0
   

When Does Life Begin?

 
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 06:44 pm
I was defending that very proposition.

It's you who needs to prove that life doesn't begin at conception. Not me. It obviously does to me.

That's where I began. Did they produce you out of a hat?
0 Replies
 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 06:49 pm
I didn't begin until a couple of years after my own birth. I have no coherent memories before the age of five, and no memories whatsoever before the age of two, which leads me to conclude that before that I didn't exist. :wink:
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 06:54 pm
According to Freud you were on tramlines long before you were two.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 07:27 pm
Cyracuz wrote:
I didn't begin until a couple of years after my own birth. I have no coherent memories before the age of five, and no memories whatsoever before the age of two, which leads me to conclude that before that I didn't exist. :wink:


Some have no coherent memories before the age of 65 or 70 etc. Perhaps they did not exist either.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 08:35 pm
spendius wrote:
TKO wrote-

Quote:
If they don't want to reproduce, then I guess YOU would just rape them.


ME? What does this have to do with me?

I'm afraid you don't understand the argument. I don't do abstractions. I'm not playing on the pro-abortionist's pitch.

Odd how you jumped on rape though. There are alternatives. We could die out. We could give in to the demands. We could hypnotise them.

Dying out would be very messy.


You are arguing that women don't know how to make choices, and that they need to have that choice made for them. There certainly are alternatives, the hypnotism one you listed is funny because that would be pretty easily defined as rape as well. As for demands, what if the demands were for abortion to remain legal? As for dying out, it was actually the first thing I addressed. If they want to end the species, I'm not going to combat that by raping them.

You just can't deal with not having control. It's pathetic.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 09:29 pm
Diest: You just can't deal with not having control. It's pathetic.

You said it, brother. Spot on!
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 04:55 am
What about when sleeping? How about during a drunken stupor?
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 05:01 am
Diest TKO wrote:
spendius wrote:
TKO wrote-

Quote:
If they don't want to reproduce, then I guess YOU would just rape them.


ME? What does this have to do with me?

I'm afraid you don't understand the argument. I don't do abstractions. I'm not playing on the pro-abortionist's pitch.

Odd how you jumped on rape though. There are alternatives. We could die out. We could give in to the demands. We could hypnotise them.

Dying out would be very messy.


You are arguing that women don't know how to make choices, and that they need to have that choice made for them. There certainly are alternatives, the hypnotism one you listed is funny because that would be pretty easily defined as rape as well. As for demands, what if the demands were for abortion to remain legal? As for dying out, it was actually the first thing I addressed. If they want to end the species, I'm not going to combat that by raping them.

You just can't deal with not having control. It's pathetic.

T
K
O


Did they know how to make choices before becoming pregnant or only after?

Talk about having control?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 08:04 am
TKO wrote-

Quote:
You just can't deal with not having control. It's pathetic.


I don't want any control. To be tautological about it- none whatsover. I would much sooner allow women total control over everything. I just think that if they have it they will wreck their own lives and most sensible ladies I've met are well aware of the fact.

Having control is a tiresome responsibility which women can well do without.

Your presumption is ignorant. It implies that I cannot comment disinterestedly on trends in society. I suppose your ignorance derives from your personal habituation to seeing such trends from an entirely subjective point of view all the time. You are projecting and assuming that everybody thinks as stupidly as you do. You underestimate others as a matter of course. c.i. knows no other method of proceeding so it is no surprise to find him supporting you.

PS. It has just been announced on the BBC News that trials are taking place of abortions in doctor's surgeries presumably with a view to making abortion the equivalent of a blood test or having one's corns trimmed. Obviously, if it is a success, and becomes nationally approved, Christian doctors will be at a disadvantage and in the long run will disappear.

I cannot see how abortion, or other forms of birth control, are of the slightest use to women. They seem to me to merely facilitate the gratification of male lust and remove responsibility off them, and onto women, for sexual activity.

You need to study the writings of Germaine Greer.

Have you had any direct involvment with abortion? I certainly haven't. If a lady told me that she had had one I'm afraid it has a similar effect on me as if she had told me she had an STD. And I am unprepared to allow a lady to poison herself on my behalf or be subjected to any other humiliating procedures. I'm happy with the daughters of Eve just as they were made by a very elegant designer.

And women are well aware of that generally which is why it is very rare to hear a woman admit to having had an abortion despite millions of them having done so. So rare that I've never heard one single one admit it.

So it seems quite obvious, in view of the propensity of women to talk about their other medical conditions, that they are ashamed of it. As well they might be as it unwomans a woman in the same way that castration unmans a man. And if she is the only one aware of that it is quite a burden.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 01:23 pm
spendius wrote:

I don't want any control. To be tautological about it- none whatsover. I would much sooner allow women total control over everything. I just think that if they have it they will wreck their own lives and most sensible ladies I've met are well aware of the fact.

Bring these sensible ladies here to speak, otherwise, I call BS. This is the most self contrary post I have ever read on these forums.

spendius wrote:

Having control is a tiresome responsibility which women can well do without.

And men?

spendius wrote:

Your presumption is ignorant. It implies that I cannot comment disinterestedly on trends in society. I suppose your ignorance derives from your personal habituation to seeing such trends from an entirely subjective point of view all the time. You are projecting and assuming that everybody thinks as stupidly as you do. You underestimate others as a matter of course. c.i. knows no other method of proceeding so it is no surprise to find him supporting you.

I underestimate others? You are the one who doesn't believe others can make choices for themselves. Hypocrite.

spendius wrote:

PS. It has just been announced on the BBC News that trials are taking place of abortions in doctor's surgeries presumably with a view to making abortion the equivalent of a blood test or having one's corns trimmed. Obviously, if it is a success, and becomes nationally approved, Christian doctors will be at a disadvantage and in the long run will disappear.

No they wont. What an absurd conclusion. Not all doctors perform abortions. Just like not all doctors perform spinal surgery. Christian doctors will not go extinct. What an absurd idea.

spendius wrote:

I cannot see how abortion, or other forms of birth control, are of the slightest use to women. They seem to me to merely facilitate the gratification of male lust and remove responsibility off them, and onto women, for sexual activity.

Whether a woman is on birth control or not does not dictate how men objectify women.

spendius wrote:

You need to study the writings of Germaine Greer.

And why is that? Do they have a compelling reason that women can't think for themselves?

spendius wrote:

Have you had any direct involvment with abortion? I certainly haven't. If a lady told me that she had had one I'm afraid it has a similar effect on me as if she had told me she had an STD. And I am unprepared to allow a lady to poison herself on my behalf or be subjected to any other humiliating procedures. I'm happy with the daughters of Eve just as they were made by a very elegant designer.

I have been a wellness educator on many different capacities over the last 7 years. I have in various positions had to counsil young women on options avalible during a unplanned pregnancy. I additionally have worked with individuals with STIs.

spendius wrote:

And women are well aware of that generally which is why it is very rare to hear a woman admit to having had an abortion despite millions of them having done so. So rare that I've never heard one single one admit it.

Based on what kinds of things you have posted here, I don't imagine many would choose you to discuss something like this with you. I doubt you are a worthy person to share that information with.

spendius wrote:

So it seems quite obvious, in view of the propensity of women to talk about their other medical conditions, that they are ashamed of it. As well they might be as it unwomans a woman in the same way that castration unmans a man. And if she is the only one aware of that it is quite a burden.


"unwomans?"
"unmans?"

I don't think shame is why women don't talk about it (though many do) I think it's because they don't need unjust harrasment from biggots like you.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 07:37 pm
spendius wrote:
I would much sooner allow women total control over everything.
Rearranging the letters of "the female dominant sex position" gives "state of minx - he lies, maiden on top"
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 07:41 pm
Chumly wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
........hope some day to meet you face-to-face at one of our frequent gatherings.
It would be fun ! Maybe this coming year if all goes well.
spendius wrote:
BTW- Have you any absolutist positions you think are solid?
Yep! I am willing to accept this absolutist position: everything is transient until such time as the second law of thermodynamics is no longer applicable.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 08:22 pm
Diest
T
K
O


I hope that a wellness educator educates in a more thorough manner than you write. Several spelling, grammatical and punctiation errors in one small post would scare me aware from someone who is supposedly a educator of any kind.

Your credentials are suspect.
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 08:30 pm
Shocked
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Dec, 2007 09:11 pm
Intrepid wrote:
Diest
T
K
O


I hope that a wellness educator educates in a more thorough manner than you write. Several spelling, grammatical and punctiation errors in one small post would scare me aware from someone who is supposedly a educator of any kind.

Your credentials are suspect.

Rolling Eyes

Like I said before, it's pretty pathetic when someone's arguements are so weak they rely on attacking the opponents spelling.

Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes

Care to put your credentials out for eveeryone to see?

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Dec, 2007 03:24 am
Diest TKO wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
Diest
T
K
O


I hope that a wellness educator educates in a more thorough manner than you write. Several spelling, grammatical and punctiation errors in one small post would scare me aware from someone who is supposedly a educator of any kind.

Your credentials are suspect.

Rolling Eyes

Like I said before, it's pretty pathetic when someone's arguements are so weak they rely on attacking the opponents spelling.

Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes

Care to put your credentials out for eveeryone to see?

T
K
O

You miss the point. BTW.... everyone has 3 e's - not 4. The point being that I am not putting forth an argument or attacking you. I am making a statement and asking a question. You are stating that you are in a professional position as a wellness educator. I am asking you how effective and professional you are at that and how is this to be taken seriously when you cannot even formulate words correctly.

If low standards are the norm for this profession, just say so. Otherwise, I am not impressed with your claims and find them to be useless for your argument regarding your involvement in the world of abortion.

I have not claimed to be a professional medical practitioner..... hence, no creditials needed.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Dec, 2007 06:43 am
Chum wrote-

Quote:
Rearranging the letters of "the female dominant sex position" gives "state of minx - he lies, maiden on top"


You think that's Femdom? Gee!!

That's male chauvinist piggery seeking novelty.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Dec, 2007 11:15 am
Tell me about your mother.

Cost per 60 minute session is $250.00. I find it most helpful if payment is made at the beginning of the session as it is a good way to begin to focus on the work at hand.

I also suggest that you have your payment ready prior to the beginning of the session in order to save time. I will provide you with a receipt.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Dec, 2007 01:45 pm
Intrepid wrote:
Diest TKO wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
Diest
T
K
O


I hope that a wellness educator educates in a more thorough manner than you write. Several spelling, grammatical and punctiation errors in one small post would scare me aware from someone who is supposedly a educator of any kind.

Your credentials are suspect.

Rolling Eyes

Like I said before, it's pretty pathetic when someone's arguements are so weak they rely on attacking the opponents spelling.

Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes

Care to put your credentials out for eveeryone to see?

T
K
O

You miss the point. BTW.... everyone has 3 e's - not 4. The point being that I am not putting forth an argument or attacking you. I am making a statement and asking a question. You are stating that you are in a professional position as a wellness educator. I am asking you how effective and professional you are at that and how is this to be taken seriously when you cannot even formulate words correctly.

If low standards are the norm for this profession, just say so. Otherwise, I am not impressed with your claims and find them to be useless for your argument regarding your involvement in the world of abortion.

I have not claimed to be a professional medical practitioner..... hence, no creditials needed.


review your post (in red above), you asked no questions, and if you did you forgot to put a question mark at the end. Razz Don't start attacking my credibility based on my spelling or typing, unless yu are willing to have yours attacked as well. Furthermore, just don't make this an issue, it is a distractor from the topic.

Also, my profession is engineering, I only did do wellness education because it is something I find very important. I didn't think you'd put any credentials out for anyone to see. I knew you would have an excuse.

The truth is, my opinion is based on furst hand interaction wiht individuals and realistic circumstances. Furhter, I have been given a degree of exposure to this topic amongst others which qualifies me to speak about it more objectively than you.

You aren't willing to put your credentials out there and I wonder why? Rolling Eyes

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Dec, 2007 02:10 pm
The cool thing about A2K is that a poster can be judged by the logicality and rationalism of the post in question and not on the logical fallacy called "appeal to authority".

An "appeal to authority" is a type of argument in logic, consisting on basing the truth value of an assertion on the authority, knowledge or position of the person asserting it.

It's a fallacy in regard to logic because the validity of a claim does not follow from the credibility of the source. The corresponding reverse case would be an ad hominem attack: to imply that the claim is false because the asserter lacks authority.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_authority
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » When Does Life Begin?
  3. » Page 162
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 02/06/2025 at 05:09:20