0
   

When Does Life Begin?

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 09:19 am
baddog1 wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
"...It's none of my business, but..."


Thank you. You finally admitted your real intent. :wink:



I did? Shocked Shocked Shocked
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 09:58 am
Sglass wrote:
Real Life do you fall into the blue category or the red category and why?





GO RED SOX


That's a very general question.

You probably have something more specific in mind.

Rather than try to guess what it is, or post a long list of irrelevancies, why don't you just ask specifically what it is you want to know?
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 10:01 am
baddog1 wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
"...It's none of my business, but..."


Thank you. You finally admitted your real intent. :wink:


Imposter's real intent is revealed by his actions, not his words.

While saying that his view of right and wrong applies only to himself, his actions are those of constantly attempting to apply those very views to the actions of others.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 10:06 am
real life wrote:
baddog1 wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
"...It's none of my business, but..."


Thank you. You finally admitted your real intent. :wink:


Imposter's real intent is revealed by his actions, not his words.

While saying that his view of right and wrong applies only to himself, his actions are those of constantly attempting to apply those very views to the actions of others.


real, My advocacy is for all women to choose without outside interference from people like you who has no interest in her life or the babies. I wish for them to be free from hypocrisy and religious' terrorists like you.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 10:21 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
real life wrote:
baddog1 wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
"...It's none of my business, but..."


Thank you. You finally admitted your real intent. :wink:


Imposter's real intent is revealed by his actions, not his words.

While saying that his view of right and wrong applies only to himself, his actions are those of constantly attempting to apply those very views to the actions of others.


real, My advocacy is for all women to choose without outside interference from people like you who has no interest in her life or the babies. I wish for them to be free from hypocrisy and religious' terrorists like you.


All about the 'woman's rights' , eh? Let's see if that's so.

If the unborn is NOT impinging on a woman's freedom in any way , does the unborn human being have a right to live?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 10:33 am
real life wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
real life wrote:
baddog1 wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
"...It's none of my business, but..."


Thank you. You finally admitted your real intent. :wink:


Imposter's real intent is revealed by his actions, not his words.

While saying that his view of right and wrong applies only to himself, his actions are those of constantly attempting to apply those very views to the actions of others.


real, My advocacy is for all women to choose without outside interference from people like you who has no interest in her life or the babies. I wish for them to be free from hypocrisy and religious' terrorists like you.


All about the 'woman's rights' , eh? Let's see if that's so.

If the unborn is NOT impinging on a woman's freedom in any way , does the unborn human being have a right to live?


That's for the woman to decide; not you. You are a completely stranger with no concern for her or her life - or in the event of birth, the baby's.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 10:39 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
real life wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
real life wrote:
baddog1 wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
"...It's none of my business, but..."


Thank you. You finally admitted your real intent. :wink:


Imposter's real intent is revealed by his actions, not his words.

While saying that his view of right and wrong applies only to himself, his actions are those of constantly attempting to apply those very views to the actions of others.


real, My advocacy is for all women to choose without outside interference from people like you who has no interest in her life or the babies. I wish for them to be free from hypocrisy and religious' terrorists like you.


All about the 'woman's rights' , eh? Let's see if that's so.

If the unborn is NOT impinging on a woman's freedom in any way , does the unborn human being have a right to live?


That's for the woman to decide; not you. You are a completely stranger with no concern for her or her life - or in the event of birth, the baby's.


Please read the question and answer again.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 12:35 pm
real: All about the 'woman's rights' , eh? Let's see if that's so. If the unborn is NOT impinging on a woman's freedom in any way , does the unborn human being have a right to live?


We have laws established in this country about what constitutes "life" or "human being." Live with it!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 12:38 pm
BTW, who determines "impinging on a woman's freedom in any way?" You?
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 01:10 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
real: All about the 'woman's rights' , eh? Let's see if that's so. If the unborn is NOT impinging on a woman's freedom in any way , does the unborn human being have a right to live?


We have laws established in this country about what constitutes "life" or "human being." Live with it!


So , if the law is changed to define a 'living human being' as including the unborn from fertilization onward, you will agree to that?

Is the legal definition the only thing you take into account?
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 01:12 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
BTW, who determines "impinging on a woman's freedom in any way?" You?


This question applies to any definition of 'impinging on a womans freedom' that you care to use.

It appears that you are trying to avoid answering the question.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 01:15 pm
No. Your question is non-specific as to who determines what? The question is vague and unanswerable in its present form.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 03:09 pm
It's a very easy question.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Oct, 2007 03:46 pm
real life wrote:
It's a very easy question.

really? I don't think you know what easy and difficult questions are...
real life wrote:
Sglass wrote:
Real Life do you fall into the blue category or the red category and why?


That's a very general question.

You probably have something more specific in mind.

Rather than try to guess what it is, or post a long list of irrelevancies, why don't you just ask specifically what it is you want to know?

Read more about this in RL's new book: "I have a hard time telling how difficult things are."

But seriously, your question is flawed, because it presurposes that the situation is one that needs to be facilitated by another person. CI's position is very clearly that the descision is not to be made by others. So even if CI's opinion was for the woamn tonot have the abortion, his stance is that his opinion, no matter how strong, is trumped by the woman's opinion/choice because all of the circumstances effect her.

You don't have to agree with abortion as the best choice to recognize that protecting the woman's choice is of paramount importance.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
kate4christ03
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Oct, 2007 08:12 am
Quote:
You don't have to agree with abortion as the best choice to recognize that protecting the woman's choice is of paramount importance

sorry i don't agree with that. I think a child's life (whether in the womb or outside of it) is most important. Especially seeing as how a vast majority of "women's choices" to abort are solely selfish reasons.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Oct, 2007 09:19 am
kate4christ03 wrote:
Quote:
You don't have to agree with abortion as the best choice to recognize that protecting the woman's choice is of paramount importance

sorry i don't agree with that. I think a child's life (whether in the womb or outside of it) is most important. Especially seeing as how a vast majority of "women's choices" to abort are solely selfish reasons.

The majority of the choices are selfish, eh? I'm fairly confortable saying that you actaully believe that all (not the majority) of abortions are done selfishly. I believe you believe this, because I don't believe you would ever be open to any reason a woman could give as being anything but.

You may see it as a majority of selfish people, but this characterization is subjective to your own standard.

If a life is most important independant of being a embryo or a full grown adult, I'll propose Clumly's old question to you.

A building is burning. Their are 10,000 embryos, and 1 child. You can either save the child of the freezer with the 10,000 embryos. Which do you do?

How would your choice affect other's?

Prove to me that they are equal.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
baddog1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Oct, 2007 11:07 am
Diest TKO wrote:
The majority of the choices are selfish, eh? I'm fairly confortable saying that you actaully believe that all (not the majority) of abortions are done selfishly. I believe you believe this, because I don't believe you would ever be open to any reason a woman could give as being anything but...

T
K
O


Deist:

Please provide your list of UNselfish reasons that a woman may use for having an abortion.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Oct, 2007 11:12 am
baddog1 wrote:
Diest TKO wrote:
The majority of the choices are selfish, eh? I'm fairly confortable saying that you actaully believe that all (not the majority) of abortions are done selfishly. I believe you believe this, because I don't believe you would ever be open to any reason a woman could give as being anything but...

T
K
O


Deist:

Please provide your list of UNselfish reasons that a woman may use for having an abortion.


You're trying to apply your own sense of what is "unselfish" to somebody else that has no interest in the other person's life - or the babies. You lose on both counts.
0 Replies
 
baddog1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Oct, 2007 11:25 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
baddog1 wrote:
Diest TKO wrote:
The majority of the choices are selfish, eh? I'm fairly confortable saying that you actaully believe that all (not the majority) of abortions are done selfishly. I believe you believe this, because I don't believe you would ever be open to any reason a woman could give as being anything but...

T
K
O


Deist:

Please provide your list of UNselfish reasons that a woman may use for having an abortion.


You're trying to apply your own sense of what is "unselfish" to somebody else that has no interest in the other person's life - or the babies. You lose on both counts.


You're talking to Deist - right?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Oct, 2007 11:32 am
baddog: You're talking to Deist - right?

Guess again. What is your interest in the woman and/or the baby?
How can any woman's choice be unselfish? It's none of your business.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » When Does Life Begin?
  3. » Page 100
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 07/09/2025 at 04:28:42