65
   

IT'S TIME FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE

 
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 10:56 am
128,578 patients.

Okay.

Thanks, McGentrix.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 11:00 am
old europe wrote:
okie wrote:
Until I see the information behind the numbers, yes, I am skeptical, especially when accompanied by the admission that programs are available in virtually any situation.


You're sceptical about the numbers published by the US Department of Health and Human Services - but numbers cited by a blogger about specialised care beds in the UK convince you that the British system is underperforming?

Do you think your ideology gets in the way of a critical analysis every now and then?

Actually, I think the numbers are quite possible, but I would like to see the reasons behind the numbers, such as number of illegals included, and how many are due to simple inaction or irresponsibility of parents rather than lack of availability of health care. Do the parents have no responsibility whatsoever?

My idealogy does get in the way, I openly admit to it. I have a built in bias whereby I firmly believe government managed programs are almost always more inefficient than privately managed programs that have more free market influence. I believe this has been proven over and over again. I also temper that assessment by recognizing the U.S. health care system needs more free market influences than it has now, so I admit to the fact that inefficiencies exist.


Quote:
okie wrote:
I think it has already been brought up about illegals and other problems with the statistics. For children of parents that can afford insurance but don't buy it, and for children of parents that can't afford it but qualify for other programs like Medicaid, but don't go sign up, are we supposed to now go find those people and lead them by the hand down to wherever they need to go to sign up or get insurance? I thought parents had a responsibility for their children?


So if children get no health care when they need it, it's sufficient to blame the parents and be done with it? Society has no responsibility? Does the same go for child abuse? Should we just say "Blimey, I thought parents had a responsibility for their children?"

No, I didn't say that. I believe the parents are first to be responsible and that should be openly recognized, but what I see here is not much mention of that, only that all of these statistical children without health care are the fault of the State. I object to that assessment.

When there is child abuse, parents are responsible first to protect children from that. In our society, if a teacher or neighbor, or social worker, notices clear signs of child abuse, they are either obliged or required to report it, and help can be provided. I believe the same thing can happen for health care. If health care is available but the parents do not avail their children to it, what happens in Germany?
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 11:03 am
Financial Assistance Program at Memoria Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center ( NYCITY)


Quote:
Our Financial Assistance Program

For many years, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center has provided financial help to patients in need. If you do not have health insurance or are worried that your health insurance may not cover your hospital bill in full, we may be able to help.

The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Financial Assistance Program helps uninsured and underinsured patients with household income up to four times the federal poverty level who cannot get publically funded health insurance and cannot afford to pay for their medical care.

Hospital and physician fees can be reduced for patients who qualify for this Program. Aid is given based on the patient's household income, assets, family size, expenses and medical needs. Each application for assistance is handled confidentially and requires the cooperation of the applicant. More information on applying for this program can be found in the Financial Assistance Program brochure. (Este folleto está disponible en inglés y en español.)

If you do not qualify for the Financial Assistance Program and your health insurance does not completely cover your medical expenses, we will work with you to arrange a payment plan. We understand that each patient has a unique financial situation and encourage you to contact our Patient Financial Services department if you need our assistance.
Contact Our Financial Assistant Program

If you have any questions or wish to speak with someone about the Financial Assistance Program at Memorial Hospital, please contact the Patient Financial Services department at 212-639-5880
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 11:05 am
McGentrix wrote:
old europe wrote:
Miller wrote:
This mission is carried out without cost to the patient or family and without regard to financial need or relationship to a Shriner


How many children are treated at a Shriner across the United States?


5 seconds on google provided:

In 2006, Shriners Hospitals approved 38,984 new patient applications, attended to the needs of 128,578 patients and provided the following:

* 251,461 radiology procedures
* 296,859 outpatient, outreach and telemedicine visits
* 61,103 orthotic and prosthetic devices
* 24,609 surgical procedures
* 412,387 physical therapy treatments
* 181,174 occupational therapy treatments


Thanks for your speed. Laughing
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 11:12 am
FREE MEDICAL CARE AT THE MAYO CLINIC



Quote:
Charity Care

Mayo Clinic has a long history of providing care to patients regardless of their ability to pay. Our primary value is "the needs of the patient come first."

Mayo Clinic provides services to meet the needs of patients who are unable to pay for care. These services include:

* Helping patients find sources to fund their care, including opportunities to work with outside agencies.
* Using fair and consistent collection practices that are in the best interest of all parties involved.
* Providing individualized payment plans, medical services at reduced rates or at no cost -- based upon the patient's ability to pay.
* Providing emergency care to stabilize patients, regardless of ability to pay.

Mayo Clinic has developed a process for directing patients to alternative sources of funding for their medical care. Mayo Clinic determines a patient's need for charity care based on financial information and the medical services needed. The financial information includes the patient's individual and family income, assets, employment status, family size and availability of alternative sources of payment. Mayo Clinic's charity care policy requires that the medical services must be extraordinary and unique to Mayo (i.e., services that are not readily available at medical centers closer to the patient's home).

If you are experiencing financial hardship, please contact Patient Account Services at (507) 266-5670 or arrange to meet with one of our financial counselors, who can talk with you about options such as a payment plan or government assistance. Visit our offices in one of the following locations:

* Eisenberg Lobby
* Rochester Methodist Hospital
* Gonda Lobby East
* Gonda Building
* Mary Brigh Main
* Saint Marys Hospital

Our staff may ask you to complete a Mayo Clinic Financial Statement form (PDF), which will help us evaluate your eligibility for charity care. Note that until your financial statement has been reviewed and approved by our financial counselors, you will be financially responsible for your medical care
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 11:14 am
Miller, could you provide links or numbers with your posts as well? It was really nice of McGentrix to go and find the numbers, but it'd be even more helpful if you could provide some numbers right away - rather than just mission statements....
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 11:16 am
old europe wrote:
Miller, could you provide links or numbers with your posts as well? It was really nice of McGentrix to go and find the numbers, but it'd be even more helpful if you could provide some numbers right away - rather than just mission statements....


Try:

www.google.com
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 11:20 am
Miller wrote:



I can't be buggered to do your homework. If you're trying to make a point, it's up to you to provide the info.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 11:27 am
old europe, I agree; it's not for us to prove their claims.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 11:32 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
old europe, I agree; it's not for us to prove their claims.


Says the one that has never posted a link in his life...
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 11:50 am
McG as always doesn't know what she's talking about. You made the claim: Prove it?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 12:58 pm
Who here agrees with the premise that health care is a "right" or should be a "right" and guaranteed by the government?
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 01:16 pm
okie wrote:
Who here agrees with the premise that health care is a "right" or should be a "right" and guaranteed by the government?


I think a society is measured by how it treats the vulnerable, the poor and helpless. It is measured by the compassion it shows, not just by the chances and opportunities it offers to those who are able to take care of themselves.

Health care isn't a right just like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. But if we think it's okay that people are deprived of these rights because they are ill and can't pay for the treatment, I find it questionable whether the profession of those rights is really more than lip service.

So I think it makes sense for a society to see to it that health care is something everyone can obtain whenever he needs it, and it makes sense that the government that we have elected makes provisions for this to happen.

That does not mean that the government has to provide health care itself - merely that the government puts regulation into place that makes health care available for everyone.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 01:17 pm
(I hope that didn't come across as judgemental....)
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 01:19 pm
old europe wrote:
okie wrote:
Who here agrees with the premise that health care is a "right" or should be a "right" and guaranteed by the government?


I think a society is measured by how it treats the vulnerable, the poor and helpless. It is measured by the compassion it shows, not just by the chances and opportunities it offers to those who are able to take care of themselves.

Health care isn't a right just like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. But if we think it's okay that people are deprived of these rights because they are ill and can't pay for the treatment, I find it questionable whether the profession of those rights is really more than lip service.

So I think it makes sense for a society to see to it that health care is something everyone can obtain whenever he needs it, and it makes sense that the government that we have elected makes provisions for this to happen.

That does not mean that the government has to provide health care itself - merely that the government puts regulation into place that makes health care available for everyone.


old europe, I agree 100 percent~! Some people still do not realize how devastating it is, even for middle class families without health insurance, to have a family member who needs medical care beyond their ability to pay. It's not only that, but a healthy society benefits everybody, and a universal health care system makes our products more competitive in the world marketplace. If any country can reduce the cars produced in their coountry by the cost of health benefits, their products become more competitive by price.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 01:53 pm
old europe wrote:
okie wrote:
Who here agrees with the premise that health care is a "right" or should be a "right" and guaranteed by the government?


I think a society is measured by how it treats the vulnerable, the poor and helpless. It is measured by the compassion it shows, not just by the chances and opportunities it offers to those who are able to take care of themselves.

Health care isn't a right just like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. But if we think it's okay that people are deprived of these rights because they are ill and can't pay for the treatment, I find it questionable whether the profession of those rights is really more than lip service.

So I think it makes sense for a society to see to it that health care is something everyone can obtain whenever he needs it, and it makes sense that the government that we have elected makes provisions for this to happen.

That does not mean that the government has to provide health care itself - merely that the government puts regulation into place that makes health care available for everyone.

Is food a right or should it be? In other words, to requote you, would your quote apply as follows:

"I think a society is measured by how it treats the vulnerable, the poor and helpless. It is measured by the compassion it shows, not just by the chances and opportunities it offers to those who are able to take care of themselves.

Food isn't a right just like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. But if we think it's okay that people are deprived of these rights because they are hungry and can't pay for the food, I find it questionable whether the profession of those rights is really more than lip service.

So I think it makes sense for a society to see to it that food is something everyone can obtain whenever he needs it, and it makes sense that the government that we have elected makes provisions for this to happen.

That does not mean that the government has to provide food itself - merely that the government puts regulation into place that makes food available for everyone"
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 02:01 pm
okie in black:

Is food a right or should it be? In other words, to requote you, would your quote apply as follows:

"I think a society is measured by how it treats the vulnerable, the poor and helpless. It is measured by the compassion it shows, not just by the chances and opportunities it offers to those who are able to take care of themselves.

That's 100 percent true. Those with "haves" should help those without. It's the humane thing to do, but you wouldn't understand anything about that philosophy.

Food isn't a right just like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. But if we think it's okay that people are deprived of these rights because they are hungry and can't pay for the food, I find it questionable whether the profession of those rights is really more than lip service.

In the richest country on this planet, our government provides food stamps for those in need. I agree with this program.

So I think it makes sense for a society to see to it that food is something everyone can obtain whenever he needs it, and it makes sense that the government that we have elected makes provisions for this to happen.

It does happen, and is happening. Also, many nonprofit organizations provides food to the needy.

That does not mean that the government has to provide food itself - merely that the government puts regulation into place that makes food available for everyone"

So, what's wrong with that? Seems like your arguing against your own position on providing food to the needy.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 02:03 pm
okie wrote:
Is food a right or should it be?


An unalienable right? I wouldn't say so.


okie wrote:
In other words, to requote you, would your quote apply as follows:

"I think a society is measured by how it treats the vulnerable, the poor and helpless. It is measured by the compassion it shows, not just by the chances and opportunities it offers to those who are able to take care of themselves.

Food isn't a right just like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. But if we think it's okay that people are deprived of these rights because they are hungry and can't pay for the food, I find it questionable whether the profession of those rights is really more than lip service.

So I think it makes sense for a society to see to it that food is something everyone can obtain whenever he needs it, and it makes sense that the government that we have elected makes provisions for this to happen.

That does not mean that the government has to provide food itself - merely that the government puts regulation into place that makes food available for everyone"


Yes, it would apply.

Now, I don't know a lot about the details, but isn't that what the US Food Stamp Program is doing?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 02:05 pm
So to be consistent, would you guys advocate a single payer system for food?
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2007 02:06 pm
okie wrote:
So to be consistent, would you guys advocate a single payer system for food?


To be consistent, I'm not advocating a single payer health care system. I'm advocating a universal health care system.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 03/11/2025 at 11:51:43