Bartikus wrote:
So you can't show me where I made such a thing clear to you?
No, I can, but why would I waste my time cuttting and pasting your useless posts from 20 pages?
Bartikus wrote:
Newsflash...I answered the questions....another from CNN......you were asking no one else.......another....I did'nt make you do anything!
Newsflash, it took you 20 pages to do it (just as I said). Newsflash, I exactly asked only you, even more reason you should have answered. Direct questions demand direct answers. Newsflash, you brought this scorn on yourself. Newsflash, if you come to a forum, you'd better be prepared to answer questions. Newsflash, if you have strong beliefs, you'd better be able to defend them.
Save me your newsflashes.
Bartikus wrote:
Stop wasting your time?
Yes please. If you aren't going to answer direct questions, this place isn't meant for you. It's a waste of energy addressing your posts.
Bartikus wrote:
Ignore my posts...stop writing back! Ever think of that? That's what I did! lol
Because I hold myself to a higher standard than you sir. Because I am not affraid to answer. Because I'm not a coward.
Bartikus wrote:
It takes a little self control on your part to do so.
On the contrary, it would be significantly easier for me to ignore you, it would require very little self control to choose to ignore you. You add little to this thread and your points are of little consequence. I'd be better to wait for better versed posters to address their points. The greater act is to address your dribble. I don't bennefit from it, but it's still an exercise of ethics.
The religious are commonly known for ignoring the counter arguement, I'm not surprized you have suggested this course of action.
T
K
O