think I'd be "week" or a "pussy" if we were to meet ... or that you think I'm a short, little fat man. You've said this crap several times now, and I've smiled, because I know what I know.

And I'll tell you this much ... I would love for us to meet face to face so we could find out.

Mmm hmm. I'm sure you would. This is the best internet tough-guy line of them all. The call out which you know won't come to fruition. It's like the perfect finale.