0
   

Is flag-waving stupid and immature?

 
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 05:50 am
I'm an occasional flag-wearer and flag-wearer.

On Canada Day. Once a year. Though I'll admit, my Canada Day lawn thingie is still in the garden from last year Confused

I'm very glad that the hamburgers came to Canada, and did not move any further south. Canada is my home, and I'm proud to be Canadian.

I wear (braid them into my hair) and wave flags at the Canada Day parade, wear my Team Canada Hockey jersey during the Olympics, and re-affirm my statement of citizenship at a ceremony each year.

~~~~~~

I live in a neighbourhood full of immigrants. People who arrived after the Second World War. People who arrived 2 years ago, 5 years ago ... people who came here from Bosnia, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Japan, Jamaica, England ...

It's one of the reasons I chose my neighbourhood. There are a lot of Canajun flags out in the week coming up to Canada Day - and a lot of backgrounds represented at the parade and at the party which follows.

~~~~~~~

I pity people who don't have the opportunity to be Canadian, but I don't think I'm better than they are. I'm just luckier :wink: , thanks to the hamburgers.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 06:12 am
Well, prepare for oceans of flags here today. It is Memorial Day. We will be remembering, so bear with us.

I think part of the turning away from waving the flag and the strong feeling of patriatism that even I had as a child, is due to the changes that have occured over the last 30 years. We have taken many steps towards one world that have resulted in many of us viewing this as a planet of people, rather than a planet with different countries and separate people.

What Bill refers to, IMO, is that the liberals / progressives (whatever) have opened their eyes to humanity at large and feel an allegence to the planet / people / nature, rather than a single continent. In that vein, I think the liberals are much more savvy.

S(I wouldn't freely approach all houses flying flags)quinney
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 06:12 am
OCCOM BILL wrote:
Francis wrote:
And, yes, I have a problem with the One Nation Under God...
Not my favorite part either, to be honest... because I care neither for the presumption nor the arroganceĀ… but the balance of it more than makes up for it IMO.


The pledge of allegiance, originally written by a Baptist minister, did not contain the words "under god," until it was added at the height of the "red scare" in the early 1950s.

Quote:
Francis Bellamy (1855-1931), a Baptist minister, wrote the orginal Pledge in August 1892. He was a Christian Socialist. In his Pledge, he is expressing the ideas of his first cousing, Edward Bellamy, author of the American socialist novels, Looking Backward (1888) and Equality (1897).


The Pledge of Allegiance: A Short History.

I have always found the provenance of the pledge to be ironic, given the socialist views of its author. In the 1950s, conservatives saw it as an opportunity to wrap themselves in the flag, so they added the "under god" tripe, and began more than 50 years of ranting about patriotism.

"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it."

-- Samuel Clemens

"Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all others because you were born in it."

-- George Bernard Shaw

"Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious."

-- Oscar Wilde

"Patriotism is a pernicious, psychopathic form of idiocy"

-- George Bernard Shaw

And, my personal favorite:

"Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel."

-- Samuel Johnson
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 06:32 am
hmmmm, so apparently I'm not a liberal, and Setanta will have no objection to giving up his American citizenship.

interesting spin
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 06:56 am
Re: Is flag-waving stupid and immature?
McTag wrote:
This is a new phenomenon in the UK, that national flags be flown everywhere. We used to be more restrained. My own view is that it shown immaturity and sometimes xenophobia.

It's no more inane than having 22 people run after some stupid ball in the first place. Some things in life just aren't supposed to be rational. <shrug>
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 06:57 am
Re: Is flag-waving stupid and immature?
Thomas wrote:
Some things in life just aren't supposed to be rational. <shrug>


I would say, life is not supposed to be rational...
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 07:01 am
Re: Is flag-waving stupid and immature?
Francis wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Some things in life just aren't supposed to be rational. <shrug>

I would say, life is not supposed to be rational...

Life is a sexually transmitted disease with a lethality of 100%. Nothing rational about it.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 07:04 am
Re: Is flag-waving stupid and immature?
Thomas wrote:
Francis wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Some things in life just aren't supposed to be rational. <shrug>

I would say, life is not supposed to be rational...

Life is a sexually transmitted disease with a lethality of 100%. Nothing rational about it.


What I was telling you...
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 07:23 am
ehBeth wrote:
hmmmm, so apparently I'm not a liberal, and Setanta will have no objection to giving up his American citizenship.

interesting spin


<hee> with ehBeth
~~~~~~~~~~~~

Generally~~

I guess, like everything, the intent is what defines the flag waving. In many cases, I think it's wonderful. Of course, like anything, it can be used for disgusting purposes.

I guess the difference is transient.

I love my country, the land, it's promise, most aspects of our foundation, and the lifestyle. I love to communicate solidarity with people and ideas occasionally by flying my flag.

When I do, I'm not, at least consciously, comparing it to any other country or flag. Except for France. <heh>

Bill~~

A couple of your comments on the previous page gave me some smiles.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 07:30 am
Yes.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 07:43 am
I knew a guy who served on oil tankers sailing between Europe and South America. He told me the following story.

Venezuelan regulations demanded there has to be armed local guard on board foreign ships in their territorial waters, who comes on board with the pilot. It is also protocol that incoming ships fly a courtesy flag when approaching a foreign port. Oil tankers do not have a big crew, and they gave the flag duty to an inexperienced junior trainee.
As he struggled with the flag and halliard (the ship, and the flag, were very large) seemingly he let some of the flag touch the deck, where perhaps he trod on it by mistake.
The guard shouted something at him in Spanish. He, uncomprehending, continued. The guard then shot him dead.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 07:54 am
I noticed our state flag flying upside down at school last week. Considering the brouhaha of Georgia flags in the past few years, I thought it was entirely appropriate and gave it a wry mental salute. Smile

Had it been the US flag, knowing me, I would have felt decidedly differently. I wouldn't have gone for my sidearm, but I would have persisted until it was corrected. Those things do bother me.

Re McTag's story-- Chilling.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 07:56 am
On the one hand, I despise jingoistic flag waving. On the other, I fly one over my home almost every day of the year.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 07:56 am
<I'm not going to comment anything about watching the Netherlands vs. Germany>


But speaking about supporting a football tema: I think, a batch would do:

http://i4.tinypic.com/110m87d.jpg


Though I'm still trying to guess, why it is attached on this card here, I've got:


http://i4.tinypic.com/110madz.jpg
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 08:11 am
Lash wrote:
Had it been the US flag, knowing me, I would have felt decidedly differently. I wouldn't have gone for my sidearm, but I would have persisted until it was corrected. Those things do bother me.

And here was I, thinking you might want to come to the flag-waver's help. After all, he was signalling dire distress in an instance of extreme danger to life and property (Federal Flag Code, clause 4, section (a)) .
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 08:21 am
If it was a fort in the wilderness, circa 1790 or so, I may have been more understanding.

Since it was last week, I would have strongly preferred them to pick up the phone, or shoot an e-mail.... Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 08:38 am
In Hawaii, it's quite common to see the state flag being flown upside down. It's a form of protest by some natives and natve-sympathizers who are still objecting to the high-handed manner in which the U.S. "acquired" the Sandwich Islands (by overthrowing the legitimate monarchy of Queen Liliuokalani) in 1898 and who would like more of a voice in determining their own future and running their own government.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 08:44 am
Obviously, MA, they don't understand the democratic process. First, we steal the territory, fair and square (cf. Senator S. I. Hayakawa during the Panama Canal debate, c. 1978). Then, we leave them in a territorial status for fifty or sixty years, before granting statehood. This allows a sufficient number of whites to move in so that upon admission to the union, the new state can be dominated by a democratically-elected white government.

It's all sour grapes, MA, i'm tellin' ya . . .
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 08:48 am
Setanta wrote:
Obviously, MA, they don't understand the democratic process. First, we steal the territory, fair and square (cf. Senator S. I. Hayakawa during the Panama Canal debate, c. 1978). Then, we leave them in a territorial status for fifty or sixty years, before granting statehood. This allows a sufficient number of whites to move in so that upon admission to the union, the new state can be dominated by a democratically-elected white government.

It's all sour grapes, MA, i'm tellin' ya . . .


Yer right as usual, Set. But it's a white-dominated gummint only because the Nisei (Japanese-Americans) who own the bulk of the business enterprises don't want to sully their hands in the dirty waters of politics. Hawaii is, economically, really a Japanese-run enterprise.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 08:50 am
The Japanese were outraged when the United States annexed the islands. They seriously considered going to war over it, but they weren't ready at that time. The took it out on the Russians a few years later.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/15/2024 at 03:16:21