McGentrix wrote:Did you read only that post in that thread? I stand by that post at that time, yes.
I actually read the whole thread... all six pages of it. I read the Ann Coulter article that you posted, too. I especially liked the part where she claimed that
Quote:After World War II, the United States ran the Japanese occupation unilaterally. Without the meddling of other nations, the Japanese occupation went off without a hitch. Within five years, Gen. Douglas MacArthur had imposed a constitutional democracy on Japan with a bicameral legislature, a bill of rights and an independent judiciary. Now the only trouble Japan causes is its insistence on selling good products to Americans at cheap prices.
The main thrust of the article was, if America only handled Iraq unilaterally and without getting other nations or <gasp> the UN involved, we would see a peaceful, democratic Iraq within a matter of years.
You kind of seemed to agree with her article (or at least you titled the thread "Insightful article").
Now, I don't blame you for comparing Iraq and WWII in 2003. That was at a time when a majority of Americans still believed in Iraqi WMD, in democratisation and in the Falling Dominoes in the Middle East. And people
did talk a lot about how nice Iraq would be after the violence would have ceased, Iraqis would have had free elections and American companies would be paid for rebuilding Iraq by the kickbacks from all that Iraqi oil that would soon start flowing.
In short, many people were saying that Iraq was just like WWII. And that the Iraqis really
wanted the US army in their country.