4
   

Bush Supporters' Aftermath Thread IV

 
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:15 am
mysteryman wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
His point is that cut-and-pasting from Wikipedia isn't exactly what we call a responsive answer to the topic.

At least, Mcg, he's not just straight making **** up and pretending he knows what he's talking about, as you are wont to do.

Cycloptichorn


I went to wiki for the list of Axis nations because I didnt remember all of them.
I needed no such help for the allied nations list.


Yes, and there's nothing wrong with looking stuff up; it's just that your comment was a non-sequitur. It wasn't material to the point: that Germany's allied forces attacked us, with Germany's support and approval. That's why stating that the Germans never attacked us is ridiculous; you know better, but choose to ignore when people point out the error of your ways.

Cycloptichorn


Ok,then answer this...
With the exception of Japan on 12/07/1941, what Axis nations attacked us to draw us into the war?
You said that "Germany's allied forces attacked us, with Germany's support and approval",so what nations were they?
And exactly when did they attack us first,BEFORE Japan did,or within 1 year of the Japanese attack?


What, you don't count Germany's largest and most powerful ally?

Why not?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:17 am
old europe wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Hint: Germany NEVER attacked us.


You've said that before.
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=2474894#2474894

You've been shown that you were wrong.
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=2474923#2474923

You've acknowledged it.
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=2476136#2476136


Apparently, you have to reminded every now and then, or else you will just start again making wrong claims....
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:20 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
His point is that cut-and-pasting from Wikipedia isn't exactly what we call a responsive answer to the topic.

At least, Mcg, he's not just straight making **** up and pretending he knows what he's talking about, as you are wont to do.

Cycloptichorn


I went to wiki for the list of Axis nations because I didnt remember all of them.
I needed no such help for the allied nations list.


Yes, and there's nothing wrong with looking stuff up; it's just that your comment was a non-sequitur. It wasn't material to the point: that Germany's allied forces attacked us, with Germany's support and approval. That's why stating that the Germans never attacked us is ridiculous; you know better, but choose to ignore when people point out the error of your ways.

Cycloptichorn


Ok,then answer this...
With the exception of Japan on 12/07/1941, what Axis nations attacked us to draw us into the war?
You said that "Germany's allied forces attacked us, with Germany's support and approval",so what nations were they?
And exactly when did they attack us first,BEFORE Japan did,or within 1 year of the Japanese attack?


What, you don't count Germany's largest and most powerful ally?

Why not?

Cycloptichorn


No,because from what I have been able to find out,Japan did NOT have Germany's support or approval when they attacked PH.
The German govt did NOT want the US involved,because Germany wanted us to remain nuetral.
Germany did not want our industrial capability to join the allied forces.

Japan attacked us without Germany's approval,support or anything else.
Japan did not consult with Germany before they attacked us,Germany found out after the attack had happened.

Perhaps you should read a little history before you comment about what Germany thought.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:24 am
mysteryman wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
His point is that cut-and-pasting from Wikipedia isn't exactly what we call a responsive answer to the topic.

At least, Mcg, he's not just straight making **** up and pretending he knows what he's talking about, as you are wont to do.

Cycloptichorn


I went to wiki for the list of Axis nations because I didnt remember all of them.
I needed no such help for the allied nations list.


Yes, and there's nothing wrong with looking stuff up; it's just that your comment was a non-sequitur. It wasn't material to the point: that Germany's allied forces attacked us, with Germany's support and approval. That's why stating that the Germans never attacked us is ridiculous; you know better, but choose to ignore when people point out the error of your ways.

Cycloptichorn


Ok,then answer this...
With the exception of Japan on 12/07/1941, what Axis nations attacked us to draw us into the war?
You said that "Germany's allied forces attacked us, with Germany's support and approval",so what nations were they?
And exactly when did they attack us first,BEFORE Japan did,or within 1 year of the Japanese attack?


What, you don't count Germany's largest and most powerful ally?

Why not?

Cycloptichorn


No,because from what I have been able to find out,Japan did NOT have Germany's support or approval when they attacked PH.
The German govt did NOT want the US involved,because Germany wanted us to remain nuetral.
Germany did not want our industrial capability to join the allied forces.

Japan attacked us without Germany's approval,support or anything else.
Japan did not consult with Germany before they attacked us,Germany found out after the attack had happened.

Perhaps you should read a little history before you comment about what Germany thought.


Germany didn't break off the alliance; therefore, they were in support of the actions. Simple as that.

Not that any of this is material to any part of the discussion we were having before. To get it back on track, what you were talking about - so-called 'total war' - is a hell of a thing to just throw out there so casually. You're talking about murdering millions of civilians, destroying their homes and lives. You're talking about an area which didn't have an insurgency problem for the first several months after we started the war. Are you suggesting that after defeating Saddam's armies (which took about a week IIRC), we should have immediately started bombing out homes until Iraq didn't exist any longer?

What would have been the point? How would that have helped end any insurgency? The thing is, what you advocate doesn't make any sense at all.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:25 am
mysteryman wrote:
Perhaps you should read a little history before you comment about what Germany thought.


<grins>

Right.

I mean, really, is it asking to much that people should remember some teeny tiny historic factoids? German forces attacked and killed Americans, both civilians and military forces, several times before Germany finally declared war on the United States.

All of that before America, in turn, declared war on the German Reich.

How does this translate to

mysteryman wrote:
Germany NEVER attacked us.



I mean, yeah, the Reich didn't really want America involved. But it didn't exactly try to avoid it very much either. I mean, if I attack and declare war on somebody, I would usually assume that he, uhm, gets involved...
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:26 am
Well, you. But you're a German.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:28 am
Quote:
Hitler's Plan to Attack America
By Gerhard Weinberg
Gerhard L. Weinberg is emeritus professor of history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the author of A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II (Cambridge University Press, 1994).

Editor's Note (1999): In his new book, A Republic, Not an Empire, Patrick Buchanan claims that as of mid-1940 Hitler "was driven by a traditional German policy of Drang nach Osten, the drive to the East." He did not want war with the West, insists Buchanan. (Pp. 268-69.) Why then did Hitler, following Pearl Harbor, declare war on the United States? Buchanan insists this was the irrational act of a madman. In fact, insists Gerhard Weinberg, it was consistent with an objective Hitler had long nourished.

It had been an assumption of Hitler's since the 1920s that Germany would at some point fight the United States. As early as the summer of 1928 he asserted in his second book (not published until I did it for him in 1961) that strengthening and preparing Germany for war with the United States was one of the tasks of the National Socialist movement. Both because his aims for Germany's future entailed an unlimited expansionism of global proportions and because he thought of the United States as a country which with its population and size might at some time constitute a challenge to German domination of the globe, a war with the United States had long been part of the future he envisioned for Germany either during his own rule of it or thereafter.

During the years of his chancellorship before 1939, German policies designed to implement the project of a war with the United States had been conditioned by two factors: belief in the truth in the stab-in-the-back legend on the one hand and the practical problems of engaging American military power on the other. The belief in the concept that Germany had lost the First World War because of the collapse at home -- the stab in the back of the German army -- rather than defeat at the front automatically carried with it a converse of enormous significance which has generally been ignored. It made the military role of the United States in that conflict into a legend. Believing that the German army had not been beaten in the fighting, Hitler and many others in the country disbelieved that it had been American participation which had enabled the Western Powers to hold on in 1918 and then move toward victory over Germany. They perceived that to be a foolish fable, not a reasonable explication of the events of that year. A solid German home front, which National Socialism would ensure, could preclude defeat next time; the problem of fighting the United States was not that the inherently weak and divided Americans could create, field, and support effective fighting forces, but rather that they were so far away and that the intervening ocean could be blocked by a large American fleet. Here were the practical problems of fighting America: distance and the size of the American navy.

To overcome these practical obstacles Hitler built up the German navy and began work on a long-range bomber -- the notorious Amerika Bomber -- which would be capable of flying to New York and back without refueling. Although the bomber proved difficult to construct, Hitler embarked on a crash building program of superbattleships promptly after the defeat of France. In addition, he began accumulating air and sea bases on the Atlantic coast to facilitate attacks on the United States. In April 1941 Hitler secretly pledged that he would join Japan in a war on the United States. This was critical. Only if Japan declared war would Germany follow.

As long as Germany had to face the United States essentially by herself, she needed time to build her own blue-water navy; it therefore made sense to postpone hostilities with the Americans until Germany had been able to remedy this deficiency. If, on the other hand, Japan would come into the war on Germany's side, then that problem was automatically solved.

Hitler was caught out of town at the time of Pearl Harbor and had to get back to Berlin and summon the Reichstag to acclaim war. His great worry, and that of his foreign minister, was that the Americans might get their declaration of war in ahead of his own. As Joachim von Ribbentrop explained it, "A great power does not allow itself to be declared war upon; it declares war on others." He did not need to lose much sleep; the Roosevelt administration was quite willing to let the Germans take the lead. Just to make sure, however, that hostilities started immediately, Hitler had already issued orders to his navy, straining at the leash since October 1939, to begin sinking American ships forthwith, even before the formalities of declaring war. Now that Germany had a big navy on its side (Japan's), there was no need to wait even an hour.

_____

This article is excerpted from Gerhard Weinberg's Germany, Hitler, and World War II (Cambridge University Press: 1995). It is reprinted with permission of the author and publisher and was reposted at TomPaine.com in 1999.


http://hnn.us/articles/32084.html
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:30 am
Quote:
I mean, really, is it asking to much that people should remember some teeny tiny historic factoids? German forces attacked and killed Americans, both civilians and military forces, several times before Germany finally declared war on the United States


If you are talking about the unrestricted submarine warfare that the Germans were using,then you are correct.

But no German land or air forces attacked any US forces or civilians before war was declared.

According to USMC reports from the time,the Germans in the occupied countries,such as France, went out of their way to be nice to and to avoid any confrontation with US civilians and military in Europe at the time.

I cite USMC reports because they guard and protect ALL US embassies around the world,and always have.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:31 am
Germans were attacking our boats in the Atlantic before war was declared. Some people just don't know their history or logic.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:32 am
That really might have been so. And that Germany attacked US-ships and declared war on the United States was due to our funny kind of showing how nice we were towards the USA.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:33 am
So it's OK for Germany to attack and kill Americans and their ships with submarines but not land and air forces.

Submarines don't count in your world.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:35 am
xingu wrote:
So it's OK for Germany to attack and kill Americans and their ships with submarines but not land and air forces.

Submarines don't count in your world.


In this case,no they dont.
We were using our ships and our merchant fleet to send war material to England and the Soviet Union.
That violated our statement of neutrality.
That made our ships fair game for attack by German submarines.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:36 am
The Battle for Control of the Atlantic

In his book "The Second World War," Winston Churchill stated: "The only thing that ever really frightened me during the war was the U-Boat peril."

The Battle of the Atlantic was not what one usually thinks of as a "battle," since it did not take place in one location over a limited period, such as the Battle of the Bulge. It was a Battle for CONTROL over shipping in the Atlantic and lasted from September 1939 until May 1945. Germany's submarines (U-Boats) tried to sink merchant ships faster than the Allies could build them. Starting in 1940, through the middle of 1942, U-Boats were very successful - they sank more ships than were built.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:38 am
mysteryman wrote:
But no German land or air forces attacked any US forces or civilians before war was declared.


Yeah. That still doesn't translate into

mysteryman wrote:
Germany NEVER attacked us.


No. I don't think so. I mean, that wasn't just a couple of terrorists with a tiny boat full of explosives, maybe attacking an American missile destroyer. No. Those were German forces, operating under the command of the Befehlshaber der Unterseeboote and ultimately of the Führer, attacking and killing American civilians and soldiers.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:41 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
The Battle for Control of the Atlantic

In his book "The Second World War," Winston Churchill stated: "The only thing that ever really frightened me during the war was the U-Boat peril."

The Battle of the Atlantic was not what one usually thinks of as a "battle," since it did not take place in one location over a limited period, such as the Battle of the Bulge. It was a Battle for CONTROL over shipping in the Atlantic and lasted from September 1939 until May 1945. Germany's submarines (U-Boats) tried to sink merchant ships faster than the Allies could build them. Starting in 1940, through the middle of 1942, U-Boats were very successful - they sank more ships than were built.


Thats 100% correct.
Germany was sinking the merchant ships faster then we could build them.
It wasnt until the USN gained total control of the Atlantic sealanes that merchant shipping became relatively safe.

But,before the US entered WW2,our using our merchant fleet to transport war material to England and the Soviet Union was a violation of our declaration of neutrality.
That made our ships fair game for German subs.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:41 am
mysteryman wrote:
xingu wrote:
So it's OK for Germany to attack and kill Americans and their ships with submarines but not land and air forces.

Submarines don't count in your world.


In this case,no they dont.


What an odd statement.

So if Iranian submarines were to attack and sink an American carrier tomorrow, would you say "Whew, I'm really glad that at least they didn't, like, attack us, you know?"

<shakes head>
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:42 am
mysteryman wrote:
xingu wrote:
So it's OK for Germany to attack and kill Americans and their ships with submarines but not land and air forces.

Submarines don't count in your world.


In this case,no they dont.
We were using our ships and our merchant fleet to send war material to England and the Soviet Union.
That violated our statement of neutrality.
That made our ships fair game for attack by German submarines.


You said; "Germany NEVER attacked us."

Wrong, they did attack us. They attacked our merchant and military ships. That is an attack on America.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:45 am
old europe wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
xingu wrote:
So it's OK for Germany to attack and kill Americans and their ships with submarines but not land and air forces.

Submarines don't count in your world.


In this case,no they dont.


What an odd statement.

So if Iranian submarines were to attack and sink an American carrier tomorrow, would you say "Whew, I'm really glad that at least they didn't, like, attack us, you know?"

<shakes>


No,because that is a different scenario.
We arent at war with Iran,nor are we using our ships to transport war material to a country at war with Iran,nor have we declared any type of neutrality towards Iran.
If one of their subs were to attack a US carrier,that would be an act of war by Iran.

You are ignoring the part about us declaring neutrality in WW2,then using our ships to aid one side.
That was not the act of a neutral nation.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:46 am
Germany threatened our economic interests, not only our merchant ships. What was the US supposed to do? Not react to assist our allies?

Funny, that, since you think nothing of the UK assisting the US in Iraq.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:47 am
xingu wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
xingu wrote:
So it's OK for Germany to attack and kill Americans and their ships with submarines but not land and air forces.

Submarines don't count in your world.


In this case,no they dont.
We were using our ships and our merchant fleet to send war material to England and the Soviet Union.
That violated our statement of neutrality.
That made our ships fair game for attack by German submarines.


You said; "Germany NEVER attacked us."

Wrong, they did attack us. They attacked our merchant and military ships. That is an attack on America.


They attacked because we were violating out neutrality and supplying their enemies.
That is totally allowed within the rules of war,and an attack we brought on ourselves.

Why do you seem to be ignoring the fact that we violated our own neutrality by supplying the Brits and the Soviets.

We cant be neutral if we are supplying arms and equipment to either side of a conflict.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/21/2024 at 06:24:38