0
   

When Does Life Begin?

 
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 May, 2007 08:09 am
You seem to have missed the point, real life. Have another look.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 May, 2007 10:48 am
If the proposed factor for suicide rates going up 10x is remorse, then abortion and suicide really aren't connected. Remorse comes from many decisions, including...

"throwing your baby to the curb and letting idiots adopt it."

(You see RL, I can use propaganda speak too if I wish, just like you.)
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 May, 2007 11:51 am
Eorl wrote:
You seem to have missed the point, real life. Have another look.


The point is the increased suicide rate, unless you have another point in mind which you failed to specify.
0 Replies
 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 May, 2007 01:42 pm
Q: When does life begin?

A: When this thread ends. Looks like it may be a while... :wink:
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 May, 2007 02:38 pm
Cyracuz wrote:
Q: When does life begin?

A: When this thread ends. Looks like it may be a while... :wink:


Q: When does life begin?

A: For many children, the answer is : When abortion ends.
0 Replies
 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 May, 2007 03:16 pm
Q: When does abortion end?

A: When life begins.

There, that wraps it up. We have an answer to both questions. Cool
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 May, 2007 03:34 pm
Eorl wrote:
baddog1 wrote:

"Teens are generally at a higher risk for both suicide and abortion. In a survey of teenaged girls, researchers at U of MN found that the rate of attempted suicide in the six months prior to the study increased 10 fold-from 0.4% for girls who had not aborted to 4% for teens who had aborted in the previous six months." from: http://www.physiciansforlife.org/content/view/554/26/


This statistic is not surprising. Abortion is a pretty awful thing to go through especially at that age. What this statistic ignores, however, is the impact that banning abortion outright would have on the teen suicide (and accidental death) rate. They would like us to assume that it would drop back to 0.4%? I think not.


real life, I'm saying that the assumption in these figures implies that only abortion leads to an increase in suicide, and it fails to consider that teenagers forced to remain pregnant may well push the figure even higher than 4% rather than dropping back to the 0.4% group.

You seem to think I doubt that abortion (mostly) caused the increase. I don't.

If you still don't get it, maybe baddog1 can explain it to you.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 May, 2007 03:34 pm
Q: When does life begin?

A: For many children, the answer is : When all sperm and all ova are protected by law!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 May, 2007 03:39 pm
Geesh, Chumly, quit giving real new ideas. The guys dangerous!
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 May, 2007 03:41 pm
Imagine: The Sperm Police
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 May, 2007 11:34 am
Eorl wrote:
Eorl wrote:
baddog1 wrote:

"Teens are generally at a higher risk for both suicide and abortion. In a survey of teenaged girls, researchers at U of MN found that the rate of attempted suicide in the six months prior to the study increased 10 fold-from 0.4% for girls who had not aborted to 4% for teens who had aborted in the previous six months." from: http://www.physiciansforlife.org/content/view/554/26/


This statistic is not surprising. Abortion is a pretty awful thing to go through especially at that age. What this statistic ignores, however, is the impact that banning abortion outright would have on the teen suicide (and accidental death) rate. They would like us to assume that it would drop back to 0.4%? I think not.


......it fails to consider that teenagers forced to remain pregnant may well push the figure even higher than 4% rather than dropping back to the 0.4% group.


They already compared the group that remained pregnant with the group that aborted. That was the point.
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 May, 2007 11:21 pm
They forced a group of teenagers who wanted abortions to remain pregnant? That website is down so I can't check, but I doubt it.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 May, 2007 08:36 am
All of the data on the website is 20 years old as well. I would be interested in what modern pychologists think about the issue with a more contemporary american culture.

Real Life - You have failed to answer my question abotu how you have established any claim to this issue. You are a coward.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 May, 2007 09:13 am
You call real a coward, I call him a hypocrite.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 May, 2007 12:45 pm
The Sperm Police
Quote:
Sperm stocks in Canada are significantly down since the federal government made it illegal to pay men for the donations, and the supply of sperm imported from the U.S. will eventually be cut off, Health Canada says.

It has been illegal to buy sperm or eggs since 2004. The change was part of Canada's new reproductive technology law, which also forbids payment for surrogacy and regulates stem cell research.

It seems without a $75 payment, most Canadian men are not interested in donating to heterosexual couples, single women looking to get pregnant or lesbian couples seeking sperm.

It is currently legal to import sperm from the U.S., where men are paid for their donation. At some point, Health Canada said, the practice will be ended.

"Unless there are amendments to the legislation allowing for some kind payment, I suspect that all sperm donation in this country will be completely shut down," said Dr. Paul Claman, a fertility specialist at the University of Ottawa.

Britain also faces a shortage of sperm donors, but the issue there is not compensation.

Rather, British men are reluctant to donate because of a legislative change that allows children conceived with donated sperm or eggs to learn the name of the donor when they turn 18.

"I think what people worry about is … somebody going to come to see me in 10 years and start demanding money," said Mark Jackson of Moss, England, who donates to infertile couples.

"Any donor doesn't need to worry because it is stated in law that you are not the guardian of this child, and you don't owe any money to this child."

With the support and funding from the British government, fertility clinics are launching an awareness campaign to encourage men to give sperm. The posters are going up where men congregate, such as rugby clubs, fire stations and ambulance halls.

Health Canada says it has no plans to launch a similar awareness campaign. Canadian fertility clinics say they should not have to pay, since they did not bring in the rules.

Surveys suggest Canadian men will step forward to donate sperm again if they're fairly compensated for lost wages and for travel to and from sperm banks.

Those rules haven't yet been worked out by Health Canada. The agency said it could be 2008 before all of the regulations governing reproductive technologies are fully implemented.


http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2006/12/19/sperm-shortage.html
0 Replies
 
baddog1
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 May, 2007 07:35 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
You call real a coward, I call him a hypocrite.


You're the hypocrite ci - and I've shown plenty of examples. Now take a look in the mirror before pounding on real or anyone else! :wink:
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2007 07:35 am
When you attack real life's arguments, he loses.

When you attack real life, he wins sympathy, and you lose credibility, and the dialog stops.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2007 09:56 am
baddog, You wouldn't know why real is a hypocrite; but by your support, it seems you belong in the same "club." Prolifers who claim they are based on medical reasoning only doesn't understand each woman's medical need or choice. While prolifers push to give the fetus more rights than the woman, they continually ignore all the living children of this world who lack the necessary shelter, food and medical care.

Hypocrites.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2007 07:39 pm
Just to get this out of the way, I assume then that all prolifers are also in support of allowing homosexual individuals and couples adopt children?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2007 08:04 pm
Diest, Ofcoarse - not.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/18/2025 at 08:09:31