Thanks, that was indeed a long, but well worthwhile read. It's a pretty intense portrait of the man.
As a portrait of the man, personally, it's objective as well - not in the way that everything's turned into some bland middle-ground take, but in the alternation of critical and understanding takes.
I winced at the detailed exposition of the man's old age flaws and health problems, which I think verged on the unfair. But on the other hand the article portrays McCain's 'betrayal' on habeus corpus in a surprisingly understanding way, providing contexts that makes his decision to let that one go feel understandable. It makes the case that he did what he could halfway persuasively, citing a critical enough authority as the Washington advocacy director for Human Rights Watch.
The quote you provide on McCains take on Iraq is also counterposed with other, more sobre observations:
The one, deep flaw that I see in this portrait is one that is shared by many more boiler-plate media "in-depth" portraits of campaigning politicians, which will multiply in the coming year. It's that the portrait is entirely focused on the man's personality, his psyche, his behaviour, his character. What I would like to know more about when it comes to a possible future president of my country, if I were American, is: what are his convictions? Not just in terms of personal moral compass, but on the actual politics of it - what are his ideals? What kind of politics does he stand for, and more interestingly, how has he come to stand for them? What vision of a future America does he have? With what political, ideological values did he grow up, how have they inspired him?
The only two things we learn about those questions here, really, are that a) he is a cultural conservative, but "his heart isnt really in it", and b) he is a patriotic, but morally strict, hawk on foreign policy. In fact, domestic politics is conspicuously absent from the portrait of the man
entirely. He is against ethanol subsidies, fine - but there is not the vaguest hint of what America he would like to see grow in the next decade and later, what ideals his domestic policy convictions are guided by, what prospects he feels most passionate about - it seems that its not just cultural conservatism that his heart isnt in, but domestic politics
period.
In fact, the total absence of passion or even mention of almost any domestic issue makes one suspect that, when it comes to McCain's moral map of what ideas or missions can be forewent in good conscience to achieve what greater goal, he'd be willing to give the hard right pretty much anything it wants on domestic policy, if he'd get full say on both practical and ethical questions of foreign policy in return. I can easily believe that he's a good guy at heart without feeling anyway comfortable about that.