The only reason English wasn't determined to be an "official" language is because of oversight. It was a given and nobody thought to standardize it.
But to act like we don't have out own language issues is a bit disingenuous.
Before a Congressional committee the president of Reading Railroad once said: "These workers don't suffer, they don't even speak English." Discrimination against nonanglophones is well documented in our history and the criticism of the English Language Amendment is not based on recognition of english as our official language but rather rejecting the recognition of certain attitudes (xenophobia and plain language discrimination) that was perceived in it's supporters. I think they are spot on to be wary. IMO it has yet to be proposed except as a pretext.
Throughout our history the attempt to undermine new languages is prevalent:
Benjamin Franklin:
Quote:"Why should the Palatine Boors be suffered to swarm into our Settlements, and by herding together establish their Language and Manners to the exclusion of ours? Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion?" (The papers of Benjamin Franklin. Ed. Leonard W. Labaree. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1959. vol 4:234).
Our congress has rejected using german to publish legal notices (in addition to English). This is a quote so common to that situationthat when I looked it up I found that I'd gotten it right the first time.
Quote:"What! In the Cherokee? [and in] the Old Congo language!" (Congressional Globe 1844, 7)
More:
Quote:"English should and must be the only medium of instruction in public, private, denominational and other similar schools. Conversation in public places, on trains, and over the telephone should be in the English language. Let those who cannot speak or understand the English language conduct their religious worship in their home." (New York Times, 18 June 1918, p. 12).
We even had to declare such discrimination illegal: 262 U.S. 390, 273 U.S. 284
So while the French are indeed sensitive about their language I don't think this is something to be proud about.