1
   

Confidence in your beliefs.

 
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Aug, 2007 09:31 pm
neologist wrote:
"This is the acme of faith, to believe that God, Who saves so few and condemns so many, is merciful; that He is just Who has made us necessarily doomed to damnation, so that....He seems to delight in the tortures of the wretched, and to be more deserving of hatred than of love."

No wonder atheism is so appealing.


Ol' Martin Luther was rather perceptive. Thanks for that quote Neo.

neologist wrote:
God doesn't need anything. The sacrifice was for our benefit.


Please explain why this mythical god needed to sacrifice his son to himself in a such disgustingly horrific manner other than to give himself some sort of cosmic orgasm. The distorted logic required to rationalize such a proposition is beyond my comprehension. Piggybacking the Jesus story on top of the Hebrew war god mythology creates massive incongruities.

I suppose this question could just as well be answered in Diest TKO's John 3:16 topic which is deserving of another bump.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Aug, 2007 11:15 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
neo: God doesn't need anything. The sacrifice was for our benefit.


For "our" benefit? What ever happened to free will? I don't want that "sacrifice." That's really not a sacrifice anyways, because he just slept for a few days. Sacrifice is when it doesn't come back.
Are you saying you believe in free will?

Really?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Aug, 2007 11:28 pm
mesquite wrote:
neologist wrote:
"This is the acme of faith, to believe that God, Who saves so few and condemns so many, is merciful; that He is just Who has made us necessarily doomed to damnation, so that....He seems to delight in the tortures of the wretched, and to be more deserving of hatred than of love."

No wonder atheism is so appealing.


Ol' Martin Luther was rather perceptive. Thanks for that quote Neo.
Martin was a great spokesman for athiesm. IMHO.
mesquite wrote:


neologist wrote:
God doesn't need anything. The sacrifice was for our benefit.


Please explain why this mythical god needed to sacrifice his son to himself in a such disgustingly horrific manner other than to give himself some sort of cosmic orgasm. The distorted logic required to rationalize such a proposition is beyond my comprehension. Piggybacking the Jesus story on top of the Hebrew war god mythology creates massive incongruities.
Once again; God doesn't NEED anything. In the most simple explanation, Jesus substituted for Adam so that Adam's descendants could eventually inherit the promise made to Adam in Genesis 1:28.
mesquite wrote:
I suppose this question could just as well be answered in Diest TKO's John 3:16 topic which is deserving of another bump.
I wouldn't take anything from my participation in this thread which started here
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Aug, 2007 12:02 am

Yeah, I responded to that here, but you bailed
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Aug, 2007 12:32 am
Sorry I missed your post. I don't make a habit of turning on email updates. You were/are wrong, of course.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Aug, 2007 12:41 am
Nope, I nailed it.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Aug, 2007 07:36 am
neologist wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
neo: God doesn't need anything. The sacrifice was for our benefit.


For "our" benefit? What ever happened to free will? I don't want that "sacrifice." That's really not a sacrifice anyways, because he just slept for a few days. Sacrifice is when it doesn't come back.
Are you saying you believe in free will?

Really?


That's what bible-thumpers continue to tell us; that god gave us free will - to be good or sin.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Aug, 2007 07:57 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
neologist wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
neo: God doesn't need anything. The sacrifice was for our benefit.


For "our" benefit? What ever happened to free will? I don't want that "sacrifice." That's really not a sacrifice anyways, because he just slept for a few days. Sacrifice is when it doesn't come back.
Are you saying you believe in free will?

Really?


That's what bible-thumpers continue to tell us; that god gave us free will - to be good or sin.
Actually, many believers spout theories of necessary foreknowledge, predestination and reprobation. All of these are contrary to the idea of total free will.

If the bible is correct, and I understand that, to you, is a big if:
Then God does not peer into the moral outcome of each individual. It's just as you would not read the last page of the whodunit. (You don't, do you? Well, you don't HAVE to.)

So, do you believe in your moral free will?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Aug, 2007 08:10 am
mesquite wrote:
Nope, I nailed it.
Might as well re run your well written, but sophomoric rant:
mesquite wrote:
neologist wrote:
For what it's worth, the bible's point of view:

Of course, it wasn't God who came to earth to provide what could only be termed a meaningless gesture, it was Jesus, a separate individual, God's firstborn, who was present for all of creation.


It seem odd that if Jesus was around from the beginning that all we heard about for the first several thousand years was about the vengeful, wrathful, jealous god that went around smiting and wiping out cities, nations, and even the whole world one time.

Nary a peep do we hear form Jesus until he is sent down to earth, and what a trip that was. God being the master doer of dirty deeds poofs pregnant a young and betrothed virgin. Joe of course buys the story without a blink. Sure, I guess we are to believe Joe never read or heard about Leviticus.

30 or so odd years later, Jesus begins to talk, but he doesn't sound a bit like Dad. Nope he says forget that eye for an eye stuff, turn the other cheek, do unto others, and all that other wonderful stuff in the beatitudes.

This doesn't last for long. The priests are getting torqued and arrange to have Jesus executed in a particularly horrific and gruesome manner.

We are told that this was all Gods plan and Jesus was aware of it except for that short little lapse when he spoke, " My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?".

But It was indeed God's plan, a plan to save us from God's terrible sin activated temper, a temper that we were previously doomed to receive since we are all born with sin as a result of God's sting operation on Eve in the Garden of Eden. But I digress. Back to the plan, the wonderful plan.

All that you need to do to save yourself from God's wrath and an eternity of torment is to believe that God completely satisfied his jollies by sacrificing his son to himself. If you can swallow that one, you are home free.

For me that is way way too much to swallow.
I took the liberty of highlighting the essence of your error in bold red. It is the error of many believers as well. It is the quintessential error of convenience:

"If there is a God, then he doesn't give a rat's behind about us, so we might as well do as we please. And if there is a hell, we can curse him from there."
0 Replies
 
Coolwhip
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Aug, 2007 08:13 am
neologist wrote:
So, do you believe in your moral free will?


I believe nobody is capable of basing their every action on morality. Weather I choose to eat a banana or an apple is completely detached from morality, and those kinds of choices are the ones we make most of in out everyday life.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Aug, 2007 08:18 am
Coolwhip wrote:
neologist wrote:
So, do you believe in your moral free will?


I believe nobody is capable of basing their every action on morality. Weather I choose to eat a banana or an apple is completely detached from morality, and those kinds of choices are the ones we make most of in out everyday life.
I wasn't referring to dietary choices or to the many physical limitations we might have on our free will.

The real question we might face regarding free will applies to our moral choices. IMHO
0 Replies
 
Coolwhip
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Aug, 2007 08:49 am
neologist wrote:
Coolwhip wrote:
neologist wrote:
So, do you believe in your moral free will?


I believe nobody is capable of basing their every action on morality. Weather I choose to eat a banana or an apple is completely detached from morality, and those kinds of choices are the ones we make most of in out everyday life.
I wasn't referring to dietary choices or to the many physical limitations we might have on our free will.

The real question we might face regarding free will applies to our moral choices. IMHO


But wouldn't you agree that we are shaped by our experiences? That out moral is somehow a product of all out thought and feelings? Would you then agree that all the small things that seem random in that moment actually are crucial to the things we experience, thus shaping our moral?

It may not be free will in the traditional sense but it's pretty damn close.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Aug, 2007 11:49 pm
neologist wrote:
mesquite wrote:
Nope, I nailed it.
Might as well re run your well written, but sophomoric rant:
.
Sophomoric yes. It is unavoidable when the subject matter deals with magical trees, talking snakes, and ghosts impregnating virgins. Rant no. This is a rant.
neologist wrote:
mesquite wrote:
neologist wrote:
For what it's worth, the bible's point of view:

Of course, it wasn't God who came to earth to provide what could only be termed a meaningless gesture, it was Jesus, a separate individual, God's firstborn, who was present for all of creation.


It seem odd that if Jesus was around from the beginning that all we heard about for the first several thousand years was about the vengeful, wrathful, jealous god that went around smiting and wiping out cities, nations, and even the whole world one time.

Nary a peep do we hear form Jesus until he is sent down to earth, and what a trip that was. God being the master doer of dirty deeds poofs pregnant a young and betrothed virgin. Joe of course buys the story without a blink. Sure, I guess we are to believe Joe never read or heard about Leviticus.

30 or so odd years later, Jesus begins to talk, but he doesn't sound a bit like Dad. Nope he says forget that eye for an eye stuff, turn the other cheek, do unto others, and all that other wonderful stuff in the beatitudes.

This doesn't last for long. The priests are getting torqued and arrange to have Jesus executed in a particularly horrific and gruesome manner.

We are told that this was all Gods plan and Jesus was aware of it except for that short little lapse when he spoke, " My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?".

But It was indeed God's plan, a plan to save us from God's terrible sin activated temper, a temper that we were previously doomed to receive since we are all born with sin as a result of God's sting operation on Eve in the Garden of Eden. But I digress. Back to the plan, the wonderful plan.

All that you need to do to save yourself from God's wrath and an eternity of torment is to believe that God completely satisfied his jollies by sacrificing his son to himself. If you can swallow that one, you are home free.

For me that is way way too much to swallow.
I took the liberty of highlighting the essence of your error in bold red. It is the error of many believers as well. It is the quintessential error of convenience:

"If there is a God, then he doesn't give a rat's behind about us, so we might as well do as we please. And if there is a hell, we can curse him from there."

According to the Genesis story Adam and Eve were destined to fall. There was no way around it. You can pretend to ignore it and invent terms like the Edenic Rebellion to camouflage it but that does not change the story told in Genesis. Your exegesis of the Eden story has been put to rest numerous times, most recently beginning here.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Aug, 2007 12:05 am
neologist wrote:
Coolwhip wrote:
neologist wrote:
So, do you believe in your moral free will?


I believe nobody is capable of basing their every action on morality. Weather I choose to eat a banana or an apple is completely detached from morality, and those kinds of choices are the ones we make most of in out everyday life.
I wasn't referring to dietary choices or to the many physical limitations we might have on our free will.

The real question we might face regarding free will applies to our moral choices. IMHO

According to the Bible, dietary choices were moral choices.
0 Replies
 
Coolwhip
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Aug, 2007 01:11 am
I doubt God is the best dietitian. Last I heard God didn't have any education.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Aug, 2007 02:19 am
mesquite wrote:
neologist wrote:
Coolwhip wrote:
neologist wrote:
So, do you believe in your moral free will?


I believe nobody is capable of basing their every action on morality. Weather I choose to eat a banana or an apple is completely detached from morality, and those kinds of choices are the ones we make most of in out everyday life.
I wasn't referring to dietary choices or to the many physical limitations we might have on our free will.

The real question we might face regarding free will applies to our moral choices. IMHO

According to the Bible, dietary choices were moral choices.
Perhaps, but not relevant to whether God has chosen to foreordain our vegetable menu.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Aug, 2007 02:45 am
mesquite wrote:
. . . According to the Genesis story Adam and Eve were destined to fall. There was no way around it. You can pretend to ignore it and invent terms like the Edenic Rebellion to camouflage it but that does not change the story told in Genesis. Your exegesis of the Eden story has been put to rest numerous times, most recently beginning here.
Joe, in his stunning example of redherringship, gave his defense to his earlier statement
Quote:
. . . A&E would never have encountered a situation that required a moral decision so long as they had no knowledge of good and evil.
His explanation? Adam and Eve, having no moral sense, evaluated God's direction, not in terms of obedience to their creator, but according to their perception that the fruit might be dangerous.

All this sidesteps the issue of what would they have done the first time a simple temptation arose. Having no knowledge of good and bad, how would they have chosen a right course?

Are you telling me that eating of the fruit of the tree was necessary for their 'education', or were Adam and Eve created with a conscience?
0 Replies
 
kate4christ03
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Aug, 2007 09:39 pm
Quote:
You should cite the member you are quoting.

neo i have always claimed to be horrid at the quoting....


Quote:
This underscores the huge difference between God's actual qualities and the misrepresentations of both believers and non believers.
Predestination
Reprobation
Determinism
Foreknowledge by necessity
All are either limitations on the power of God or paint God as a cruel tyrant.




God knew everything before he created anything. i already gave you the scripture that says God preordained Christ to die bf he even created adam and eve. God is omniscient but that doesnt mean that we don't have freewill. This doesn't paint God as a tyrant or limit his powers. He knows all yet still gives us the opportunity to choose. and get this ....The biggest proof of his mercy, he knew adam and eve would fall bf creating them, and instead of condemning all his creation to damnation, he sacrificed his son.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Aug, 2007 09:48 pm
Coolwhip wrote:
I doubt God is the best dietitian. Last I heard God didn't have any education.



Coolwhip, You bring up an interesting topic; god's education. If there was "nothingness" before he created the universe, where did he get his "education?"
0 Replies
 
Terry
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Aug, 2007 10:25 pm
neologist wrote:
Having no knowledge of good and bad, how would they have chosen a right course?

Are you telling me that eating of the fruit of the tree was necessary for their 'education', or were Adam and Eve created with a conscience?

Presumably A&E were created without a working conscience since they lacked knowledge of good and evil. They were like infants who are not expected to make moral decisions because their brains take years to develop the necessary circuitry. The Israelites knew nothing of neurons so they came up with a just-so story in which knowledge can be ingested by eating magical fruit.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 03/16/2025 at 01:54:50