cjhsa wrote:
HSUS and anyone who talks about "animal rights" is out of their mind. Animals have the right to be cooked in butter and garlic and it ends there.
In light of this latest gem then cj, I'd appreciate an honest response from this post here.
If animals have no rights, what's the difference between shooting one from a few hundred yards and dragging one to it's death behind Mom and Dad's SUV.
You stated that animal abuses like the ones I posted are the faults of families and school, but if animals have no rights, they have no rights independent of the kinds of harm caused to them or the intentions or mindset of the perpetrators of their deaths.
Your initial thesis was that the HSUS has an agenda that is contrary to their stated mission. That banning hunting is their real motive, not fair treatment of animals.
You have now traversed into the above unfortunate position--one who cares not about the animal in any capacity, rather in the utility they provide for man.
If they have no rights other than to serve the needs of man, then is not serving to entertain a few rednecks after a few beers utilitarian enough?
No amount of firepower and no amount of hillbilly rhetoric will mask the fact that you belong to a realy f*ucked up minority....one to which very few can relate to, much less tolerate listening to.