Frank Apisa wrote:This is an aside, but I think it is an appropriate place for it:
As most of you know, I have been unyieldingly pessimistic about the chances for any kind of accommodation between the state of Israel and the Arab/Islamic/Palestinian peoples in the area.
I have also been very pessimistic about the idea of two separate states existing in any kind of reasonable peace with each other.
BUT the recent moves and comments of Prime Minister Sharon have honestly got me thinking in a whole new direction.
Sharon is putting a hell of a lot on the line -- and I think only very large moves like this will lead to anything remotely resembling peace in this area.
The Palestinians have to make a comparable big move -- and the dissidents on each side have to be kept in check -- but until I see how these latest moves, maneuvers, and policy statements play out -- I am suspending my pessimism.
This move by Sharon could be a game breaker.
WOWIE KAZOWIE!
I am glad to see some people are paying attention to Israel's attempts toward peace. As steissd responded, Sharon has made many unpopular moves toward concession before, but maybe now they aren't getting lost in the media, due to the laser Bush has pointed in the Pal/Israel direction. (Feel free not to give Bush credit--but I think the Roadmap has the world's attention.)
I hope feverishly that there can be established a lasting peace, but I think we may see the Pals rejecting everything (when it gets down to the wire).
A few good men, who walked this road before have been assasinated by extremists on their own side. Sharon has bullseye on his chest, as does this newly appointed Pal. Arafat still lives because he refused to agree to very good offers, IMO. Their (Pal) stated goal has long been the expulsion of destruction of Israel. (HAMAS document, I think accepted by the PA).
Why is Arafat still a player, when this other guy has been installed to by-pass him?