Setanta wrote:So, that makes a difference? Once again, it is used as racist symbol, for the good and sufficient reason that it was once the symbol of a racist organization. Whether or not it was so seen 50 years ago has no bearing on its meaning today. Do you think you'll get some kind of prize for making a point that it is somehow not, or once was not, a racist symbol?
No, I asked a thought provoking question on A2K. Seems like there aren't enough of those these days.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Mine is that up until about 50 years ago, it was just the rebel battle flag. At some point in time it was labeled racist by those who like to revise history. In that way, at least half of its original meaning was lost, if it is in fact racist, as you state.
Someone ought to point out there were also free blacks who owned black slaves. I wonder what flag they flew?