1
   

stupid is as stupid does

 
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 08:31 pm
LoneStarMadam wrote:
kelticwizard wrote:
"Republicans understand the importance of bondage between a mother and child."
-Dan Quayle

It was a Quayle quote, not Gore

http://www.ahajokes.com/gb002.html

Looks like that page got the attribution wrong then.

The "Republicans" version (attributed to Quayle): 774 Google hits

The "Democrats" version (attributed to Gore): 95 Google hits

Dont trust Google hits (a crude method after all), then just read what Snopes says:

Quote:
Dan Quayle has certainly made more than his share of misstatements, and most* of the ones on the following list are actual Quayle quotes (although versions of this list with all the quotes mischievously attributed to Vice-President Al Gore and Texas governor George W. Bush also circulate around the Internet).

*nimh: the exceptions are marked on the page - but the "bondage" one is real.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 08:35 pm
LoneStarMadam wrote:
snood wrote:
LoneStarMadam wrote:
"Terrorism started with Abu Graib"
John Murtha

Can you source that quote?

Yes.


Google results for "Terrorism started with Abu Graib": 1. (A blog called "Pondering Penguin").

Google results for "Terrorism started with Abu Ghraib": 1. (A blog called "Lifelike Pundits")

Well, at least we can track LSM's reading habits down pretty precisely..
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 08:38 pm
Good for you nimph, now maybe you could teach snood to do his own research.
You aren't denying that Murtha said it, are you?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 08:40 pm
LoneStarMadam wrote:
You aren't denying that Murtha said it, are you?

Well, with the only sources for the quote in the entire Googled world appearing to be two blog posts, I'll say it seems highly unlikely he ever said it.

("nimph"? are you the same one who was just excoriating snood for misspelling your name?)
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 08:46 pm
nimh wrote:
LoneStarMadam wrote:
You aren't denying that Murtha said it, are you?

Well, with the only sources for the quote in the entire Googled world appearing to be two blog posts, I'll say it seems highly unlikely he ever said it.

("nimph"? are you the same one who was just excoriating snood for misspelling your name?)

Yes, that's me, sorry i spelled your name wrong.
Then you can't dispute that Murtha said it, right? Especially remembering that he called some of our marines cold blooded killers before charges were even brought.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 08:52 pm
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
LoneStarMadam, I just called my bookie and placed a bet that you are a bitter old hag that lives above a laundromat and owns thirty cats.

Will I win the bet?


Don't you go dragging cats down with her.


They ain't done nuttin' wrong.
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 08:57 pm
Some more stupid is as stupid does
Not withstanding the reallllly stupid comment of dlowan.
But then, dolwan, like some others here always like to go after another poster that shows them what complete asses some people can be.
http://www.bootmurtha.com/MurthaInfo/MurthawasWrong.htm
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 09:57 pm
George Bush - anything he does [or says]
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 10:18 pm
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blpic-hillaryfunny.htm

Could this be the next president of....Chappaqua?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 11:09 pm
LoneStarMadam
Seasoned Member



Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 1425

=====================

How is this even possible? Look at the number of posts for less than 30 days.

1425 / 27 days [12/12/06] = 52.7 postings per day.

Somethin's screwy, besides the poster I mean.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 11:11 pm
LSM making fun of the way people look again, what's that about the fourth time today. Oh, if y'all really knew.

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/8/L/hillary_funny.jpg
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 11:29 pm
snood wrote:
LoneStarMadam wrote:
"Terrorism started with Abu Graib"
John Murtha


Can you source that quote?


nimh wrote:
LoneStarMadam wrote:
You aren't denying that Murtha said it, are you?

Well, with the only sources for the quote in the entire Googled world appearing to be two blog posts, I'll say it seems highly unlikely he ever said it.


REP. JOHN MURTHA: "Well, I say that the fight against Americans began with Abu Ghraib. It began with the invasion of Iraq. That's when terrorism started. ..."
LINK
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 11:41 pm
One of the favorite tactics of right-wing propagandists nis to deceive by taking posts out of context:

Quote:
REP. JOHN MURTHA: Margaret, Margaret, the flawed policy is what's devaluated their service. They had inadequate forces when they went in, and then they disbanded the army.

These troops are disciplined. They can't speak for themselves. It's up to the Congress of the United States. Only the Congress can send our nation to war, and the Congress -- and I voted to go to war. When I looked at the intelligence, I believed the same way they believed.

But now I believe the opposite. I believe we've done everything we can do. I believe we have become the enemy. And I'll tell you this: The Iraqis are not going to do the fighting unless we turn it over to them. They're going to let us continue.

If we allow our measurement to get out of their up to the Iraqis, we'll never get out. It's going to be up to us to decide when we get out of there.

Now, when I say redeploy our troops, I'm talking about to Kuwait, if they allow us to redeploy there, to Okinawa where we can be over the horizon, go back in, in case there's more terrorist activity.

You have got to remember, Margaret, there was no terrorist activity in Iraq at all before we went in there. There's been an increase. The State Department said there's been an increase in terrorist activity in the last couple of years, before they stopped putting the report out.

MARGARET WARNER: Okay. But the president does say, as you know, that for whatever reason Iraq --

John MurthaREP. JOHN MURTHA: But the president said a lot of things, and they turned out not to be true. The president said there are weapons of mass destruction. The president said oil would pay for it. The president cut taxes at a time when we're in a war.

MARGARET WARNER: So do you reject -

REP. JOHN MURTHA: Just because he says it doesn't make it so. The American people don't believe this president.

MARGARET WARNER: But may I ask you, sir, if you believe -- he says -- for whatever reason, Iraq has become the center of terrorism - that if the U.S. appears to retreat in the face of that, that it will be a blow to the American fight against radical Islamic terrorism? What do you say to that?

REP. JOHN MURTHA: Well, I say that the fight against Americans began with Abu Ghraib. It began with the invasion of Iraq. That's when terrorism started. It didn't start when there was criticism of this administration. This administration doesn't want to listen to any ideas.

This is an idea of how we can save lives, of how we can be on the periphery of Iraq and send troops back in, in case there is an increase in terrorism that we need to go back in.

The Iraqis have to control this themselves. They're proud people. They've got to realize this election -- and I'm saying this before the election because I believe the Iraqis have to -- when they elect somebody, they've got to unify that country, and we have got to ask for international help to work through the problem. I think terrorism would stop. I think it would be the opposite. We're the enemy. We're reason they're -- we're the ones they're attacking for heaven's sake. We're the only thing that could unify the Iraqis.

The future of the U.S. Military

MARGARET WARNER: You said something today, and I'm going to quote you, you said, "The future of our military is at risk if the U.S. stays in Iraq much longer."

REP. JOHN MURTHA: Yes.

MARGARET WARNER: Explain in a nutshell what you meant by that.

John MurthaREP. JOHN MURTHA: Yes. And this is really a problem. We have got $50 billion worth of ground equipment which needs to be rehabilitated, and I've told all the CEO's that's where they ought to be looking because we're not going to be able to buy 'em anything.

We only bought four or five ships this year. They cut back $5 billion out of defense this year, and what I worry about, it takes 18 years to put a system in place, and we don't know what the threat is. Is China the threat down the road?

We don't want to -- there to be a misperception that we're not prepared to fight a war. We don't want somebody miscalculating like they did in Korea. George Washington said the best way to preserve peace is to have -- be prepared with your military, and that's what we have to be.

MARGARET WARNER: Let me ask you about something the vice president said last night, and the president has said it. And they are saying that it's irresponsible for Democrats like you, who saw the intelligence before the war, who voted for the war, to now be out criticizing the war and undercutting it. What do you say to that?

REP. JOHN MURTHA: Well, I say that it's time to return our troops -- I say to redeploy our troops out of Iraq. I say it's time to change direction in Iraq. The American people are way ahead of us. You know, Cheney, he is a good friend of mine. The president, they may believe what they're saying, but it's an illusion.

A year from now, if we stay in there, we're going to be - we'll have the same number of casualties, if not more; this thing is not going to get better.

MARGARET WARNER: Republicans who have worked with you on defense issues for decades were stunned by this, what did you today. Was it hard for you to come to this?

John MurthaREP. JOHN MURTHA: Well, it's not a matter of being hard. It's what I decided. My conclusion was, that in measuring every element that I've seen, and a number of Republicans came to me and said they thought it was a very thoughtful statement. But the point is I came to this conclusion by measuring the casualties, by measuring the criteria for success which they sent over themselves, and then looking and seeing no progress at all, economically, or on the ground.

MARGARET WARNER: Finally, Congressman, do you think the fact that you as a defense hawk have now come to this position, do you think this represents a tipping point? Are you hearing from other Democrats who voted for the war that they're coming to this view themselves?

REP. JOHN MURTHA: I hope this is a watershed. I hope a lot of people think about what I've said and we can begin to withdraw our troops immediately from that area and put them on the horizon, or over the horizon, so if they have to they can go back in.

MARGARET WARNER: All right. Congressman John Murtha, thank you so much.

REP. JOHN MURTHA: Nice to be here, Margaret.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 11:43 pm
Roxxxanne wrote:
One of the favorite tactics of right-wing propagandists nis to deceive by taking posts out of context:


How was that quote taken out of context?
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Dec, 2006 11:50 pm
Tico:

Not only was the quote taken out of context, it is NOT the same quote LoneStarMadam keeps insisting Murtha made.

LoneStarMadam says Murtha said the following words.
Quote:
"Terrorism started with Abu Graib" .


She didn't say this was a summary of his words, or the gist of his words, she insists those were his very words.


The words Murtha did say were these.
Quote:
"Well, I say that the fight against Americans began with Abu Ghraib. It began with the invasion of Iraq. That's when terrorism started. ..."


Apart from being technically different, there are significant differences in meaning between these two "quotes"-I use quote marks because Murtha never said the first one.

When one says "Terrorism began", it implies that is the first time terrorism was ever used. You know, like "the world began" or "life began" or "democracy began", etc.

However, the second quote refers to terrorism in this situation-not that it began first time in history here, or for first time since America was discovered, or something similar.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Dec, 2006 12:16 am
kelticwizard wrote:
Tico:

Not only was the quote taken out of context, it is NOT the same quote LoneStarMadam keeps insisting Murtha made.

LoneStarMadam says Murtha said the following words.
Quote:
"Terrorism started with Abu Graib" .


She didn't say this was a summary of his words, or the gist of his words, she insists those were his very words.


The words Murtha did say were these.
Quote:
"Well, I say that the fight against Americans began with Abu Ghraib. It began with the invasion of Iraq. That's when terrorism started. ..."


Apart from being technically different, there are significant differences in meaning between these two "quote"-I use quote marks because Murtha did not say the first one.


I don't disagree. Did you think I was trying to claim that the quote I posted was identical to the quote she typed?

The two are, however, functionally identical (even if one were to adopt your theory of Murtha's meaning).

Quote:
When one says "Terrorism began", it implies that is the first time terrorism was ever used. You know, like "the world began" or "life began" or "democracy began", etc.


I don't follow you here ... who said "terrorism began"? You are the only one I see using those words.

Quote:
However, the second quote refers to terrorism in this situation-not that it began first time in history here, or for first time since America was discovered, or something similar.


For you to try and explain what Murtha meant when he said, "That's when terrorism started," you don't need to look outside the quote that I provided. In other words, the quote I typed was not taken out of context -- at least not in the sense that you have tried to explain that it was. And I submit that your explanation of Murtha's meaning is a pure guess on your part ... completely unsupported by the context of his statement.

And either way he meant it, what Murtha said ("That's when terrorism started") was profoundly stupid.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Dec, 2006 12:42 am
Ticomaya wrote:
The two [quotes] are, however, functionally identical....

No, they are not. When one starts a sentence like "terrorism started", it is akin to "the world started", "life started" or "democracy started"-all of these, taken alone, imply the for the first time in history or in the modern age.

Now when we take Murtha's real quote, stated below,
Quote:
"Well, I say that the fight against Americans began with Abu Ghraib. It began with the invasion of Iraq. That's when terrorism started. ..."


With the second quote, it becomes clear that by terrorism, Murtha means violence against Americans by Iraqis. That is quite a different slant from saying "Terrorism started with Abu Ghraib", as if terrorism was unknown before that prison was used by the US.

Now, when you add the context, which is that Murtha's quote was in answer to a television moderator's question about terrorism in Iraq specifically, the real statement becomes even more clear and to the point.




Ticomaya wrote:
I don't follow you here ... who said "terrorism began"?

My mistake. It was "terrorism started" as opposed to "terrorism began".
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Dec, 2006 05:38 am
Not for the first time, Keltic already said everything I'd wanted to say... :wink:
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Dec, 2006 08:35 am
nimh wrote:
Not for the first time, Keltic already said everything I'd wanted to say... :wink:

BTW-Phoenix did not vote for Bush twice. Thought you might want to set your record straight.
Murtha did say that terrorism started with Abu Graib, just because I didn't post the Iraq invasion as well, doesn't make any difference, & he was/is wrong about the Iraq invasion causing terrorism too. He's an idiot though so we should overlook him, actually, he's like several here.
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Dec, 2006 08:44 am
Roxxxanne wrote:
LSM making fun of the way people look again, what's that about the fourth time today. Oh, if y'all really knew.

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/8/L/hillary_funny.jpg

What are you talking about, Hillary looks better in that photo than you do in yours.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/02/2024 at 08:28:58