0
   

Bush Supporters' Aftermath Thread V

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 05:30 pm
What for? Can't do anything about Bush; he's got 13 more months to screw everybody.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 05:42 pm
That's the nature of bushes c.i.

When are you going to elect a prick?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 06:12 pm
Haven's decided who that will be until we find out more about each candidate. There are a few I like now, but we still have a whole year before election time.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 06:16 pm
Vacillation and procrastination. Be the death of us I fear.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 06:53 pm
spendi, I will not waste ny vote on a loser. Principles don't mean much in this environment.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 03:30 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
spendi, I will not waste ny vote on a loser. Principles don't mean much in this environment.


Thats where you are wrong.
Principles do mean something, they always will.
Its better to stand on your principles and lose then to compromise them and win.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 08:50 am
mysteryman wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
spendi, I will not waste ny vote on a loser. Principles don't mean much in this environment.


Thats where you are wrong.
Principles do mean something, they always will.
Its better to stand on your principles and lose then to compromise them and win.


Did you vote for Bush in 2000? If you did; what could you have possibly have known about Bush other than he was republican, was the son of George Bush senior, and was not a lefty liberal like Gore?

If we are honest we will admit that most people vote for someone based more on not wanting the other guy to win because we opposed to that candidates platform than what a particular candidate can do for our country. Rarely are we impressed with actual candidates which is why we (on both sides) harken back to previous presidents to use as comparisons. In the republican case it is Reagan; Reagan Reagan for reasons I can't fathom, in the democrat case it is Bill Clinton for his fiscal responsibilities and Kennedy for his visions (I guess). I have been reading (cant stand to watch) the republican debates and I have noticed that no one mentions Bush at all.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 09:06 am
tick bush tock aftermath tick bush tock aftermath tick bush tock aftermath

Quote:
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 09:31 am
more aftermath...

Quote:

http://www.crooksandliars.com/
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 09:38 am
Blatham, why don't you start the "Life Would Have Been Peachy Had Either Gore or Kerry Been Elected -- and Other Selected Leftist Fantasies" thread.


Seriously.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 09:46 am
Ticomaya wrote:
Blatham, why don't you start the "Life Would Have Been Peachy Had Either Gore or Kerry Been Elected -- and Other Selected Leftist Fantasies" thread.


Seriously.


That would be because I'm part of the reality-based community. If we discuss and illuminate the actual consequences (aftermath) of this administrations acts and policies, we are discussing and illuminating something that is real and factual. Not to mention precisely matching the heading of this thread.

It you care to speak about fantasy, then by all means write up whatever fictional accounts you might imagine had a previous election gone differently or had different principals or policies been in place.

Now, it might well be the case that you yourself would prefer that discussion does not reflect upon real states of affairs and real consequences of this administration but your preference here wouldn't be a responsible one in terms of your citizenship as an American or in terms of your citizenship in the world.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 09:51 am
amen
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 10:23 am
blatham wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Blatham, why don't you start the "Life Would Have Been Peachy Had Either Gore or Kerry Been Elected -- and Other Selected Leftist Fantasies" thread.


Seriously.


That would be because I'm part of the reality-based community. If we discuss and illuminate the actual consequences (aftermath) of this administrations acts and policies, we are discussing and illuminating something that is real and factual. Not to mention precisely matching the heading of this thread.

It you care to speak about fantasy, then by all means write up whatever fictional accounts you might imagine had a previous election gone differently or had different principals or policies been in place.

Now, it might well be the case that you yourself would prefer that discussion does not reflect upon real states of affairs and real consequences of this administration but your preference here wouldn't be a responsible one in terms of your citizenship as an American or in terms of your citizenship in the world.


For some reason, the reality-based community I live in shows that both Gore and Kerry lost the general election and Bush won.

Shoulda...woulda...coulda is for losers. Therefore there is no sense in discussion "what if".

What If Kennedy didn't cheat in the 1960 election?

What If Andrew Jackson actually won the 1824 election?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 12:41 pm
Yeah, kind of my point.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 01:22 pm
blatham wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Blatham, why don't you start the "Life Would Have Been Peachy Had Either Gore or Kerry Been Elected -- and Other Selected Leftist Fantasies" thread.


Seriously.


That would be because I'm part of the reality-based community. If we discuss and illuminate the actual consequences (aftermath) of this administrations acts and policies, we are discussing and illuminating something that is real and factual. Not to mention precisely matching the heading of this thread.

...


Matching the heading of this thread has never been of interest to you, which is why I suggested you start one of your own. Call it "Blatham's Bitchings," if you want. You can be creative.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 01:41 pm
You might simply say, "Go away". It won't happen. If you folks choke on the truth of what Bush has wrought, then you'll choke on it. And you should.

You'll notice that in the last iteration of this thread I promised to leave and did. But of course, a Bush-style legalism would maintain that this is not the same thread. Thus my presence here is inspired by and a direct consequence of the administration you continue to support. Ironic, isn't it?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 02:09 pm
blatham wrote:
You might simply say, "Go away". It won't happen. If you folks choke on the truth of what Bush has wrought, then you'll choke on it. And you should.

You'll notice that in the last iteration of this thread I promised to leave and did. But of course, a Bush-style legalism would maintain that this is not the same thread. Thus my presence here is inspired by and a direct consequence of the administration you continue to support. Moronic, isn't it?


Fixed.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 02:17 pm
That was cute, McG. Got me smiling. However, I'm afraid the legal issues still pertain regardless of any re-labelling. You may contest that, of course, and you are free to do so. Please have your legal people forward their opinions to my legal people and we should be in a resolution hearing within a year and if that doesn't provide an agreement, then its on to the courts, it's the american way, and mandated resolution will be forthcoming after appeals. My grandkids will be in touch with your grandkids.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 02:23 pm
Ahh, the American Way ... cherished by a citizen of the world ... currently in Manhatten ... helping out.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 02:31 pm
Actually Portland now, but otherwise, precisely correct.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 01:45:30