0
   

Gonzales must resign now. "Mistakes were made."

 
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 05:48 am
You have to picture Joe with a twinkle in his eye when you read his political postings.



S(I wanna meet that twinkle some day.)quinney
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 05:48 am
squinney wrote:
I just have one question before he's sworn in... Can he keep a file?


I taught him to cross his legs. But no promises beyond that.

He might testify, but never under oath.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 05:50 am
squinney wrote:
You have to picture Joe with a twinkle in his eye when you read his political postings.



Excellent. Every board needs a poster like Joe to lighten the load.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 06:13 am
Well bud, if you thought anyone would seriously suggest "Brownie" as the new AG, your load is exceptionally heavier than mine.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 06:22 am
snood wrote:
Well bud, if you thought anyone would seriously suggest "Brownie" as the new AG, your load is exceptionally heavier than mine.


You've done a heckova job Brownie.

Wasted millions on the minions. Just like Papa did.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 06:22 am
Well, Snood, who coulda imagined that anyone would seriously suggest "Brownie" as the head of FEMA, ..... Very Happy
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 06:25 am
I hear ya....
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 06:30 am
squinney wrote:
Well, Snood, who coulda imagined that anyone would seriously suggest "Brownie" as the head of FEMA, ..... Very Happy


I'm still wondering why Edwards isn't commander in chief right about now.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 07:33 am
Tis no difference than the appointment of Eric Keroack, MD to oversee the Family Planning post at HHS (that's Housing and Human Services to you non-USAers, don't ask me to explain what that is).

One would think that the Bush Administration would want a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist in a position like that but they preferred someone who believes (and has written about) the claim that premarital sex suppresses the hormone oxytocin, thereby impairing one's ability to forge a successful long-term relationship. Right. Hmmm.

It's part of Bush's plan to place as many dolts in government as possible (yes, including himself) if you believe, as George does, that government is the problem then you work as hard as you can to make sure that government doesn't work.

BIG NEWS! Eric Keroack, MD resigned yesterday!!! I swear to God!! I just found out when I went to look up the spelling of his name.....

So he is available to take over for Alberto!!

Joe(that Rove is a genius)Nation
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 07:41 am
Jesus Harry Christ.

What will I ever know if not for your research, Joe Nation?

You've dragged us out of the shadows again.

Your farts are clearly worth bottling for posterity. :wink:
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 07:45 am
When it comes to ideological nut cases I guess the Bush administration can be quite entertaining. Without them we probable would never hear of these weirdo's and their loony theories.

I wonder if his resignation has to do with Medicare fraud. Wouldn't surprise me being a Bush appointee.

Quote:
Dr. Eric J. Keroack is an American non-board certified obstetrician-gynecologist.[1]

In late 2006, he was nominated by President George W. Bush to oversee the federal family planning program of the United States. Bush appointed Keroack deputy assistant secretary for population affairs at the Department of Health and Human Services, the office that oversees federally funded teenage pregnancy, family planning, and abstinence programs, using its $283 million annual budget.[2]

The nomination of Keroack, an anti-contraceptive advocate, to a position responsible for ensuring low-income women get access to birth control has been criticized.[3][4][5]

The Massachusetts native has faced criticism before, after making the claim that sex with multiple partners hurts women's ability to bond by altering their brain chemistry.[6] He claims that premarital sex suppresses the hormone oxytocin, thereby impairing one's ability to forge a successful long-term relationship.[7]

Before assuming his new position on Monday, November 20, 2006, Keroack was the medical director of A Woman's Concern, a Christian nonprofit organization based in Dorchester, Massachusetts. It runs six centers in the state that offer free pregnancy testing, ultrasounds and counseling and works to "help women escape the temptation and violence of abortion." Its crisis pregnancy centers oppose contraception and do not distribute information concerning birth control.[2]

The Associated Press reported on March 29, 2007 that Dr. Keroack resigned his position at HHS in response to unspecified actions taken against him by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' Office of Medicaid.[8]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Keroack
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 07:49 am
He sounds like he'd make a good goat herder.

I wouldn't be trusting him around children.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 08:27 am
Maybe Bush can appoint Julie McDonald as the new AG.
Quote:
A senior Bush political appointee at the Interior Department has repeatedly altered scientific field reports to minimize protections for imperiled species and disclosed confidential information to private groups seeking to affect policy decisions, the department's inspector general concluded.
...
The IG noted that MacDonald "admitted that her degree is in civil engineering and that she has no formal educational background in natural sciences" but repeatedly instructed Fish and Wildlife scientists to change their recommendations on identifying "critical habitats," despite her lack of expertise.

Report Faults Interior Appointee
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 08:32 am
There was a thread about the "Doc" being appointed last November.

The thing is, we guffaw and carry on about it, but don't actually do anything to affect these appointments. We get what we deserve until we actually DO something about it.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 08:45 am
squinney wrote:


The thing is, we guffaw and carry on about it, but don't actually do anything to affect these appointments. We get what we deserve until we actually DO something about it.


Damn straight, Squinney.


What to do that won't involve a lengthy stay in gitmo?
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 08:48 am
Oh.....


Yeah.

Nevermind.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 09:22 am
Quote:
Bush's long history of politicizing justice
It's not only the U.S. attorneys who are threatened by partisan politics. Since Day One, the Bush administration has been quietly dismantling the DOJ's Civil Rights Division.

By Alia Malek

March 30, 2007 | The current U.S. attorneys scandal shows that the Bush administration was mistaken in its belief that it could politicize the nation's top federal law enforcement agency, the Department of Justice, with impunity. The attorney general's chief of staff and the director of the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys have both had to leave their jobs, and Congress has begun grilling DOJ leadership. But having decimated another entire sector of the DOJ in plain sight for six years with little consequence, is it any wonder the Bush White House figured nobody would miss a few prosecutors?

Since George Bush took office, his administration has been not so quietly dismantling the DOJ's Civil Rights Division, which is responsible for enforcing the nation's civil rights laws, and doing it for the same reason the eight federal prosecutors were fired: to use the enforcement power of the federal government for Republican gain. Instead of attending to the Civil Rights Division's historic mission, addressing the legacy of slavery by enforcing anti-discrimination laws, the Bush administration has employed the division to advance the political agenda of a key GOP constituency, the Christian right and also, quite literally, to get Republicans elected.
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/03/30/civil_rights/

Quote:
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2007/03/thinkagain_baadd.html
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 11:09 am
Key Rove aide fingered in US Attorney investigation to step down; Could face subpoena Michael Roston
Published: Friday March 30, 2007

Multiple sources reported today that a top aide to President George W. Bush's key adviser Karl Rove will soon step down from her job in the White House. The aide, Sara M. Taylor, was identified in yesterday's hearing with a former top Justice Department official as seeking the resignation of a US Attorney in Arkansas. She could still face a subpoena, RAW STORY learned.

Last week, the House and Senate Judiciary Committees authorized subpoenas of Scott Jennings, a deputy to Taylor, who is a top aide to Karl Rove. A House Judiciary Committee aide told RAW STORY she could still face a subpoena today.

"The people for whom subpoenas were authorized were a result of the document review, and it could be could be that Jennings' name was more prevalent," said a House Judiciary Committee aide. "Other subpoenas can be authorized or issued should any other names come up."

Taylor and Jennings were both fingered yesterday by Kyle Sampson, the former chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, as playing key roles in the elevation of Tim Griffin, a top staffer in the Bush-Cheney 2004 campaign and a Army Judge Advocate General, as the interim US Attorney for Arkansas in place of Bud Cummins.

Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) asked Sampson in yesterday's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing why he believed the appointment of Griffin was important to Rove.

"That e-mail was based on an assumption," Sampson answered. "I knew that Sara Taylor and Scott Jennings had expressed interest in promoting Mr. Griffin for appointment to be U.S. attorney, and I assumed, because they reported to Karl Rove, that he was interested in that."

Both the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal's Washington Wire blog reported today that Sara Taylor, the White House political director, is set to resign soon.

"White House political director Sara M. Taylor, who has worked with Bush since April 1999, when he was starting his first presidential run, told Rove in December that she plans to leave in the spring, according to friends," wrote the Post's Peter Baker.

The Wall Street Journal's John D. McKinnon also stated that "persons familiar with the situation" said Taylor would exit soon.

Taylor's name had earlier been raised as a potential subject for House and Senate Judiciary Committee off the record interviews that White House Counsel Fred Fielding said could be permitted.

"Bush said that Fielding, told lawmakers they could interview Rove, Miers, deputy White House counsel William Kelley and J. Scott Jennings, a deputy to political director Sara Taylor - who in turn works for Rove," wrote the AP's Laurie Kellman on March 21.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 11:42 am
And yet another Rove aid under the gun. "House Committee requests deposition of former Rove assistant in connection with Abramoff" RAW STORY
Published: Friday March 30, 2007

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee today requested that former Special Assistant to the President, Susan Ralston, appear at a deposition on Apr. 5th, as part of the committee's ongoing investigation into the connection between the White House and lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

Ralston, who was a deputy to White House Adviser Karl Rove between 2001 and 2006, appeared frequently in emails collected in the case.

The Committee found that Ralston had 69 contacts with Abramoff or his associates during that time, according to a letter sent by Committee Chair Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA).

The following letter, sent to the Susan Ralston Friday, was acquired by RAW STORY.
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/House_Oversight_Committee_requests_deposition_of_0330.html
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 12:38 pm
The AG story is on top of a larger one - using the Prosecutors who are there in order to pursue bogus voter fraud cases and influence elections. Joe Nation recognized this one right away.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-rich29mar29,0,3371050.story?coll=la-opinion-center

Joseph D. Rich was chief of the voting section in the Justice Department's civil right division from 1999 to 2005. Today he penned an Op-Ed in The Los Angeles Times, and he didnt' mince words:

Quote:
Over the last six years, this Justice Department has ignored the advice of its staff and skewed aspects of law enforcement in ways that clearly were intended to influence the outcome of elections.

It has notably shirked its legal responsibility to protect voting rights. From 2001 to 2006, no voting discrimination cases were brought on behalf of African American or Native American voters. U.S. attorneys were told instead to give priority to voter fraud cases, which, when coupled with the strong support for voter ID laws, indicated an intent to depress voter turnout in minority and poor communities.


...

Quote:
In March 2006, Bradley Schlozman was appointed interim U.S. attorney in Kansas City, Mo. Two weeks earlier, the administration was granted the authority to make such indefinite appointments without Senate confirmation. That was too bad: A Senate hearing might have uncovered Schlozman's central role in politicizing the civil rights division during his three-year tenure....

Missouri had one of the closest Senate races in the country last November, and a week before the election, Schlozman brought four voter fraud indictments against members of an organization representing poor and minority people. This blatantly contradicted the department's long-standing policy to wait until after an election to bring such indictments because a federal criminal investigation might affect the outcome of the vote. The timing of the Missouri indictments could not have made the administration's aims more transparent.


The whole DoJ is going to be reorganized from the top down in the wake of all this. And you can bet your booties that the Dems are going to ask potential candidates a question before they are confirmed:

Quote:
Are you willing to serve a duly legal subpoena to members of the Executive branch, capture them, and bring them before the Congress in order to testify under oath?


The Executive branch couldn't have picked a worse time to lose the DoJ completely, but that's exactly what is happening.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/19/2024 at 09:39:34