Kofi Annan Gives Farewell Speech

I heard that you married yours.

Bet you typed that with the other hand while gently frigging yourself.

Jealous?

Nope.

You seem to be preoccupied with my personal habits, just wondering why. No private moments of your own?

Actually I'd prefer that you kept your masturbatory acts off A2K but that's about all you ever post. Just keep jerkin bernard/massa/lone hand masturbator. I will avert my eyes and my posts.

Re: Kofi Annan Gives Farewell Speech


Lone Star, you just do not understand the liberal left mind yet. To understand it, you must get one thing clear, and that is Bush is the most dangerous man in the world and should be hated the most. He is worse than Saddam Hussein and Kofi Annan combined. Bush is the ultimate terrorist. Bush is the focus of all evil. Once Bush is removed, and the Democrats have control of the presidency and Congress, there will not be any more enemies anywhere. However there will be scores to settle, and so investigations of Bush and his buddies will be an important part of the agenda because they are still the potential enemies even though they won't be in power anymore. The terrorists will be nice if we are nice to them, and that problem will simply evaporate. Then we can quit spending all of this wasted money on the military escapades of Republican hate mongering Nazis, and once again spend the money on the children (the ones that aren't aborted of course) and all the poor helpless old people (the ones we don't euthenize).

In his speech chastising Bush, Kofi said Truman was a great man, I'm guessing because he was in Missouri when he said it and needed to say something good about somebody from Missouri? Anyway, Kofi will long be remembered as a great man that ran the U.N. so efficiently with never any lost funds, always tried to enforce all U.N. resolutions, never ignored starving and victimized peoples, and although he was a great peace loving man as well, he must not be much of a historian as he apparently never heard about Truman dropping "the bomb" on two large Japanese cities to end WWII. I am sure he would never have approved of anybody that did that.

Couple of better pictures of Annan, back home after his career at the UN:









Don't worry though, the UN will survive without Kofi...

Ah! Have customer like this Snake man in Kazakhstan.

Big tough man outside.


But in private time, they like girl make wee wee on them, or like smacking for being naughty little boy.

Then they cry say cannot pay, and want more smack.

Not allow in place I work.

On the off chance that any of you Kofi Annan fans might not have heard this one.......


A tribe of cannibals once lived in reed/thatch huts supported on stilts over the Nile river, and a warrior amongst them led a commando raid and stole the golden throne of the pharoahs, and transported it to the hut of their chieftain, and caused it to be placed in the center of the chieftain's hut on the floor.

Now, when the village had been built, several generations prior to this, the engineers had designed the thatch flooring of the huts to withstand structural loads of as much as 200 lbs per square foot. Nonetheless the golden throne of the pharoahs weighed 600 lbs with its feet set about 2" apart and when the chief, who weighed over 300 lbs sat upon the throne, the floor gave way and the chief and several of his advisers who were standing close by, were eaten by the ferocious crocodiles which inhabit the Nile river.

The moral of the story: Those who live in grass houses, should not stow thrones.....

Any similarity between these characters and past/present UN employees is purely coincidental.

Actually, it was you that delved into my privacy, so I suggest that you keep your fantasies to yourself, leave mine to me, & you'll be much happier, nimrod.

Sanctimonious nonsense from Annan
TODAY'S EDITORIALDecember 13, 2006


Whatever one thinks of outgoing U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, it's clear that he suffers no shortage of chutzpah -- as evidenced by his willingness to lecture the United States about ethics and our supposed failure to live up to the values that made America great in the current struggle against international Islamofascism. Of course it would be absurd to pretend that the United States hasn't made mistakes in its conduct of this war -- just as we made them in World II, World War I and every other conflict the nation has been involved in. But Americans need no lectures from United Nations apparatchiks about what we can and cannot do to defend ourselves -- especially from Mr. Annan, whose U.N. career has been marred by ethical lapses and serial incompetence, which include the looting of the oil-for-food program, the erosion and collapse of international sanctions against Saddam Hussein's Iraqi government, Rwandan genocide and ethnic cleansing in Bosnia.
Regarding Iraq, Mr. Annan, who became secretary-general 10 years ago, was in the forefront of international appeasement of Saddam prior to September 11. In February 1998, for example, after the Iraqi ruler triggered a crisis by blocking U.N. weapons inspectors from doing their jobs, Mr. Annan went to Baghdad to cut a deal with Saddam weakening weapons inspections. The secretary-general then declared that Saddam had been misunderstood and gushed praise over his supposed courage. After achieving his "success" in negotiations with Saddam, Mr. Annan was honored at a state dinner in Paris by French President Jacques Chirac and received a hero's welcome from U.N. staff after returning to New York.
In March 2000, when Saddam was in the process of diverting billions of dollars worth of oil-for-food program money intended for the Iraqi people to his international cronies, Mr. Annan was bragging to the Security Council about his success in making the program more transparent. Only after coalition troops ousted Saddam three years later did the world learn that Benon Sevan, the man Mr. Annan hired to run the program, had received vouchers for millions of barrels of oil from Saddam. Only when he came under pressure from Congress did Mr. Annan end his obstruction of congressional investigations of the scandal by releasing internal U.N. audits of the program. S. Iqbal Riza, Mr. Annan's chief of staff, suddenly "retired" after it came to light that he authorized his secretary to shred several years worth of documents relevant to the investigation.
Perhaps the most shameful episode of Mr. Annan's U.N. career was his failure, as director of peacekeeping operations during the 1990s, to take action to prevent Rwandan genocide. In 1994, Mr. Annan failed to act after being warned by Lt.-Gen. Romeo Dallaire, commander of U.N. peacekeeping forces there, that Hutu radicals were planning to massacre members of the rival Tutsi tribe. Mr. Annan rejected Gen. Dallaire's request to seize an arms cache that Hutu militias aligned with the Rwandan government were planning to use to massacre Tutsis. Mr. Annan's decision helped pave the way for ensuing massacres in which 800,000 died. The following year in Bosnia, the failure of U.N. peacekeepers to keep their promises enabled Serbian troops and militiamen to execute 8,000 Muslim men and boys.
Given his own record of malfeasance, Mr. Annan is in no position to lecture the United States about its shortcomings.

Great article, hope everyone reads it.

You weren't blaming them for the invasion, you were blaming them for taking over the torture of the Iraqi people. That is what I objected to.

War always leads to atrocities on both sides - senseless war makes this even more grotesque. I was blaming the invasion for creating the situation where:

becomes even more possible/prevalent.

Clearly I've hit some sort of nerve - but you can't deny soldiers have committed offences - I never said all soldiers or even one nation's soldiers. Your obvious point is noted - it's a pity you're countering an argument I never made.

ROTFLMAO Good one McGentrix.

Borat Sister, I have not posted on this thread because of the general tone, racism and the usual rants from radical right-wingers. Seeing your post, though, made me decide to post just to welcome you to a2k. You will be a welcome addition. Just try not to get caught up in it. They aren't worth your time unless you need to get across an important post or to ridicule the vain and narrow minded drivel. They are seldom worth even that much effort.

Exactly!

How the hell can you make a huge organization like the UN work when it's most powerful "member" is hell bent on subverting it for its own ends?

I'm not saying the UN has been 100% fantastic in resolving the woes & conflicts of the planet, certainly not. But hey, it's the best avenue we have available to us. Some will & determination by all parties, to get it functioning a damn sight better than it has, would be a very positive development!