0
   

Is flag-waving stupid and immature?

 
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 10:02 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
"The Left" - Horse hockey. I'm of the left, and I fly a flag above my home.
Few, if any, stereotypes are all-inclusive Edgar... and I mean no offense whatsoever with the term. Think left-leaning when you read it from me. I'm not one of those people either.

edgarblythe wrote:
Who is this left that you people talk about,...
My sister, Bro-in-law, Soz, Nimh and many if not most of the people I love and respect most.

edgarblythe wrote:
...that does everything in unison, like breath, hate America, etc.?
I made no such idiotic statements nor anything that even resembles them. Try reading my words without the predisposition to oppose them, and you may get my point... which is one of strategy, not derision.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 12:38 am
Perhaps an idea for you, Bill? :wink:

A pub in Bry/England (from today's Manchester Evening News, page 12)

http://i2.tinypic.com/116lwms.jpg

http://i3.tinypic.com/116lwsk.jpg
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 01:37 am
OCCOM BILL wrote:
Fast thread...


McTag: it strikes me as odd that a man could defend the symbol of royalty in the same post as he ridiculed a symbol of freedomÂ… even if you were joking. But seriously; these are not the symbol.


I did what? I didn't do that. And this thread is not only about America and its flag.

It's about the custom of showing and waving national flags. Why do we do it, when do we, how often do we, and what does this symbolism mean to ourselves and others.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 02:08 am
nimh wrote:
Ah, the hint in it at a whole true American tradition, which has been lost in times, and purposefully forgotten I'm sure as well...

It's not the only such tradition. Those American baptists weren't just Socialists, they were free-lovers and spouse sharers as well. Setanta has some fascinating history to tell about this.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 02:57 am
Re: Is flag-waving stupid and immature?
McTag wrote:
In England here, with a World Cup (soccer) competition coming up soon, there are flags everywhere. These flags are the Cross of St George, the English flag. The Union Flag ("Union Jack") represents Great Britain (UK), not England alone. Both of these flags however are used by far-right nationalist parties.

This is a new phenomenon in the UK, that national flags be flown everywhere. We used to be more restrained. My own view is that it shown immaturity and sometimes xenophobia. I know Americans are keen to wave their national flag on all occasions. My view is, it is silly and is often worse than that.

What do others think?


I am not too bothered re sporting events, cos they are semi licensed madness anyway...as long as people aren't stupid and aggressive about it, and mass flags can look kind of cute, and they are a venue for discharging patriotic nonsense harmlessly, one hopes.


They are ok outside embassies and such.....but generally I think devotion to flags utterly atavistic primitive nuttery, and as for flying one on one's car/home etc...ewwww....


Oh, exceptions to that, for me, are the flags of new little countries, like East Timor, who struggled to get a country, and things like the Aboriginal flag, which celebrates survival, and is flown next to the Oz flag to acknowledge Aboriginal people and their experience.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 03:16 am
Both tigerpete and dlowan used terms that I think apply: tribalism and primitive atavistic nuttery. Extreme symbolic forms of group identification and announcing of such to all who can see and hear.

Why now? Why variations? Lack of self confidence and identity so that one must fall back on the next closest thing - the group? Heightened at times of high emotion (sporting events) and uncertainty about the future and correctness of one's views, opinions, values, etc.?
0 Replies
 
najmelliw
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 03:17 am
It is so easy nowadays to be stigmatized and condemned for every other comment one makes. Well, let me state the following.
While my country does have quite a checkered past, I'm still proud of it in many ways. I know for a fact many people in my country share that sentiment. Why not show that pride by flying your country's flag?
I am a cautious patriot, not a nationalist. As long as the sentiment of being proud of one's country doesn't include xenophobia in any shape or form, I think it's a positive thing.
Countries such as France, with it's bloody revolution, and America, have a flag that is firmly connected to its history, and that history is a proud one in many ways. So be proud of one's country, and of one's soccer team! Wave a flag during a match! Like I said before, when there are no hidden xenophobic and nationalistic ideas behind the flag weaving, I'd say, let them be.
There is a great tendency towards excessive caution. Many types of behaviorism can be and are explained as having xenophobic and/or nationalistic (extreme right) tendencies. This is not entirely unjustified given the steadily deteriorating conditions in Europe, but that is no excuse to seek sinister(probably the wrong word to use here, since 'we're aiming at the other side of the political spectrum Smile ) motives behind every other action.

Naj.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 04:00 am
OCCOM BILL wrote:
edgarblythe wrote:
Who is this left that you people talk about,...
My sister, Bro-in-law, Soz, Nimh and many if not most of the people I love and respect most.

I am not American, so I dont have to deal with how "Anti-American doesn't sell well here in the United States" or with the risk of "The Right" exclusively "aligning themselves with a beloved symbol".

It's not such a big deal in Holland. The Dutch flag is well-liked and gladly flown when there's football on the telly, but doesnt evoke the emotional, passionate reverence you express, except perhaps among the elderly and the deeply Protestant. So although of course it's always an unwise move, politically, to actively go out and offend through flag-burning or the like, expressing the kind of agnosticism re flag-waving like I did isn't much of a political risk.

I am therefore free to approach the question in the philosophical way it was asked, without having to instantly worry about political expediency and how it would play out in elections.

In fact, so is Soz and anyone else who comes here. You may notice that the question was asked in the Philosophy & Debate forum, not in the Politics forum. We are therefore free to express our personal, individual feelings about it without having to bother about political strategy. We are free to approach the question as individuals, rather than as representatives of "The Left". And as you will have noticed, it then turns out different people on the Left actually have very different feelings on it.

If McTag had indeed asked the question: what approach should the Left, or the Democratic Party, or Labour, or whatever, take towards the political use of the flag, I am convinced that all of us would indeed agree that, for a politician, it would be Greatly Unwise to deride the flag, especially in the US. We are not all that gullible on the "point... of strategy" you raise.

But even if we were to be smart enough to turn on this point of strategy if ever recruited for some kind of political campaigning job, we cant very well change our actual personal feelings and instincts on this matter - and that is what McTag asked us about. We are after all, I think I can assume to say for all, not quite so politicized that we have succeeded mastering the art of making our personal feelings and instincts subservient to electoral expediency. So we answer accordingly. Should we train ourselves diligently into learning to love the flag, just so we dont let the Democratic Party's chances down as presumed card-carrying members of The Left?

Truth is, there's no "trap" waiting for us here on A2K in any case (face it, nothing any of us will say here will have any consequence of significance in the political realm). When asked a straightforward question about our personal take in the Philosophy Forum, we don't, thank God, have to worry about "alienating a healthy chunk of the folks you need to get elected" - we're not out to "rule the Nation". We won't "forever be shooting our own feet" by fessing up that, personally, this flag-waving thing is a bit of a mystery to us, and just seems off-putting to our sensitivities somehow.

Why don't you approach this thread, or rather, the others in it, as an individual as well, as one would in a Philosophy & Debate forum? The "predisposition" to approach every question within a perspective of Us/Them, Left/Right, Republican/Democrat is tiresome enough on the Politics board, not to mention how it is a mostly irrelevant distraction to the many of us outside America.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 04:31 am
najmelliw wrote:
It is so easy nowadays to be stigmatized and condemned for every other comment one makes. Well, let me state the following.
While my country does have quite a checkered past, I'm still proud of it in many ways. I know for a fact many people in my country share that sentiment. Why not show that pride by flying your country's flag?
I am a cautious patriot, not a nationalist. As long as the sentiment of being proud of one's country doesn't include xenophobia in any shape or form, I think it's a positive thing.
Countries such as France, with it's bloody revolution, and America, have a flag that is firmly connected to its history, and that history is a proud one in many ways. So be proud of one's country, and of one's soccer team! Wave a flag during a match! Like I said before, when there are no hidden xenophobic and nationalistic ideas behind the flag weaving, I'd say, let them be.
There is a great tendency towards excessive caution. Many types of behaviorism can be and are explained as having xenophobic and/or nationalistic (extreme right) tendencies. This is not entirely unjustified given the steadily deteriorating conditions in Europe, but that is no excuse to seek sinister(probably the wrong word to use here, since 'we're aiming at the other side of the political spectrum Smile ) motives behind every other action.

Naj.





(Looking fearfully at Naj, having just realised how sinister he is...... :wink:
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 04:45 am
The only thing I have against the recent flag-waving trend over here in the UK is those flimsy flags that are stuck on the sides of cars. Whilst driving on the motorway, the wind buffets the flags and the plastic pole waves so violently I fear the sticky adhesive might fail and the entire flag, pole and all comes flying off the car into some poor chap's windscreen or into the face of a motor cyclist.

I've often seen flags fly off those stupid plastic poles and they can be a hazard.

Flying the flag is one thing. Flying it stupidly is another.

Not like this one guy... Stuck it to the car roof and then tied the thing to the radio aerial. No change of the flag flying off there. That's sensible!
0 Replies
 
najmelliw
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 04:57 am
I'm the proverbial wolf dressed in a sheeps skin (which of course is painted red, white blue in the pattern of the Dutch flag)
Muahahahahahahahaha
Laughing Laughing

Nimh... Wow. You ought to be a high ranking diplomat! You certainly have that impecciable sense of using just the right words at just the right way. I btw, do not look at the forum a thread is posted in... Only at what is asked and the responses.
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 05:43 am
I have a swedish exchange student staying with me at present. She expressed some surprise at the tendancy for people to wrap themselves in our national flag when celebrating and the display of national flags on a house etc. In sweden the overt display of the national flag has become associated with far right activists such as groups linked to Nazi "type" activities.

As for me I am ambivalent about our flag mostly because of the onion jack in the corner and the tendancy to be confused with NewZealands flag.

My preference would be to see a national flag used as a ceremonial synbol and treated with reverence and respect. Ok to fly the flag over your house but not dragged around sporting events and other similar occasions.

NZ flag
http://www.mch.govt.nz/nzflag/images/nz-flag.jpg


Aus flag
http://www.flags.net/images/largeflags/ASTL0001.GIF

eureka flag also has an association with a union/left group
http://www.ausflag.com.au/flags/images/eureka.gif

the Boxing kangaroo a sporting symbol
http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a40/dadpad/avatars/boxing-kangaroo-flag.jpg

aboriginal flag
http://www.ausflag.com.au/flags/images/ab.gif
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 06:07 am
I believe it was Upton Sinclair who said something to the effect that when Facism comes to the US it will be draped in the American flag and carrying a cross.
0 Replies
 
SierraSong
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 06:18 am
Dadpad - Students in Sweden aren't allowed to display the Swedish flag. A student who recently arrived at school with a tiny Swedish flag pinned to a backpack was reprimanded and told it was forbidden because it might be seen as offensive to the immigrant population.
0 Replies
 
SierraSong
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 06:27 am
Re: Is flag-waving stupid and immature?
McTag wrote:
In England here, with a World Cup (soccer) competition coming up soon, there are flags everywhere. These flags are the Cross of St George, the English flag. The Union Flag ("Union Jack") represents Great Britain (UK), not England alone. Both of these flags however are used by far-right nationalist parties.

This is a new phenomenon in the UK, that national flags be flown everywhere. We used to be more restrained. My own view is that it shown immaturity and sometimes xenophobia. I know Americans are keen to wave their national flag on all occasions. My view is, it is silly and is often worse than that.

What do others think?


Maybe this has something to do with your "new phenomenon".

Quote:
School Lessons in British Values

Compulsory classes on how "core British values" of democracy, freedom of speech, fairness and responsibility have developed down the centuries could be introduced into the national curriculum as part of a drive to better integrate Muslims into society.

Existing citizenship classes in secondary schools would be expanded to trace the origins of those values through key events in Britain's social and cultural history, Bill Rammell, the higher education minister, said yesterday.

He announced a six-month review on how to take the proposals forward in a speech to the South Bank University.

Aides to Gordon Brown immediately suggested that the Chancellor should take credit for the ideas, as they merely built on themes he had floated in January.

The way that the Treasury leapt on Mr Rammell's speech is proof that if the Chancellor enters No 10 Britishness would become a central theme of his premiership.

Mr Brown, keen to reposition Labour as the party of patriotism, has suggested that British people should imitate the Americans and plant a union flag "in every garden". He also wants a "Britishness day" on which British ideas and values could be celebrated.

Mr Rammell began work on how to promote mutual understanding last August as part of the Government's response to the July 7 London bombings.

Yesterday he also announced a review on how to improve teaching of Islam in British universities. Both reviews were designed to improve understanding of differing beliefs within a multi-cultural society.

If Muslims better understood the values underpinning British society, and non Muslim Britons realised that extremist ideas were not common among mainstream Muslims, mutual respect would be enhanced, he said.

At present there are three strands to compulsory citizenship classes: social and moral responsibility, which encourages pupils to act in a morally responsible way; community involvement, encouraging them to become "helpfully involved" in life in their neighbourhoods; and political literacy, teaching about public life, government institutions and democracy.

Mr Rammell said he wanted to consider a fourth strand to "embed the British values of freedom, fairness, civic responsibility and democracy into the teaching of our cultural and social history". This would mean tracing the emergence of those values through British history.

John Dunford, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, had mixed feelings about the plan. "We do need to encourage discussion of what constitutes British values," he said. "We do not want a government-imposed national curriculum on British values."

Boris Johnson, the shadow higher education minister, said Mr Rammell was missing the point and should promote more lessons on the heroes of British history.

"It is not a question of teaching British values, it is a question of teaching British history. There is nothing exclusive or divisive in pointing out the fantastic achievements of the British people."
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 06:28 am
SierraSong wrote:
Dadpad - Students in Sweden aren't allowed to display the Swedish flag. A student who recently arrived at school with a tiny Swedish flag pinned to a backpack was reprimanded and told it was forbidden because it might be seen as offensive to the immigrant population.


That seems odd at first (and is no doubt unthinkable in America etc) but something similar had happened here before. Some schools and some public institutions have decided to ban the overt use of our national flag because of its misuses and its association with right-wing groups and their sentiments. I think the local authority was Bolton or Blackburn and the schools, in Nottingham.

Obviously opinions are well polarised about this...and for the duration of the football tournament at least, the flag-wavers have it.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 06:35 am
Re: Is flag-waving stupid and immature?
SierraSong wrote:
McTag wrote:
In England here, with a World Cup (soccer) competition coming up soon, there are flags everywhere. These flags are the Cross of St George, the English flag. The Union Flag ("Union Jack") represents Great Britain (UK), not England alone. Both of these flags however are used by far-right nationalist parties.

This is a new phenomenon in the UK, that national flags be flown everywhere. We used to be more restrained. My own view is that it shown immaturity and sometimes xenophobia. I know Americans are keen to wave their national flag on all occasions. My view is, it is silly and is often worse than that.

What do others think?


Maybe this has something to do with your "new phenomenon".

Quote:
School Lessons in British Values

Compulsory classes on how "core British values" of democracy, freedom of speech, fairness and responsibility have developed down the centuries could be introduced into the national curriculum as part of a drive to better integrate Muslims into society.

Existing citizenship classes in secondary schools would be expanded to trace the origins of those values through key events in Britain's social and cultural history, Bill Rammell, the higher education minister, said yesterday.

He announced a six-month review on how to take the proposals forward in a speech to the South Bank University.

Aides to Gordon Brown immediately suggested that the Chancellor should take credit for the ideas, as they merely built on themes he had floated in January.

The way that the Treasury leapt on Mr Rammell's speech is proof that if the Chancellor enters No 10 Britishness would become a central theme of his premiership.

Mr Brown, keen to reposition Labour as the party of patriotism, has suggested that British people should imitate the Americans and plant a union flag "in every garden". He also wants a "Britishness day" on which British ideas and values could be celebrated.

Mr Rammell began work on how to promote mutual understanding last August as part of the Government's response to the July 7 London bombings.

Yesterday he also announced a review on how to improve teaching of Islam in British universities. Both reviews were designed to improve understanding of differing beliefs within a multi-cultural society.

If Muslims better understood the values underpinning British society, and non Muslim Britons realised that extremist ideas were not common among mainstream Muslims, mutual respect would be enhanced, he said.

At present there are three strands to compulsory citizenship classes: social and moral responsibility, which encourages pupils to act in a morally responsible way; community involvement, encouraging them to become "helpfully involved" in life in their neighbourhoods; and political literacy, teaching about public life, government institutions and democracy.

Mr Rammell said he wanted to consider a fourth strand to "embed the British values of freedom, fairness, civic responsibility and democracy into the teaching of our cultural and social history". This would mean tracing the emergence of those values through British history.

John Dunford, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, had mixed feelings about the plan. "We do need to encourage discussion of what constitutes British values," he said. "We do not want a government-imposed national curriculum on British values."

Boris Johnson, the shadow higher education minister, said Mr Rammell was missing the point and should promote more lessons on the heroes of British history.

"It is not a question of teaching British values, it is a question of teaching British history. There is nothing exclusive or divisive in pointing out the fantastic achievements of the British people."


The "Little Englanders" of the fascist British National Party used to wave the flag known as the Union Jack. When they discovered the Union flag actually represents the union of Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland with England in the UK, then they swapped it and now fly the St George's Cross almost exclusively at their rallies.

Plenty of our immigrants are happy with the Union flag, but for the above reason see the St George's Cross as an affront and a deliberate challenge and insult. As it no doubt ofttimes is intended to be.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 06:38 am
Maybe a bit like the use of the Confederacy flag in the USA. A political statement, and not an inclusive nor conciliatory one: and not as a symbol of freedom and justice for all.
0 Replies
 
kitchenpete
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 06:42 am
sumac wrote:
I believe it was Upton Sinclair who said something to the effect that when Facism comes to the US it will be draped in the American flag and carrying a cross.


Such a great quote - I googled it and found it attributed to Sinclair Lewis, who was associated with Upton Sinclair
0 Replies
 
SierraSong
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 May, 2006 06:46 am
As long as you don't fly it from a boat, I think you're safe. Smile
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/15/2024 at 10:10:50