1
   

The psychosis of Rush Limbaugh

 
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Oct, 2006 09:30 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
He didn't use vicodin?


I believe he did, but that's not what sozobe's "source" says now is it?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Oct, 2006 09:32 pm
You haven't refuted the fact he used a substance that could have made him go deaf.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Oct, 2006 09:33 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
You haven't refuted the fact he used a substance that could have made him go deaf.


I am not trying to as I have yet to see a source say it did.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Oct, 2006 09:44 pm
Drugs normally list side effects that occur when taken as directed. It doesn't list those that occur when an overdose or abuse occurs.

You did happen to notice that death wasn't listed as a side effect of Oxycontin yet an overdose can cause it.

Oxycodone drugs warn against taking with acetampinophen. In the case of hearing loss it is the drug interaction between the 2 drugs.

Rapid hearing loss with abuse of hydrocodone
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Oct, 2006 09:52 pm
parados wrote:
Drugs normally list side effects that occur when taken as directed. It doesn't list those that occur when an overdose or abuse occurs.

You did happen to notice that death wasn't listed as a side effect of Oxycontin yet an overdose can cause it.

Oxycodone drugs warn against taking with acetampinophen. In the case of hearing loss it is the drug interaction between the 2 drugs.

Rapid hearing loss with abuse of hydrocodone


From your link.

Quote:
Deafness resulting from narcotic overuse is a rare occurrence. In the past, there have been no reports of progressive hearing loss occurring as a result of overdosing hydrocodone or acetaminophen.


It's only when combined in a drug like Vicodin, which Rush was not accused of abusing, that hearing loss may result. Oxycontin does not contain acetaminophen.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Oct, 2006 09:59 pm
McG,

Abuse of any codone when mixed with acetaminophen can cause hearing loss. Acetaminophen is an over the counter drug. Percocet, another oxycodone warns against taking more than 4 acetaminophen.

Rush could have been taking 100 acetaminophen a day without breaking any laws. It would have put him at risk of hearing loss however.

You completely ignored the rest of the paragraph.

Quote:
Deafness resulting from narcotic overuse is a rare occurrence. In the past, there have been no reports of progressive hearing loss occurring as a result of overdosing hydrocodone or acetaminophen. However, Los Angeles ear, nose, and throat specialists have found that when both agents are combined and overused, hearing loss can occur and can progress to total hearing loss.

Its the combination of the 2 that creates hearing loss. Rush said he was taking the oxycontin for pain. Acetaminophen is also taken for pain. Rush was probably combining the 2 and since he wasn't telling the doctor how he was abusing oxycontin he wouldn't have been warned of the side effects of mixing the 2 drugs.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 12:07 am
What games are you trying to play here, McGentrix?

edgarblythe wrote:
He didn't use vicodin?


McGentrix wrote:
I believe he did,




Then you turn around and say,

McGentrix wrote:
It's only when combined in a drug like Vicodin, which Rush was not accused of abusing, that hearing loss may result. Oxycontin does not contain acetaminophen.


If you recall, the man was taking simply enormous amounts of pills from the black market. Surely you can't think he was taking only normal amounts of Vicodin and was only overdoing it on Oxycontin!
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 12:18 am
From the very earliest reports of the story, Limbaugh was linked to Vicodin. Remember, Lorcet=Vicodin.

From the New York Daily News story which broke the same night as the original Enquirer story.

Quote:
Wilma Cline, 42, says Limbaugh was hooked on the potent prescription drugs OxyContin, Lorcet and hydrocodone - and went through detox twice.


Although Lorcet seemed to be Limbaugh's second favorite, he was taking so many pills that he surely was overdosing on Lorcet as well as his favorite Oxycontin. The deafness could well have come from the Lorcet alone. But as Parados pointed out, if he combined the Oxycontin with Tylenol-the most popular over-the-counter painkiller there is and which is marketed as being safer than aspirin or Advil-he can get the combination there as well.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 12:29 am
A few years ago, I went to an implantologist for an incisor implant. Throughout the surgery I was a bit concerned that he was listening to Rush Limbaugh while working on me. Three years later the implant failed. I should have know better.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 12:53 am
I would wonder about any doctor or dentist who had any partisan political broadcast on during office hours, regardless of which side it was.

You are trying to relax the patient, not get him all stirred up.

The fact that this guy thought political broadcasting was okay while he worked shows he was a real True Believer.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 07:37 am
parados wrote:
McG,

Abuse of any codone when mixed with acetaminophen can cause hearing loss. Acetaminophen is an over the counter drug. Percocet, another oxycodone warns against taking more than 4 acetaminophen.

Rush could have been taking 100 acetaminophen a day without breaking any laws. It would have put him at risk of hearing loss however.

You completely ignored the rest of the paragraph.

Quote:
Deafness resulting from narcotic overuse is a rare occurrence. In the past, there have been no reports of progressive hearing loss occurring as a result of overdosing hydrocodone or acetaminophen. However, Los Angeles ear, nose, and throat specialists have found that when both agents are combined and overused, hearing loss can occur and can progress to total hearing loss.

Its the combination of the 2 that creates hearing loss. Rush said he was taking the oxycontin for pain. Acetaminophen is also taken for pain. Rush was probably combining the 2 and since he wasn't telling the doctor how he was abusing oxycontin he wouldn't have been warned of the side effects of mixing the 2 drugs.


So, you can't back up your statements so you turn to hypotheticals... poor form.

Fix your argument and come back when you have.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 07:41 am
kelticwizard wrote:
What games are you trying to play here, McGentrix?

edgarblythe wrote:
He didn't use vicodin?


McGentrix wrote:
I believe he did,




Then you turn around and say,

McGentrix wrote:
It's only when combined in a drug like Vicodin, which Rush was not accused of abusing, that hearing loss may result. Oxycontin does not contain acetaminophen.


If you recall, the man was taking simply enormous amounts of pills from the black market. Surely you can't think he was taking only normal amounts of Vicodin and was only overdoing it on Oxycontin!


I don't know that he was taking vicodin or not, that why I said I believe he was. However, his Vicodin abuse is not what I am arguing but the ability of people to rely on wikipedia as a medical reference. It was wrong, though it has since been corrected, and so was the argument.

As far as I know, Rush was only charged with oxycontin abuse and that was all he had prescriptions for. If you can show otherwise, please do.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 07:50 am
kelticwizard wrote:
From the very earliest reports of the story, Limbaugh was linked to Vicodin. Remember, Lorcet=Vicodin.

From the New York Daily News story which broke the same night as the original Enquirer story.

Quote:
Wilma Cline, 42, says Limbaugh was hooked on the potent prescription drugs OxyContin, Lorcet and hydrocodone - and went through detox twice.


Although Lorcet seemed to be Limbaugh's second favorite, he was taking so many pills that he surely was overdosing on Lorcet as well as his favorite Oxycontin. The deafness could well have come from the Lorcet alone. But as Parados pointed out, if he combined the Oxycontin with Tylenol-the most popular over-the-counter painkiller there is and which is marketed as being safer than aspirin or Advil-he can get the combination there as well.


How do you know what his second favorite was? Were you in his narcanon meetings? How do you know he was overdosing on Lorcet? Did you read on the daily Kos? I sure haven't read that anywhere else but slimeball sites like that pushing their liberal agenda.

Stop falling back on hypotheticals. I am sure that if he was stuffing rabbit turds in his ears that, too, might have led to his deafness.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 07:53 am
Whether he WAS taking Vicodin with Oxycontin is absolutely besides the point. Strip away all of that, and what he said about Michael Fox was none the less disgusting.

Did Michael Fox exaggerate his symptoms for the "benefit" of the camera? I dunno. The fact remains that he has a horrible disease, that causes him, terrible anguish. Even if he did exaggerate (which I doubt personally) if it points out the reasonableness of not tying the hands of scientists attempting to cure diseases through stem cell research, he has done a good thing.

Do you think that Christopher Reeve exaggerated????
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 08:03 am
Phoenix32890 wrote:
Whether he WAS taking Vicodin with Oxycontin is absolutely besides the point. Strip away all of that, and what he said about Michael Fox was none the less disgusting.

Did Michael Fox exaggerate his symptoms for the "benefit" of the camera? I dunno. The fact remains that he has a horrible disease, that causes him, terrible anguish. Even if he did exaggerate (which I doubt personally) if it points out the reasonableness of not tying the hands of scientists attempting to cure diseases through stem cell research, he has done a good thing.

Do you think that Christopher Reeve exaggerated????


He stopped being a victim when he allowed his image to be used in a political ad supporting a political cause which, by the way, would make cloning constitutional. You don't seem to understand that.

Let me ask you one question, just for clarification sake.

Has George Bush or any Republican in office put any ban what-so-ever on stem cell research? Any at all?
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 08:13 am
Sturgis wrote:
Even I don't give credence to the rantings of Limbaugh...does anyone?

I don't know any American who would answer "yes" if you asked the question as directly as this. But I don't think that's how Limbaugh works. The frequent Limbaugh-listeners I know tend to view him as a pleasant background noise while they're driving their car, preparing dinner, or vacuum their floors. He is not a serious journalist and doesn't seriously pretend to be. Instead, his attempt at mind-control works more like that in Huxley's "Brave New World". (Do you guys remember this?) The government in this dystopian novel uses radio transmission and earphones to feed individually tailored propaganda to its citizens. It does that while they are sleeping, so not paying attention.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 08:13 am
George Bush wrote:
Some people argue that finding new cures for disease requires the destruction of human embryos like the ones that these families adopted. I disagree. I believe that with the right techniques and the right policies, we can achieve scientific progress while living up to our ethical responsibilities. That's what I sought in 2001, when I set forth my administration's policy allowing federal funding for research on embryonic stem cell lines where the life and death decision had already been made.

This balanced approach has worked. Under this policy, 21 human embryonic stem cell lines are currently in use in research that is eligible for federal funding. Each of these lines can be replicated many times. And as a result, the National Institutes of Health have helped make more than 700 shipments to researchers since 2001. There is no ban on embryonic stem cell research. To the contrary, even critics of my policy concede that these federally funded lines are being used in research every day by scientists around the world. My policy has allowed us to explore the potential of embryonic stem cells, and it has allowed America to continue to lead the world in this area.

Since I announced my policy in 2001, advances in scientific research have also shown the great potential of stem cells that are derived without harming human embryos. My administration has expanded the funding of research into stem cells that can be drawn from children, adults, and the blood in umbilical cords, with no harm to the donor. And these stem cells are already being used in medical treatments.



http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/07/20060719-3.html

My understanding is that the stem cell lines that are being used in research with government funding are very limited. Many of the available lines are no longer viable. Although there are uses for stem cells drawn from sources other than embryos, it is my undrstanding that it is the embryonic stem cells that hold the most promise in medicine.

There are scientific groups that are using embryonic stem cells, but are getting their funding privately, through foundations and the like.
0 Replies
 
SierraSong
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 08:22 am
Phoenix32890 wrote:
My understanding is that the stem cell lines that are being used in research with government funding are very limited. Many of the available lines are no longer viable. Although there are uses for stem cells drawn from sources other than embryos, it is my undrstanding that it is the embryonic stem cells that hold the most promise in medicine.

There are scientific groups that are using embryonic stem cells, but are getting their funding privately, through foundations and the like.


I think there are plenty of studies available for perusal that show adult stem cell research to be more promising than embryonic stem cells.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 08:35 am
McGentrix wrote:
parados wrote:
McG,

Abuse of any codone when mixed with acetaminophen can cause hearing loss. Acetaminophen is an over the counter drug. Percocet, another oxycodone warns against taking more than 4 acetaminophen.

Rush could have been taking 100 acetaminophen a day without breaking any laws. It would have put him at risk of hearing loss however.

You completely ignored the rest of the paragraph.

Quote:
Deafness resulting from narcotic overuse is a rare occurrence. In the past, there have been no reports of progressive hearing loss occurring as a result of overdosing hydrocodone or acetaminophen. However, Los Angeles ear, nose, and throat specialists have found that when both agents are combined and overused, hearing loss can occur and can progress to total hearing loss.

Its the combination of the 2 that creates hearing loss. Rush said he was taking the oxycontin for pain. Acetaminophen is also taken for pain. Rush was probably combining the 2 and since he wasn't telling the doctor how he was abusing oxycontin he wouldn't have been warned of the side effects of mixing the 2 drugs.


So, you can't back up your statements so you turn to hypotheticals... poor form.

Fix your argument and come back when you have.

I have no argument that needs fixing.. codones cause the same sort of hearing impairment that Rush had. We know Rush abused codones. We know that codone abuse can cause hearing impairment. It is your argument that needs fixing McG.

Find me another logical reason for Rush to have the type of hearing loss he sustained. You can NOT use hypotheticals.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 08:37 am
Phoenix32890 wrote:
There are scientific groups that are using embryonic stem cells, but are getting their funding privately, through foundations and the like.

Isn't this the way it should be? Rightly or wrongly, about a quarter of all Americans believe that human lives begin at conception, and that killing an embryo is morally comparable to murder. It's unacceptable to let these people cram their world-view down the majority's throat by making stem cell research illegal. It's just as unacceptable to cram majority values down the minority's throat, forcing this minority to subsidize with their taxes what they consider murder. The status quo strikes me as an utterly reasonable balance for the federal government to strike: whoever wants to research stem cells can do so -- but only with money from state governments, or from voluntary donors.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/18/2024 at 12:02:33