9
   

THE US, THE UN AND IRAQ, ELEVENTH THREAD

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 01:48 pm
I was sure people could "read between the lines" on this one. LOL
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 01:56 pm
but some are being prevented from "reading between the lines" :wink:
or any lines at all !

http://img.tfd.com/dict/4B/63942-blinder.gif
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 02:00 pm
That's for sure, and we know who "they" are.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 02:48 pm
Quote:
Soros has been criticized for his large donations, as he also pushed for the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 which was intended to ban "soft money" contributions to federal election campaigns. Soros has responded that his donations to unaffiliated organizations do not raise the same corruption issues as donations directly to the candidates or political parties.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 02:54 pm
Ican, you have failed to address allegations you have made on the other thread. Please do so in good time.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 03:07 pm
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 03:10 pm
O'Reilly Factor? ROFLMAO
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 03:12 pm
George Soros

George Soros is Pure Evil By Michael Illions Any success on the part of the Democrats in the upcoming election can be traced to one man. The DNC, John Kerry and the Presidency of the United States itself will be beholden to this man. If you connect the dots and fill in the blanks, if you follow the cash and the funding of the major Liberal 527 groups, you come to George Soros. Soros, the Hungarian born billionaire, was responsible for the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997 and was dubbed the "man who broke the bank of England" in 1992. Further controversial business deals, it was ruled in 2002 that Soros was involved in insider trading during a French bank takeover bid in 1988. While admitting no wrongdoing, Soros was fined $2,000,000 for his part.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 03:19 pm
Media Matters for AmericaSearch this siteAdvanced Search Search Go

Home Issues/Topics About Us Take Action Press/Bloggers Donate Fri, Apr 13, 2007 5:05pm EST
Send to a friend Print Version
Drudge falsely claimed Soros funds Media Matters
Internet gossip Matt Drudge has claimed that Media Matters for America is a "Soros operation."

In fact, Media Matters has never received funding from progressive philanthropist George Soros.
ican, All you need to do is show evidence that Media Matters received funding from George Soros.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 03:27 pm
ALL OF TODAY'S EXCERPTS CAN BE FOUND AT:

www.earstohear.net/soros.html


Quote:
Soros's contributions are filling a gap in Democratic Party finances that opened after the restrictions in the 2002 McCain-Feingold law took effect. In the past, political parties paid a large share of television and get-out-the-vote costs with unregulated "soft money" contributions from corporations, unions and rich individuals. The parties are now barred from accepting such money. But non-party groups in both camps are stepping in, accepting soft money and taking over voter mobilization. "It's incredibly ironic that George Soros is trying to create a more open society by using an unregulated, under-the-radar-screen, shadowy, soft-money group to do it," Republican National Committee spokeswoman Christine Iverson said. "George Soros has purchased the Democratic Party."
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 03:37 pm
ican, Are you intentionally ignoring my direct q? Re: George Soros' funds Media Matters. You made a claim, now prove it with evidence.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 03:37 pm
Quote:
...May 16, 2004
... His campaign began last summer with the help of Morton H. Halperin, a liberal think tank veteran. Soros invited Democratic strategists to his house in Southampton, Long Island, including Clinton chief of staff John D. Podesta, Jeremy Rosner, Robert Boorstin and Carl Pope.
They discussed the coming election. Standing on the back deck, the evening sun angling into their eyes, Soros took aside Steve Rosenthal, CEO of the liberal activist group America Coming Together (ACT), and Ellen Malcolm, its president. They were proposing to mobilize voters in 17 battleground states. Soros told them he would give ACT $10 million.

Asked about his moment in the sun, Rosenthal deadpanned: "We were disappointed. We thought a guy like George Soros could do more." Then he laughed. "No, kidding! It was thrilling. It was like getting his Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval." "They were ready to kiss me," Soros quipped.

Before coffee the next morning, his friend Peter Lewis, chairman of the Progressive Corp., had pledged $10 million to ACT. Rob Glaser, founder and CEO of RealNetworks, promised $2 million. Rob McKay, president of the McKay Family Foundation, gave $1 million and benefactors Lewis and Dorothy Cullman committed $500,000. Soros also promised up to $3 million to Podesta's new think tank, the Center for American Progress.


...Soros will continue to recruit wealthy donors for his campaign. Having put a lot of money into the war of ideas around the world, he has learned that "money buys talent; you can advocate more effectively." At his home in Westchester, N.Y., he raised $115,000 for Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean. He also supports Democratic presidential contenders Sen. John F. Kerry (Mass.), retired Gen. Wesley K. Clark and Rep.> Richard A. Gephardt (Mo.). In an effort to limit Soros's influence, the RNC sent a letter to Dean Monday, asking him to request that ACT and similar organizations follow the McCain-Feingold restrictions limiting individual contributions to $2,000. The RNC is not the only group irked by Soros. Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21, which promotes changes in campaign finance, has benefited from Soros's grants over the years. Soros has backed altering campaign finance, an aide said, donating close to $18 million over the past seven years.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 03:44 pm
MORE CIRCUMSTANCIAL EVIDENCE TO COME!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 03:49 pm
I won't hold my breath.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 03:52 pm
The dems are blowing it; it's gonna affect the November 2008 elections.

Senate Dems fail to cut off war funds
By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent
25 minutes ago



WASHINGTON - Anti-war Democrats in the Senate failed in an attempt to cut off funds for the Iraq war on Wednesday, a lopsided bipartisan vote that masked growing impatience within both political parties over President Bush's handling of the four-year conflict.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 04:16 pm
SOURCES OF CIRCUMSTANCIAL EVIDENCE OF GEORGE SOROS'S FUNDING

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros#Influencing_media

http://www.earstohear.net/soros.html

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=George_Soros
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 04:55 pm
ican, Do you even understand the meaning of "circumstantial evidence?"

Those links aren't even close. Using Bill O'Reilly as evidence will only get you laughed out of court.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 05:32 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
The dems are blowing it; it's gonna affect the November 2008 elections.

Senate Dems fail to cut off war funds
By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent
25 minutes ago



WASHINGTON - Anti-war Democrats in the Senate failed in an attempt to cut off funds for the Iraq war on Wednesday, a lopsided bipartisan vote that masked growing impatience within both political parties over President Bush's handling of the four-year conflict.


How is this possible?
I thought that stopping the war was the only reason the dems were elected?
Now you are saying they either cant or wont stop it?

But,arent they doing the "will of the people"?

Lets face it,the dems dont want to stop the war while they are in power,and they cant stop it while Bush is in the WH.

If they stop the funding and force the US to leave Iraq,and the ME then falls into complee and total chaos,then the dems will get the political blame for it.
They dont want that to happen.

If the dems in congress do nothing,they get the political blame from their various constituent groups.
Either way,the dems will lose,and they dont want that.
They want to be seen as trying to do something,allthe while hoping that Bush will end the war BEFORE the 08 elections.
If that happens,the dems can take the credit.
If it doesnt happen,the dems will get the blame because they campaigned on a platform of ending the war.

So,the dems dont want the war to end,they cant afford it politically.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 05:37 pm
mm, You can take that article for what it's worth; no skin off my butt.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 05:45 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
mm, You can take that article for what it's worth; no skin off my butt.


I really am not interested in any of the skin off your butt or any other part of your anatomy.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.22 seconds on 07/27/2025 at 04:27:02