When Does Life Begin?

s the definition of life in your country different than others?

Why should I know the answer to that?

See below

Quote:

What does your Constitution or Bill of Rights have to do with the question of when life begins?

You tell me? I never made that connection; you did.

These are your words as you wrote them. (emphasis mine)

cicerone imposter wrote:
Bartikus has a typical mental block inherent in fundamental fanatic christianism; they just don't know how to answer questions that conflicts with their stance on pro-life and discrimination against gays and lesbians. They not only have difficulty with the legal system's definition of life in our country, but do not understand the Constitution or the Bill of Rights guaranteed to all citizens.

Now, you tell me.

Quote:

Could you provide the definition of a fundamental fanatic Christian?

Quote:

People of religion who by their rhetoric portray themselves to be morally superior by defining what constitutes a human life (but fail to provide a definition except "at time of conception," but fail to acknowledge all the living human babies now in existence who need support for their lives. It surely is not coming from the "fundamental fanatic christian" who spends more time trying to influence women's lives they don't even know or care about, and surely not the baby - or all the babies now dying by the millions for lack of food. There's a matter of consistency where it involves "life." Fanatic christians fail to see their own hypocrisy.

This appears to be away from the topic.

People of religion who by their rhetoric portray themselves to be morally superior by defining what constitutes a human life (but fail to provide a definition except "at time of conception," but fail to acknowledge all the living human babies now in existence who need support for their lives.

You need to learn how to read, and comprehend the content of the sentences. You are making interpretations from my sentences not there.

You are also free to ask for clarification if you have difficulty with any of my posts - or is that too difficult?

cicerone imposter wrote:

People of religion who by their rhetoric portray themselves to be morally superior by defining what constitutes a human life (but fail to provide a definition except "at time of conception," but fail to acknowledge all the living human babies now in existence who need support for their lives.

Sad but often enough trues of the fundamental fanatic Christian.

Chumly wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

People of religion who by their rhetoric portray themselves to be morally superior by defining what constitutes a human life (but fail to provide a definition except "at time of conception," but fail to acknowledge all the living human babies now in existence who need support for their lives.

Sad but often enough trues of the fundamental fanatic Christian.

This could be a definition without the inclusion of the word Christian.

This could be a definition without the inclusion of the word Christian.

Intrepid wrote:

This could be a definition without the inclusion of the word Christian.

Then you'd be missing the not only the point, but the noun in question, making (as no great surprise) your post rather meaningless.

Chumly wrote:

Intrepid wrote:

This could be a definition without the inclusion of the word Christian.

Then you'd be missing the not only the point, but the noun in question, making (as no great surprise) your post rather meaningless.

Your opinion is of little or no consequence to me. However, perhaps you could clarify the point since you, as often happens, go around in circles without providing any evidence of your little snippets.

Intrepid wrote:

Chumly wrote:

Intrepid wrote:

This could be a definition without the inclusion of the word Christian.

Then you'd be missing the not only the point, but the noun in question, making (as no great surprise) your post rather meaningless.

Your opinion is of little or no consequence to me. However, perhaps you could clarify the point since you, as often happens, go around in circles without providing any evidence of your little snippets.

The "evidence" is self-evident; you just fail to see it.

Bartikus, You still haven't noticed, but you're the one who claims a fetus "is a life" and must not be "killed." In support of your position, we are asking some questions to see how strong your belief system is, and how you determine what a human life is? We have no such conviction, and leave those decisions up to the woman. You wish to impose your "it's a life" thesis on complete strangers; we don't.

Intrepid: In other words, you are right and nobody elses opinion is of any value.

You do know how to misinterpret; are you a loser in life?

Bartikus: No matter what stage of life a human is in...they are still human. The unborn are humans made after humankind.

A fetus has no brain, feeling, or pain; it's a cell. A good percentage of those cells do not come to full term by nature.