0
   

When Does Life Begin?

 
 
baddog1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 12:36 pm
Diest TKO wrote:
They obviously already have children. "Because they could" suggests and even greater disconcern for life. A contempt for life for that matter. being able to "get away with it," hardly seems believeable.
T
K
O


"Because they could" more likely suggests personal convenience because they could get away with it than a disconcern for life. If they had a disconcern for life - why would they have had any children at all?
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 01:56 pm
I don't believe they have a disconcern for life. I'm only answering to the claims that those who abort do have a disconcern for life.

"Personal convieniance" is only a judgemental rewording of "personal ability." Convieniance is only insignificant when it's someone else's convieniance.

So take an example. A woman with 4 children, who for whatever reason, is single (perhaps divorced, or widowed), is supporting her family on her own. She has an unplanned pregnancy. She can barely financialy support her children as is, and she is concidered below the poverty line due the size of her family. Pregnancy will bring on extra debt that could send her into extreme debt.

Do you really believe "inconvieniance" is a honest description?

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 02:02 pm
Just an aside to your post.

I guess it was convenient for the single mother with four children (as you described) to either leave the children alone or pay a babysitter while she went out and got herself pregnant. A mother of four should be better versed in the probability of getting pregnant.

Again.... she is using abortion for birth control.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 02:28 pm
Perhaps she is using abortion as birth control. Perhaps she is on birth control, and was on antibiotics. Perhaps the condom broke.

Many situations exist, none of which should be policed by the state or you.

Treppy - You seem to think "convieniance" is a honest word. It trivializes the situation, further, you're not qualified to judge what is simply inconvieniant and which is more.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 03:43 pm
Some people have the temerity to try and control the actions of other humans; CLUE: it can't be done. They can't live with the simple truism that "it's none of their business." As if their own lives are perfectly lived.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 08:23 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Some people have the temerity to try and control the actions of other humans; CLUE: it can't be done.
To quote that immortal philosopher, Popeye, "I yam what I yam and dat's all dat I yam."
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 09:58 pm
Diest TKO wrote:
Perhaps she is using abortion as birth control. Perhaps she is on birth control, and was on antibiotics. Perhaps the condom broke.

Many situations exist, none of which should be policed by the state or you.

Treppy - You seem to think "convieniance" is a honest word. It trivializes the situation, further, you're not qualified to judge what is simply inconvieniant and which is more.

T
K
O


Nor are you. And, the name is not Treppy.

It would be interesting to know why your are so passionate about women having abortions. Are you a champion for other causes?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 10:04 pm
Intrepid: It would be interesting to know why your are so passionate about women having abortions. Are you a champion for other causes?

It's not (NOT) about women having abortions. It's about the woman choosing what's best under her own situation and circumstances; it's called "private" choice. In other words, it's none of your business what any woman you don't know chooses to do with her own life or her fetus.
There are laws on the books on "murder."
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 10:10 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Intrepid: It would be interesting to know why your are so passionate about women having abortions. Are you a champion for other causes?

It's not (NOT) about women having abortions. It's about the woman choosing what's best under her own situation and circumstances; it's called "private" choice. In other words, it's none of your business what any woman you don't know chooses to do with her own life or her fetus.
There are laws on the books on "murder."


Pray tell....why is it your business? Are you without morals?

It would be really nice if for once you asked a question of your own rather than use somebody's else's question to another poster and then ask the question back to them. Use your imagination. I'm sure you could do it.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 11:56 pm
Intrepid, You talk about morals as if your's is the only one that has any human value. You really don't understand human history or contemporary life.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 03:05 am
Intrepid wrote:
Diest TKO wrote:
Perhaps she is using abortion as birth control. Perhaps she is on birth control, and was on antibiotics. Perhaps the condom broke.

Many situations exist, none of which should be policed by the state or you.

Treppy - You seem to think "convieniance" is a honest word. It trivializes the situation, further, you're not qualified to judge what is simply inconvieniant and which is more.

T
K
O


Nor are you. And, the name is not Treppy.
Intrepid wrote:

I am not qualified to say whether a woman aborts out of "convieniance" or something greater. I am qualified to say that women exist that non-trivial reasons to have abortions. Their existance independant of my ability to tell the difference is what matters. I don't have to be able to decide, because it is not my bussiness. The only people qualified to decide is the women, and their only qualified to make the choice about themselves.

My beliefs don't require me to be a qualified source, yours do. You haven't proved how it's your bussiness, and you won't ever be able to, Treppy. Cool


It would be interesting to know why your are so passionate about women having abortions. Are you a champion for other causes?

I am passionate about civil liberties. I care about choice, not abortion. I have been a health educator for the last 9 years in various different positions which ranged from tobacco education to sexual health. If you think I'm passionate about pro-choice, I'm actually much more passionate about...

-Birth control and sexual health
-Socialized healthcare

Other topics I find extreme passion about are

-Racism and correct cultural depictions of history
-Corparate crime

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 03:00 pm
Diest TKO wrote:
Yeah... sure...

Quote:
In Bartikus' case, he was talking about civil conversations generally happening in person rather than the smartass comments that are given behind the safety and anonymity of a keyboard. He made no threat to you (from what I read) he was just trying to get you to try to be more civil in your rantings.


Above in red: Safety? Safety from what exactly Treppy? I thought you were making the claim that I'd encounter no such threat based on his post. Seems to me that you fully acknowledge what he was implying.

It's so good to be here in the Mechanical Engineering Building. I'm so SAFE here. Much more SAFE than any of the other plaes I go. I should take the keyboard with me when I go to East St. Louis next time.

The truth is that I am quite used to debate, debate in person too. If Barty wants to try and back pedal out of saying he threatened me, and you want to help him, I really don't care. I'm not threatened by him, and had we been in person, his debate would have gone even worse for him.

There's no way to avoid questions for days in person without being called on it.

Bart is a coward, and he earned it. I gave him a second chance for respect, and he opted to not take it. Now it seems he whines every other post on how he is picked on or singled out. He wants the attention and he singled himself out, not me or anyone else for that matter.

Big picture, this is a waste to time. Fungo tried to redirect the thread back to the topic, and it seems Barty and you only wish to thrown ad homenims until Jesus, Weezer, or the McRib returns.

For those in the pro-life crowd that think that people who abort have a skewed view of life, what do you say to the fact that the same number of abortions are performed on women who have had 0 births as women who have had 4+ births?

I can understand your theory if the woman simply didn't know what to expect, but if you've already had 4 babies, you understand quite well.

T
K
O


I'm ok with being regarded as a coward by you just as I am ok being regarded as a "fag" and a "wuss" by an old friend. When asked if he would like for me to come over to discuss it he became very defensive.

I'm not sure why anyone would unless they knew what they said was offensive and possibly should not have even been said. Instead of apologizing, he opted to not speak to me for over a year. That hurt. This old "wuss" went to make amends and apologized for him feeling threatened....even though it were his own remarks that led to it.

Maybe you would call me a coward to my face......any mention of a face to face meeting and you take it as a threat. Why?

I don't intend a threat at all. I just have alot of faith that you would'nt say it to my face. I could be wrong but, since you regard even mention of the meeting itself as a threat.....we will never know now will we?

That's why your coward comment really don't amount to much anyways......it's hollow and waiting to be filled by another.

Thanks anyways. I'm sorry if you took it as a threat. I never intended it as such. Just trying to make a point and maybe I should'nt have even done that.

I'll try better to watch my tongue Diest.

Take it easy.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 04:11 pm
Truce
K
O
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 08:07 pm
Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil for thou art with me; thy TKO and thy Barty they comfort me
0 Replies
 
Bartikus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 10:41 pm
Diest TKO wrote:
Truce
K
O


I don't really have a beef with you. We are 2 different people who has lived 2 totally different lives you know?

I wish the best for you even if you do aggravate me. Laughing

Same to you chum. You have a weird sense of humor and can take things lightly. Maybe I should lighten up a little.

Not such a bad quality I suppose.

Getting mean and nasty is soooooo draining.

No, I'm not ready to smoke any piece pipe but might have a drink or 2. Here's to you! Drunk lol

I still think abortion is like one of the worst choices that can be made and the most unfortunate.So much so..... I wish it was'nt.......ok that's all folks.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 11:18 pm
We all make good and bad choices during our life. Even the idea of good and bad differ from person to person. Nobody tries to impose their morals on us just because we make bad choices. There's a very good reason why; there's no way in the world to impose our morals on others.

We are free to make judgements about our own morals. When it concern others, it's only an opinion; nothing more, nothing less.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 11:18 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Intrepid, You talk about morals as if your's is the only one that has any human value. You really don't understand human history or contemporary life.


Why don't you educate me?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 11:19 pm
Intrepid wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
Intrepid, You talk about morals as if your's is the only one that has any human value. You really don't understand human history or contemporary life.


Why don't you educate me?


It's too late for you!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 11:21 pm
You can try to educate yourself, but I don't give it much hope.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 11:26 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
Intrepid, You talk about morals as if your's is the only one that has any human value. You really don't understand human history or contemporary life.


Why don't you educate me?


It's too late for you!


Why is that? You continue to give out meaningless one liners. I am trying to find a thread where you actually contributed something rather than just hang off other posters who you agree with. How about something genuine and original for a change.

What is too late for me and why? Surely you can provide a more reasonable answer than that. Can you explain exactly why you are for abortion? Can you even try to imagine why others would be against it? Is life so meaningless to you? Are you glad that you had the opportunity to develop into a human adult?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » When Does Life Begin?
  3. » Page 158
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 02/07/2025 at 05:06:33