McGentrix wrote:No, Limbaugh has been attacked repeatedly here, not his position. It's all so very typical of the many liberal posters here. Slander where you can, make up facts when you can't discuss the actual facts.
Cycloptichorn, you have barged in with guns blazing slinging **** everywhere and now try to look valiant about it. It's like you haven't read the thread, nor listened to Rush's actual comments. If you had, you would know Rush did not and has not made fun of anyone, but he did bring up an interesting tactict that the left has been using to their advantage. He also discussed a political advertisement in which Fox, who has admitted to not even reading the actual bill he was supporting, starred.
The only reason it appears I am defending Rush is because lying benefits no one and not understanding that actual facts of the issue leads to people being more ignorant then they usually are.
I agree with Rush's point that Fox was used BECAUSE of his disease. That was his point, which you have failed to understand. Fox used his disease and it's effects to try to garner sympathy with voters to vote for candidates who favor stem cell research. Michael J. Fox is allowing his illness to be exploited and in the process is shilling for a Democratic politician.
Now, take notice that I have addressed your statement without calling you a "sack of ****". See if you can do the same.
I guess that by your logic, MLK was exploiting his African-American status when he pushed for equal rights. How dare they attempt to put an 'untouchable' up in front as a shill for political positions!
Your argument is asinine. Fox
has more authority on the issue than the average person. So would you if you had Parkinsons.
When Rush was spazzing around in his studio, making jerky motions, he was making fun of Fox.
You probably have a much easier time writing a post without referring to me as a 'sack of ****,' because I am not, in fact, a sack of ****. You can see how it would be much more difficult for me to do so, because Limbaugh is, in fact, a sack of ****.
This however
Quote:
The only reason it appears I am defending Rush is because lying benefits no one and not understanding that actual facts of the issue leads to people being more ignorant then they usually are.
Certainly does not provide evdience that you are not one as well. Rush didn't understand the facts of the issue in the slightest (Fox was most likely over-medicated, not under, if anything) and it appears that you don't either. I certainly don't buy your 'lying benefits noone' argument, because you sure have spent a whole lot of your time defending liars these last several years.
Cycloptichorn