When Does Life Begin?

Bartikus wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

real: CI, however, claims his position as one who NEVER tries to apply his own personal moral standard, or view of right and wrong, to ANYONE but himself.


I can prove that I have been donating to Second Harvest Food Bank and Habitat for Humanities for many years. It helps those organizations feed the needy and shelter the poor irregardless of race, religion, culture, or any other group description. I have also donated my time to nonprofit organizations that provides services to the elderly and handicapped, and have served on the Santa Clara County Grand Jury for the 2003-2004 year. I know that my effort in these area helps people not only in my community by world-wide. I have also donated to schools in foreign countries, and have letters from the schools acknowledging my donation. These are my "realities."

The difference is you had the choice!

What are you trying to say? That my choices were right or wrong?

cicerone imposter wrote:

Bartikus wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

real: CI, however, claims his position as one who NEVER tries to apply his own personal moral standard, or view of right and wrong, to ANYONE but himself.


I can prove that I have been donating to Second Harvest Food Bank and Habitat for Humanities for many years. It helps those organizations feed the needy and shelter the poor irregardless of race, religion, culture, or any other group description. I have also donated my time to nonprofit organizations that provides services to the elderly and handicapped, and have served on the Santa Clara County Grand Jury for the 2003-2004 year. I know that my effort in these area helps people not only in my community by world-wide. I have also donated to schools in foreign countries, and have letters from the schools acknowledging my donation. These are my "realities."

The difference is you had the choice!

What are you trying to say? That my choices were right or wrong?

What? Read my previous statements and I'm sure you'll understand.

Do pro choicers believe pro lifers should have the choice as to whether any of their tax dollars should be used to help fund abortion?

Bartikus wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

Bartikus wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

real: CI, however, claims his position as one who NEVER tries to apply his own personal moral standard, or view of right and wrong, to ANYONE but himself.


I can prove that I have been donating to Second Harvest Food Bank and Habitat for Humanities for many years. It helps those organizations feed the needy and shelter the poor irregardless of race, religion, culture, or any other group description. I have also donated my time to nonprofit organizations that provides services to the elderly and handicapped, and have served on the Santa Clara County Grand Jury for the 2003-2004 year. I know that my effort in these area helps people not only in my community by world-wide. I have also donated to schools in foreign countries, and have letters from the schools acknowledging my donation. These are my "realities."

The difference is you had the choice!

What are you trying to say? That my choices were right or wrong?

What? Read my previous statements and I'm sure you'll understand.

Do pro choicers believe pro lifers should have the choice as to whether any of their tax dollars should be used to help fund abortion?

I don't make that kind of decision; our government does. Next q?

Notice how pro lifers are told to keep their morals to themselves and called hypocrites while I ask

"Do pro choicers believe pro lifers should have the choice as to whether any of their tax dollars should be used to help fund abortion?"

I want to hear what they have to say and.........crickets.

Why?

Ofcoarse we do, and I vote at every election. Next q?

cicerone imposter wrote:

Ofcoarse we do, and I vote at every election. Next q?

And so shall we.....

just remember that if abortion ever becomes outlawed or severely regulated....we pro lifers don't make that decision. Our government does....

Bartikus wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

Ofcoarse we do, and I vote at every election. Next q?

And so shall we.....

just remember that if abortion ever becomes outlawed or severely regulated....we pro lifers don't make that decision. Our government does....

True; it's beyond our/my control. All I can do is vote for people I think meets my ideal as a candidate. Even that is no guarantee that my wishes will be met. It's called "reality."

Should we respond to chumly's re post?


NYAAH!

I'll leave the issue of abortions to our government, the woman, and her doctor.

cicerone imposter wrote:

I'll leave the issue of abortions to our government, the woman, and her doctor.

I guess that means we won't be hearing from you anymore on this thread.

cicerone imposter wrote:

I'll leave the issue of abortions to our government, the woman, and her doctor.

I guess that means we won't be hearing from you anymore on this thread.

cicerone imposter wrote:

I'll leave the issue of abortions to our government, the woman, and her doctor.

I guess that means we won't be hearing from you anymore on this thread.

real life wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

I'll leave the issue of abortions to our government, the woman, and her doctor.

I guess that means we won't be hearing from you anymore on this thread.

It doesn't matter if doesn't speak if it falls on def ears. Quite frankly, the way you practice listening is an insult to those who really are def: You can listen, but choose not to.

I disagree with CI. I think the government has the licence to regulate abortions, but not to outlaw them. Leave it to the woman and her doctor.

T
K
O

the practice of medicne is not only to prevent death but to improve life.

Diest TKO wrote:

real life wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

I'll leave the issue of abortions to our government, the woman, and her doctor.

I guess that means we won't be hearing from you anymore on this thread.

It doesn't matter if doesn't speak if it falls on def ears. Quite frankly, the way you practice listening is an insult to those who really are def: You can listen, but choose not to.

I disagree with CI. I think the government has the licence to regulate abortions, but not to outlaw them. Leave it to the woman and her doctor.

T
K
O

the practice of medicne is not only to prevent death but to improve life.

Why not tell that to the abortionist and point out his hypocrisy for once. Or will it just fall on his deaf ears? Let's see if your listening skills are any better....

If you seen me with a sign stating "The practice of medicine is not only to prevent death but to improve life." in front of a planned parenthood building.....what would you think or say?

Bartikus wrote:

Diest TKO wrote:

real life wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

I'll leave the issue of abortions to our government, the woman, and her doctor.

I guess that means we won't be hearing from you anymore on this thread.

It doesn't matter if doesn't speak if it falls on def ears. Quite frankly, the way you practice listening is an insult to those who really are def: You can listen, but choose not to.

I disagree with CI. I think the government has the licence to regulate abortions, but not to outlaw them. Leave it to the woman and her doctor.

T
K
O

the practice of medicne is not only to prevent death but to improve life.

Why not tell that to the abortionist and point out his hypocrisy for once. Or will it just fall on his deaf ears? Let's see if your listening skills are any better....

If you seen me with a sign stating "The practice of medicine is not only to prevent death but to improve life." in front of a planned parenthood building.....what would you think or say?

Bartikus, You and your pro-lifers are the ones who should be telling all abortionists your reasons why they are breaking your moral laws since you are the one who apposes it. Pro-choice is self-explanatory; the woman chooses; no need for us to interfere in their choice.