1
   

Civilians Death Rate in Iraq Less Than in Washington, DC

 
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jun, 2006 05:31 pm
Mr. Dyslexia- Do you have trouble reading?

BernardR wrote:
That was a very mean thing that Rep. King said about Ms. Helen Thomas. She can't help it if she is unremediably ugly. She did not choose to be ugly. She can't even help it if she is Lebanese and bends over backwards to report favorably on the Palestinian morons who have gone into Israel to kill innocents in suicide bombings on buses and in restaurants.

I am happy that Mr. King apologized!!!!
***********************************************************

If you can find an error in my post, please do so..But I really must insist that you prove that it is an error!

A. Is Helen Thomas Ugly?

B. Has she proven with her past statements that she is Pro- Lebanese

C. Did I commend Mr. King for apoligizing?

**********************************************************

I am afraid your reading abilities leave a great deal to be desired!!
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jun, 2006 09:48 pm
Being Pro-lebanese now makes you Lebanese?


It seems someone is pro-stupid.


I agree with Dys. Calling someone ugly is a lot of smelly bubble generation whether it is about Thomas or Coulter.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jun, 2006 10:08 pm
Mr.Parados- I would suggest you do a great more study of Ms. Helen Thomas.

You wrote being Pro-Lebanese makes you Lebanese?

You have egregiously erred.

Ms. Thomas is of Lebanese ancestry. She is Lebanese. That, besides her reflexive liberalism; her implacable hate of President Bush, and her possible senility at the age of 85, makes her PRO LEBANESE.

You may not wish to accept the judgment that she is irremediably ugly but that would make you a minoirty among those who have seen her in person, on TV and in photos.

She looks like an Arab Camel Merchant in drag!!!
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jun, 2006 10:11 pm
Do you bite those bubbles Bernie so you can get the full effect of their smell?
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jun, 2006 12:14 am
What a stunning rebuttal of my post!!!! It could be said to be in violation of the TOS--a personal attack!!! I will save it so I can use it in the future if I am imitating a poster who has no information or wit in his arguments.

You may note, Mr. Parados, that I critique your arguments and not your person. Those who that they must resort to crude personal attacks such as you did in your last post have already lost the argument!!!
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jun, 2006 05:52 am
Bernie,
Helen Thomas was born in Kentucky. The last time I checked Kentucky was still part of the US. That would mean Helen Thomas is NOT Lebanese. She is a US citizen, American, or southerner. But nowhere does it make her lebanese.

Your referring to her in your selected derogatory terms shows your true colors.

My sentence was crude? Care to point to the crude part? You have to read something into what I said that isn't in my statement to make it crude. It certainly isn't a violation of TOS. Your repetitions of posting the same article over and over is a violation however.

Quote:
You agree that you will not .... deliberately disrupt topics with repetitive messages


Your comments about Thomas also appear to violate this part of TOS
Quote:
2) Use respectful language. You agree not to use language that abuses or discriminates on the basis of race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual preference, age, region, disability, etc. Hate speech of any kind is grounds for immediate and permanent removal from the service.

Your posting of complete articles without referencing the copyright holder may well violate this part of TOS
Quote:
You represent, warrant, and covenant that no materials of any kind submitted through your account will (i) violate, plagiarize, or infringe upon the rights of any third party, including copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary rights

No Bernie. The only one violating TOS is you. Feel free to report me and cite this post for how mean I am to you.
0 Replies
 
JustanObserver
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jun, 2006 07:20 am
BernardR wrote:
Mr.Parados- I would suggest you do a great more study of Ms. Helen Thomas.


Funny, I was just about to say the same about yourself. Why? Read on...
BernardR wrote:
You have egregiously erred.

Ms. Thomas is of Lebanese ancestry. She is Lebanese.


WRONG. Ms Thomas was born in Kentucky to SYRIAN parents (Link to proof). Seriously dude, you've made a fool of yourself so many times that one would think you'd at least try to avoid looking like an idiot if possible.

IT TOOK ME 20 SECONDS TO FIND THAT INFORMATION. You have access to the entire f*cking internet and you can't take a few seconds to make sure what your saying isn't complete horsesh*t?

I would think that you'd be embarrassed for making such a stupid comment/mistake, but it's pretty clear you're shameless. You'll just keep right on doing the same thing, as though this never even happened.


BernardR wrote:
You may not wish to accept the judgment that she is irremediably ugly but that would make you a minoirty among those who have seen her in person, on TV and in photos.
She looks like an Arab Camel Merchant in drag!!!


As though that has something to do with anything. What a joke you are.

By the way, many people are thinking "BernardR" is just the most recent incarnation of the same person who'se posted under different usernames in the past. Is this true? I've never seen you address it.

Although I would understand if it is. If I made as much a fool of myself as yourself, I'd jump ship to a new username too.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jun, 2006 07:23 am
JustanObserver wrote:
Although I would understand if it is. If I made as much a fool of myself as yourself, I'd jump ship to a new username too.


Not one. A couple more.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jun, 2006 02:11 am
I am indebted to Mr. Just An Observer for his information. That makes it worsE than I thought. As a Syrian, Ms. Thomas is rooted in a country whose people are listed as 90% Arab. Now, you may think this is not important and you have a perfect right to do so but it is clear that many Arabs in American Life are defenders of the Islamic and Arabic ideas from the Middle East.

Ms. Thomas does show a bias that is pro- Arab. If anyone looking at her portrait thinks she is not ugly, that is their opinion. She would be described by 75% of the population as an ugly old hag.

Now, the liberals feel that this is a very bad characterization, yet have no compunction barring them from describing President Bush as a "fuking Moron" or a "drunk". That is hypocrisy.

I promise never to call Mrs. Thomas pro-arab or an ugly old hag when I see that the respect which I am asked to give to her is given to the President.

And, Mr. Parados, You have given a litany of supposed violations of the TOS by me. I have received no message that I have violated the TOS.

May I suggest that you communicate your concerns to the moderators?

But, if you do not wish to be a total hypocrite, also communicate the large amount of name calling you have indulged in when posting messages to me.

You are the one who is unable to debate like a gentleman. Your comment, one of many--"It seems someone is pro-stupid" comes from a person who will not debate but merely name call.

It is a sign that you are so frustrated with the argument that you must indulge in childish comments--"PROSTUPID" INDEED.
0 Replies
 
JustanObserver
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jun, 2006 12:36 pm
BernardR wrote:
I am indebted to Mr. Just An Observer for his information. That makes it worsE than I thought.


Translation: "I was proven wrong, but I'll ignore that and just keep on ranting as though it never happened..."

By the way, you keep ignoring when people ask about your former usernames. I'll repeat:

Quote:

By the way, many people are thinking "BernardR" is just the most recent incarnation of the same person who'se posted under different usernames in the past. Is this true? I've never seen you address it.


So what's the deal?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jun, 2006 04:02 pm
Bernie,

Showing a pro-Arab bias doesn't make her Lebanese. Your comment was factually incorrect.

But you failed to address that point, didn't you. Doesn't failing to address the point mean it stands and you capitulate? Isn't that your rule?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jun, 2006 04:11 pm
Bailiff, whack his pee pee...
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jun, 2006 04:19 pm
Yes, of course, I will capitulate on Helen Thomas. I was wrong. She is of Syrain extraction and is dead set against anything that the Bush Administration wants to do, but I am wrong for saying that she is against the Bush Administration at LEAST PARTLY because of her ethnic heritage.

She has a face that would stop a clock but I was wrong for saying she was ugly.

I capitulate, Mr. Parados. I capitulate because if you have an ounce of integrity when you argue about topics like Global Warming and Clinton's lies and Clinton's efforts to avoid indictment and I PROVE THAT YOU ARE WRONG, you will capitulate.
But you won't because I don't believe that you understand when you are proven wrong. That's no problem!!!!!

Now, as Just an Observer has commented in the past about the wonderful and learned Debra Law--I should not contest with her because she has a background in LAW. I reject that and tell Mr. Just an Observer that all the brilliant Debra LAW has to do in one or two lines is what you and Just an Observer did, Mr. Parados--force me to capitulate.

I do it gladly on the subject of Mrs. Helen Thomas.

But I have absolutely no confidence in your integrity, Mr. Parados, when, in the future, it is shown that you are in error.

Let us continue!!!
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jun, 2006 05:40 pm
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
Bailiff, whack his pee pee...

Judge, I'm afraid I must hand in my resignation. I'm unable to locate said organ even with the highest magnification we have available.
0 Replies
 
JustanObserver
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jun, 2006 06:02 pm
BernardR wrote:
Let us continue!!!


Yes, please. With this question in particular:

Is "BernardR" really just the latest in a series of usernames for the same person?

The way you seem to not even acknowledge the question, after it's been asked so many times is making me think the accusations might be true.

Maybe your not sure how to answer. I'll help you out:
A) Yes
B) No
C) I don't want to answer that question.

Pick one, Bernie.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jun, 2006 06:09 pm
JustanObserver wrote:
BernardR wrote:
Let us continue!!!


Yes, please. With this question in particular:

Is "BernardR" really just the latest in a series of usernames for the same person?

The way you seem to not even acknowledge the question, after it's been asked so many times is making me think the accusations might be true.

Maybe your not sure how to answer. I'll help you out:
A) Yes
B) No
C) I don't want to answer that question.

Pick one, Bernie.

It's been decided (by poll ) that gatos current user name is Possum R Fartbubbles.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jun, 2006 06:20 pm
Mr. Dyslexia is clearly in violation of the TOS.

But, I forgive him since I know he is bereft of the mental capacity to debate and can only call names like a small child does.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jun, 2006 06:42 pm
BernardR wrote:
Mr. Dyslexia is clearly in violation of the TOS.

But, I forgive him since I know he is bereft of the mental capacity to debate and can only call names like a small child does.


Oh, I dunno.


Possum R Fartbubbles would be a pretty tough name for a small child to pronounce.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jun, 2006 06:45 pm
dlowan wrote:
BernardR wrote:
Mr. Dyslexia is clearly in violation of the TOS.

But, I forgive him since I know he is bereft of the mental capacity to debate and can only call names like a small child does.


Oh, I dunno.


Possum R Fartbubbles would be a pretty tough name for a small child to pronounce.
At least without frothing at the mouth.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jun, 2006 06:46 pm
BernardR wrote:
Mr. Dyslexia is clearly in violation of the TOS.

But, I forgive him since I know he is bereft of the mental capacity to debate and can only call names like a small child does.

I would suggest MR. Possum R Fartbubbles that you report Mr. Dyslexia for violations.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/09/2025 at 08:50:41