The Pentacle Queen wrote:Please can someone speak very slowly and explain to an art student who knows absolutely nothing of politics/world affairs these few questions:
Why do Muslims extremists hate British/american peoples?
What do they hope to achieve by bombing us?
PQ
The article in the Observer by Hassan Butt which McT linked explains things quite well.
I've come back to the beginning of this. It was going to be a slow and brief summation...sorry. Thanks in advance for getting to the end if you do, at least you will know where I'm coming from.
Islam has been at war with Christianity since the beginning. There have been battles/invasions/crusades and long periods of stalemate for over 1000 years. But there has never been reconciliation and peace between the two religions because they are fundamantally incompatible. Although it may appear that each side is fighting for their version of (
the same) God (how ironic is that?) in fact it has always been a struggle for power and dominance and control over people and resources.
Over the centuries religions evolved. But much more radically in the West/Europe. Here religion gradually became divorced from the state. Much more than in the Muslim world, religion became a private matter. Despite there still being an established Church of England, no one forces religion upon you. We are free to adopt any religion, or none, compatible with the laws of the land.
I believe that freedom of thought and action (which was hard won) which came through the reformation, the enlightenment and renaissance provided the platform for the fantastic developments we have seen in Europe and America. People may have their doubts about free market captitalism (I'm one) but you cant deny the astonishing progress we have made in the West over the last 250 years.
For whatever reason, and I believe religion has a lot to do with it, that didnt happen in the middle east. Europe and then America became dominant, and the Islamic world went into a long period of relative decline.
About 100 years ago we found new ways of exploiting the vast energy reserves stored in oil - specifically the internal combustion engine and later the jet engine. Very rapidly we became hooked on fossil fuels to provide us not only with cheap and easy transport but for all sorts of stuff including artifical fertilisers giving us cheap food, and plastics for new materials.
At the end of the first world war, the Ottoman Empire collapsed. The victors of that war, notably Britain and France raked over the pickings in the middle east and drew various lines in the sand to create a whole series of sheikdoms, emirates and "countries" where the European powers would be dominant. Knowing just how important oil was, Britain took a particular interest in the new country of Iraq.
The Muslims however saw things rather differently. They had once been a huge empire, and because of their "superior" religion regarded the west with a certain amount of disdain. But the facts on the ground spoke differently. They were reduced to being bit players in their own lands, peasants trying to survive whilst their rulers (installed by Western governments) did deals with western businesses to exploit the region's natural resources. A huge amount of resentment of the West built up, based on the Arab/muslim sense of humiliation.
Right so to sum up so far. We have western economic and technological dominance. ME lagging behind still locked into religion. Western economies dependent on ME oil. Muslim resentment and humiliation.
Now we get to the tricky bit, because governments dont tell us the truth, they only tell us what they think is good for us to know.
America used to have a lot of oil. (It powered the allied side during WW2). But no longer. Britain and Europe have oil, but its past peak production. The remaining sources of conventional oil, on which we unfortunately are
still dependent are increasingly concentrated in the middle east. (In particular Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, United Arab Emirates and Kuwait). This is why American and Western military forces are spread throughout the region. The aim is to prevent any one country becoming dominant such that it becomes a regional super power and threatens the worlds oil supply.
To the north of the Gulf is the Caspian and there is a lot of oil and gas there, but relatively unexploited. The problem is getting it out without going through Russia or Iran. The obvious route is through Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Arabian sea. But Afghanistan is still home for the Islamic militants that we trained and supported when they were fighting the Russians. Part of the problem is blow back. Having defeated the atheistic communists these religious fanatics take that as proof that Allah really is with them and that another push this time against the West will finally defeat the decadent Great Satan and Little Satan (Britain), thus restoring the dominance of Islam in the world and gaining revenge for past humiliations.
To quote from the article by Hassan Butt
Quote:Many Muslims may or may not agree with secularism but at the moment, formal Islamic theology, unlike Christian theology, does not allow for the separation of state and religion. There is no 'rendering unto Caesar' in Islamic theology because state and religion are considered to be one and the same. The centuries-old reasoning of Islamic jurists also extends to the world stage where the rules of interaction between Dar ul-Islam (the Land of Islam) and Dar ul-Kufr (the Land of Unbelief) have been set down to cover almost every matter of trade, peace and war.
What radicals and extremists do is to take these premises two steps further. Their first step has been to reason that since there is no Islamic state in existence, the whole world must be Dar ul-Kufr. Step two: since Islam must declare war on unbelief, they have declared war upon the whole world. Many of my former peers, myself included, were taught by Pakistani and British radical preachers that this reclassification of the globe as a Land of War (Dar ul-Harb) allows any Muslim to destroy the sanctity of the five rights that every human is granted under Islam: life, wealth, land, mind and belief. In Dar ul-Harb, anything goes, including the treachery and cowardice of attacking civilians.
So now to the crunch. Why do muslims want to kill us? I have thought about all the above quite a bit in recent times. I used to think it was all to do with oil, and western interference in muslim lands. Then I thought it was because we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. I'm sure our actions in doing these things have not helped, but we did them because we had to do them because we are dependent on oil. We didnt do them because we are Christians who want to kill Muslims. We the west are going to get our oil fix by fair means or foul. But it doesnt have to be violent. Its the worlds oil and the militants could co operate and help develop it.
But they dont want anything to do with us. They want to restore the glory of Islam. They want to build a new global caliphate, and they think they are pleasuring Allah through martyrdom. The crunch is that for us the struggle is over resources, where we are prepared to co operate. But for the jihadists resources are only of interest in furthering Islam. It is Islam that turns ordinary people into human bombs. And its the absurdities of Islam that we should expose and attack. IMHO