1
   

NYC's Gay High School

 
 
Sugar
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 12:38 pm
This school is also undergoing a $3.2 million dollar restoration. That's a lot of money for the taxpayers to spend on a school for so few students.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 03:10 pm
Scrat wrote:
sozobe wrote:
The thing with the precedent is not that it exists or that it's silly, but that it wasn't the thin edge of the wedge. Arguments here seem to be saying something like, "Well one school is fine, but the problem is what this will start." I'm saying that there have been similar precedents (silly or not) that haven't started any kind of sweeping change.

But I am not aware of a single separate facility for black students having been setup on the premise that the students needed a safe haven in which to learn. One of which I am aware was setup for black boys only. The concept was that these children needed strong black male models that were lacking in most of their lives and the school was staffed to provide for this need. This had nothing to do with creating a safe place for them to go, nor has anyone argued that gay students have special educational needs. I see yours as an apples and oranges comparison. (Nicely made, of course, but apples and oranges just the same. Very Happy )


I brought up black schools in terms of segregation, and precedent. A lot of people seem to oppose the idea of segregation in and of itself, and worry about precedent. There are black charter schools which are "segregated" (I'll say over 80% black for the purpose of this discussion), have been for a long time, and haven't started some huge chain reaction of segregation, as far as I know. (If you know otherwise, I'm interested.) That seems to me to compare apples with apples.

Note, I am not saying here that black charter schools are a good thing or a bad thing. I am bringing them up purely in terms of the argument that one school of this type is fine, but it's the precedent that is a problem.

The apples-with-apples features of black charter schools/ Harvey Milk include arguments that integration is necessary so that the minority group and the majority group can understand each other, minority group members need to learn how to deal with majority group members, even if minority group members could learn more easily in that segregated environment they would eventually have to deal with "the real world", the minority group's message of wanting equal rights is belied by wanting their own separate school, etc., etc.

For example, which group does this quote refer to?

Quote:
The PACE investigation also reveals that [----- students] attending charter schools are more isolated than those attending regular public schools. In charter schools serving the largest number of ----- students, enrollments are 80 percent -----, on average...

"Some [---] educators are attracted to the charter school mechanism, aiming to reinforce their communities and identity," said study co-author, Marytza Gawlik, a doctoral student at UC Berkeley's Graduate School of Education.


In terms of gay students having special educational needs, I refer to what I posted a few pages back, from the National Mental Health Association:

Quote:
How is their education being affected?

Gay teens in U.S. schools are often subjected to such intense bullying that they're unable to receive an adequate education.5

They're often embarrassed or ashamed of being targeted and may not report the abuse. GLBT students are more apt to skip school due to the fear, threats, and property vandalism directed at them.6

One survey revealed that 22 percent of gay respondents had skipped school in the past month because they felt unsafe there.7

Twenty-eight percent of gay students will drop out of school. This is more than three times the national average for heterosexual students.8

GLBT youth feel they have nowhere to turn. According to several surveys, four out of five gay and lesbian students say they don't know one supportive adult at school.9
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 03:57 pm
Thomas
Quote:
Nope. For every single student who leaves, there is a probability of 1/30 that this will eliminate one class and free resources for educating 30 students. The cost saved on average is 30/30 times the cost of educating one student


With all due respect that is mental masturbation. To begin with the removal of one or two students from a class in a school will result in no saving what so ever. Class sizes in this city are variable a few more or less changes nothing. The costs for teachers and school services remains exactly the same. Setting up and maintaining a new school building has it's own set of overhead and administration costs and will also require additional staffing, teachers, administrator and etc. You can't take a piece of teacher from each school these children came from and materialize the pieces into whole teachers. Therefore all costs related to this new school will an additional burden on the education budget.
0 Replies
 
Scrat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 04:58 pm
Sozobe - What you've cited are not examples of special educational needs, they are examples of unsupportive or outright hostile environments. Schools that present such an environment should be changed, rather than removing students from same. No one advocates creating separate schools for black students on the basis that we can't make existing schools safe or supportive for them. That argument would (and should) be met with derision. I am inclined to think the same is true here.

Don't get me wrong--I have mixed feelings about this idea and am just playing devil's advocate here. In a broad sense I'm inclined to think more choice in education is a good thing, I just see it as a complicated issue and have expressed some of my thoughts on what I see as the complications.
0 Replies
 
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 05:06 pm
I don't see the issue here as being one of segregation at all.
I remember High School. It was hell.

Where I live there are two major school boards/unions and a few other smaller boards. Each Board gets tax dollars, which is then divided amongst schools based on student population - and program ect.
Students can choose an array of schools.
ie. deaf, blind, all girls, all boys
langauge immersion - french, mandarin, spanish, cree, ukrainian... religious/cultural - catholic, muslim, jewish, christian, native american...
non religious - public
sports - hockey, soccer,
performing arts, music, dance, fine art
trades and or computer
Most kids are bused but if you choose just a plain old education the neighbourhood school is still up the road but part of it, is most likely dedicated to a specialized program.
Schools get a basic ammount and must teach the basic curriculum in set hours. So all kids are ensured an equal education.

C.
0 Replies
 
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 05:09 pm
Oh yeah, anything extra is almost, always raised by parents doing bingos, casinos or any number of other fundraising schemes.

I'm begining to hate chocolate.
Thanks,
Ceili
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 05:27 pm
I read an article in one of my daughter's teen mags recently, featuring a couple of Milk students.

There are already govt funded schools for students with behavior problems, and I think Milk references these type of schools more closely than all-black or all-girl schools.

Many of Milk's students have been in fights, and misdirected anger to teachers--trying to cope with being singled out, harrassed and treated badly. The 'behavior schools' are a needed, valuable service for a segment of our children--and I think Milk specializes in this area.

You don't have to have a history of behavior problems to attend Milk, but most children who would choose Milk most likely do so (in the absence of behavior problems) because they haven't felt comfortable in the regular public school environment. I am grateful this school is a choice for students. We lose so many to suicide. Most, during their high school years.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 05:27 pm
"I'm begining to hate chocolate."

Hee hee! I know the feeling.

Scrat, of course schools should be improved, but how long will that take? I see nothing wrong with doing both -- improving schools that have problems while presenting a (very tiny) alternative until those schools are in fact "fixed".

Scrat wrote:
No one advocates creating separate schools for black students on the basis that we can't make existing schools safe or supportive for them. That argument would (and should) be met with derision. I am inclined to think the same is true here.


I don't think "no one" is accurate. It's a tough one to Google for -- not enough meaty keywords -- but I did find this:

Quote:


In the book, Diana Reay and Heidi Safia Mirza look at black supplementary schools, so-called "Saturday morning schools" where parents attempt to fill the gaps left by a system that they see as having abandoned their children.

"One of the things we really succeed in is giving the children a positive sense of self," one parent told the researchers.

Majors believes these schools offer a model for policy-makers. "In desperate circumstances you have to consider other solutions." He argues that schools led by black teachers and rooted in the community they serve are the answer. They certainly could not make the situation any worse.

"I would have no problem with race-specific agendas. Inclusion work is futile - we are already separated by race, by class. No matter how badly a child was doing in school, if he knew he was in a place where he was secure, where he was appreciated, where people treated him fairly, he would remain engaged."


http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,5500,597509,00.html

Again, the main point I am interested in refuting with the black charter school example is the idea that it's fine if it's just one school, but what kind of precedent does that set? I haven't said that I think this is a great idea, just that it doesn't bother me that much.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 05:29 pm
Hadn't seen your post, Sofia. Very good points.
0 Replies
 
Scrat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 05:47 pm
Sofia wrote:
I read an article in one of my daughter's teen mags recently, featuring a couple of Milk students.

There are already govt funded schools for students with behavior problems, and I think Milk references these type of schools more closely than all-black or all-girl schools.

Many of Milk's students have been in fights, and misdirected anger to teachers--trying to cope with being singled out, harrassed and treated badly. The 'behavior schools' are a needed, valuable service for a segment of our children--and I think Milk specializes in this area.

You don't have to have a history of behavior problems to attend Milk, but most children who would choose Milk most likely do so (in the absence of behavior problems) because they haven't felt comfortable in the regular public school environment. I am grateful this school is a choice for students. We lose so many to suicide. Most, during their high school years.

FYI - I read a very convincing article a few years back tracing the creation of the much-quoted factoid on the high rate of suicide among gay teens back to its origins and showing it to be false. The author pointed out that it was an example of how a useful falsehood in the information age can sometimes be impossible to root out once it takes hold. I do not have the article in question, nor do I know it to be true, but I continue to hear this factoid quoted and generally find those who quote it simply "heard" it from someone who "heard" it from someone, ad nauseum. I wonder whether anyone can cite a definitive source. (Perhaps it is fodder for another discussion.)
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 05:50 pm
Things got pretty interesting here. I hope I can catch up through all the posts!
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 05:57 pm
Here are some stats on suicide and sexual orientation:

Suicide attempts were reported by
28. 1 % of bisexual/homosexual males,
20.5% of bisexual/homosexual females,
14.5% of heterosexual females,
4.2% of heterosexual males.

For males, but not females, bisexual/homosexual orientation was associated with suicidal intent (odds ratio [OR] = 3.61 95% confidence interval [CI = 1.40, 9.36) and attempts (OR=7.10; 95% CI=3.05, 16.53).

CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence of a strong association between suicide risk and bisexuality or homosexuality in males.

From the National Library of Medicine:Study abstract
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 06:06 pm
The National Mental Health Association page I have referred to a couple of times now cites the following as their source ("Gay, lesbian, and bisexual youth are two to three times more likely to attempt suicide than their heterosexual counterparts.4 "):

Quote:
4Report from the Secretary's Task Force on Youth Suicide (Paul Gibson, US Department of Health and Human Services), 1989


I'm sure a more recent source could be found with a little Googling, but I'm Googled out for a while -- your turn. Wink
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 06:07 pm
Oh, littlek did it for ya.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 06:11 pm
{grin}
0 Replies
 
Scrat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 06:20 pm
littlek - Thanks for the citation. It may be right, but when I read it, I immediately came away thinking that it might simply be indicating a greater likelihood of reporting a suicide attempt among that group rather than a greater incidence of attempts. It seems to me that a good study would have eliminated this potential dual meaning of the data, so I tend to wonder at the methodology and question the quality of the study. But thanks for the citation.

I actually managed to find something along the lines of what I think I read way back, but find the source lacks credibility as they seem to have a clear anti-gay bias.

There seems to be far more information supporting the notion that this factoid is true than that it is not, so consider my "FYI" retracted. Cool
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 06:21 pm
littlek
And those statistic indicate what? That they must be kept separate from the general population? I doubt that. These people no doubt have many physiological problems that they have trouble dealing with.
Can you perhaps find the same statitics relative to adults. I wonder if they follow the same pattern.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 06:32 pm
Was that a typo, au? What kinds of physiological problems do you think that bi/gay youth have, that are different from the general population? I can understand the potential for transgender youth/adults to have different medical issues, but not bi/gay.
0 Replies
 
Scrat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 06:35 pm
au1929 wrote:
littlek
And those statistic indicate what? That they must be kept separate from the general population? I doubt that. These people no doubt have many physiological problems that they have trouble dealing with.
Can you perhaps find the same statitics relative to adults. I wonder if they follow the same pattern.

If it is true that their suicide rate is higher, is it automatically to be assumed that the cause is other people? Just throwing out an idea here, but I used to know and associate with a lot of gay men (oh! scandalous!) and one good friend told me once that he wished he weren't gay because he believed it to be a very unhappy way of life. Now, how much of that was due to external stresses (how others treated/viewed him) and how much was due to internal stresses (how he treated/viewed himself) I don't know, but I wonder whether he would have felt differently--and how much so--if he lived in a society that embraced same-gender relationships.

I guess what I'm getting at is that people seem to assume that society needs to change in order to lower this gay teen suicide rate, and I'm not altogether convinced that it isn't something within those gay teens that needs to change. (And I'm not simply suggesting they need to turn straight.)
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jul, 2003 06:36 pm
Students who describe themselves as gay, lesbian, or bisexual and/or who have had same sex sexual contact reported being significantly more likely than their peers to face threats, attempt suicide and abuse drugs and alcohol. When compared to peers, this group was:

four times more likely to have attempted suicide
five times more likely to miss school because of feeling unsafe
nearly five times more likely to have used cocaine

From the 1995 Massachusetts Youth Risk Behavior Survey relevant to GLB youth and suicide.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/19/2024 at 08:17:54