Hoping For Some Input....

rex

Quote:

I am not in the science threads spreading spam in them. Us Christians have more taste

Yes you are you two tongued spreader of untruth. Youll show up wherever the mood hits you. As far as your claim to being the civil ones, youve been outhammered many times and then you begin to cry TOC's whenever you get frustrated. You were going to report me once , why didnt you? we were only arguing about some lame point of science and you felt that my retort bordered on incivility, when all along you were being ad-hominem.
I dont think that you see the "moat" in your own eye..

0 Replies

OH yeh rex, wsnt it you that got the "Evolution, How" thread shut down for badmouthery?

0 Replies

Group hug! Group hug!!

0 Replies

Lash,

What in the world is wrong with you? This was over! It ended. You are the person that constantly brings this up and every single time you do, you cause contention with it.

The more you harp on this, the more I am NOT SORRY I asked someone to come on this forum and post something in contrast to this kind of mess. I have admitted doing it. I told you the timeline of the whole thing. I was accused of doing it. Hadn't done it and said so. A few weeks later I did it after I did it. No, I didn't tell anyone I did it. Call it a lie if you want. I don't care. I have confessed it all and it's over.

I have seen Snood over and over try to resolve things with you. I have tried to resolve things with you. YOU will not accept it. Don't you understand that YOU are the one that keeps this wound festering. Yes, once you start, I let myself get drug into it and I have to deal with that.

I honestly do feel sorry for you because for some reason you harbor anger and resentment and I know what effects that can cause on a person.

So, please just let it go. Leave everyone else out of this Lash. YOU keep bringing it up, not anyone else. And, if me asking others to come to this thread to give some Glory to God is a sin in your eyes, then YOU have a real problem. If I had broken the TOS by what I did then the Moderators would have let me know I am sure. So, obviously, since I wasn't reprimanded or banned by the powers that be on A2K, I guess I didn't break any rules by asking anyone to come on this forum. Guess that means freedom of religion and freedom of speech, to you (just going by what you post) only applies if those people share your views. And, I'm afraid you made that very obvious, Lash. Very obvious.

Now, please just leave it alone Lash. If you want to attack me, then fine attack me. Send it in a PM or an email. We used to email each other some, remember? When we both thought a bit differently of each other? I swear to you no matter what you say in it, I will not report it or reply to it. Just leave everyone else out of it. Why drag them into this when your anger is with me?

Now, if you won't accept that I am asking you to attack me and only me and leave everyone else out of it, then YOU definitely have a problem. I am offering you a straight shot to me ~ NOT ANYONE ELSE. NOT THE FORUMS, ETC. A straight shot Lash, and I won't move a muscle. (Caps for emphasis only).

Now, the ball is in your court. You do with it what you will.

0 Replies

For people who don't spewing rote: A question:

What is the primary or overriding reason some people are quietly cognizant of their own failings, whatever they are--and deal with them is the way they deem appropriate--

and the other people forcefully plaster their own personal beliefs about religion or spirituality for other people to approve--and when they don't get the response they are going for--some laud or back patting-- they think they've been slighted?

What is it about those people that makes them think their beliefs merit a spotlight and other people are wrong not to respond favorably?

Anyway, the thing I'm interested in is 1) what is their emotional payoff from the self-promotion and making themselves look saintly in other's eyes? (especially when it's received badly) and 2) are they really surprised when people take offense, or 3) are they actually seeking the disagreement so they can climb up on their own cross?

Are they subconsciously compelled to do this for religious purposes?

0 Replies

My, my, my;- All this shouting, I was just about to thank Red for the invitation to play some game or another which was on offer yesterday and came across a skirmish.

It's opinion time, sit it out without all the funny knicker-shaking and bra-twirling.

Red, you cannot be sending armies across the world hectoring little countries and taking thousands of innocent lives. It's wrong.

America has previously given the UK great support, we should be eternally grateful for that. We stood shoulder to shoulder with you on the WTC heinous crime and we are there with you in Iraq.

World opinion, not simply American or British opinion speaks out against this act.

OK we cannot simply walk away and leave the middle east to total insanity and goodness knows what other atrocities against the western world especially would be initiated, however, the battle to introduce civilised control of Iraq by Iraqis is no easy task. Frank A. would probably suggest nuking the whole lot, he is entitled to that suggestion, but its not the answer is it?

Point being made is purely the decision to go into Iraq had as much to do with the WTC as Laurel and Hardy, W H Woolworths and Attila the Hun.

The main guys, the heat being taken off them by this foolish course of action are re-grouping, re-arming and re-planning. The strongholds and very covert sanctuaries they inhabit in the mountains of Afghanistan and Pakistan are relatively safe havens.

Russia and China are keeping low profile, probably smiling away at the costs to The States & UK in the deaths involved, the costs involved and the anti-war factions showing up. We won't mention the profit being made from arms being supplied to insurgents, it leaves a very bitter taste in your mouth.

0 Replies

Absolutely agree, to my astonishment, Mathos!

0 Replies

Momma Angel wrote:

Lash,

What in the world is wrong with you?
You haven't left yet.
This was over! It ended.
I think we have significant evidence to the contrary.
You are the person that constantly brings this up and every single time you do, you cause contention with it.
Impressive comprehension of the situation, I'd say.
The more you harp on this, the more I am NOT SORRY I asked someone to come on this forum and post something in contrast to this kind of mess. I have admitted doing it. I told you the timeline of the whole thing. I was accused of doing it. Hadn't done it and said so. A few weeks later I did it after I did it. No, I didn't tell anyone I did it. Call it a lie if you want. I don't care. I have confessed it all and it's over.
Wrong.
I have seen Snood over and over try to resolve things with you. I have tried to resolve things with you. YOU will not accept it.
Another astounding grasp of the situation at hand.
Don't you understand that YOU are the one that keeps this wound festering.
Yes. I've picked up on that.
I honestly do feel sorry for you because for some reason you harbor anger and resentment and I know what effects that can cause on a person.
Harboring resentment finding out someone is a boldfaced liar and represents herself to be a Christian, when she secretly holds herself apart and above people you care about, says she is against them and tells me I should know it--after all it's Christians V Heathens. You can make a decision that someone is ****, and resolve to warn other people. That's not harboring resentment or anger. That's a public service.
YOU keep bringing it up, not anyone else. And, if me asking others to come to this thread to give some Glory to God is a sin in your eyes, then YOU have a real problem.
This is precisely why I will hound you as long as I am able. This is a lie. A self-serving, manipulative, fake-Christian-piousness-at-ITS-WORST lie. As long as you try to pass it off as that, it is still unresolved.

If I had broken the TOS by what I did then the Moderators would have let me know I am sure. So, obviously, since I wasn't reprimanded or banned by the powers that be on A2K, I guess I didn't break any rules by asking anyone to come on this forum.

They don't ban people for lying.
Guess that means freedom of religion and freedom of speech, to you (just going by what you post) only applies if those people share your views. And, I'm afraid you made that very obvious, Lash. Very obvious.
You're free to lie and I'm free to say everything I've said. Works for me.
You are intruding on a conversation you weren't a part of. Mind your own business. If you have a problem with it, exert your mesmerizing power over snood, and tell him not to ask questions you don't want answered.

0 Replies

Lash,

First of all, I started this thread so I would say that gives me the freedom to engage in any conversation that is being held in it, wouldn't you?

Second, get the BEAM out of your own eye and I'll get the BEAM out of mine. I'd say right now, as far as each other thinking the other one lied about something, we're even.

Fine, do your public service Lash. But don't you realize YOU are now trying to present yourself as SUPERIOR to everyone because YOU are the one that keeps bringing it up? They don't. You do. Let them make up their own minds. They don't have to respond to me anymore than I have to respond to you or them. We're adults. I'd say right now that you and I are the ones that are acting like children more than anyone else.

And Lash, if you are going to say I said something, at least get it right, ok? What I said in that pm or email to you was that God said it's us against them. You are either for or against God. I didn't call anyone a heathen (as far as I can remember). So, if my "sin" to you was so terribly bad why do you feel the need to keep adding things to it that weren't said? I'll admit anything I said or did. So, just try a bit harder to use the exact words ok? If they aren't the exact words then just say something like (not exact quote) or something, ok?

Lash, fake Christian? We often call others what we are guilty of ourselves, honey. You led me to believe you were a Christian, remember? Seems then, neither of us has any stones to cast.

Lash, this IS my business. YOU brought me into it as you always do because you can't let your obvious anger and bitterness go. Fine. Guess this means you want to keep it in the open and keep dragging anyone and everyone else in? No thanx! C-L-I-C-K!

And to everyone else, if I EVER respond to another thing that Lash posts to or about me, feel free to send me a PM and tell me I am going back on this:

Lash, I will NEVER, EVER respond to anything you say to or about me or my posts again after this particular post is submitted. If you won't end this, then I will.

Lash, ask BBB, I made her a promise to not post in any thread she starts or to post directly to or after her. I've kept that promise and I will continue to keep that promise. Take care Lash. I sincerely only wish good things for you in life.

0 Replies

Lash:

Quote:

You're free to lie and I'm free to say everything I've said. Works for me.
You are intruding on a conversation you weren't a part of. Mind your own business. If you have a problem with it, exert your mesmerizing power over snood, and tell him not to ask questions you don't want answered.

How many times just over the last week, have you intruded into a conversation between me and another person, because you saw another opportunity to slam me?

...something very wrong with you, lady. Yeah, Ma angel is a little preachy and self-righteous sometimes. I have lost patience with her myself a few times. I am even considering asking her to consider how her screen name might put some people off - what ehbeth said about "she's not my mom, and I don't call any humans 'angel' " made sense to me.

But you ascribe all kinds of nefarious motives to her that ain't necessarily true, by any means. You seem determined to pick on her - perhaps you are like the schoolyard bully who perceives something a little vulnerable, so you're all over it?

And I have come to her defense, but that "blind obediance" crap you're trying to peddle is weak. I see her trying to move past whatever the horrendous wrong it is she's done you and the A2K forum (according to you), and you being determined not to let her.

I've seen you defend people you think are being wronged in some way, as well. does that make you 'under their control'?

Like I said, you just hate on some folks because its a need you have. The more screwy your reasoning gets for continuing your little vendettas, the clearer that gets.

0 Replies

farmerman wrote:

I realize that your comment was meant to be condescending.

Pretty much sums up my understanding

0 Replies

Excuse me, but there seems to be some miscommunication. I realize that what you may have understood me to say might not be what I intended to convey, but I have to point out that just because you didn't understand what you thought I meant, that doesn't mean that what I didn't say was anything like what your preconceived notion of my unexpressed ideas would have sounded like if I had said what I intended, and if you had in fact heard me to say what was originally on my mind.

0 Replies

snood wrote:

Excuse me, but there seems to be some miscommunication. I realize that what you may have understood me to say might not be what I intended to convey, but I have to point out that just because you didn't understand what you thought I meant, that doesn't mean that what I didn't say was anything like what your preconceived notion of my unexpressed ideas would have sounded like if I had said what I intended, and if you had in fact heard me to say what was originally on my mind.

Yeah really, easy for you to say.

0 Replies

MA wrote-

Quote:

Many fine men and women have been stationed overseas, ready to fight for this nation and sacrifice all for you and me.

And they seem to have been forgotten about as your pride driven quarrel has barreled out of control.

I told you that they didn't need you getting on their case because if they did they would really be in the **** wouldn't they?

They don't need your thanks nor your support.

0 Replies

Snood, why do you let sarcasm be your tool of engagement? You also have a 'nasty habit' of playing the race card, I don't think that is necessary at all, do you?

0 Replies

Ok, what say we have a change of subject here? I'm hoping for some input on this question: What made you smile today? Laughing

0 Replies

Mathos wrote:

Snood, why do you let sarcasm be your tool of engagement? You also have a 'nasty habit' of playing the race card, I don't think that is necessary at all, do you?

Please specify what you mean - that's some pretty serious accusations, and I'd appreciate if you provided a little more info.

I'm sarcastic sometimes, but I try to be topical sometimes and controversial sometimes, and informative sometimes, and thought-provoking sometimes, and compassionate sometimes, too. Why do you call sarcasm my "tool of engagement"? I don't even remember ever getting into any exchanges with you involved - to what do you refer?

And I really, really need you to substantiate that "race card" thing, as that is a live wire, and you shouldn't just toss that out without any explanation. I mean, that's like saying "Why don't you stop beating your wife?" Would you cut and paste a post where I used "the race card"?

0 Replies

what made me smile today was the nice hot high colonic I got this morning at the "I am Self-Actualized Spa and Deli" on 3rd st.

Hoping For Some Input....

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know