old europe wrote:okie wrote:Until I see the information behind the numbers, yes, I am skeptical, especially when accompanied by the admission that programs are available in virtually any situation.
You're sceptical about the numbers published by the US Department of Health and Human Services - but numbers cited by a blogger about specialised care beds in the UK convince you that the British system is underperforming?
Do you think your ideology gets in the way of a critical analysis every now and then?
Actually, I think the numbers are quite possible, but I would like to see the reasons behind the numbers, such as number of illegals included, and how many are due to simple inaction or irresponsibility of parents rather than lack of availability of health care. Do the parents have no responsibility whatsoever?
My idealogy does get in the way, I openly admit to it. I have a built in bias whereby I firmly believe government managed programs are almost always more inefficient than privately managed programs that have more free market influence. I believe this has been proven over and over again. I also temper that assessment by recognizing the U.S. health care system needs more free market influences than it has now, so I admit to the fact that inefficiencies exist.
Quote:okie wrote:I think it has already been brought up about illegals and other problems with the statistics. For children of parents that can afford insurance but don't buy it, and for children of parents that can't afford it but qualify for other programs like Medicaid, but don't go sign up, are we supposed to now go find those people and lead them by the hand down to wherever they need to go to sign up or get insurance? I thought parents had a responsibility for their children?
So if children get no health care when they need it, it's sufficient to blame the parents and be done with it? Society has no responsibility? Does the same go for child abuse? Should we just say "Blimey, I thought parents had a responsibility for their children?"
No, I didn't say that. I believe the parents are first to be responsible and that should be openly recognized, but what I see here is not much mention of that, only that all of these statistical children without health care are the fault of the State. I object to that assessment.
When there is child abuse, parents are responsible first to protect children from that. In our society, if a teacher or neighbor, or social worker, notices clear signs of child abuse, they are either obliged or required to report it, and help can be provided. I believe the same thing can happen for health care. If health care is available but the parents do not avail their children to it, what happens in Germany?