Unfortunately, Bush support Maliki. sob sob...
George Soros doesn't know what he's talking about; "crushing the terrorists?" He's not a spokesman for anybody but himself. Terrorism around the world has been increasing since Bush started his illegal war. ROFLMAO. You must do better than that!
cicerone imposter wrote:
...
IT WOULD BE BETTER IF ALL THOSE ROOTING AGAINST VICTORY IN IRAQ WENT AHEAD AND ADMITTED THAT WAS A MISTAKE.
_________________
He makes these stupid assumptions that he can't back up. I'd like to see him prove his point that anyone is rooting against victory in Iraq. Typical ican statement; no basis in fact.
"I'd like to see him prove his point that anyone is rooting against victory in Iraq. Typical ican statement; no basis in fact."
GEORGE SOROS in the 2003 edition of his book, page 15, [i]The Alchemy of Finance[/i], wrote:My greatest fear is that the Bush Doctrine will succeed--that Bush will crush the terrorists, tame the rogue states of the axis of evil, and usher in a golden age of American supremacy. American supremacy is flawed and bound to fail in the long run.
What I am afraid of is that the pursuit of American supremacy may be successful for a while because the United States in fact employs a dominant position in the world today.
I do not accept the rules imposed by others. If I did, I would not be alive today. I am a law-abiding citizen, but I recognize that there are regimes that need to be opposed rather than accepted. And in periods of regime change, the normal rules don't apply. One needs to adjust one's behavior to the changing circumstances.
Tividar [George Soros's father] saved his family by splitting them up, providing them with forged papers and false identities as Christians, and bribing Gentile families to take them in. George Soros took the name Sandor Kiss, and posed as the godson of a man named Baumbach, an official of Hungary's fascist regime. Baumbach was assigned to deliver deportation notices to Jews and confiscate Jewish property. [Baumbach] brought young Soros with him on his rounds.
My goal is to become the conscience of the world
Usually it takes a crisis to prompt a meaningful change in direction.
Ousting Bush from the White House is the central focus of my life. It's a matter of life and death.
My greatest fear is that the Bush Doctrine will succeed--that Bush will crush the terrorists, tame the rogue states of the axis of evil, and usher in a golden age of American supremacy. American supremacy is flawed and bound to fail in the long run.
What I am afraid of is that the pursuit of American supremacy may be successful for a while because the United States in fact employs a dominant position in the world today.
These are not normal times.
The principles of the Declaration of Independence are not self-evident truths but arrangements necessitated by our inherently imperfect understanding.
In April 2005 the Soros funded Campus Progress web site posted this headline: "An Invitation to Help Design the Constitution in 2020" (This was an invitation to a Yale law School Conference on "The Constitution of 2020: a progressive vision of what the Constitution ought to be.")
On December 9, 2004, Eli Pariser, who headed Soros's group Moveon PAC, boasted to his members, "Now the Democratic Party is our party. We bought it, we own it."
The Fatwahs Against American Troops in Saudi Arabia and Yemen
5. At various times from in or about 1992 until the date of the filing of this Indictment, Usama Bin Laden, working together with members of the fatwah committee of al Qaeda, disseminated fatwahs to other members and associates of al Qaeda that the United States forces stationed on the Saudi Arabian peninsula, including both Saudi Arabia and Yemen, should be attacked.
The Fatwah Against American Troops in Somalia
6. At various times from in or about 1992 until in or about 1993, Usama Bin Laden, working together with members of the fatwah committee of al Qaeda, disseminated fatwahs to other members and associates of al Qaeda that the United States forces stationed in the Horn of Africa, including Somalia, should be attacked.
The Fatwah Regarding Deaths of Nonbelievers
7. On various occasions, an unindicted co-conspirator advised other members of al Qaeda that it was Islamically proper to engage in violent actions against "infidels" (nonbelievers), even if others might be killed by such actions, because if the others were "innocent," they would go to paradise, and if they were not "innocent," they deserved to die.
The August 1996 Declaration of War
8. On or about August 23, 1996, a Declaration of Jihad indicating that it was from the Hindu Kush mountains in Afghanistan entitled, "Message from Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Laden to His Muslim Brothers in the Whole World and Especially in the Arabian Peninsula: Declaration of Jihad Against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Mosques; Expel the Heretics from the Arabian Peninsula" was disseminated.
The February 1998 Fatwah Against American Civilians
9. In February 1998, Usama Bin Laden endorsed a fatwah under the banner of the "International Islamic Front for Jihad on the Jews and Crusaders." This fatwah, published in the publication Al-Quds al-`Arabi on February 23, 1998, stated that Muslims should kill Americans - including civilians - anywhere in the world where they can be found.
10. In an address in or about 1998, Usama Bin Laden cited American aggression against Islam and encouraged a jihad that would eliminate the Americans from the Arabian Peninsula.
Bin Laden Endorses the Nuclear Bomb of Islam
11. On or about May 29, 1998, Usama Bin Laden issued a statement entitled "The Nuclear Bomb of Islam," under the banner of the "International Islamic Front for Fighting the Jews and the Crusaders," in which he stated that "it is the duty of the Muslims to prepare as much force as possible to terrorize the enemies of God."
Usama Bin Laden Issues Further Threats in June 1999
12. In or about June 1999, in an interview with an Arabic-language television station, Usama Bin Laden issued a further threat indicating that all American males should be killed.
Usama Bin Laden Calls for "Jihad" to Free Imprisoned Terrorists
13. In or about September 2000, in an interview with an Arabic-language television station, Usama Bin Laden called for a "jihad" to release the "brothers" in jail "everywhere."
13. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
TERRORIST INCIDENTS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents#1996
Note: All the following listed terrorist incidents exclude all terrorist incidents in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, and Israel.
Quote:1996
June 25: Khobar Towers bombing, killing 19 and wounding 372 Americans.
1997
----
1998
August 7: U.S. embassy bombings in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania and Nairobi, Kenya, killing 225 people and injuring more than 4,000.
1999
----
2000
October 12: USS Cole bombing kills 17 US sailors.
2001
September 11: The attacks on September 11 kill almost 3,000 in a series of hijacked airliner crashes into two U.S. landmarks: the World Trade Center in New York City, New York, and The Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia. A fourth plane crashes in Somerset County, Pennsylvania.
October 12: Bali car bombing of holidaymakers kills 202 people, mostly Western tourists and local Balinese hospitality staff.
October 17: Zamboanga bombings in the Philippines kill six and wounds about 150.
October 18: A bus bomb in Manila kills three people and wounds 22.
October 19: A car bomb explodes outside a McDonald's Corp. restaurant in Moscow, killing one person and wounding five.
Note: October 20, 2001: USA invades Afghanistan
Quote:October 23: Moscow theater hostage crisis begins; 120 hostages and 40 terrorists killed in rescue three days later.
Note: December 20, 2001: Osama helps establish al Qaeda training bases in Iraq.
Quote:2003
March 4: Bomb attack in an airport in Davao kills 21.
Note: March 20, 2003: US invades Iraq at the time al Qaeda controls about a dozen villages and a range of peaks in northeastern Iraq on the Iranian border.
Quote:2003
May 12: Bombings of United States expatriate housing compounds in Saudi Arabia kill 26 and injure 160 in the Riyadh Compound Bombings. Al-Qaeda blamed.
May 12: A truck bomb attack on a government building in the Chechen town of Znamenskoye kills 59.
May 14: As many as 16 die in a suicide bombing at a religious festival in southeastern Chechnya.
May 16: Casablanca Attacks by 12 bombers on five "Western and Jewish" targets in Casablanca, Morocco leaves 41 dead and over 100 injured. Attack attributed to a Moroccan al-Qaeda-linked group.
July 5: 15 people die and 40 are injured in bomb attacks at a rock festival in Moscow.
August 1: An explosion at the Russian hospital in Mozdok in North Ossetia kills at least 50 people and injures 76.
August 25: At least 48 people were killed and 150 injured in two blasts in south Mumbai - one near the Gateway of India at the other at the Zaveri Bazaar.
September 3: A bomb blast on a passenger train near Kislovodsk in southern Russia kills seven people and injures 90.
November 15 and November 20: Truck bombs go off at two synagogues, the British Consulate, and the HSBC Bank in Istanbul, Turkey, killing 57 and wounding 700.
December 5: Suicide bombers kill at least 46 people in an attack on a train in southern Russia
December 9: A blast in the center of Moscow kills six people and wounds at least 11.
2004
February 6: Bomb on Moscow Metro kills 41.
February 27: Superferry 14 is bombed in the Philippines by Abu Sayyaf, killing 116.
March 2: Attack on procession of Shia Muslims in Pakistan kills 43 and wounds 160.
March 11: Coordinated bombing of commuter trains in Madrid, Spain, kills 191 people and injures more than 1,500.
April 21: Basra bombs in Iraq kill 74 and injure hundreds.
April 21: Bombing of a security building in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia kills 5.
May 29: Al-Khobar massacres, in which Islamic militants kill 22 people at an oil compound in Saudi Arabia.
August 24: Bombing of Russian airplane kills 90.
August 31: A blast near a subway station entrance in northern Moscow, caused by a suicide bomber, kills 10 people and injures 33.
September 1 – 3: Beslan school hostage crisis in North Ossetia, Russia, results in 344 dead.
September 9: Jakarta embassy bombing, in which the Australian embassy in Jakarta, Indonesia was bombed, kills eight people.
October 7: Sinai bombings: Three car bombs explode in the Sinai Peninsula, killing at least 34 and wounding 171, many of them Israeli and other foreign tourists.
December 6: Suspected al Qaeda-linked group attacks U.S. consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, killing 5 local employees.
December 12: A bombing at the Christmas market in General Santos, Philippines, kills 15.
2005
February 14: A car bomb kills former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri and 20 others in Beirut.
March 9: An attack of an Istanbul restaurant killed one, and injured five.
March 19: Car bomb attack on theatre in Doha, Qatar, kills one Briton and wounds 12 others.
April 7: A suicide bomber blows himself up in Cairo's Khan al Khalili market, killing three foreign tourists and wounding 17 others.
May 7: Multiple bomb explosions across Myanmar's capital Rangoon kill 19 and injure 160.
June 12: Bombs explode in the Iranian cities of Ahvaz and Tehran, leaving 10 dead and 80 wounded days before the Iranian presidential election.
July 7: London bombings - Attacks on one double-decker bus and three London Underground trains, killing 56 people and injuring over 700, occur on the first day of the 31st G8 Conference. The attacks are believed by many to be the first suicide bombings in Western Europe.
July 23: Sharm el-Sheikh bombings: Car bombs explode at tourist sites in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, killing at least 88 and wounding more than 100.
August 17: Around 100 home-made bombs exploded in 58 different locations in Bangladesh, Killing two and wounding 100.
October 1: A series of explosions occurs in resort areas of Jimabaran Beach and Kuta in Bali, Indonesia.
October 13: A large group of Chechen rebels launched coordinated attacks on Russian federal buildings, local police stations, and the airport in Nalchik, Kabardino-Balkaria. At least 137 people, including 92 rebels, were killed.
October 15: Two bombs exploded at a shopping mall in Ahvaz, Khuzestan in Iran. Six people died and over 100 were injured.
October 29: Multiple bomb blasts hit markets in New Delhi, India, leaving at least 61 dead and more than 200 injured.
November 9: Three explosions at hotels in Amman, Jordan, leave at least 57 dead and 120 wounded.
December --
2006
January --
February --
March 2: Bombing in Karachi, Pakistan kills four, including a U.S. diplomat.
March 7: Bombings in the Hindu holy city of Varanasi, India, leave at least 15 people dead.
cicerone imposter wrote:: Any fruitcake like Osama can make threats, ... the threat is mostly bluster without any way to carry it out.
...
"the threat is mostly bluster"![]()
Let's examine that a little more carefully. A total of 20 suicidal terrorists, less one named Moussaoui, murdered almost 3,000 American civilians. Would it take 15 times as many terrorists -- 300 -- to murder 45,000 American civilians? Al-Qaeda trained more than enough in Afghanistan before 9/11: a minimum of 10,000 trained terrorists - 300 suicidal terrorists = 9,700 left over for more murdering still.
From page 2:
In the "Israel WW3 thread":
cicerone imposter wrote:
Why Israel will not have peace until they realize military might is not the answer.
ican711nm wrote:
Malarkey! Every agreement the Israelites negotiate with the Palestinian Arabs is followed by the Palestinian Arabs committing more mass murder of Israelies. The truth is, the Palestinian Arabs negotiate with the Israelis for only one reason: to fool the Israelis into thinking the Palestinian Arabs do not really want Israel destroyed, and thereby to fool the Israelis into relaxing their defenses.
Israel will finally get some peace only after it exterminates the Palestinian Arabs.
ican really loves wholesale slaughter of a group of people whether they are innocent men, women and children. We should know by now that ican is a insane madman.
Speaking with retired Col. Jack Jacobs, Carlson said he was "a little bit uncomfortable with" the op-ed because he says "weighing in on a political question such as this" may "squander the awesome moral authority that these guys have." "I think there is some detriment to the moral authority," agreed Jacobs.
While saying he "instinctively" respects "people who are serving in a war zone," Carlson went on to attack the op-ed, saying that he also "instinctively distrust[s]" some of the assertions made by the soldiers, such as their argument that "a vast majority of Iraqis feel increasingly insecure and view us as an occupation force."
While Carlson claims to have respect for people serving in a war zone, he appears to have no hesitations in calling out the credibility of soldiers when they present a viewpoint that doesn't confirm his own. On MSNBC's Countdown last night, Paul Rieckhoff ?- executive director of the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) ?- said soldiers are the "subject matter experts" when it comes to Iraq. "That's why this op-ed is so important," he explained. He added:
The soldiers who wrote this piece just completed a 15-month tour. One of them was actually shot in the head before this piece was published, and he's recovering in the U.S. now. These guys know what they are talking about and they present a very nuanced understanding of the battlefield that the politicians and the policy wonks haven't been able to provide.
Additionally, Carlson's feigned skepticism of the soldier's assertions about Iraqi views is contradicted by actual studies of Iraqi public opinion. A national survey of Iraq from June 2007 found an "ebbing hope in a landscape of loss":
- 39 percent of Iraqis said they feel their lives are "going well," compared to 71 percent in November 2005."
- 26 percent of Iraqis said they feel "very safe" in their neighborhoods, compared to 63 percent in November 2005.
- 82 percent of Iraqis said they "lack confidence" in coalition forces.
- 69 percent of Iraqis said coalition forces make "the security situation worse."
Faced with the sophisticated argument that the soldiers present, Carlson is resorting to simple-minded, ignorant views to discredit their op-ed.
old europe wrote:ican, how would you define "success in Iraq?"
ican711nm wrote:
(1)The mass murder of Iraqi non-murderers is reduced to less than 1,000 per month;
(2) the Iraq Government continues for one year after that to reduce the mass murder of Iraqi non-murderers; and
(3) al-Qaeda continues for one year after that to be denied sanctuary anywhere in Iraq by the Iraq government.
However, what about the possibility that the Iraq government decides to ask the US to remove its military from Iraq before they can protect their non-murderers from being killed by mass murderers in Iraq? In that case, the US will have not succeeded.
Should the US leave when asked by the Iraqi government regardless? I say YES! Staying when we are asked to leave will not allow the US to succeed. We will be compelled to find an alternate plan to succeed in protecting American non-murderers from mass murderers in Iraq (or elsewhere) emigrating to America.
In late July, House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., said an upbeat assessment from Petraeus would carry significant weight with his party's most conservative members. They would "want to stay the course, and if the Republicans were to stay united as they have been, then it would be a problem for us," Clyburn told The Washington Post.
Why are so many of the dems now saying that the surge in Iraq is working?
Especially since one dem leader (James Clyburn D-SC) has admitted that if it is working it would be "very difficult" for the dems.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/8/20/145934.shtml
Quote:In late July, House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., said an upbeat assessment from Petraeus would carry significant weight with his party's most conservative members. They would "want to stay the course, and if the Republicans were to stay united as they have been, then it would be a problem for us," Clyburn told The Washington Post.
mysteryman wrote:Why are so many of the dems now saying that the surge in Iraq is working?
Especially since one dem leader (James Clyburn D-SC) has admitted that if it is working it would be "very difficult" for the dems.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/8/20/145934.shtml
Quote:In late July, House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., said an upbeat assessment from Petraeus would carry significant weight with his party's most conservative members. They would "want to stay the course, and if the Republicans were to stay united as they have been, then it would be a problem for us," Clyburn told The Washington Post.
I think you will have a difficult time specifically naming Dems who are claiming that the 'surge is working.' There may be a couple, but the vast majority don't believe this.
Cycloptichorn
WASHINGTON ?- After a brief trip to Iraq, Sen. Carl Levin said Monday that the Iraqi Parliament should vote no confidence in the government of Prime Minister Nouri Al Maliki because of its sectarian nature and leadership.
"The Maliki government is non-functional," Levin, D-Mich., said in a conference call with reporters.
Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Sen. John Warner of Virginia, the panel's top Republican, just returned from a fact-finding mission to the country. The two reported that they are encouraged by the effects of the recent U.S. military surge there, but their enthusiasm is tempered by concerns about Iraq's political climate.
WASHINGTON - One senator said U.S. troops are routing out al-Qaida in parts of Iraq. Another insisted President Bush?'s plan to increase troops has caused tactical momentum.
These are not Bush-backing GOP die-hards, but Democratic Sens. Dick Durbin, Bob Casey and Jack Reed. Even Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services committee, said progress was being made by soldiers.
"One, I think we're making real progress. Secondly, I think the consequences of pulling back precipitously would be potentially catastrophic for the Iraqi people themselves, to whom we have a tremendous responsibility ... and in the long run chaotic for the region as a whole and for our own security."
Cycloptichorn wrote:mysteryman wrote:Why are so many of the dems now saying that the surge in Iraq is working?
Especially since one dem leader (James Clyburn D-SC) has admitted that if it is working it would be "very difficult" for the dems.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/8/20/145934.shtml
Quote:In late July, House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., said an upbeat assessment from Petraeus would carry significant weight with his party's most conservative members. They would "want to stay the course, and if the Republicans were to stay united as they have been, then it would be a problem for us," Clyburn told The Washington Post.
I think you will have a difficult time specifically naming Dems who are claiming that the 'surge is working.' There may be a couple, but the vast majority don't believe this.
Cycloptichorn
Then you think wrong.
Here are just a few top dems that are saying the surge is working...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,293815,00.html
Quote:WASHINGTON ?- After a brief trip to Iraq, Sen. Carl Levin said Monday that the Iraqi Parliament should vote no confidence in the government of Prime Minister Nouri Al Maliki because of its sectarian nature and leadership.
"The Maliki government is non-functional," Levin, D-Mich., said in a conference call with reporters.
Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Sen. John Warner of Virginia, the panel's top Republican, just returned from a fact-finding mission to the country. The two reported that they are encouraged by the effects of the recent U.S. military surge there, but their enthusiasm is tempered by concerns about Iraq's political climate.
http://www.onelocalnews.com/prescottherald/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=150003
Quote:WASHINGTON - One senator said U.S. troops are routing out al-Qaida in parts of Iraq. Another insisted President Bush?'s plan to increase troops has caused tactical momentum.
These are not Bush-backing GOP die-hards, but Democratic Sens. Dick Durbin, Bob Casey and Jack Reed. Even Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services committee, said progress was being made by soldiers.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/6420ap_wa_iraq_baird.html
Quote:"One, I think we're making real progress. Secondly, I think the consequences of pulling back precipitously would be potentially catastrophic for the Iraqi people themselves, to whom we have a tremendous responsibility ... and in the long run chaotic for the region as a whole and for our own security."
And at the national VFW convention in Kansas City,even Hillary on monday said the surge was working.
So,there are just a few dems now saying the surge is working.
Also,why are many of the dem candidates now saying that we cant leave Iraq immediately?
Why are so many of the dems now saying that the surge in Iraq is working?
Especially since one dem leader (James Clyburn D-SC) has admitted that if it is working it would be "very difficult" for the dems.
...
Also,why are many of the dem candidates now saying that we cant leave Iraq immediately?
...
mysteryman wrote:
...
A question for you, to see if you grasp the situation correctly: what is the goal of the 'surge?'
Cycloptichorn
![]()
Mysteryman, I recommend you don't tell Cyclo the answer! Make him guess. That way we can see if Cyclo grasps the situation correctly.
mysteryman wrote:Why are so many of the dems now saying that the surge in Iraq is working?
Especially since one dem leader (James Clyburn D-SC) has admitted that if it is working it would be "very difficult" for the dems.
...
Also,why are many of the dem candidates now saying that we cant leave Iraq immediately?
Some of the Dems are now saying the present Iraq government must be replaced, or failure in Iraq is certain.
I bet the Dem leadership has devised a new way to attack the Repubs.
Oh! But never forget: regardless, of course it's all Bush's fault.
