Bush Supporters' Aftermath Thread III

Pointing up your deeply offensive ignorance is precisely what this thread is about. The aftermath of Bush hasn't been pretty, especially for the Iraqui people.

It's people, and I use that term lightly, with offensive ideas like yours, who cause most of the problems in this world.

If you had the slightest speck of morality, we would have seen some comments, at some time, from you and your ilk, on how much suffering the Iraqis have gone through because of this ill-thought out invasion. But no, it's your same old childish sandbox attitiude. How old are you, man? Are you ever going to grow up?

McGentrix,
" 9/11 showed the consequences of chardonnay diplomacy, deal-cutting with dictators and a band-aid approach to national security,". It sure did. History shows Reagan/Bush wheeling and dealing with Saddam and bin Laden, arming and funding them. Rummy, Wolfie, Baker, Cheney all played a big part in that. And follow the money and find how interlocked the Bushies are with the corporations who have profitted from the blowback. This Presidunce is surrounded by those who said a new Pearl Hatbor would help their cause and desire to invade Iraq. And despite all the warnings Bushie told us he had "no sense of urgency" about bin Laden and al qaeada before 911. Then he said he "got lucky and hit the trifecta". Yes he and those advocates of a new Pearl Harbor got "lucky". Hopefully their luck has run out.

Where did this nonsensical canard come from? Just because conservatives tend to be rabid "go for the gun, leave your mind in neutral, create fictitious enemies, then shoot all these enemy first, ask questions later" people doesn't mean that they are the defenders of anything, let alone freedom or America.

I see many of the more rabid lefty posters continuing to post on this thread like they believe their post will be read or replied to.

Imagine that.

Sometimes it seems the only way to respond to the most stupid posters even though it may be pointless.

McG has reached his zenith in this regard so we'll just have to take him as he has been from day 1, only now we know the truth. He lied about being a middle of the roader. That was just another ploy; ploys are just part of the pattern of deception for these folks.

"I see many of the more rabid lefty posters continuing to post on this thread like they believe their post will be read or replied to.

Imagine that." Leave no one call that a reply.

The temerity of these people, the gall, the chutzpah. Here they've been supporting, rabidly, thee or at least one of the most incompetent governments the world has ever seen and they pull things like this.

Your evenhandedness astounds, McG.

Well since a Speaker Pelosi seems inevitable which should pretty well gag and straight jacket any incoming moderate or conservative Democrats, it is now official that she is backing Murtha for House Majority Leader. Who wants to lay odds on how quickly we now wave the white flag in Iraq and declare defeat?

Shouldn't be too long.

Evenmoreso as it appears Rangel will be the Ways and Means Chair and he has already hinted that he will having the power to suspend funding for Iraq.

Rumsfeld isn't the only one in deep deep unfathomable denial.

Yay Chuck!

Rumsfeld isn't the only one in deep deep unfathomable denial.

And along the same lines of discussion not conducted by trolls and/or idiots and/or exercises in futility. . .

Heeeeeeere's Boortz

Monday, November 13, 2006

THE SURRENDER BEGINS
Well .. if the Islamic fascists dared to think last week that the American voters signaled surrender, they can pretty much rest assured that this is the case as we begin the week after.

If anybody thought for a second with Nancy Pelosi sitting there in the Oval Office pledging cooperation with George W. Bush that she was anything other than a Leftist radical, think again. She has already said she's supporting John Murtha for House Majority Leader. Get ready for an interesting two years...the door swings to the left on Capitol Hill.

Sure....Nancy Pelosi is doing everything she can to change her image from San Francisco Moonbat to one of a middle-of-the road moderate Democrat. But people who really know Nancy Pelosi know better. The good news for Republicans over the next two years is that she can't hide who she is. And why are all of these supposedly new moderate members of Congress going to vote for Pelosi as Speaker of the House? Who knows.

So now she's saying she supports Murtha for Majority Leader. This suddenly makes Steny Hoyer look like a conservative. So Pelosi is for Murtha....the same John Murtha that is calling for unconditional surrender to Al-Qaeda in Iraq. This is the same John Murtha that jumped to conclusions, all but accusing our troops of war crimes in Iraq. Yup...that John Murtha.

So don't let the conservative hairdo and attire fool you...Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi is a huge Leftist....as far to the Left as they come in the United States Congress.

Nancy Pelosi will also pass over Jane Harman for the chairmanship of the House Intelligence Committee. Harman, a California Democrat, is accepted as the Democrat's most knowledgeable member of the House on Security and Intelligence issues. There's a problem though. Harman supports the war on Islamic Fascism. Pelosi wants the House Intelligence Committee to be chaired by someone who doesn't support that war. Make sense to you?

And let's not forget the actions of President Bush. The very day after the Democrat victory Bush fires Don Rumsfeld. Should Rumsfeld have gone? Perhaps so .. but could there be a worse day than the day after an election that changes the face of power in Washington? Islamic fascist leaders do not understand the nuances of power in Washington. They see Democrats (1) calling for withdrawal from the battlefield in Iraq; and (2) the resignation of Donald Rumsfeld. The day after the Democrats score their victory they get Rumsfeld's resignation. Then within a weak major Democrat players start their withdrawal chant again.

Considering the above, why wouldn't the Islamic terrorists believe that they have scored a major victory, and that America is weakening before their eyes?
SOURCE

Jesus. Neil Boortz as an authoritative voice.

Okeedokie.

SURRENDER? Charge Bushie and Blair with crimes against humanity. Throw in Olmert and reign in American/Israeli imperialism. Wolfie at the World Bank? No wonder we're hated.

I don't see that anybody has offered Boortz as an authority on anything. I posted his take on a subject pertinent to the discussion in progress. So, Snood, what does Boortz say that you disagree with and why do you disagree with it? Or maybe you agree with him?