9
   

THE US, THE UN AND IRAQ, ELEVENTH THREAD

 
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Mar, 2007 04:17 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:

We will probably win in Iraq if we assume we will win in Iraq.


Ah, the Green Lantern theory of diplomacy and warfare.
...
We can only fail, if we believe we can fail

Such hubris has been the end of more than one nation. I pray that we find humility before we suffer the same fate.

Cycloptichorn

ican711nm wrote:
We will probably lose in Iraq if we assume we will lose in Iraq.
We will probably win in Iraq if we assume we will win in Iraq.

Persistance with the kind of humility you wish upon us will probably lead to the end of our nation, beginning with our loss in Iraq.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Mar, 2007 04:23 pm
ican711nm wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:

We will probably win in Iraq if we assume we will win in Iraq.


Ah, the Green Lantern theory of diplomacy and warfare.
...
We can only fail, if we believe we can fail

Such hubris has been the end of more than one nation. I pray that we find humility before we suffer the same fate.

Cycloptichorn

ican711nm wrote:
We will probably lose in Iraq if we assume we will lose in Iraq.
We will probably win in Iraq if we assume we will win in Iraq.

Persistance with the kind of humility you wish upon us will probably lead to the end of our nation, beginning with our loss in Iraq.


As an intellectual exercise, tell me - how will the US end? What will bring about our end? You talk about this a lot, so I would think that instead of fearmongering, you could tell us specific things that you predict would happen if we pulled out of Iraq, and how that would lead to the end of the US.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Mar, 2007 05:17 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:

We will probably win in Iraq if we assume we will win in Iraq.


Ah, the Green Lantern theory of diplomacy and warfare.
...
We can only fail, if we believe we can fail

Such hubris has been the end of more than one nation. I pray that we find humility before we suffer the same fate.

Cycloptichorn

ican711nm wrote:
We will probably lose in Iraq if we assume we will lose in Iraq.
We will probably win in Iraq if we assume we will win in Iraq.

Persistance with the kind of humility you wish upon us will probably lead to the end of our nation, beginning with our loss in Iraq.


As an intellectual exercise, tell me - how will the US end? What will bring about our end? You talk about this a lot, so I would think that instead of fearmongering, you could tell us specific things that you predict would happen if we pulled out of Iraq, and how that would lead to the end of the US.

Cycloptichorn

You posted:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Such hubris has been the end of more than one nation. I pray that we find humility before we suffer the same fate.

I responded:
ican711nm wrote:
Persistance with the kind of humility you wish upon us will probably lead to the end of our nation, beginning with our loss in Iraq.

Separate question:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
As an intellectual exercise, tell me - how will the US end? What will bring about our end?

Specific things that I predict will happen if we pull out of Iraq before the Iraqis decide they are able to defend theselves and ask us to leave.
(1) Al-Qaeda will re-establish its sanctuary in Iraq for training suicidal mass murderers of non-murderers located throughout the world.
(2) The number al-Qaeda trains in that Iraq sanctuary within the five years following our pull out of Iraq before the Iraqis decide they are able to defend themselves and ask us to leave, will significantly surpass the number they trained in Afghanistan in the years 1996-2001.
(3) The number of al-Qaeda suicidal mass murderers of non-murderers that will travel to America and do in America what they are now doing in Iraq, will grow to more than 19,000 until their number is reduced by their own suicidal mass murders of American non-murderers.
(4) To combat these al-Qaeda suicidal murderers our then governent will declare a 2009-? marshal law that will far exceed anything Lincoln did in fighting our 1860-1865 Civil War, including but not limited to an 100% monitoring of all communications among people in America with each other as well as among people in America and elsewere.
(5) We will probably lose in America if we assume we will lose in America; We will probably win in America if we assume we will win in America.

Winning or losing such a conflict in America will probably result in the loss of our constitutional, representative republic.

On the other hand if we win in Iraq, we will continue to be faced with this rapidly growing problem in America:
Alexander Tyler writing about the viability of democracy, in [i]The Cycle of Democracy[/i], 1778, wrote:
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasur[y]. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most money from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy followed by a dictatorship.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Mar, 2007 06:40 pm
Seems this administration is really only interested in "stay the course." It doesn't matter that the majority of Americans doesn't.

From the NY Times:


March 12, 2007
Cheney Assails Those Favoring Iraq Drawdown Our military is already stretched to the breaking point by extending assignments in a war zone, and keeping people who were due to be discharged. To add insult to injury, if they come home with an injury, they're treated with disdain, and Bush cut funding for veteran's benefits beginning in 2009. These are the same hypocrites that puts our soldiers in harms way, then shoots them in the back if they return home with an injury. Nice people. they have the audacity to say "support our troops." Talk about "wrong message" all you want, you jerk.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Mar, 2007 07:00 pm
Quote:
March 12th, 2007 7:16 pm
The Army is ordering injured troops to go to Iraq

At Fort Benning, soldiers who were classified as medically unfit to fight are now being sent to war. Is this an isolated incident or a trend?

By Mark Benjamin / Salon

COLUMBUS, Ga. -- "This is not right," said Master Sgt. Ronald Jenkins, who has been ordered to Iraq even though he has a spine problem that doctors say would be damaged further by heavy Army protective gear. "This whole thing is about taking care of soldiers," he said angrily. "If you are fit to fight you are fit to fight. If you are not fit to fight, then you are not fit to fight."

As the military scrambles to pour more soldiers into Iraq, a unit of the Army's 3rd Infantry Division at Fort Benning, Ga., is deploying troops with serious injuries and other medical problems, including GIs who doctors have said are medically unfit for battle. Some are too injured to wear their body armor, according to medical records.


<snip>

Quote:
Master Sgt. Jenkins, 42, has a degenerative spine problem and a long scar down the back of his neck where three of his vertebrae were fused during surgery. He takes a cornucopia of potent pain pills. His medical records say he is "at significantly increased risk of re-injury during deployment where he will be wearing Kevlar, body armor and traveling through rough terrain." Late last year, those medical records show, a doctor recommended that Jenkins be referred to an Army board that handles retirements when injuries are permanent and severe.

A copy of Jenkins' profile written after that Feb. 15 meeting and signed by Capt. Starbuck, the brigade surgeon, shows a healthier soldier than the profile of Jenkins written by another doctor just late last year, though Jenkins says his condition is unchanged. Other soldiers' documents show the same pattern.

One female soldier with psychiatric issues and a spine problem has been in the Army for nearly 20 years. "My [health] is deteriorating," she said over dinner at a restaurant near Fort Benning. "My spine is separating. I can't carry gear." Her medical records include the note "unable to deploy overseas." Her status was also reviewed on Feb. 15. And she has been ordered to Iraq this week.


full article at Salon

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Support your troups.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Mar, 2007 09:41 pm
We have ignoramuses running our military.


Gen. Pace calls homosexuality immoral

15 minutes ago



WASHINGTON - The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said Monday he considers homosexuality to be immoral and the military should not condone it by allowing gay personnel to serve openly, the Chicago Tribune reported.

Marine Gen. Peter Pace likened homosexuality to adultery, which he said was also immoral, the newspaper reported on its Web site.

"I do not believe the United States is well served by a policy that says it is OK to be immoral in any way," Pace told the newspaper in a wide-ranging interview.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Mar, 2007 08:58 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
We have ignoramuses running our military.


Gen. Pace calls homosexuality immoral

15 minutes ago



WASHINGTON - The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said Monday he considers homosexuality to be immoral and the military should not condone it by allowing gay personnel to serve openly, the Chicago Tribune reported.

Marine Gen. Peter Pace likened homosexuality to adultery, which he said was also immoral, the newspaper reported on its Web site.

"I do not believe the United States is well served by a policy that says it is OK to be immoral in any way," Pace told the newspaper in a wide-ranging interview.


Oh ya. That makes sense.

We need a moral military that is trained to kill people. Makes as much sense as training 18 year olds to kill then tell them they're to young and immature to drink a beer.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Mar, 2007 12:32 pm
The Soros gang, its fellow travelers, and its sympathizers are still trying to convince us all that George Bush and the members of his administration are fools&frauds.

Suppose they succeed?

What has that got to do with this?

WHEN TO STAY AND WHEN TO LEAVE IRAQ

When the Iraqis decide they can protect themselves without our help, and the Iraqi government asks us to leave, we must remove our military from Iraq as rapidly as we are able, but only after they ask us to leave.

We will probably lose in Iraq if we assume we will lose in Iraq.
We will probably win in Iraq if we assume we will win in Iraq.
I for one assume we will win in Iraq.

Who wants us to lose in Iraq?

George Soros in his 2003 edition of his book, page 15, [i]The Alchemy of Finance[/i] wrote:

My greatest fear is that the Bush Doctrine will succeed--that Bush will crush the terrorists, tame the rogue states of the axis of evil, and usher in a golden age of American supremacy. American supremacy is flawed and bound to fail in the long run.


Who wants us to disregard our principles?

Quote:
="George Soros In his 2004 book, page 159, The Bubble of American Supremacy"]
The principles of the Declaration of Independence are not self-evident truths but arrangements necessitated by our inherently imperfect understanding.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Mar, 2007 12:34 pm
ican711nm wrote:
The Soros gang, its fellow travelers, and its sympathizers are still trying to convince us all that George Bush and the members of his administration are fools&frauds.

Suppose they succeed?

What has that got to do with this?

WHEN TO STAY AND WHEN TO LEAVE IRAQ

When the Iraqis decide they can protect themselves without our help, and the Iraqi government asks us to leave, we must remove our military from Iraq as rapidly as we are able, but only after they ask us to leave.

We will probably lose in Iraq if we assume we will lose in Iraq.
We will probably win in Iraq if we assume we will win in Iraq.
I for one assume we will win in Iraq.

Who wants us to lose in Iraq?

George Soros in his 2003 edition of his book, page 15, [i]The Alchemy of Finance[/i] wrote:

My greatest fear is that the Bush Doctrine will succeed--that Bush will crush the terrorists, tame the rogue states of the axis of evil, and usher in a golden age of American supremacy. American supremacy is flawed and bound to fail in the long run.


Who wants us to disregard our principles?

Quote:
= "George Soros In his 2004 book, page 159, The Bubble of American Supremacy"]
The principles of the Declaration of Independence are not self-evident truths but arrangements necessitated by our inherently imperfect understanding.


Your obsession with Soros would be sad if it wasn't so damn funny. You're turning into a laughing-stock on A2K, Ican

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Mar, 2007 12:37 pm
is there anything going wrong in this world that CANNOT be blamed on soros ?
he must feel that he is god-like , with all the credit he is getting for the mayhem being created in this world by others .
hbg
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Mar, 2007 12:42 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
The Soros gang, its fellow travelers, and its sympathizers are still trying to convince us all that George Bush and the members of his administration are fools&frauds.

Suppose they succeed?

What has that got to do with this?

WHEN TO STAY AND WHEN TO LEAVE IRAQ

When the Iraqis decide they can protect themselves without our help, and the Iraqi government asks us to leave, we must remove our military from Iraq as rapidly as we are able, but only after they ask us to leave.

We will probably lose in Iraq if we assume we will lose in Iraq.
We will probably win in Iraq if we assume we will win in Iraq.
I for one assume we will win in Iraq.

Who wants us to lose in Iraq?

George Soros in his 2003 edition of his book, page 15, [i]The Alchemy of Finance[/i] wrote:

My greatest fear is that the Bush Doctrine will succeed--that Bush will crush the terrorists, tame the rogue states of the axis of evil, and usher in a golden age of American supremacy. American supremacy is flawed and bound to fail in the long run.


Who wants us to disregard our principles?

George Soros In his 2004 book, page 159, [i]The Bubble of American Supremacy[/i] wrote:

The principles of the Declaration of Independence are not self-evident truths but arrangements necessitated by our inherently imperfect understanding.


Your obsession with Soros would be sad if it wasn't so damn funny. You're turning into a laughing-stock on A2K, Ican

Cycloptichorn

Your obsession with the malarkey fomented by Soros in the Soros gang directed news media is sad and is funny and makes your blind-to-reality assertions, jokes.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Mar, 2007 12:45 pm
ican711nm wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
The Soros gang, its fellow travelers, and its sympathizers are still trying to convince us all that George Bush and the members of his administration are fools&frauds.

Suppose they succeed?

What has that got to do with this?

WHEN TO STAY AND WHEN TO LEAVE IRAQ

When the Iraqis decide they can protect themselves without our help, and the Iraqi government asks us to leave, we must remove our military from Iraq as rapidly as we are able, but only after they ask us to leave.

We will probably lose in Iraq if we assume we will lose in Iraq.
We will probably win in Iraq if we assume we will win in Iraq.
I for one assume we will win in Iraq.

Who wants us to lose in Iraq?

George Soros in his 2003 edition of his book, page 15, [i]The Alchemy of Finance[/i] wrote:

My greatest fear is that the Bush Doctrine will succeed--that Bush will crush the terrorists, tame the rogue states of the axis of evil, and usher in a golden age of American supremacy. American supremacy is flawed and bound to fail in the long run.


Who wants us to disregard our principles?

Quote:
="George Soros In his 2004 book, page 159, The Bubble of American Supremacy"]
The principles of the Declaration of Independence are not self-evident truths but arrangements necessitated by our inherently imperfect understanding.


Your obsession with Soros would be sad if it wasn't so damn funny. You're turning into a laughing-stock on A2K, Ican

Cycloptichorn

Your obsession with the malarkey fomented by Soros in the Soros gang directed news media is sad and is funny and makes your blind-to-reality assertions, jokes.


Sorry, your conspiracy is ridiculous. I'm not blind to reality. I don't rely on any one source for news, or even multiple sources, but in fact a multitude of sources. Many of these, I guarantee, have nothing to do with Soros whatsoever.

You can claim that I'm the one with the problem, but you are the one who obsessively posts about Soros and how he manipulates everyone's opinions from behind the scenes like some sort of puppeteer. I think you are becoming paranoid and demented in your old age, sorry to say.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Mar, 2007 01:01 pm
hamburger wrote:
is there anything going wrong in this world that CANNOT be blamed on soros ?
he must feel that he is god-like , with all the credit he is getting for the mayhem being created in this world by others .
hbg

Laughing
Ham, that's really funny. You guys are obsessed with showing that there is nothing going wrong in this world that CANNOT be blamed on George Bush and the people in his administration. Then you criticize me for blaming Soros gang direction only for the malarkey in the media. Laughing To paraphrase a well known dictum: Take the spotlight out of your own eye, before trying to take the twinkle out of mine.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Mar, 2007 01:06 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:

...
Many of these [sources of mine], I guarantee, have nothing to do with Soros whatsoever.
...
Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn, you know as well as I do that you have made these dumb statements on able2know:
(1) one cannot prove a negative
(2) al-Qaeda has contributed little to the 2006 and 2007 mass murders of non-murderers in Iraq
(3) al-Qaeda was caused to be in Iraq by the American invasion of Iraq
(4) the Bush administration is responsible for the mass murders of non-murderers in Iraq since we invaded Iraq
(5) the US invasion of Iraq was illegal
(6) the Iraqi people do not want democracy
(7) the American people want us to leave Iraq before the Iraqi people can defend themselves without our help
(8) go after and punish the criminals who carry [suicidal terrorism] out
(9) the Bush admin isn't interested in catching Osama Bin Laden or the top AQ leadership
(10) The Taliban did far more than just allow AQ sanctuary, they were entwined together ... very different from Saddam's situation
(11) You quoted the wrong passage; that one talks about self-defense, whereas we are currently on the Offensive
(12) There is no such thing as going on the offensive in order to defend oneself
(13) Many of these [sources of mine], I guarantee, have nothing to do with Soros whatsoever.

You guarantee Exclamation Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Mar, 2007 01:29 pm
I don't blame the Soros gang for the existence of smmonm = suicidal mass murderers of non-murderers = inhuman terrorist malignancy = those who murder civilians + those who abet the murder of civilians + those who advocate the murder of civilians + those who are silent witnesses to the murder of civilians + those who allow the murderers of civilians sanctuary. [/quote]

What you folks continue to fail to understand is that those of us who disagree with you about Iraq and Afghanistan, do not disagree with you about the inadequacy of the USA's performance in Iraq and Afghanistan. We disagree with you over what to do about the inadequacy of the USA's performance in Iraq in Afghanistan.

You folks appear to think the USA's inadequate performance cannot be improved.

We folks who disagree with you think the USA's inadequate performance can be improved.

You folks appear to think we should leave Iraq and Afghanistan by a date certain.

We folks who disagree with you think we should leave Iraq and Afghanistan only after the respective governments of those two countries are able to remove the smmonm from their countries on their own.

You folks appear to think that we have lost and should quit.

We folks who disagree with you think that we must persist and do whatever it takes to enable the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan to remove the smmonm from their countries without our help.

You folks appear to think the smmonm, if left to pursue their declared global objectives are not a serious threat to America and humanity.

We folks who disagree with you think the smmonm, if left to pursue their declared global objectives, are a serious threat to America and humanity.

You folks appear to think the USA shares responsibility with the smmonm for the murders perpetrated by the smmonm.

We folks who disagree with you think the smmonm are 100% responsible for the murders perpetrated by the smmonm.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Mar, 2007 01:50 pm
ican711nm wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:

...
Many of these [sources of mine], I guarantee, have nothing to do with Soros whatsoever.
...
Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn, you know as well as I do that you have made these dumb statements on able2know:
(1) one cannot prove a negative
(2) al-Qaeda has contributed little to the 2006 and 2007 mass murders of non-murderers in Iraq
(3) al-Qaeda was caused to be in Iraq by the American invasion of Iraq
(4) the Bush administration is responsible for the mass murders of non-murderers in Iraq since we invaded Iraq
(5) the US invasion of Iraq was illegal
(6) the Iraqi people do not want democracy
(7) the American people want us to leave Iraq before the Iraqi people can defend themselves without our help
(8) go after and punish the criminals who carry [suicidal terrorism] out
(9) the Bush admin isn't interested in catching Osama Bin Laden or the top AQ leadership
(10) The Taliban did far more than just allow AQ sanctuary, they were entwined together ... very different from Saddam's situation
(11) You quoted the wrong passage; that one talks about self-defense, whereas we are currently on the Offensive
(12) There is no such thing as going on the offensive in order to defend oneself
(13) Many of these [sources of mine], I guarantee, have nothing to do with Soros whatsoever.

You guarantee Exclamation Laughing Laughing Laughing


Yes, unless Soros is funding the National Review and other comparable Republican news and opinion sources.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Mar, 2007 01:52 pm
Quote:

You folks appear to think the USA's inadequate performance cannot be improved.


You are wrong; we believe that it won't be improved. There's no evidence to show that it will.

Quote:

We folks who disagree with you think that we must persist and do whatever it takes to enable the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan to remove the smmonm from their countries without our help.


Sorry, but whatever it takes is more than I'm willing to do. This simply isn't that important an issue to trump each and every other issue we face as a society.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Mar, 2007 01:59 pm
It's no longer a surprise, but ican can't seem to see the irony in the way our civilian leadership continues to push this failed war with soldiers who are put in harms way much longer than is known to be safe or sane, then treat them with disrespect after they come home with injuries.

Their primary goal to "win in Iraq" no matter what has been shown to be incompetence and mismanagement of humans seems not one bit to bother them. They prefer the "stay the course" scheme that has been tried before and failed than to look at saving lives and treasure. No sacrifice is too great when the ones making the decisions has nothing to lose. Just hundreds of Iraqis every week, and more than two American soldiers every day.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Mar, 2007 02:09 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Yes, unless Soros is funding the National Review and other comparable Republican news and opinion sources.

Excuse me! WHEN AND WHAT did you ever post here in this forum that was an excerpt or a link from the National Review or other comparable Republican news and opinion sources?

Hay! that's a nice mystery phrase: "other comparable Republican news and opinion sources."

Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:

You folks appear to think the USA's inadequate performance cannot be improved.


You are wrong; we believe that it won't be improved. There's no evidence to show that it will.
...
Cycloptichorn


Fair enough!

ADDENDUM

You folks appear to think the USA's inadequate performance WILL NOT be improved.

We folks who disagree with you think that USA's inadequate performance WILL be improved.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Mar, 2007 02:12 pm
ican711nm wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Yes, unless Soros is funding the National Review and other comparable Republican news and opinion sources.

Excuse me! WHEN AND WHAT did you ever post here in this forum that was an excerpt or a link from the National Review or other comparable Republican news and opinion sources?

Hay! that's a nice mystery phrase: "other comparable Republican news and opinion sources."

Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:

You folks appear to think the USA's inadequate performance cannot be improved.


You are wrong; we believe that it won't be improved. There's no evidence to show that it will.
...
Cycloptichorn


Fair enough!

ADDENDUM

You folks appear to think the USA's inadequate performance WILL NOT be improved.

We folks who disagree with you think that USA's inadequate performance WILL be improved.


Why? Why? Why would you believe such a thing? Where has the evidence been shown that our performance will be improved?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 07/09/2025 at 11:24:47