Eorl wrote:Thats' probably because it's a whole other issue.
No it's the same issue. Terry says that 'awareness' is required to be a living human being.
(Much in the same way that you stated that the ability to build a fire, and produce music and literature were required to be a human being.
About the same amount of credibility in both statements.)
Eorl wrote: No one ever comes out of a PVS. If they do, then it wasn't a PVS...it was a TVS by definition.
And that's the whole point.
We, looking on from the outside, say 'he's in PVS, there is no person left there anymore.'
Surprise, we are wrong.
Now look at the unborn.
We, looking on from the outside, say 'it's not a person, because we can't tell that it's 'aware' of itself'.
Surprise, we don't know everything here either.
So , shouldn't the benefit of the doubt go to preserving life instead of recklessly destroying it just because 'we're sure it's not a person' ?
Many persons in a coma, whether PVS or TVS , show no sign of 'awareness'. Perhaps they are. But even if they cannot meet our arbitrary definition of 'awareness' (and it is a moving target) , does that mean they are not a living human being?