FIRST A2K STRAW POLL White House 2008

Probably been mentioned before but Skerry is conspicuously absent from the list....

teenyboone

That migratory pattern may well explain why I've seen no crows here in Manhattan.

Came here about two years ago with a ladyfriend who was setting up a psychoanalytic practice here.

I just looked at the poll results gathered so far. Can it be possible that the vote is being stacked in his favor or can Obama be leading this poll by such a plurality?

Is ballot-box-stuffing possible here? If so, it sure would be disappointing if that's what his 2.5:1 ratio lead is about. I will state that I do feel it's possible, however, that he could capture many A2K-ers imagination and support. I wonder if that will translate to actual votes in a primary.

Ragman wrote:

I just looked at the poll results gathered so far. Can it be possible that the vote is being stacked in his favor or can Obama be leading this poll by such a plurality?

Is ballot-box-stuffing possible here? If so, it sure would be disappointing if that's what his 2.5:1 ratio lead is about. I will state that I do feel it's possible, however, that he could capture many A2K-ers imagination and support. I wonder if that will translate to actual votes in a primary.

You might be catching on that A2K is not representative of the general population. Thankfully!

The electorate is fickle. Obama just happens to be flavor of the week. As for the A2k they in no way reflect the general public. If they did the radical left would be in power which IMO is as dangerous as the conservative religiously oriented regime now in power.

I just looked at the poll results gathered so far. Can it be possible that the vote is being stacked in his favor or can Obama be leading this poll by such a plurality?

Is ballot-box-stuffing possible here? If so, it sure would be disappointing if that's what his 2.5:1 ratio lead is about.

Regarding the haircuts of Edwards, I remember the right nitpicking every Dem. It mentioned Clinton's haircut on the tarmac, Kerry's windsurfing while wearing spandex, Gore's earth-tone wardrobe, etc.

I guess the right can't let the electorate focus on the real issues, so the right has perfected nitpicking in the extreme. Too bad the media don't catch on to this.

Regarding the haircuts of Edwards, I remember the right nitpicking every Dem. It mentioned Clinton's haircut on the tarmac, Kerry's windsurfing while wearing spandex, Gore's earth-tone wardrobe, etc.

I guess the right can't let the electorate focus on the real issues, so the right has perfected nitpicking in the extreme. Too bad the media don't catch on to this.

The media pointed out things about Bush, not the left.

The media pointed out things about Bush, not the left.

Advocate wrote:

The media pointed out things about Bush, not the left.

Right! I see... Care to find that link to an authorative news source that that first referred to Bush as a chimp? Or any authorative news source that mentions Bush's beedy eyes?

You truely are delusional.

The brouhaha about Edwards' haircuts, Clinton's haircut on the tarmac, Kerry's windsurfing, and Gore's earth-tone wardrobe, came from the Republican campaign and prominent conservative media figures themselves.