Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Aug, 2006 09:15 pm
kate4christ03 wrote:
jesus in the flesh was still fully God...he was incapable of sin.......there is no scripture to back up the belief that Jesus could have sinned...and dont use the "satan tempted him" thingy please....i already explained that ........ Very Happy


Did Jesus sin when he whipped the money changers in the temple?
0 Replies
 
kate4christ03
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Aug, 2006 09:23 pm
Did God sin when he poured out his wrath on Sodom and Gomorrah?

No......God has righteous anger....Christ is God ...his anger was righteous
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Aug, 2006 09:30 pm
When Jesus cried out from the cross, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"

Was that a sin?

If the wages of sin is death?

Did Jesus sin?
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Aug, 2006 09:36 pm
EpiNirvana wrote:
Arella Mae wrote:
Answer: No, Jesus could not have sinned. If He could have sinned, He would still be able to sin today because He retains the same essence He did while living on earth. He is the God-Man - and will forever remain so, having full deity and full humanity so included in one person as to be indivisible.


Im intrested in this paragraph. First of seeing this it seams right. But Jesus died, and he rose again in spirit and his body was taken up, but he did not return physically. So couldnt the Man part of him be separted then? B/c dieing for our sin was the ultimate sacrifice, he didnt need to rise again to complete our ticket to slavation, it was already finished. So the rising agian was just a piece to b/c fully god again.


Whoa, who said He didn't return physically? He did return physically. If he didn't return physically why did he tell Mary not to touch him and how could Thomas have touched him? Also, His spirit didn't die. God's spirit cannot die. He only died a physical death.

The raising from the dead was his conquering sin. He overcame death/sin and thus established his deity. No human could be raised from the dead without God.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Aug, 2006 09:38 pm
Arella Mae wrote:
EpiNirvana wrote:
Arella Mae wrote:
Answer: No, Jesus could not have sinned. If He could have sinned, He would still be able to sin today because He retains the same essence He did while living on earth. He is the God-Man - and will forever remain so, having full deity and full humanity so included in one person as to be indivisible.


Im intrested in this paragraph. First of seeing this it seams right. But Jesus died, and he rose again in spirit and his body was taken up, but he did not return physically. So couldnt the Man part of him be separted then? B/c dieing for our sin was the ultimate sacrifice, he didnt need to rise again to complete our ticket to slavation, it was already finished. So the rising agian was just a piece to b/c fully god again.


Whoa, who said He didn't return physically? He did return physically. If he didn't return physically why did he tell Mary not to touch him and how could Thomas have touched him? Also, His spirit didn't die. God's spirit cannot die. He only died a physical death.

The raising from the dead was his conquering sin. He overcame death/sin and thus established his deity. No human could be raised from the dead without God.


I have to ask, Arella Mae.... If the raising from the dead was His conquering sin and he overcame death/sin.....are you saying He sinned?
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Aug, 2006 09:39 pm
Intrepid wrote:
When Jesus cried out from the cross, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"

Was that a sin?

If the wages of sin is death?

Did Jesus sin?


Jesus took "our" sins upon Himself. He did not commit the sins. At the time He took all the sin upon Himself God turned His face from Jesus because of the sin. But He overcame death/sin when He was resurrected. And, of course, this is as I understand it.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Aug, 2006 09:40 pm
Thanks. I had to ask because the way you worded it left it open for those who would disagree with you. You have now clarified.
0 Replies
 
kate4christ03
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Aug, 2006 09:46 pm
amen arella.......the bible said he knew no sin yet took our sins for us
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Aug, 2006 09:53 pm
Intrepid wrote:
Thanks. I had to ask because the way you worded it left it open for those who would disagree with you. You have now clarified.


No problem Intrepid. Sorry I didn't make it clearer earlier.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Aug, 2006 10:00 pm
1 John 3:5  And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin.

1 John 3:8  He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.

1 John 3:9  Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Aug, 2006 01:15 am
Arella Mae wrote:
EpiNirvana wrote:
If he was incapable of sin then why would satan tempt him?


Because Satan refuses to believe He has the power, authority, etc. that he has. Satan already knows he's lost the game but it doesn't stop him from trying, does it?

Neo,

Jesus was not capable of sin. He was perfect. He was the Son of God.
Adam was also perfect
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Aug, 2006 01:16 am
Intrepid wrote:
kate4christ03 wrote:
jesus in the flesh was still fully God...he was incapable of sin.......there is no scripture to back up the belief that Jesus could have sinned...and dont use the "satan tempted him" thingy please....i already explained that ........ Very Happy


Did Jesus sin when he whipped the money changers in the temple?
No
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Aug, 2006 01:17 am
Intrepid wrote:
When Jesus cried out from the cross, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"

Was that a sin?

If the wages of sin is death?

Did Jesus sin?
No
0 Replies
 
EpiNirvana
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Aug, 2006 05:53 am
neologist wrote:
Adam was also perfect


Wiat how? i thaught he ate the bad fruit.
0 Replies
 
EpiNirvana
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Aug, 2006 05:57 am
Arella Mae wrote:
Whoa, who said He didn't return physically? He did return physically. If he didn't return physically why did he tell Mary not to touch him and how could Thomas have touched him? Also, His spirit didn't die. God's spirit cannot die. He only died a physical death.

The raising from the dead was his conquering sin. He overcame death/sin and thus established his deity. No human could be raised from the dead without God.


They couldnt touch him b/c he had alredy been purified and was once agian fully god. And just a physical death seams pretty unincredible ressurection. Also this disprove your he journeyed to hell thoery. No his Death was conquering sin, His ressurection was conquering death. Even if he never raised again we could of already had the salvation.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Aug, 2006 06:03 am
neologist wrote:
Arella Mae wrote:
EpiNirvana wrote:
If he was incapable of sin then why would satan tempt him?


Because Satan refuses to believe He has the power, authority, etc. that he has. Satan already knows he's lost the game but it doesn't stop him from trying, does it?

Neo,

Jesus was not capable of sin. He was perfect. He was the Son of God.
Adam was also perfect


Nope. Adam was not perfect. Adam sinned. That makes him not perfect, unless, of course you are thinking he was perfect until he sinned?
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Aug, 2006 06:06 am
Epinirvana Wrote:

Quote:
They couldnt touch him b/c he had alredy been purified and was once agian fully god. And just a physical death seams pretty unincredible ressurection. Also this disprove your he journeyed to hell thoery. No his Death was conquering sin, His ressurection was conquering death. Even if he never raised again we could of already had the salvation.


Uh, you left out the fact that Thomas actually did touch Jesus after he was resurrected. So, you can't use that argument for the women and not Thomas. It can't be both ways. And how does this disprove my he preached in hell theory?

You consider being raised from the dead after three days pretty unincredible? Hmmm, how many times have you seen it done?
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Aug, 2006 06:44 am
All I know is that Jesus died at the hands of the Romans, that Pontius Pilot's character meant he would never have washed his hands on the entire deal and would have actively sought to have Jesus executed and that Jesus "died" unusually quickly compared to the other prisoners and that for some strange reason Joseph of Aramathea brought aloe to Jesus' tomb, despite the fact that Aloes were not a part of Jewish burial practices and are in fact plants that were thought to have healing properties.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Aug, 2006 06:52 am
Wolf_ODonnell wrote:
All I know is that Jesus died at the hands of the Romans, that Pontius Pilot's character meant he would never have washed his hands on the entire deal and would have actively sought to have Jesus executed and that Jesus "died" unusually quickly compared to the other prisoners and that for some strange reason Joseph of Aramathea brought aloe to Jesus' tomb, despite the fact that Aloes were not a part of Jewish burial practices and are in fact plants that were thought to have healing properties.


So I take it you aren't buying the dream that Pilate's wife had? Pilate's wife had a dream and told Pilate to have nothing to do with that man. I would think it perfectly reasonable for Pilate to do just that, wash his hands of the whole deal.

He died unusually quickly? Got any scripture to back that up? I'm not saying he didn't. Can't say that I've ever run across that before.

Are you trying to perhaps tell me that since he took Aloe and it had healing properties that Jesus didn't die but was wounded only or something? Also, got any scripture that says it was aloe?
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Aug, 2006 07:33 am
Arella Mae wrote:
So I take it you aren't buying the dream that Pilate's wife had? Pilate's wife had a dream and told Pilate to have nothing to do with that man. I would think it perfectly reasonable for Pilate to do just that, wash his hands of the whole deal.


Well, maybe Pilate's wife did have the dream, but I can't buy the fact he would wash his hands on the entire deal. Pilate was a tyrannical, brutal man that would have executed anyone going around saying he was the King of Kings.

Pilate's wife isn't the only one whom supposedly had a dream.

Julius Casear's wife, also had one too.

Quote:
He died unusually quickly? Got any scripture to back that up? I'm not saying he didn't. Can't say that I've ever run across that before.


Crucifixion is death by suffocation. However, the Romans got tired of waiting so they broke the legs of the two criminals that were crucified along with him.

Quote:
Now it was the day of Preparation, and the next day was to be a special Sabbath. Because the Jews did not want the bodies left on the crosses during the Sabbath, they asked Pilate to have the legs broken and the bodies taken down. The soldiers therefore came and broke the legs of the first man who had been crucified with Jesus, and then those of the other.

John 19:31-32


However, they did not break Jesus' legs, which suggests he exhibited signs that he may have already been dead. But to check, they pierced his side with a spear.

Quote:
But when they came to Jesus and found that he was already dead, they did not break his legs. Instead, one of the soldiers pierced Jesus' side with a spear, bringing a sudden flow of blood and water.

John 19:33-34


So, he died far quicker than the other criminals. Now this may have been because he was flogged before cruxificion, but that was required by Roman law and all criminals were flogged before crucifixion.

There is also the possibility that he wasn't really dead at the time, but was unconscious. But it's merely a possibility.

Quote:
Are you trying to perhaps tell me that since he took Aloe and it had healing properties that Jesus didn't die but was wounded only or something? Also, got any scripture that says it was aloe?


It is possible. I also read that there was something unusual about the fact that Roman guards were guarding the tomb and that such a thing shouldn't really have happened as there really was not point in having the tomb guarded.

However, as for the scripture that says aloe...

Quote:
Later, Joseph of Arimathea asked Pilate for the body of Jesus. Now Joseph was a disciple of Jesus, but secretly because he feared the Jews. With Pilate's permission, he came and took the body away. He was accompanied by Nicodemus, the man who earlier had visited Jesus at night. Nicodemus brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about seventy-five pounds. Taking Jesus' body, the two of them wrapped it, with the spices, in strips of linen. This was in accordance with Jewish burial customs.

John 19:38-40


Now, it does state that this was in accordance with Jewish burial customs. However, I've been told that Jewish burial customs haven't changed and most people I've asked state that the herbs are merely there for cosmetic reasons to make the body appear as lifelife as possible. Hence, myrrh and aloes do not necessarily have to be used. Any herbs that can get rid of the stench of death is just as good.

Still, this is just one viewpoint that I wanted to make clear. It's equally valid as Christ dying and resurrecting, and there's nothing to suggest that either one is more true than the other.

There is one more thing I'd like to point out which gives the "Jesus may not have really died" hypothesis equal footing with the traditional view.

In India, there is a tomb to a wiseman called Issa or Jesus. He is buried in the traditional Jewish manner of, I think it's facing west-to-east (or was that the Arabic burial method? I can't remember which it is, because there's an Arabic tomb near by and I always get their burial methods confused).

Casts were made of his feet and they seem to have had wounds that suggest that they had nails shoved through them, in a way that suggests that they were nailed together in the way feet are nailed together in a crucifixion.

It could relaly be that Jesus survived and went to his Apostles, thinking he really had resurrected from the dead.

Or it could be that this is a completely different Jesus.

Who knows?

It doesn't help that the fact that in Shakespearian times, India was the name for some kind of other-wordly afterlife.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Trinity?
  3. » Page 8
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/20/2025 at 07:27:47